I/O Fund lead tech analyst Beth Kindig joined Motley Fool analyst Deidre Woollard on podcast about Women in Investing to talk about the recent downturn for tech investors and how Beth and I/O Fund are weathering the storm.
It’s been a bumpy road, but despite that, I/O Fund and Beth Kindig continue to be buyers. “When we see a quality company being down in price, we try not to overthink it, because there will probably be a day where we will talk about the prices of 2022, meaning that they were so low,” says Beth. “The probability that 2022 was oversold is pretty high at this point. It was just an extreme reaction to the downside, as part of 2020 and 2021 was an extreme action [in] the opposite direction.”
Both Beth and I/O Fund are part of the 2030 club – meaning that we are both fully invested in tech through 2030 at minimum. Especially with tech stocks, Beth says you need to have at minimum a 3-year hold, and ideally a 5- to 7-year time horizon. She notes that her 2018 and 2019 entries are doing very well right now because she has held them for 3+ years.
Regarding the last earnings season, Deidre mentioned that although there were a lot of companies that reported some pretty strong results, the market kept reacting negatively, asking if it represented an opportunity for Beth. The I/O Fund pays really close attention to earnings, and when a company has a really strong report and the market sells off, that’s usually a buying opportunity for I/O Fund. Beth notes that while I/O Fund uses a combination of fundamental and technical analysis, as a long-term buy-and-hold tech industry analyst, she looks for management to give an outlook.
Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 403% – Click hereSign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 403% – Click hereClick here
Beth notes that even if she doesn’t own the stock, she listens to the heavyweights in adtech because they give you a broad look at the adtech industry. “They have visibility that we don't have,” says Beth. “Analysts can obviously go into channel checks, but channel checks aren't nearly as good as having visibility at the company, and the right management teams are trying to build trust with investors.”
Looking forward to next earning season, Beth states that she thinks the supply chain will have a rebound in the second half of this year – specifically noting the big auto inventory rebound in Q4 of 2021. “We're hoping that funnels through by the second half of the year,” says Beth. “If so, all kinds of industries will start to be positively impacted. Adtech, especially, I would say is one where if it can't come in the current guide, we really are watching it for the Q3 guide, which would be an adtech rebound due to supply chain issues easing. That's one to look for. What we try to remind people is that perfect timing is impossible.”
Listen to the entire podcast and read the full transcript of the interview here.
Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Please consult with your financial advisor in regards to any stocks you buy.
Timestamps:
00:00 – Intro
00:30 – Air Travel Market
06:25 – Media Stocks
13:30 – Sleep Number
19:05 – Beth Comes In
23:00 – Beth Discusses Earnings and Sentiment with Regard to Earnings
26:42 – What Beth’s Looking for (Also includes Supply Chains and Quarters Data)
Last week, we discussed how negative sentiment is often the catalyst that takes a market to new highs even in light of an ongoing negative news cycle. In fact, we are beginning to see broad indexes and key stocks make their first series of higher highs after going through the longest correction we’ve seen since 2018.
The S&P 500 (SPX) corrected more than 14% from the recent top, while the NASDAQ100 corrected more than 20%. Regarding the S&P 500, this depth of a correction has only happened four other times since 2009, so it's quite rare to see a drawdown of this size.
Each time we've seen this type of cyclical bear/deep correction (2011, 2016, 2019, 2020) the belief of a secular bear market starting up (again) is usually quite high. Maybe this time is different, but secular bears historically coincide with recessions and are not led by the equity markets.
If we are not heading towards a recession in 2022, the unwinding of this bearish sentiment would be what drives this next move higher, and I believe we are starting to see evidence of this. In fact, since Russia invaded Ukraine, the SPX is up over 450 points, the 10-year yield is up +70 bps, crude oil is comfortably over $100, and many high beta tech names are leading the current move up in equities.
The reason the news cycle is rarely in line with the market is because markets are always forward-looking, and news is always a lagging report. Below, I review some important factors for tech investors to consider and also statistics around bear markets that are conveniently forgotten when bear market warnings are issued.
The two single most important factors a tech investor needs to know:
What is my risk tolerance? Or, what level of risk am I willing to take and still be able to sleep at night? Most investors play lip service to this until they experience a large drawdown.
“What is my time horizon” is an essential question. Again, most investors will say +3-5 years; however, when they see their portfolio decrease with the markets, emotions tend to force bad decisions and they will suddenly sell right now.
Notably, many financial advisors will advise their clients to not buy stocks (at all) if the money is needed in a 1-2 year time frame, and yet a four-month drawdown is enough to cause many with “long-term horizons” to fold their hands, which defeats the purpose of buying a stock, which is to not be in a position to where one must sell.
A Famous study led by mathematical psychologist Amos Tversky and Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman discovered that “Investors feel the pain of a loss twice as much as the joy of an equivalent gain”
In fact, they found that the feeling from a win tends to flatten after a certain percentage gain. In other words, the feeling an investor gets from a 100% gain is roughly the same as an investor gets from a 200% gain. However, the study found that there is no limit to the feeling that we experience as humans from an ongoing loss. What makes this even more interesting is that losses are capped at 100% while wins can extend to +1,000% or even +10,000%. Therefore, wins should be exponentially celebrated and yet the human psyche does not allow positive emotions to compound. Instead, investors feel negative emotions more deeply and the fear of unrealistic outcomes (such as a stock going to $0) catalyzes selling at the low.
Without a plan to rationally counter the emotional side of investing, investors are prone to buy at the top, and sell at the bottom, and/or forget their time horizon.
Considering that right now the market is registering extreme levels of fear, we thought it would be good to provide more context as to how previous markets have performed following this level of negative emotion.
Pictured above: The AAII Sentiment Survey which shows the spread between bulls and bears. Recently, the spread was more bearish than at the Covid low of March 2020. Source: Ycharts
S&P 500 below its 50/200 Simple Moving Average
One of the arguments I frequently see is that the S&P 500 has closed for multiple days below the 50-day moving average (MA) and the 200-day MA. However, it’s important to look back at what happened every time SPX closed three days below these moving averages.
Since 1980, the S&P 500 has closed 3 days below its 50-day and 200-day MA a total of 25 times. Only four of these times resulted in a secular bear market.
Regarding the other 21 times, from the moment the index broke the 50/200 day MA, we saw new highs within 3.5 months, on average.
The four times that resulted in a secular bear market, we saw ATHs, on average, within 3.6 years from the moment that we broke the 50/200 day MA.
Daily RSI 22
The relative strength index (RSI) is a popular way to measure momentum in an advancing trend. If the RSI is making lower highs while price is making higher highs, it can signal that the trend is getting weaker.
The RSI is also used to measure oversold and overbought conditions, considering it is an oscillator that moves between 100 and 0.
Since 2002, the daily RSI on the S&P 500 has only gone below a reading of 23 a total of seven times. Six months after this reading of <23, the market was positive every time, ranging between +3% after the October 2008 reading, and as high as 25% after the 2011 low.
Interestingly, six out of the seven times this reading happened, we saw another low in the market before a bottom was struck. On Jan. 27 we saw a reading of 23 on the S&P 500 daily RSI, followed by a new low.
Apple in 2000
We continuously hear the current bull market being compared to 2000. This argument has been made too-often and especially since 2015. Yet, from the start of 2015, the NASDAQ100 is up +220%, including the current drawdown in 2022. Investors had to weather an average annual drawdown of 17.8% in order to capture this return. It is no surprise that volatility goes hand-in-hand with tech investing, as most accept this reality. But, what about during a secular bear market.
The big fear is walking into a secular bear market that is led by tech, just like in 2000. We hear examples of QCOM and CSCO going down over 80%, and how it took QCOM 20 years to reclaim its highs and CSCO has never reclaimed its high. These are catastrophic losses that can destroy a portfolio without an exit strategy and position sizing strategy.
Yet, few talk about Apple reclaiming its 2000 high in just over 4.5 years, or how Apple reclaimed it 2007 high in under 2 years. The same can be said about Google, Amazon and Salesforce. Google reclaimed its 2007 high in just under 5 years, AMZN made new highs just over 2 years from its high, while Salesforce made new highs in less than 2 years. Keep in mind, these were devastating secular bear markets. The 2008 bear market was so harsh that it has been dubbed the Great Recession.
It's unlikely most would hold these high beta stocks in a clear secular bear market. However, if one did have a +5 year time horizon, a buy and hold on the right tech stocks would have been quite rewarding.
Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 403% – Click hereSign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 403% – Click hereClick here
So, what’s the difference between Apple, Google, Amazon, Salesforce and Cisco and Qualcomm? In one word – microtrends. Apple was right in the middle of the personal computer microtrend in the early 2000s, and beginning to disrupt the music industry with its iPod, while releasing the first iPhone in 2007. Google and Amazon were setting themselves up to capture the internet/mobile microtrend and Amazon was trailblazing a path for the e-commerce microtrend while quietly building cloud IaaS in the background. Salesforce was also growing rapidly as one of the first software-as-a-service companies on the market that helped enterprises organize their sales and marketing departments.
We are invested in companies that are in the middle of powerful tech microtrends. These are companies that have superior products, and are growing revenues by mid to high double digits and raising guidance, mostly. If the company has a miss, we closely track the macro headwinds and make strategic bets on when those headwinds will clear (supply chains, for example).
These are companies that we thoroughly vet on product, fundamentals and technical. Our time horizon is TRULY +5 years, and behind our various and robust risk management protocols, there are specific stocks that we do not plan to sell based on our research and the magnitude of microtrends just starting.
This doesn’t mean we are inflexible. When Zoom Video guided for one of the lowest growth rates across cloud – and subsequently missed this guide, we closed the position. We will gladly revisit Zoom as the product grows and the management team decides which market and TAM it wants to tackle next. Meanwhile, in contrast to closing Zoom, we believe ad-tech is seeing temporary headwinds and have been building positions here.
The Path we are Following
The only way that I know how to truly measure sentiment in a robust and mechanical way is through technical analysis. We see the exact same technical patterns and Fibonacci ratios in play in the mid-late 19th century in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, long before anyone knew to map price patterns. Human sentiment is quantifiable, and measurable, which is why I use technical analysis.
It is true, this time is different, just like every other event that caused a fear driven drawdown. What has not changed is human emotion, and how the measurement of this force manifests when funneled into a market.
I’ve showed our Premium Members a variation of this chart since late 2020. As of now, the current correction falls directly into the minor 4th wave targets outlined in blue, with room to go, if a bottom hasn’t been struck. As long as we can hold the 4300 break out, the odds will start to build towards a low being in.
I believe that with sentiment as low as it is, the level of bearish bets as well as the economy not being as abysmal as most think, we are setting up for a multi-month uptrend that should take us +5000 SPX.
In conclusion, the same Teflon market that shrugged off countless bear market events over the last 12 years, appears to be alive and well today.
Can it let go and crash? Of course; no one knows for certain. However, if we let history, market patterns and sentiment guide us, giving this bull market the benefit of the doubt has paid off for 12 years. We remain flexible at all times, yet we side with the bulls that this market could give us at least one more all-time high.
The I/O Fund is a team of analysts who share their research publicly as they build a portfolio of 20 stocks. Our team has record results for a retail Fund and we also have four-digit gains on some of our free newsletter coverage. You can learn more about our premium service by clicking here or sign up for our free newsletter here.by clicking here or sign up for our free newsletter here.
Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Please consult with your financial advisor in regards to any stocks you buy.
We are in a market where the macro environment is front and center.
The S&P500 is comfortably below its 50-day and 200-day moving average (MA), growth has reversed much of the gains from 2020 and energy is the only sector positive for the year. Inflation is at 40-year highs, oil went from $90- $129 in less than a month, as the FOMC arguably waited too long into this cycle to begin raising rates.
The FOMC is now boxed and must either abandon inflation concerns or growth concerns. Consumer sentiment is trending into recessionary levels, which means if the FED doesn’t address inflation, the consumer will do this for them. As if that’s not enough, the current war is potentially leading to a global sanction war that would all but guarantee a global recession.
Regardless, I still think the odds are higher that we see +5000 SPX before we see 3500 SPX, and the reason for this is due to the single most powerful force in equity markets – sentiment.
I know many will claim this time really is different, but many forget that similar excessive bearishness was present during Brexit, Grexit, the near collapse of the Euro zone, downgrading US debt, China collapses 1 and 2, double dip recession fears in 2012, as well as the 2016 global slowdown and political shift that brought about cries of a 50% drawdown. In fact, it really was different in 2009 as well as 2020, yet the market marched higher and never looked back, regardless of the data and extreme bearishness.
For the first time since 2020, we have sentiment depressed enough to propel us higher, and it is only from such states of despair that deep corrections find bottoms and begin to march higher. If you have ever said to yourself, “this market makes zero sense,” then you indirectly understand that fundamentals do not always drive market moves. I believe the time will come soon, that many will be saying the same phrase as we begin to march higher in light of the ongoing negative news cycle.
Bear Market or Correction?
The debate is whether this is a correction or the start of a secular bear market. If this is the start of a secular bear market, it will be the first one in history that the equity market sees before the bond market. Yes, the yield curve is flattening, but it has not indicated that the FED has made a catastrophic mistake that would all but insure a recession. The equity market has historically and consistently been the final market to wake up to the macro picture, with the bond market usually being the first.
As of today, the 30-year yield is making a new high. Unlike the short end of the curve, the longer out you go, the more rates are controlled by growth/inflation. The 30-year has been in a prolonged downtrend, until recently, suggesting that inflation AND growth do not warrant a coming recession, yet.
The spread between the 10/2 year is the flattest we’ve seen since October of 2018. This is not ideal, and this trend is moving towards an inversion. However, we have not inverted, yet.
What history has shown us is that once the yield curve inverts, the economy falls into recession, on average, between 9-24 months from the first inversion. Also, surprisingly, some of the best gains within a bull market happen in that final +1 year period after inversion.
Also, this would be the first bear market that triggers while the economy is still expanding, and earnings are surprising to the upside. In fact, over 75% of the stocks in the S&P 500 provided upward surprises, as many talked about raising their prices and increasing production to meet the demand in the global economy.
Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 403% – Click hereSign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 403% – Click hereClick here
Though the Rate of Change is starting to slow in the high frequency economic data, we are still expanding. We appeared to have reached peak growth in mid 2021, as the Rate of Change (RoC) continues to move towards a contraction.
However, the above chart is measuring Rate of Change, and though we are seeing the RoC decelerate, we are still expanding. In fact, the last two rounds of global PMI data showed numerous surprises to the upside in both manufacturing and services, and not just in the US. Historically, this is not the environment that we see large, prolonged drawdowns.
If we look at the US PMI data, anything above 50 is signifying an expansion, while below 50 signals a contraction. It’s not until we get that sub-50 reading that we see the equity markets at their most volatile. Note in the below chart how the PMI moving sub-50 tends to coincide with either the largest leg of a drawdown, or close to the start of a large drawdown. As of today, the PMI reading is at 58.
Furthermore, we are seeing Business Development Companies (BDCs) reporting strong demand, as many have raised their dividends and increased guidance for 2022. It’s important to monitor the sources of borrowing for small to medium sized businesses, which BDC’s service. This is further backed by the upward trending loan growth in commercial banks in the US.
I am not arguing that the current economy is ripe for growth. In fact, it’s important to understand where we are in the business cycle as well as earnings cycle. What I am saying is that sentiment in the markets have gotten too bearish, too quickly. This, more times than not, leads to an unwind which I believe could take SPX +5000 before we see 3500.
Next week, I will discuss statistics around bear markets and what has historically preceded a bear market and what has historically led to new highs. You might be surprised.
The I/O Fund is a team of analysts who share their research publicly as they build a portfolio of 20 stocks. Our team has record results for a retail Fund and we also have four-digit gains on some of our free newsletter coverage. You can learn more about our premium service by clicking here or sign up for our free newsletter here.by clicking here or sign up for our free newsletter here.
Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Please consult with your financial advisor in regards to any stocks you buy.
Even though the larger cyclical growth trend is slowing, we are seeing unexpected signs of a temporary and unexpected bounce in growth. With inflation likely peaking, the FED beginning to walk back the most hawkish path of rate hikes this year, we could set up a much needed rally in high beta stocks from historically oversold conditions. This also lines up with our technical analysis work, all of which we discuss below.
We do plan to use any move in high beta stocks from here to further de-risk and raise another round of cash. We raised cash in December/early January, and have used that cash to layer into the companies that we want to own for longer than 1-2 years. On a short to intermediate-term time frame, we believe the upside risk from current oversold levels is higher than the downside risk. On an intermediate to long-term time frame, the risk will likely be more to the downside until the 4th cyclical slowdown within the larger secular bull market runs its course. Regardless, we believe the odds that the end of this great secular bull market is quite low.
The type of bear markets that go deep and last for years happen in conjunction with recessions. With the Yield Curve NOT inverted, nor giving any sign of an inversion in the near future, the current consensus odds of a recession are close to zero. Instead, what we are likely experiencing is the 4th deflationary shock in an ongoing secular bull market. We experienced these shocks in 2011, 2015, 2019/2020, and now 2022. these shocks are emotional and sharp but tend to recover quickly with a renewed reflationary impulse. Nobody can give you an exact guarantee, however, this is the outlook we are using for our current portfolio positioning. If something changes, we will let you know.
Inflation vs. Equities
Historically, rate hikes cause a knee-jerk reaction by markets rotating assets over the short term; however, we tend to see sharp snapbacks to new highs once that rotation subsides. Rising rates imply a strong economy. As growth and inflation rise together with the Fed Funds Rate, we tend to see strong moves in the stock market.
For example, in December of 2015, the Fed raised rates for the first time since 2006. This created a short-term top as the S&P 500 fell 11%. Within 8 months the market was back at ATHs. From there the FED raised rates aggressively, as inflation, growth and the markets began to advance together on one of the best years within the secular bull market that started in 2009.
Today, we seem to be getting a similar reaction, yet at a more aggressive velocity. So, what happened? The short answer is that the FED has never waited this long to raise rates. Their “transitory” inflation stunt last year, coupled with inflation targets in the second half of 2021 that were also wildly detached from reality, placed them between a rock and a hard place.
On one hand, now that inflation is elevated, we are seeing the results of this reality filter through the economy. For example, real hourly wage growth is at an annualized pace of 12%, which is very inflationary. Yet, this growth in wages is still not enough to keep up with the annualized CPI print, causing real wage growth to be negative. Another example is that Real GDP grew at a 6.9% annual rate in Q4. Even with this excellent Q4 beat, real GDP for 2021 was only 1.6% (growth minus inflation), which was slower growth than the pre-COVID trend.
On the other hand, we have the U.S. Equity Market, which is dependent on an ongoing infusion of liquidity to maintain support. Though there is some room to deflate current prices in equities, letting the market crash for a sustained period is also not a viable option. Unlike in prior decades, the pivot towards manipulating a “Wealth Effect” in 2009 through FED policy, coupled with the near-universal adoption of 401Ks, over a decade of mostly 0% savings rates forcing money out of savings, and Wall Street’s infiltration of public and private retirement funds, has fundamentally tied the stock market to the economy.
The FED is now faced with allowing inflation to further erode growth, which is affecting middle to low-income households or attempting to deflate the stock market by focusing on curbing inflation. Going into Jan of 2022, we got the answer to that very difficult question, which was further backed by the recent FOMC Q&A. The market was expecting 1-2 rate hikes going into 2022 with a targeted roll off of QE to be in June-July. They then announced that 4 rate hikes were needed and an end to QE in March. This sudden increase of actions caused a panic out of risk assets and into energy, financials and various defensive assets, which is still playing out.
On top of a rushed tapering announcement, we have further evidence building that the cyclical growth in the global economy is peaking. So, unlike 2017 where inflation growth and rates rose together, we have the FED rushing to raise rates with growth and likely inflation peaking. Once again, this is unchartered territory, as the FED has never waited this long to act, which is creating uncertainty that is showing up in market volatility.
Like many, we did not expect such a sharp selloff so early into 2022. I do believe the market has moved too far too fast, which is common with market sentiment. This has set up the pricing in the worst-case scenario, and created oversold conditions that noticeably outpaced March of 2020. With sentiment at extremes, we only need the slightest upward surprise to trigger a reverse rally, which I believe the bond market is signaling.
How Bonds Relates to Tech and Why This Matters
Tech growth is considered a long-duration asset. When a stock has no current cashflow or earnings, yet is showing strong top-line growth with a large runway to expand, you are in essence buying a stake in the future cashflow of that business. These cashflows are far out in the future but are assumed to be very large. They are then discounted back to the present-value. Thus, a small change in the discount rate on the long duration cashflows has a material impact on current valuations.
As inflation rises, the costs associated with these company’s day-to-day businesses becomes more expensive. Furthermore, if they require on-going debts to fuel growth until profitable, the cost of borrowing goes up with an increase in yields. This forces the stockholder’s future stake on the company’s profitability to get repriced.
Equity investors are focused primarily on a company’s fundamentals and price action. Bond traders, on the other hand, are focused predominantly on economic growth and inflation. This is what drives the bond market, except for one key factor – FED policy. Because the Federal Reserve controls the Fed Funds Rate, which is the target yield set by the FOMC for commercial banks’ lending excess reserves overnight, this action filters out across the yield curve, having a greater effect on yields the closer you are to the Fed Funds Rate.
In other words, the closer a bond’s duration is to the front end of the curve, the less it is affected by growth and inflation expectations, and the more it is controlled by FED policy. As we move farther out on the yield curve, FED policy has less of an effect on bond buying. Instead, growth and inflation expectations drive these yields. This is important to understand when discussing what’s going on in the greater macro environment.
If growth and inflation expectations are driving long-duration yields, what does this mean for the recent upward moves in the 10-year yields across the world (Ex-China)?
With the CPI at 7% and the 10-year yielding 1.75%, the real yields on the 10-year are currently -6.25%. Inflation is obviously affecting the 10 year yield. However, with evidence that inflation is peaking, which will likely rollover in a decelerating economy, as well as evidence of one-time events not moving into 2022, the 10-year is likely also picking up on an unexpected and temporary growth surge.
Inflation
In 2022, the only major assets and sectors that are up are Energy, Oil, Commodities and the Dollar. In fact, the energy sector is the only sector that is up YTD, showing 17% gains in one month. Inflation fears are high and the expectation is that the 10-year yield is destined to reach 2.5%, and likely never see sub-2% again. All of this could happen, but I do not believe this is what’s causing the 10-year yield to make a higher high. Here are some points that show inflation may be peaking soon.
Our model measures the Rate of Change in both Inflation and Economic Growth. This matters because even though we are seeing a high reading of 7% in the CPI, the rate of change is slowing.
Note how Nov-21 marked a lower high in inflation’s rate of change than May-21. As we entered December, inflation is slowing and trending towards deceleration.
The recent CPI number showed a slowing down of both food and energy, which is a trend that will likely continue to further fuel the deceleration in inflation into 2022. With energy showing a noticeable topping pattern, a drawdown will bring inflation numbers down further.
The advance is oil prices is showing a strong divergence within the RSI, suggesting the upward advance in oil is due for a pullback. This would relieve the inflation pressures on the economy, pushing yields down and potentially being a temporary catalyst for long-duration assets.
Last Friday, we also saw the FED’s preferred method for gauging inflation, PCE, was up 5.8% on a YoY basis, while the core PCE was up 4.9% on a YoY basis. These are high numbers, which have been fully priced into stocks, yet they were well below the worst case scenarios. Moving into February and March inflation metrics will have higher comps to clear on a YoY basis, which should provide a cushion. As long as we continue to see CPI and PCE either come in-line or surprise to the downside in 2023, we should see buyers step back into the risk market.
From recent earning calls the one theme that is universal is the ongoing supply chain disruption, which is certainly contributing to the inflation we are seeing throughout the global economy. Interestingly, the continued trend in recent PMI reports as well as the Empire State MoM delivery Times Index are showing that purchasers are reporting quicker delivery times, which suggests that we have reached peak supply chain issues, and should see a further resolution in 2022.
The supply chain disruptions have forced businesses to build up their inventory, which has also contributed. The excellent Real GDP Print in Q4 was largely due to this inventory buildup, as businesses have reacted to the supply chain issues in 2021. This increase in inventory will not be repeated going into 2022 due to signals of a recovering supply chain and a cyclical slowdown in global growth.
All of the above data points suggest inflation should start to ease. This was further backed up by recent statements from Mathias Cormann, the secretary general of the OECD. Corman claimed that inflation should start to ease as global central banks update their policies to pre-pandemic levels.
Furthermore, the bond market is also suggesting an inflation slowdown, which is running counter to the popular narrative that inflation is only going to get worse. If inflation was going to remain elevated and continue upwards as a secular trend, we would likely see more of a reaction the further out on the yield curve we move, as well as a continued upward move to the 10-year yield.
Instead, with the 10 year making new highs and holding below the 2% line, the 30-year, which is looking more at longer cyclical trend in growth and inflation is still in a noticeable downtrend.
In other words, the bond market is not buying that the inflation (as well as growth) will continue its upward trend on a longer-term time frame. Instead, the 10-year could be signaling a temporary reprieve, which is not fully being priced into the equity market, and the 30-year is signaling that if this manifests, it will not be sustainable before the bigger cyclical slowdown resumes.
Growth
The below model measures various growth metrics within the U.S. economy that tend to be leading indicators for the market. This is important because cyclical growth affects the far end of the yield curve. Visually, you can see how the economy was slowing down going into the COVID crash, and how it appears to have peaked in Q4 of 2021.
This is confirmed with recent data worth pointing out:
Industrial production came in at -0.1% on a MoM basis, which compares to the historical average of 0.74%. This was well below the expectation of a 0.3% increase.
Retail sales also came in at well below expectations of -0.1% with a -1.9% MoM reading.
New Orders missed expectations.
The same can be said with manufacturing and business activity. The Manufacturing PMI came in an 11 month low, also surprising to the downside as it dipped below its 1-year moving average. The last time this happened was in September of 2018.
PMI in Services came in relatively strong; however, we needed more growth in this area of the U.S. economy to offset the decline in manufacturing.
This was further backed up with the recent ADP employment survey showing the economy lost 301,000 jobs in January, which was well below the expectation of an increase of 200,000. This was the first decline for ADP employment since December of 2020, and it was led by services.
Economic Conditions and Consumer Sentiment
Economic conditions, as measured by the US Current Economic Conditions Index, are at a similar measurement as March 2020, while consumer sentiment actually was lower in December than at the March low in 2020.
The reason for this is that though average hourly wage growth is up between 5.1% and 4.7% on a YoY basis over the last 2 months, real wage growth, when factored in for inflation, is down between -1.75% and -2.4%. As you can see in the above table, real wage growth has been negative since April of 2021, which has certainly been one of the main drivers for the deceleration in consumer sentiment that is filtering into economic growth.
Why is consumer sentiment so important? There are a few simple factors that when present, have preceded deflationary shocks to the stock market and economy. Consumer sentiment is one of them.
Going back to 1987 there is a clear correlation between consumer sentiment and stock market events. As consumer sentiment diverges from the stock market’s uptrend, what tends to follow is large correction or bear market. Today, we are seeing consumer sentiment hit levels that we last saw in 2011, which is something investors should be aware of.
The reason for this correlation is quite simple. If consumers feel good about their financials, they tend to spend more money on discretionary items. What tends to affect this sentiment, aside from a rare black swan event, is that inflation rises faster than wages. As consumers feel their real wages decline, they tend to spend less on discretionary items, and in periods of heightened inflation, consumers tend to take out debt to cover living expenses, which is what we have been seeing in the last half of 2021.
It’s important to know where we are in the business cycle for both short and long term investors. The larger cyclical trend is certainly suggesting that we have reached peak growth or close to it. However, recent data is providing some green shoots that the consumer is starting to feel better about the economy.
The Conference Board released their monthly Consumer Confidence index and report in January. Even though it fell to 113.8 from 115.2 in December, it was above the expected decline to 111. They acknowledge that the surprise was that even though inflation is high, and real hourly wages are down, the average consumer is still planning to buy homes and large ticket items including cars over the next 6 months.
This positive upside surprise was even further backed by Visa and American Express’s recent earnings call. AMEX said that card members’ spending was at an all-time high. They also confirmed that consumer travel and leisure spending is finally above pre-pandemic highs. They further claimed that they believe travel and leisure spending will continue to boost their revenues through 2022.
UPS recently reported a strong beat on both the top and bottom line. Their top-line growth showed a 11.5% YoY increase, which they claim was the result of strong e-commerce demand. They further raised their guidance for 2022. UPS further noted that they have raised their prices do to supply chain disruption, and the consumer has shown a willingness to pay these higher prices.
Two Federal Reserve chairs came out this week easing the probability of the most hawkish FED response in 2022, which has been priced into the equity market. The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia President Patrick Harker expressed that the supply chains have a lot do with inflation pressures. He believes that 50 bp hike in March is not necessary. This approach was also expressed by the Atlanta President as well as the San Francisco President, supporting a more tempered approach to rate hikes in 2022.
With sentiment at rock bottom levels, this potential temporary return to growth, and likely peaking of inflation, which the bond market could be signaling, would be the catalyst that leads to a short to intermediate-term reprieve from the larger cyclical slowdown taking place. If this scenario manifests, and/or we see the FED continue to let up on the most aggressive plot program for 2022, we expect to see a bid in risk assets.
Is Tech Growth Over?
What will happen to long-duration assets and high beta when the larger global growth slowdown resumes, and if/when inflation continues its deceleration into 2022? Right now, many tech innovators are showing strong forward growth and even raising guidance into 2022, yet their stock is down anywhere between 30-70%. With growth assets left for dead, this would be the ideal environment to see a multi-week to multi-month relief rally that could last throughout the remainder of Q1 2022.
This is also lining up with our broad market Technical Analysis in the S&P 500
The above scenario lines up with the macro thesis outlined. It would suggest a multi-week/multi-month rally to ATHs within the broader market. This is supported by extreme sentiment readings. For example, the S&P 500 recently hit 22 on the daily RSI, a level only seen 5 times in the last 20 years, and each time showing positive returns 6 months from that reading.
On a micro view, it appears that the current bounce is still within the range of being a 4th wave within a 5 wave decline. Considering that the current c wave down is only showing a distinct 3 waves down, I wouldn't be surprised to see the market trend down into a lower 5th wave to complete the correction that started 9 weeks ago. If we do get another low into the Feb 3-11 time factor, I would consider this strong evidence that the above thesis is in play.
On the other hand, if the market moves above 4585-4600, that will complicate the above scenario on a technical basis. I would not like to see us trend up into the February time factor after only giving us 3 waves down. My current count, for reference, has us in the final leg lower now, but we would need to see one more leg to retest the lows, at minimum. If we do not see this, It would mean that we have likely only experienced the first leg down, the current bounce is a b wave, with a c wave to follow to new lows. We will simply need to see what the coming week gives us.
If we do rally to new highs, once this rally finishes, we will likely see a larger deflationary correction in both price and time. So, any rally that we get would be an opportunity to de-risk as we head further into 2022. Note the larger degree (4) wave in our future (shown above). this lines up with the slow move into the deflation/stagflation macro quadrant.
Keep in mind, as inflation and economic growth start their decline, it is only a matter of time before stocks get the message in a meaningful way. Because this Deflation/Stagflation cycle is looming over any short-term economic boost, it is likely only some indexes and some sectors will make new highs while others make lower highs. This is common with risk assets. They tend to lead us into slowdowns and lead us out, which appears to be the case, so far.
For example, one of our favorite microtrends in play, which is only in its middle innings, is Cloud. The best proxy for this trend is CLOU, which is an ETF of cloud pure-plays (shown below).
One thing that is undeniable is that the excess sentiment from 2020 in high tech began to correct in February of 2021. As the broad market moved forward, cloud, which is arguably the strongest microtrend in tech right now, is providing us with a very distinct corrective pattern outlined in blue. This would suggest that this flush-out in January could setup the next large degree uptrend.
Even with this potential on the table, I’m leaning more towards the red path. This suggests that the high beta tech world is experiencing its first leg down in a larger degree 2nd wave drawdown. Like we see with high beta, they tend to lead us into and out of larger declines. So, as SPX and the DOW would potentially make a new high, continuing their uptrend, high beta would be in a b wave. Thus, we would see high beta bottom first, and begin its new uptrend as the broader market likely makes one more lower low.
Conclusion
Regardless of what plays out, we believe that valuations in key names are oversold and setting up for a decent comeback. As long-term investors in tech trends, managing sentiment is crucial. Though cloud is growing and well within the middle innings of adoption economically, the sentiment regarding the stocks that are setup to benefit from this growth experience wide and emotional swings. Just like we saw an exuberance stretching sentiment in one direction in 2020/Q1 of 2021, we are now seeing the reverse effect, which we believe is setting up great buying opportunities amongst specific names for long-term investors willing to ride out any further volatility, which is likely.
We do believe the market shifted into a risk-off investing environment in Nov/Dec of 2021 due to the realization of peak growth and the projections of peak inflation soon after. However, the consumer is starting to perk up, appearing to accept the new norm of heightened inflation. This, coupled with the real possibility of a post-pandemic economy and heightened inflation, is causing long-duration assets to get sold, which is affecting tech growth. When coupled with the oversold conditions in tech growth, the macro environment could be setting up for a recovery rally that could last well into 2022. However, we see any renewed uptrend as an opportunity to de-risk, and raise some cash until the global growth story bottoms and begins a new cycle.
Microsoft, Tesla and Apple reported last week (week of 01/24/22) and results came in strong across the group. Investors needs to stay aware of what these companies are doing as they can impact numerous industries, such as semiconductors, cloud and even financial/insurance markets.
Microsoft, Tesla and Apple strong results will likely be a tailwind for the broader technology complex. For example, Tesla, Microsoft and Apple are ramping capex, which will benefit key industries such as semiconductors.
As shown below, Microsoft has ramped capital expenditures, which has been driven by its expansion of cloud computing. This is a strong tailwind for cloud companies, and highlights that cloud remains an area of hyper growth.
Watch the video below for a quick recap of Microsoft, Apple and Tesla's latest earnings release and the impact that they have on the broader market.
A trend that we are watching closely at I/O Fund, heading into 2022, is the memory market. Memory storage is struggling to keep pace with the explosion and data that's being created in the cloud environment so 2022 might be a big year as new technologies hit the market. Tech Analyst Bradley Cipriano touches on what these new technologies are and who's likely to benefit in 2022.
A major new technology is 3D NAND. Key players that have innovated around this technology are Micron and Samsung.
The chart below displays the TTM Capex of prominent companies in the memory market, highlighting that investments are being made now in anticipation of strong demand in the future.
For more on the memory market and to hear about what specific companies are doing to measure up, take a look at our newest YouTube video.
Going into February of 2021, we warned of a selloff based on weakening momentum trending into an important broad market time factor. We used this opportunity to raise some cash and even had a proactive hedge on QQQ at the time. This shift helped us remain competitive with the pros in the growth markets, as did our proactive move out of crypto (and back in again). Even when the growth selloff intensified into late Q1, many were calling for the end of the bull market, as we used that opportunity to add to some quality companies that were getting beaten up. Like many, we underestimated the difficulty in the high beta market, showing mixed results in our additions to high conviction/long-term plays, but we continued to hold the broader thesis that the bull market is not over, as we do today. I do believe we will see a return to 2020-style growth investing before this great bull market is over, but I also believe that we will get a chance to grab shares of targeted companies at lower prices first.
That being said, what I do want to point out is the difference between February 2021 and today. The economic environment tends to lend itself towards high beta being in favor or out of favor. Coming out of the 2020 bear market, we saw a large acceleration of economic growth with low inflation – ie, the perfect environment for our world. As inflation picked up in mid Q1 of 2021, growth investing became more difficult. We still saw numerous winners in this field coming out of the February/March selloff, so a more discerning filter really paid off. The reason for this is that we saw inflation and growth accelerating up at the same time. However, today's dip in growth assets and rotation into more deflation protection assets is signaling something different, in my opinion. I believe looking at the growth trends in the macro-environment will help clarify what that is…
First up, we'll look at our economic heat map.
Note the difference between February of 2021 and today. In February, inflation was starting to pick up but wasn't a major concern (according to the bond market). Also, note how we were in the early stages of accelerated growth in the US economy. Now, compare that to today – growth is starting to slow as our models expect the rate of change in this deceleration to start turning soft red in mid-late Q1. With inflation in the red as well, we also are expecting this slowdown to lead to inflation slowing down as well. We are seeing signs of this slowdown globally with China leading the way. Much like we saw a global growth push in 2017, the macro environment is suggesting a global growth slowdown into 2022.
Our quadrant analysis, which measures the Rate of Change of both growth and inflation in the US, is supporting this thesis.
The October data is being uploaded soon, but it will have the Oct. numbers closer to the bottom right quadrant – inflation/stagflation. This is a risk-off macro environment where high beta struggles, and we see a flight to real estate, utilities, staples, long-duration bonds, and very liquid mega-cap growth companies (exactly what has been working over the last month). We do believe this quadrant will take us into the lower left quadrant (deflation) in 2022.
With this in mind, think of the FED's position. They waited too long to raise rates so are under the gun to rush this process in order to have ammo to fight the next deep correction. So, with growth slowing, inflation peaking, and the FED in a rush to tighten conditions for the next reflation attempt, probabilities suggest that risk assets will continue to struggle until a floor is found in the economic slow-down.
But, don't take our word for it, just look what the bond market is saying.
Remember, long-duration yields are controlled by market expectations of growth and inflation (not the FED). As long-duration yields go down, it's signaling the same slow down our models are showing. The spread between the 10-year yield (not affected by FED policy) and 2-year yield (highly affected by Fed policy) has seen the sharpest flattening since 1994.
Interestingly, this also lines up with our Elliott Wave analysis. I have always been amazed at how using Fibonacci/golden ratio analysis on charts tends to predict future outcomes. Anyone that has been with us for a while knows that we've been talking about 2022 being a tough year based on this analysis alone. We now have a combined macro analysis, coupled with inflation and FED policy catching up to what Elliott Wave was predicting over a year ago.
Trends move in 5 waves in the direction of the predominant trend. this is true in all markets and on all time frames. Since March of 2020, the predominant trend is up. We have a clean 1st and 2nd wave in place (in red). In order to complete the minimum targets for the 3rd wave, we need the current trend to move us into the SPX 4900-5200 region. This will lead to the larger 4th wave, which we expect to be between a 10%-15% drawdown in early/mid-2022. We also have two important broad market time factors coming up – Dec 27-Jan 3 and one in late January (I'll narrow down the focus as we approach this). Almost every chart I map is showing the same inflection points.
These time factors are marking inflection points and how the market trends into them will be crucial. Interestingly, they are also lining up with what our models are suggesting – an acceleration of the global economic slowdown in late Q1 (remember, markets are looking into the future, so expect a top prior to the data coming out). Furthermore, if we look at inter-market signals, a similar warning is still present.
Our risk-on and economically sensitive sectors are diverging from the broad market. When we see this pattern, only one of 2 things will happen: (1) either the broad market is leading the risk-on sectors; (2) the risk-on sectors are leading the broad markets. With the preponderance of evidence discussed, we believe 2 is more likely as we push into early 2022.
Why This is Not the End of the Great Bull Market
In one word – liquidity. I've talked about this for several weeks, in various ways. Last week we showed the strange phenomenon that money market funds and the S&P 500 are both close to ATHs, which is one of many examples of the excess liquidity in the markets. This week, we will focus on how the flood of liquidity in the economy is affecting the banking system.
I, for one, do believe the central banking system will go down in history as a monumental failure. However, you have to play the market you are dealt – not the one that you want or think makes more sense. Many pundits have stubbornly ignored this reality, and as a result, missed out on one of the greatest bull markets in US history. That being said, this is a FED-driven, liquidity-fueled bull market, and the drastic actions taken by the FED (and global central banks) during the COVID crash last year is why we are continuing to push higher today.
In 2008, we saw a gradual tightening that ultimately put in motion the GFC. During this time we saw the first run on banks (and money markets) since the turn of the century. The fear was sudden and caused banks to shut the borrowing window for even qualified companies to refinance their debts. As a result, defaults intensified, and only exacerbated the problem. This liquidity/credit crunch was the primary driver behind the pain experienced in the GFC.
Compared to 2007/2008, last year the FED flooded the economy with excess liquidity that was needed by struggling companies to stay afloat. In other words, they guaranteed that a credit crunch would not happen. this lead to the bizarro world of monthly economic data that literally went off the charts in a negative way, while the stock market kept powering higher. As a result, it's hard to look at the current landscape and see any hint of a liquidity crunch. In fact, the opposite seems to be true.
Liquidity in Banks
We tend to see the beginning stages of a liquidity crunch in overnight markets. In other words, if a bank needs additional liquidity to meet their normal business demands, they will borrow this cash from other banks in the overnight markets. If these private banks see trouble on the horizon they tend to not want to participate in overnight loans, pushing the overnight borrowing rate up, and thus making liquidity even harder to come by. This lack of overnight liquidity begins to filter into the banking system and ultimately down into the economy. To combat this free-market phenomenon, the FED created the repurchase agreement program (Repos) to be the lender of last result. In other words, when no private bank wants to take on the counter-party risk of another bank needing cash to operate, the FED steps in.
Prior to the economic slowdowns, we tend to see the FED's repo program tick up, signaling that private banks are not willing to loan into the overnight markets.
Note how these repo agreements preceded major market events. It's a signal that liquidity is drying up, and this removal of liquidity from the market by the banking system is what ultimately crashes the markets.
Now, let's overlay this metric with inflation expectations (10 yr. breakeven rate) as well as economic growth (PMI – manufacturing).
Note how inflation peaked as did economic growth going into these liquidity crunches. What preceded was sharp bear markets in both instances. Now, note the 2011 and 2015 deep correction periods. We had a deceleration in both economic growth and inflation (much like we're projecting going into 2022), but there was no liquidity crunch. The result was either a sharp and quick selloff (2011), or a correction that was more in time than price (2015) before the bull market resumed. It's important to see that we are not in a similar liquidity crunch today. In fact, the opposite seems to be happening.
The FED also has a program designed to address this opposite problem banks can face, and it's called reverse-repo agreements (Reverse-Repos). Banks operate under strict regulations, one of which addresses the maximum amount of cash/credit they are allowed to hold relative to assets. If a bank is close to that limit, it will lend this excess liquidity to other banks for a small overnight rate. However, what happens when most banks are flushed with cash and cannot accept anymore? The FED steps in to be the buyer of last result, exchanging cash for bonds at a minuscule rate.
Today, the reverse repo operation is at record highs.
In other words, the FED is "borrowing" excess cash from banks on a nightly basis. This is what too much liquidity in the banking system looks like. Now, factor in that the FED is STILL adding ~$60 Billion of QE per month on top of the chart above!
So, like 2019 and 2008, the economy is starting to slow as inflation is likely about to peak. However, unlike 2008 and 2019 there is tons of liquidity in the system that has to go somewhere, and with the CPI running at 6.8% and likely to move into the 7% region, money markets and bonds are not very attractive. For this single, yet crucial reason, I see 2022's volatility to be more like 2011/2015 – an extended road bump in a much larger bull market, which we want to prepare our readers for.
Remember, the FED and global governments need inflation. It is literally the only way out of the massive debt obligations taken on by governments, aside from a default. the same problem was seen in the post-war 1940's – large increase in money supply as inflation ran hot for over a decade. This allowed the US government to get out from under their war debts, while the stock market went on a multi-decade bull market. This, I believe, is what the FED is trying to do today – get everyone used to higher inflation, so that the US has a shot of unwinding its debt. So, creating a market crash would not be conducive to this end.
Our Game Plan for 2022 and Beyond
Going back to our Elliott Wave analysis, if we are completing the 4th wave of the larger 3rd wave, that means that we have the final 5th wave to go. If everything moves as planned, which is always a BIG if, we will bottom into late December, and rally hard into the late January time factor, which is targeting the 4900 regions, at a minimum. We also know that we are in a stagflation/inflation style macro environment, which tends to favor mega-cap growth names. The type of mega-cap growth that is working right now is FAANG and semis. Since our recent entries in NVDA and AMD, we are sitting on 60% gains in just under 2 months, as LRCX and MRVL were almost at ATHs while the rest of tech sold off hard. You are seeing where the money is flowing in real-time. We plan to continue to ride this momentum as the SPX makes its minor 5th wave push, focusing on a potential MSFT play and continued adds to our semis.
Regarding high beta, we are trending down into the first-time factor, which, as previously stated, I'm expecting to be a low. This should kick off the final minor 5th wave push. Also, even though we are focusing on mega-caps and semis, I do not think risk assets are being completely left for dead on this push, as of now.
The options market is not as bearish on risk assets now as the popular narrative/Twitter suggests. Note how ARKK is showing negative implied volatility on a 30-day basis based on their recent realized volatility. When this pattern is present at market/asset highs, it's a big warning. However, when we see this closer to market/asset lows, it's a signal that the options market believes the volatility in this asset is likely to reverse.
So, over the short term, our plan is to continue to rotate into lower beta positions, ride any momentum of our higher beta plays (CFLT, VYGVF, ASAN, AFRM, etc), and then build cash along the way.
Over the longer-term time frame, we plan to have a reasonable cash position to accumulate shares of great companies for when the economic environment clears up and the bull market resumes. Our targeted themes will continue to be semis, as Beth's long-term thesis is starting to really pick up, as well as Cloud. As growth slows and rates move higher, borrowing costs will be affected as will revenue streams. In a slow-growth environment, we tend to see companies address margins in a much more aggressive fashion. We saw this in 2020 regarding cloud. The cloud migration intensified because companies saw that cutting costly IT infrastructure budgets and moving to cloud systems both reduced overhead and made their business more efficient. We believe the same will happen in the current environment.
Arguably, the most cost-effective microtrend is the work-from-home trend. This allows companies to reduce COL allowances as well as expensive real estate. This trend is here to stay, and we are only in the early stages. For this reason, we like plays like ASAN, ZM, MNDY, etc. Regarding Zoom, it showed a 94% enterprise growth on top of triple-digit comps. Yet, the market continuously beats it down as a consumer play that peaked during COVID. This is a mistake and allows for a great chance to buy a quality company at low relative valuations. Though we did not expect the market to beat it down this much, we do believe a relative floor is under Zoom based on its current price to forward growth projections.
Look for ideas like this as we move into 2022. If/when we start approaching any bottom from the coming correction we will shift our focus to more high beat/speculative plays. But, for now, defense is warranted for anyone looking to not be shocked by 2022. As always, we developed a thesis based on incoming data. If that data changes, so will our thesis and pivot. We are not looking to be right, only make money. Markets are fluid, and thus require the need for pivots If anything changes, you will be the first to know.
Also, it's important to not overreact and sell everything or buy everything in an emotional rush. Instead, we prefer to tilt our portfolio into a defensive/offensive posture. We will target 10-15% cash if our plan for a bounce manifests.
I/O Fund is keeping tabs on cloud security company Zscaler because of its surging sales and strong growth over multiple quarters. Zscaler's success is evident in the most recent earnings results.
Sales History
Zscaler's growth is impressive, because sales have grown over 50%+ for five consecutive quarters.
In fact, as you can see in the chart below, Zscaler has grown 40%+ or more in every quarter, except one, as a public company.
Growth Factors
Zscaler's notably high growth is due to a few secular tailwinds propelling the company forward:
Rise of the cloud environment
Obsolescence of firewalls used to secure networks in the cloud
Network effects, as Zscaler collects massive amounts of data, over 300 trillion signals everyday
Upward Trending Sales and Persistent Demand
Market demand for Zscaler's products and solutions is demonstrated in customers' willingness to pay for multi-year contracts upfront, allowing for a constant stream of revenue and capital to go back into Zscaler's operations.
Current cashflow trends are indicative of Zscaler's ability to deliver high quality results.
We can see upfront cash payments by looking at deferred revenue, which increased 74% YoY. It is also worth pointing out that long-term deferred revenue (DR) increased 99% YoY to $63 million. Deferred revenue turns into sales in the future and an outsized growth in DR highlights that there is ample balance sheet support for future sales.
Deferred revenue actually represented 281% of Q1 sales, the highest seasonal value in the firm's history.
Thoughts from Zscaler's Management
Management has raised its sales guide, and expects FY2022 sales to grow 50% YoY to $1 billion. Management also expects billings to increase 40% YoY to $1.3 billion, which further underscores recent topline growth.
I/O Fund's Potential Position on Zscaler
I/O Fund is watching Zscaler closely but we do have reservations about the company’s elevated valuation. Zscaler trades at over 50x fwd sales which is a premium multiple in the cloud category.
We will be tracking cloud earnings to better understand whether Zscaler is positioned to continue to grow strongly going forward.
But there's more to Zscaler and this analysis –
Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% here.Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% here.here.
Look over our Premium Services, offered through our Premium Membership program, here.Look over our Premium Services, offered through our Premium Membership program, here.here.
DLocal reported Q3 earnings recently and I/O Fund analyst Bradley Cipriano discusses what these earnings mean for the burgeoning company. DLocal offers alternative payment methods to emerging market consumers who may not have access to debit or credit and are more likely to own a smartphone. DLocal's business model has enabled the company to see rapid growth.
Emerging markets, their global relevance, and lively consumers in those areas aren't going away any time soon. Watch the video below to see why DLocal's sales should continue to grow rapidly.
Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% -Click hereSign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% -Click hereClick here
This quarter, we chose to go over Roku, Snap, PubMatic, The Trade Desk, Magnite, Pinterest, and Digital Turbine for an earnings preview on what to expect from these ad-tech companies. This list was chosen by those with the most forward growth, those with the highest valuations or those that have recently completed an acquisition so we can look deeper into what the Street is expecting from management.
Roku Inc– Earnings on November 05th
Below is a chart of Roku’s financials from last year, last quarter and what is expected in the upcoming quarter.
The consensus estimates suggests that the revenue growth will be slowing down in the next quarter. Below are the analysts’ views on Roku.
Wells Fargo analyst Steven Cahall has recently downgraded the stock to Equal Weight and reduced the price target from $488 to $350. He states that "The primary reason we go from Overweight to Equal Weight is, while there may still be a long ARPU runway, it's far better understood," Cahall writes in a note. "Consensus CY22E/CY23E ARPU is +50%/+47% over the past year to now $50/$60. In our January deep dive, we called CY22E ARPU of $55 a bull case scenario; but current consensus shows our alpha has decayed. The Q2 ARPU beat slowed a lot from Q1."
On the other hand, Guggenheim analyst Michael Morris says that the recent sell-off is a good opportunity to buy the shares as he upgrades the stock from a neutral rating to a buy with a price target of $395. “We expect the connected television ad marketplace will continue to grow at a rapid pace and that Roku will be a primary beneficiary — this view is unchanged,”
KeyBank analyst Justin Patterson has said that the New Amazon fire TV’s as an incremental positive to the company and its competitive position. He notes that Amazon’s devices appear to be similar to Roku’s offering.
Please note, the I/O Fund does not necessarily agree with the financial analysts mentioned above rather our goal is to objectively review companies. Our premium members have been updated frequently on Roku and we have been able to buy this stock very early before the market understood the true potential of this cord-cutting and AVOD play.
PubMatic revenue growth rate is expected to show a notable deceleration in comparison with the recent quarter although margins remain high. We will be keeping an eye on the net dollar-based retention ratio in the next quarter. The management has raised the 2021 revenue growth forecast to 38% to 40% and 25% next year.
Macquarie analyst Tim Nollen has an outperform rating on the stock with a price target of $37. He believes that the company benefits from “a strong advertising backdrop in which traditional advertising is shifting to digital, open Internet players are gaining share from walled gardens, and ad spend is consolidating around fewer SSPs,".
Macquarie further states “PubMatic is banking on real CTV growth coming from open exchange, where the OpenWrap bidding engine will be able to grow alongside that migration – though that still needs time to play out”.
“And on an enterprise value/sales basis, it's trading at roughly a 3.5x discount to its closest peer, Magnite and a 5x discount to the broader ad-tech universe.”
You can find the ad-tech companies which had their growth estimates updated in the last few months here.
The Trade Desk Inc – Earnings on November 05th
The consensus revenue estimates for the next quarter suggests a sharp drop in the revenue growth, as well. One of the primary reasons for the strong revenue growth in the second quarter was due to lower comps as Q2 2020 revenue fell 13% YoY.
Needham analyst Laura Martin has a buy rating with a price target of $100 and her 3Q21 revenue estimate is $284M.
She is of the view that “Digital markets have proven themselves to have winner-take most economics, and we believe TTD is the winner among DSP’s (demand side platforms). 30% of TTD’s revenues come from CTV which should accelerate TTD’s growth trajectory since CTV revenues are growing 3-5x faster than other digital media categories. About 15% of TTD’s 1H21 revenues came from outside the US, and offshore is growing faster than the US, suggesting a longer growth runaway”.
Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% – Click here Click here
Citi analyst Nicholas Jones has a price target of $85 and a neutral rating. He believes: “Trade Desk is a dominant and best-in-class adtech player, but continues to see risk associated with technology disruption and privacy regulation”.
The revenue growth is expected to be lower than the second quarter but higher than the previous year. The adjusted EBITDA in the second quarter showed a strong growth when compared to the previous year. The management also expects to show an improvement in the third quarter.
Goldman Sachs’ analyst believes that the company has a high chance to achieve its target of 50% plus revenue growth in the next three years. Goldman Sachs also believes that the strong growth will be accompanied by margin expansion with the EBITDA margins improving from -13% in 2021 to 40% in 2026. It has a price target of $90.
RBC is also positive on the company. They have initiated coverage on the company with an outperform rating and a price target of $88. According to the analysts “Snap has everything pointed in the right direction to become a top social media business,stable footing in an attractive secularly growing ad market, an evolving direct response/ad-load/downfunnel commerce narrative leading to potential ARPU [average revenue per user] and profitability upside and finally, new products that could invite broader usage and incremental monetization.”
Channel checks were more mixed, but the analysts think the possibility of adverse near- or medium-term effects “seems low” compared to the stage of the company’s developing monetization.
The company is benefitting from the strong growth in digital advertising. However, as discussed earlier the super growth was partly due to the M&A with SpotX.
Analysts are positive on this stock as Berenberg analyst Alexandra Ross has initiated coverage with a buy rating and a price target of $37. Other analysts who are positive about the company include Susquehanna analyst Shyam Patil. He likes the company as a CTV play and is also optimistic about the recent acquisitions of SpotX and SpringServe.
Earlier this year, Truist analyst Thornton said, “Magnite is well positioned in the connected-TV advertising space, with secular growth in connected TV estimated to represent more than half the company's overall revenue by 2024”.
Pinterest Inc – Earnings on October 28th
The stock fell after releasing the 2Q 21 results as the company failed to meet the consensus global monthly active users (MAUs) in spite of beating the revenue and EPS consensus estimates. The management in the earnings call mentioned that due to the lack of visibility they will not be giving guidance for MAUs for this quarter.
RBC Capital analyst Brad Erickson initiated coverage of Pinterest with a Sector Perform rating and $58 price target. “We believe user growth is likely closer to plateauing than not and our channel feedback indicated that outside of targeted categories, conversion needs improvement, particularly vs FB where we think user crossover is virtually 100%. Expectations have come down after last quarter’s miss. However, we need to see an improving content or commerce experience before getting more constructive”.
Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% – Click here Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% – Click here Click here
Piper Sandler analyst Thomas Champion has a neutral rating and a $68 price target. He believes “that the post Q2 earnings selloff may be overdone. Recent monthly active user declines seem driven by non-mobile app users, which contribute less to the financial model”. He sees a more favorable setup for the stock into year-end.
Earlier this year, Argus analyst downgraded the stock to neutral in response to lower user growth in the second quarter. “The disappointing guidance reflects the decline in online sales as traditional stores reopen and users spend more time away from home. But it has strong brand recognition in the U.S. and prospects for growth in international markets over time."
Canaccord analyst Austin Moldow has upgraded the stock from a hold to a buy. He also raised the price target to $95. “The company has now gotten stronger with its transition into "a full phone lifecycle monetization engine" thanks to the addition of in-app advertising, which grew the total addressable market. He further notes that the Digital Turbine's valuation has "become more reasonable" and the fundamentals have improved up to justify the valuation”.
On the other hand, Macquarie analyst Tim Nollen has initiated coverage on the company with a neutral rating and $60 price target. He's unable to determine the relative position of Digital Turbine's on-device software versus ironSource's (IS). Digital Turbine's in-app advertising business has only just now come on board, and while these acquisitions are growing fast, they are notably smaller than peers”.
Oppenheimer analyst Timothy Horan reiterated an Outperform rating and $100 price target. "Single-Tap could be a revolutionary product, akin to the transition from banner ads to video. Despite the already significant dollars, Single-Tap is very early in its growth phase, with APPS being very selective on the brands being allowed to participate. The moat on Singe-Tap is sizable: IP, hundreds of millions of devices scale, as well as huge investment in last-mile measurement and attribution."
Bradley Cipriano and Royston Roche contributed to this article.
Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Please consult with your financial advisor in regards to any stocks you buy.