Experts pay attention to FOMC meetings in order to help navigate the financial markets and their positions with more confidence. Our FOMC meeting cheat sheet will help equip you with everything you need to know about the Federal Reserve's key decisions and how they may impact your investments.
The Importance of FOMC Meetings for Investors
FOMC meetings are crucial in determining the direction of U.S. monetary policy. The decisions made during these meetings significantly influence interest rates and asset prices. By understanding the FOMC's actions, investors can make more informed decisions and better manage their portfolios.
Key Components and Terminology in FOMC Meetings
Three critical elements drive FOMC meetings and monetary policy: the federal funds rate, open market operations, and quantitative easing/tightening (QE/QT). The Federal Funds rate is the primary tool for conducting monetary policy and affects other interest rates in the economy. Open market operations involve buying or selling government securities, influencing the federal funds rate and the banking system's reserves. Quantitative easing entails large-scale purchases of government bonds and mortgage backed securities, aiming to lower long-term interest rates and stimulate the economy.
Economic Indicators to Watch
Stay informed by monitoring vital economic indicators, such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP), inflation rates (CPI and PCE), unemployment rate, labor force participation rate, average hourly earnings, and housing market indicators. These factors play a crucial role in shaping the FOMC's policy decisions.
Navigating the FOMC Meeting Schedule and Resources
The FOMC meets eight times a year, with meeting minutes released three weeks after each session. Four times a year, the FOMC releases its Summary of Economic Projections (SEP). Additionally, the FOMC Chair holds press conferences after scheduled meetings, providing further insights into the committee's decision-making process.
Understanding the FOMC's Dual Mandate
The FOMC operates under a dual mandate from Congress, which includes ensuring maximum employment and maintaining stable prices with a long-term inflation target of 2%. Striking a balance between these goals requires the FOMC to carefully consider various economic indicators and policy tools.
Note: For a Limited Time, I/O FundNote: For a Limited Time, I/O Fundis offering a $99/year Premium Newsletter plan that provides one actionable stock tip per month and analysis from a top performing, audited team. Click here for more details is offering a $99/year Premium Newsletter plan that provides one actionable stock tip per month and analysis from a top performing, audited team. Click here for more details Click here for more details
The Impact of Forward Guidance
The FOMC utilizes forward guidance to communicate its future policy intentions. This communication method influences market expectations and long-term interest rates, enabling investors to better understand the FOMC's monetary policy approach.
Insights into FOMC Members and Voting Structure
The FOMC consists of 12 voting members, including the Chair, Vice-Chair, New York Fed President, and other regional Fed Bank presidents. Investors can gain valuable insights into these members' views on economic conditions and policy by following their speeches and comments.
Preparing for FOMC Meetings
To effectively prepare for FOMC meetings, one might consider reviewing recent economic indicators, assessing the impact of global events on the U.S. economy, studying FOMC members' speeches, monitoring market expectations for policy decisions, familiarizing yourself with the latest SEP and dot plot, and reviewing previous meeting minutes for context.
How FOMC Decisions Could Affect Your Investments
FOMC policy decisions can create market volatility and impact asset prices. By understanding the FOMC's actions, you can make more informed investment decisions and align your portfolio with your risk tolerance and market outlook.
The I/O Fund is a publishing company. The analysis, strategies, reports, activity and all other features of our service is provided for informational and educational purposes only, and should not be construed as personalized investment advice. Hedging is an advanced method of trading stocks, sudden losses can occur, and hedging should only be pursued under the supervision of your personal financial advisor.
Want a cheat sheet that looks like this in .PDF form?
The bear market is not over. This has been our probable thesis since the start of 2023. With the 10-year rates breaking out to new highs, and on-going inflation reports showing a re-acceleration under the headline numbers, it was apparent that the FOMC would need to raise the terminal rate to further fight stubborn inflationary pressures. This realization marked the February top, which has since been intensified by the unforeseen collapse of two large regional banks.
We are open to the bullish narrative; however, it would require a clear and dramatic reversal in the monthly inflationary trends, coupled with no more banks coming under pressure. The needle the FOMC must thread is one of the most delicate in modern history. With inflation still elevated and showing little signs of decelerating in key areas, how much can the FED drop rates, short of a bank contagion? Either way, it does not look good for equities, and until we get signs of this bullish scenario playing out, we will remain cautious and defensive.
Broad Market Analysis
We have been warning our members since early 2023 that this market is unhealthy. Our automated hedge signal went to sell, and we have been hedged since early February; however, the warnings were present long before. We were seeing warning signs in Financials long before the current regional banking crisis. On February 22nd, we even posted a public warning about this sector flashing warning signals.
We were seeing a clear bearish pattern forming off the October low, which was confirmed over the last 2 weeks.
We were also seeing similar warnings in international markets. The reason this was concerning was that if we were on the verge of starting a new bull market, this would likely be signaled across the globe. This was not what we were seeing.
For example, the Canadian TSX has a long history of leading the US markets. This was a very clear bear pennant playing out, which has now been confirmed.
European markets have been relatively strong this year. For those watching, it was actually just a little behind US markets. In other words, the same bearish setup was playing out, just with a lag. So, while many were talking about a US breakout, we were seeing topping patterns in European markets, which did not line up with a new bull market forming.
So, where does that leave the US markets? From a technical perspective, the 2022 bear market does not appear to be over. We seem to be tracing a rather complex pattern, which suggests one more large degree 5 wave drop to complete the pattern.
These complex patterns tend to have shallow recovery rallies, much like we saw in July/August, and then again in October/January. Also, another key feature is that the length of each leg tends to be proportionate.
Note: For a Limited Time, I/O FundNote: For a Limited Time, I/O Fundis offering a $99/year Premium Newsletter plan that provides one actionable stock tip per month and analysis from a top performing, audited team. Click here for more detailsis offering a $99/year Premium Newsletter plan that provides one actionable stock tip per month and analysis from a top performing, audited team. Click here for more detailsClick here for more details
For the first leg, which is marked “W” in the chart below, it broke down into 3 legs, marked A,B,C. Note how the C wave, which bottomed in June, is exactly 150% the length of the A. Regarding the 2nd leg of this bear market, which is marked “Y”, we should expect similar proportions.
Interestingly, if we apply the same measurements, from the recent top in February of 2023, 150% targets the 3050 SPX region. This lines up with several techniques pointing out the significance of this support region. If this pattern is playing out, we will loosely target this zone for some signs of a low being put in.
However, we need confirmation that this leg is playing out. The primary pivot will be 3765-3750. If we break below here, I would expect the drop to unfold rather rapidly. As long as we stay above this pivot, there is an off chance that we could see one more attempt at a bullish push higher, before the next leg lower.
Peak Inflation?
On Tuesday, the market celebrated a YoY CPI reading that was in line with expectations. While equities were up, long duration bonds on the other hand were down, which was a warning. This is interesting because what drives the price of long duration bonds is not the FED, but the growth and inflation outlook set by the bond market. With the FED trying to lower rates, and the CPI print coming in as expected, signaling inflation is cooling, you would think the bond market would rally with equities.
What the headlines were not discussing was that the CPI print was actually much hotter than the YoY print was suggesting. Inflation is best measured on a sequential basis, not a YoY basis. What matters is the trend, not annual comparison. It’s much more important to see if inflation is improving from month to month, not year over year, when tracking the trend.
I prefer to take the 3-month annualized readings to get the best feel for the actual trend. When you add up the prior 3 month readings and annualize them, the number comes out to 4.08%, compared with last month’s reading at 3.4%. This is a concerning rate of acceleration, and marks the 2nd month in a row of an accelerated trend within the CPI data.
Even more concerning, we are seeing a similar acceleration in energy, core prices, core goods, shelter, as well as services, which has been the biggest concern regarding inflation. The reason why services is so concerning is because it accounts for ~85% of the US GDP and it is still expanding above its 12 month trend.
With an on-going economic expansion comes inflation, which continues to show up in the CPI numbers. There is no question the FED, short of a banking crisis, would have to increase their terminal rate well above 5%, considering both the resilience of the US economy and the stubbornness of inflationary pressures in the services sector. This is why, in light of the troubles in the banking sector, the futures market is still priced in a 25 bps raise at a 50% chance.
What’s more concerning is that the current inflation readings were for February, which was done with Wheat and Energy commodities at subdued prices. If we look at these charts, from a technical perspective, they appear to be either coming to the end of their large downtrends, or in bullish postures, suggesting a bigger breakout is brewing.
Take gasoline, for example. It’s holding the ascending triangle pattern on bullish momentum.
If we see a breakout $2.8-$3 price point, we should see a sharp move higher, which would mean higher gas prices. The same can be said with Wheat, which appears to be coming to the end of a large degree correction.
These charts are suggesting a move higher on the horizon, which would not be good for future inflation readings.
Banks Matter
When the market bottomed on October 13th, 2022, it did so on the day that major banks began reporting their earnings for Q3, 2022. Interestingly, some of the larger banks surprised to the upside and even raised their 2023 guidance. What became apparent was that larger banks were thriving in the elevated rate environment.
Through various FOMC policies like 0% interest rates, operation twist, QE programs, etc., banks have not seen 30-year mortgage rates this high in a very long time. Being artificially suppressed, this affected the margins. So, this change was actually a windfall for banks that have been starved for years to make more money on the difference they take in for loans and then pay out on liabilities, also called net interest income (NII).
For example, JP Morgan in Q3 of 2022 reported NII of $17.6 billion, and guided for NII of $61.5 Billion for the year, beating expectations of $58 Billion. Even more astounding, JP Morgan announced that they currently have $1.2 Trillion in excess cash at the time. But, JPM was not the only bank reporting similar growth, we saw similar stories around the October lows from most major banks.
As a result, financials led the market higher into late November, which was signaling a stronger economy than most were anticipating. This was one of the primary reasons why we went on a spending spree in mid-late October. What’s important to note is that when financials are strong, the market tends to be strong, and vice versa.
For reference, there have been two bear markets that saw a greater than 50% drawdown in modern market history: 1929, 2008. They are extremely rare events that have one common theme running throughout each narrative – a banking crisis.
In each instance we saw a rare phenomenon that can be summed up as a loss of confidence in the banking sector. Each instance also saw the credit windows shut for even reasonably capitalized companies, which only intensified the accompanied recessions.
Note: For a Limited Time, I/O FundNote: For a Limited Time, I/O Fundis offering a $99/year Premium Newsletter plan that provides one actionable stock tip per month and analysis from a top performing, audited team. Click here for more detailsis offering a $99/year Premium Newsletter plan that provides one actionable stock tip per month and analysis from a top performing, audited team. Click here for more detailsClick here for more details
It’s easy to dismiss the financial sector in today’s tech focused market. After all, financials only account for 11% of the total market cap of the S&P 500, with 3 sectors ahead of it. However, all companies depend on loans, and when banks get scared, the credit window shuts, which tends to lead to outsized bankruptcies. Bankruptcies lead to unemployment, which leads to less spending, which snowballs the process into a panic.
With the recent fall of Silicon Valley Bank (SIVB), followed by Signature Bank (SBNY), we saw the 2nd and 3rd largest bank failures in US history. In fact, the run on SIVB was the largest bank run in US history, with $2 Billion withdrawn in one day. Prior to this run, Washington Mutual was the largest run, with $16.7 Billion over 10 days.
According to the markets, the problem is not localized. The below chart is a handful of larger regional banks in the S&P 500 as well as the SPYDR Regional Bank ETF (KRE). This type of drop off is not the sign of a healthy stock, and we are seeing them across the board.
No one knows what will ultimately play out. We could see no further bank failures, accompanied with inflation continuing to trend towards the FED’s 2%. This would allow them the freedom to start a fresh liquidity cycle and rescue equities from any additional volatility. However, the above charts are quite telling and very unhealthy. They appear to be incomplete, and if they break below the recent panic low, expect the banking crisis to only intensify.
In conclusion, markets climb a wall of worry. This was the phrase that championed one of the greatest bull markets in US history from 2009-2022. After all, the market shrugged off Grexit, Brexit, the downgrading of US debt, two global slowdowns, China crash 1 and 2, as well as a global pandemic (!) Why would investors not believe it could shrug off a regional banking crisis as well as inflation?
However, the one common theme within the last bull market was that the FED was allowed to maintain an expansive liquidity cycle due to low inflation. Even in 2016, 2019 and 2020, the FED was able to start fresh liquidity cycles before the selloff lead to severe damage in the markets and economy. Today, the FED is aggressively draining liquidity from the system as a means to fight inflation, as shown in the below chart that compares liquidity in the system to the S&P 500
What’s troubling is that the aggressive actions taken by the FED are starting to affect the banking sector. However, these aggressive actions are simply not doing enough to quell inflation.
It could be argued that the FOMC will drop rates, start a new liquidity cycle and save the day. History suggests that this is not the case once the damage is done. It takes months for rate changes to filter into the economy, and once an aggressive hiking cycle breaks something, it tends to run its course in the equity markets before a bottom is found. The below chart compares the Fed Funds rate to the S&P 500. Note when the FED started lowering rates, which started a fresh liquidity cycle. Then look at how long it takes for equities to finally respond.
Maybe inflation will trend lower going forward, and maybe no more banks will have trouble; maybe, we are missing out on an opportunity to buy equities at lower prices just before a new bull market is about to start up. This is a very thin needle that must be threaded, and until we get evidence it is manifesting, we remain cautious.
Join us every Thursday, at 4:40 EST, when we host a webinar for our premium members. We go over various markets, outline what we are seeing and what we need to see in order to reverse our perspective. We also go through the charts of tech stocks and some cryptos that we are targeting to buy or trim. You can sign up here.
Note: For a Limited Time, I/O FundNote: For a Limited Time, I/O Fundis offering a $99/year Premium Newsletter plan that provides one actionable stock tip per month and analysis from a top performing, audited team. Click here for more detailsis offering a $99/year Premium Newsletter plan that provides one actionable stock tip per month and analysis from a top performing, audited team. Click here for more detailsClick here for more details
The I/O Fund is a publishing company. The analysis, strategies, reports, activity and all other features of our service is provided for informational and educational purposes only, and should not be construed as personalized investment advice. Hedging is an advanced method of trading stocks, sudden losses can occur, and hedging should only be pursued under the supervision of your personal financial advisor.
Investors were taken by surprise last week when the US consumer price index rose 5.4% year-over-year in June, the fastest pace seen since August 2008. On a monthly basis, it rose 0.9%. Excluding the volatile food and energy prices, while the Core Consumer Price Index rose 4.5% in June, this was the fastest pace since 1991.
Source: YCharts
There is an argument that the recent rise in inflation is temporary. One prime reason is attributed to the supply constraints due to the pandemic. The sudden rise in used cars and trucks accounted for a major portion of the inflation number, and this was mainly due to the global chip shortage, which reduced the supply of new cars. Used cars and trucks rose 10.5% in June from the previous month, when you compare on a yearly basis, prices rose about 45%.
Last week, we discussed in detail technical signals that suggest the market is not currently concerned with inflation. We see this in the new uptrend in bonds and the collapse of certain economically sensitive commodities. The market is shrugging off inflation fears, for now.
You can read our Portfolio Manager’s July Market Update that discusses this in detail here.
We are prepared to shift our investing thesis if the narrative changes. If inflation is not transitory, this reality will show up in price relations first. For example, if bonds continue down while commodities continue up, this could lead to the FED increasing the Fed Fund rate sooner than expected.
Historically, the rise in interest rates has been negative for equities, which ultimately stops the bull market. Some of the possible reasons are when the discount rate increases the present value of future cash flows will be lower. Another reason is that debt servicing costs for companies with high debt will be higher. The exception will be banking stocks which benefit from rising interest rates.
Even if this happens, history tells us that the time to worry is not when the first rate hike happens, but up to 18 months on average after the yield curve inverts. So, even if rates increase ahead of schedule, history tells us that we still have time for the bull market to run.
It’s important to remember that what causes the cascade of events that leads to a bear market, is the FED reacting to rising inflation. So, the sky-high data regarding inflation is nothing to shrug off completely. If inflation numbers do not subside, the FED will have no choice but to raise rates, and we could be looking to invest in an inflationary environment.
Stocks can make solid investments precisely because they beat inflation in the long-term. On a more granular level, the more traditional thinking here is that dividend stocks are ideal during periods of inflation because of the periodic dividend payouts. Dividends also help to fund your increased expenses due to inflation. While growth appreciation stocks are good in the long term, many institutions will see dividend stocks that have reasonable growth as an important hedge. They will also typically view low debt companies with low debt servicing costs as favorable.
Please note: the I/O Fund is a tech growth portfolio that places an emphasis on growth over profits, and for this reason, the I/O Fund does not currently hold stocks for their dividends. Below, we discuss what inflation trades can look like for a more forward-looking discussion.
Dividend Stocks that Institutions Could Favor for an Inflation Trade
Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ: AVGO) shares rose 50% in the past year. The company’s revenue growth has been strong as it grew at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16% in the past five years. It also has a very good profit margin which also plays an important role in the long-term stability of dividend payouts.
The company has a dividend yield of 3.00%. It is comfortably above the US 10-year treasury rate of 1.19%. The company has steadily increased its dividends. The free cash flow from which the dividends are paid is also increasing. In the recent earnings call, the company’s CFO, Kirsten Spears mentioned“Relative to capital allocation, first and foremost, we're dedicated to paying 50% of our free cash flows to our shareholders.” In the recent quarter, it had a free cash flow of $3.4 billion and dividends paid were $1.6 billion.
Intel Corp (NASDAQ: INTC) has a dividend yield of 2.45%. The company raised its dividend in January this year. They increased their quarterly dividend by 5.3% to $0.3475/share. The company had a free cash flow of $1.6 billion in the first quarter of the fiscal year 2022. It also had repurchased $2.4 billion of shares and completed the $20 billion repurchase plan announced in October 2019. The management also assured that they are committed to growing its dividend.
Source: YCharts
Will the rise in interest rates be a concern for the ad-tech industry?
Ad-tech stocks typically have low or no debt. One exception is Magnite, which has a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.13. Magnite accumulated debt when it acquired companies in the past year. More recently it acquired SpotX, a deal that will help to double its CTV business. In the words of Michael Barrett, President and Chief Executive Officer, “We believe the combination is transformative because it immediately gives us critical mass and scale in CTV and more than doubles the size of our CTV business”.
Roku has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.36. The company’s debt is small and it’s coming down. Interest costs were only $742,000 in the recent quarter when compared to $863,000 in the same period last year. Roku’s revenue in the first quarter grew by 79% year-on-year to $574.2 million. It also added 2.4 million incremental active accounts in the quarter to reach 53.6 million. The company had a net profit of $76.3 million when compared to a net loss of $54.6 million in the same period last year.
Source: YCharts
Looking into the stock returns of the ad tech industry, Roku has been outperforming other companies in the past six months. Recently listed companies like PubMatic and Viant Technology had successful initial trading gains but they have not sustained in the recent months.
Secondary Offerings to Raise Cash
After tech’s historic run last year, many companies have benefited from rising stock prices by tapping secondary offerings. Zoom raised $1.75 billion in January this year by pricing 5.15 million shares at $340 per share. It was able to benefit from the strong share price gains due to the remote working boom. The recent offering was about 10 times its IPO price. Previously the company had issued its shares in the IPO at $36 per share in April 2019. Zoom is a debt-free company.
Shopify raised $1.5 billion by offering 1.18 million shares at $1,315 per share in February this year. The company’s share price grew about 175% during the one-year period before the secondary offering. It had benefitted from the shift to online business during the pandemic.
MongoDB recently raised about $889 million by offering 2.5 million shares at $365 per share. The company has a negative debt-to-equity ratio. Its interest expenses are also high, at $3.7 million in the quarter ending April 30 although down from $13.8 million in the previous year. The stock has a three-year return of 510%.
Source: Ycharts
Conclusion
Many tech companies have low debt right now with many sitting on decent amounts of cash due to raising cash from secondary offerings. The I/O Fund doesn’t own dividend paying stocks as a strategy, per se, yet it’s good to know what kinds of stocks could be favored by institutions should we see inflation haunt the market and consumer spending environment. Specifically, semiconductor companies like Broadcom which continue to have excellent growth and a dividend yield of 3.00% stand out from the list.
Last week, the Portfolio Manager from the I/O Fund spelled out his thoughts regarding inflation fears. In summary, the market’s quiet rotation back into growth stocks and bonds, coupled with the new downtrend in commodities and defensive names, seems to suggest that the market isn’t as concerned with inflation as retail is. You can read this article here.here.
On February 16th, the dynamics of the market shifted as we saw the beginning of a large rotation away from the growth stocks that led us out of the 2020 bear market. Around the same time, the price of copper rose to levels that we haven’t seen since March of 2013, while the yield on the 10-year treasury moved above a key resistance level that has held since February of 2020. In other words, inflation was officially here.
Pictured Above: Copper and Yields broke out on the same day that growth equities topped
Historically, inflation pressures build towards the end of a cycle, resulting in the bond market selling off. The reason for this is because as the FED raises rates to fight inflation, bonds get priced down. Bonds don’t perform well in a rising rate environment; hence a downtrend in bonds usually begins in anticipation of a rate hike. As bonds get sold, rates go up, making the cost for companies to refinance debts more difficult while at the same time harming future projected cash flows for high growth companies. Eventually, stocks catch up to bonds and a bear market begins.
Ultimately, inflation begins the cascade of reactions that leads to a recession, hence the steep selloff in richly valued growth stocks. The real question today is whether the inflation is transitory, as the FED and many economists are claiming, or is it here to stay? If it is truly here to stay, the FED will have no choice but to raise rates, cutting off the bull market. On the other hand, if inflation is transitory, then the recent drawdown in high growth names may have presented a buying opportunity if the bull market resumes.
The popular narrative tends to side with “inflation is here” and “the FED will have no choice but to raise rates soon.” This is backed not only with countless anecdotal claims, but real data. For example, June’s CPI came in at 5.4% YoY which exceeded expectations. This has caused analysts and pundits to point out that the last time we saw a rise this high was in 2007. Just as alarming, housing prices are now exceeding 2007 levels.
This is compelling evidence to support the popular narrative that inflation is here, and likely signals the end of the bull market. However, I believe the markets are a much greater predictor of future economic outcomes. If we monitor the price relations with intermarket analysis (see below), the market is telling us that inflation fears are likely overblown. Even if the trend in inflation continues, we could still see an environment like 1999 where inflation, yields, commodities and equities all advance together.
Intermarket Analysis
On May 12th, the equity markets appear to have hit a significant bottom. Following this low, what we have seen is a quiet rotation out of commodities and value stocks, and back into risk-on assets. Across key sectors, high growth and green tech is up 20% while big tech and cloud is up 15%. Meanwhile, value is up just over 1% while commodities are in negative territory.
Since the May 12th bottom, we have seen beaten down growth stocks take back their leadership role in the market – this is a thesis that we held, positioned for and stated publicly. The I/O Fund has initiated numerous buys since the May 12th bottom, after building a reasonable cash position going into the selloff in February.
Joining growth in a renewed leadership role is bonds. We are seeing bonds in a new uptrend, specifically longer duration treasury (+20 years), which are outperforming the S&P 500 since the May 12th bottom.
If we look a little deeper, copper topped on May 12th, the same day that growth stocks bottomed. Also, on May 12th bonds were confirming their first higher low, which was starting a new uptrend. In short, the bond market was signaling that inflation fears were either overblown, or that they may not be significant enough to force rate hikes.
Pictured Above: The intermarket relationship between copper, bonds and growth stocks from the May 12th bottom
Further evidence that inflation fears may be overblown are found in the recent behavior in lumber. The price of lumber has been the rally cry for investors concerned about inflation. Historically, not a speculative commodity, lumber saw a roughly 180% increase YTD before peaking on May 10th. Since the peak, prices have collapsed by roughly 65%.
This puts the growth in lumber prices at negative for the year, which is rare for a commodity because it’s not speculative. This is further backed by the price of copper. After a roughly 35% rise in prices, from its May 10th peak, the price of copper has decreased by 10%.
The collapse in economically-sensitive commodities is also not typically what you’d expect in an inflationary environment. Also, it’s worth pointing out that the 10-year yield is testing the very breakout zone that triggered the growth sell-off.
Pictured Above: bonds, copper and the 10 year yield are almost back where they were before the February 16th rotation began.
As of now, Bonds have broken out above the February 16th resistance with the 10 year yield only 7% away from reclaiming the February 16th region and copper 11% away. If yields and copper follow bonds, and reset the dynamics that lead to the growth rotation, it would suggest that growth stocks could continue their uptrend. As of now, high growth stocks are about 31% below their high.
Correlations and History
I’d also like to suggest that even if the 10-year yield and copper does hold the February 16th breakout zone, and continues to move up, it doesn’t necessarily mean that growth will continue its downtrend. In today’s market, it is now believed that growth stocks simply cannot go up with yields and commodities with inflation on the rise. However, if we look through history, this is simply not the case.
The chart above compares the NASDAQ100 with copper and the yield on the 10 and 20-year government bonds between 1998 through 2000. Red indicates a downtrend and green indicates an uptrend. Note how all four assets participated in an uptrend in unison from February 1999 – December 1999. These assets remained correlated, and this was during a rising rate environment with elevated inflation.
It’s also worth noting that in 1999 copper topped first, then yields, followed by equities. The drop in copper and yields would be considered a boon to equities today, but this was actually a warning in 1999/early 2000. When assets correlate, it’s good to take notice as history tends to rhyme.
Levels to Watch for the NASDAQ100 and S&P500
In our last market report, we identified the 14080 region as a likely breakout zone for the NASDAQ100.
On June 22nd, the breakout was confirmed and we have seen a move up roughly 5%. We’ve also publicly identified that we believe the NASDAQ100 is targeting the 16000 before we’d potentially see a deeper correction.
With the breakdown in the S&P500 on Monday, July 19th, this threatened to end this target earlier than expected. The recovery since has halted the early correction in the broader markets, and setup some clear levels for us to monitor.
The above chart outlines the levels that we are watching. These are the potential outcomes I see playing out:
Even with the strong bounce off the recent lows, we are not out of the woods yet. Until we can reclaim all-time highs, the current bounce could be a corrective bounce in a deeper correction. If we do see another leg lower, I’m expecting the 14200 level to hold, setting up a short correction in a much larger uptrend.
If the bounce continues and we can move past the 14985-14900 region, we can resume our move to the 16000 region before a larger correction unfolds.
The lowest probability scenario is that the current correction breaks down below 14080. If this support breaks, it will signal that we are in the larger correction earlier than expected.
We believe that any correction is part of a much larger uptrend. We expect much higher prices before the secular bull market that started in March of 2009 end, and that the current selloff in growth has provided a remarkable opportunity to buy some of most innovative, and fastest growing companies at a relative bargain.
Regardless of what scenario, or variation of a scenario plays out, the above information provides context so that emotions do not dictate our investments.