Skip to content
Logo-main-white.860316a8

I/O Fund

  • Home
  • Free Stock Analysis
  • AI Stocks
  • BEST OF 2025
  • Analysts
  • Nvidia Hub
  • About
    • Case Studies
    • About Us
    • Premium Services
    • Pricing
    • Notable Wins
    • I/O Fund Reviews
    • Media
  • Contact Us

Month: January 2024

Apple Can’t Save This Tech Rally

Posted on January 31, 2024June 30, 2026 by io-fund
Apple Can’t Save This Tech Rally

In 2023, the Nasdaq-100 saw its best year since 2009 with returns of 54%. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 finished the year up over 24%, which rivaled 2021’s banner year. The question that should be on every investor’s mind in 2024 is – will this performance continue? 

In this article, I lay out both the bull and bear cases for 2024 and beyond. Interestingly, both are calling for a level of volatility in 2024 that will, at least, retrace the rally we’ve seen since November 2023.

Bull Case vs. Bear Case

All trends fit within repeatable patterns. In technical analysis, these patterns repeat in all markets and on all time scales. The only bullish interpretation of the pattern that has developed off the October 2022 lows is what we call a leading diagonal pattern, which generally develops as shown below.

leading diagonal pattern

This is a 5 wave pattern that has large and choppy swings in both directions. The key is the 4th wave moving into 1st wave territory, which is what happened in 2023.

sp500 stock chart

If this is what is playing out, then it’s worth noting the 5th wave is coming to an end. This means the larger pattern is almost complete, which should give way to a multi-month correction. The implication here is that the leading diagonal is the 1st wave in a very large 5 wave pattern that will take years to complete.

I have many problems with this scenario, the biggest one is that it does not fit within the context of the secular bull market that started in 2009. That bull market pattern simply does not have room to allow for another multi-year bull run, which makes this scenario a low probability outcome. 

The bear case, which does fit in within the larger context, suggests that 2023 was a cyclical bull market within a secular bear market. In Elliott Wave speak, 2022 was your large A wave, 2023 is the large B wave bounce, and 2024-2025 will be your large C wave drop to new lows.

sp500 index stock chart

Regardless of whatever the long-term pattern that unfolds, it’s worth noting that both interpretations are calling for a multi-month drop into mid-2024, which should retrace the bulk of the rally off the November 2023 lows.

Timing the 2024 Top

The pattern that is playing out since the November lows in 2023 can be interpreted in three general ways. Keep in mind, it is part of the larger leading diagonal pattern that started in 2022. This means that there is a limit to how high it can extend from here.

sp500 hourly chart
  • Red Count – This count suggests that we are in the final 5th wave within the larger uptrend pattern that started in October of 2022. We should see the markets roll over soon once this final 5th wave ends.
  • Blue Count – this count has us in a 3rd wave, which should lead to a minor dip, followed by a final 5th wave into the 5000 – 5050 region.
  • Green Count – this pattern will see a deep retrace followed by a bullish leg into late March/early April. 

When we analyze other markets, the evidence suggests that the green count is a low probability scenario. The likely outcome will be a complex topping process that starts in late January and lasts into mid/late February.

Intermarket Analysis

The green count is calling for a deep retrace of the November rally, followed by a rally that should be equal in length. The problem with this scenario is that most markets are only showing a potential minor swing higher from current prices before completing their larger pattern.

Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJI)

DJI appears to be in a complex correction that is taking us to new highs. If accurate, once complete, we should see a 5 wave drop that eventually retraces all of the 2023 rally. The current pattern is in the form of a 5-wave move, which has all 5 waves intact. The question is how much farther can this last swing extend?

dow jones daily chart

German Dax

The DAX, which has a history of leading the U.S. markets, also looks like it is in the process of working through the final 5th wave swing to complete the larger uptrend pattern. Note how price is making a higher high on lower volume and momentum. This is classic 5th wave behavior – peak volume and momentum tends to happen on the vertical 3rd wave, with less participants in the 5th wave. The question now is – how much higher can it go? We technically have all waves in place, so the upside is much more limited when compared with the downside potential from here. 

dax index daily chart

Equal-Weight S&P 500

The Equal Weight S&P 500, which is stripped of tech dominance due to each stock containing equal weighting, looks similar. It needs a 5th wave to complete the larger pattern. If this happens, it will likely be a bull trap for those attempting to buy the breakout to all-time highs.

invesco daily chart

Japanese Nikkei

The strongest global market, the Japanese Nikkei, is marching towards what could be one of the largest double tops in market history. the symmetry if this larger 5 wave push lines up with these levels quite well. If accurate, we still need a 4th and 5th wave push into this zone, which supports a limited continuation of the current rally.

nikkei weekly chart

I’m showing some of the more bullish markets in the world. What they all have in common is the same scenario – we are looking at a minor swing higher, at most, which could take us into late mid-February – late-March, before we see a bigger pullback into 2024.

Even the bullish scenario suggests that a multi-week to multi-month correction is likely as we move into 2024. How this correction unfolds, and how deep it goes will tell us whether to raise more cash into any following bounce, or to continue to add to our longs. We will update our readers as we progress.

Divergences

When an index breaks out to new highs from a previous correction, a healthy trend would show many markets participating in that move higher. The more markets participating in the new move higher, the more likely it is to last. However, major indexes are breaking out to new highs while other markets are not, it is a warning sign that we are close to a turning point in the trend.

The below chart showing the S&P 500, NASDAQ-100 and Down Jones Industrial Average on the top panels, all are breaking out to new highs. However, on the below panels, small caps, high beta, and transportation stocks, prior leaders in the prior rally, are not confirming this move higher.

break out moves charts

More importantly, one of the largest stocks in the S&P 500 and NASDAQ-100 is also not confirming this breakout move. Apple is currently 7% of the weighting in the S&P 500 and over 9% in the NASDAQ-100. This is a big weight within these indexes, which is signaling caution to the on-going bullish trend.

apple stock charts

Apple is stalling at the $197 – $200 region, while heading for a triple top potential. The current bounce is happening on less volume and less momentum, while the internal momentum is at a new high without price. These tend to be sell signals.

With that said, we are watching Apple’s earnings results with outsized anticipation given the technical picture just described. On the other hand, a sustained break below $190 will further build the case that the market has likely already begun a larger correction than most anticipate.

What the bulls need to see is Apple break above the $200 region, then retest and hold that level as support. If this happens, then we could see the warnings stated in this report start to get reversed, as the market extends higher.

To reiterate, if Apple fails to break $200 in a meaningful way, and instead turns lower all tech investors should pay close attention.

In conclusion, regardless of what the long-term outlook is in the US markets, the near-to-intermediate term favors a deep retrace into 2024. As shown, most key global markets suggest more upside is likely, but they also support volatility into 2024. With key markets diverging, and not confirming this breakout to new highs, we are likely closer than most think to market reversal.

If you own any FAANGs, especially Apple, or are looking to own any of the FAANGs, we encourage you to attend our weekly premium webinars, held every Thursday at 4:30 pm EST for premium members to discuss how to navigate the broad market, as well as various stock entries and exits. We offer trade alerts plus an automated hedging signal. The I/O Fund team is one of the only audited portfolios available to individual investors. Learn more here.

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Please consult with your financial advisor in regards to any stocks you buy.

Recommended Reading:

  • Coinbase, Robinhood: Examining The Impact Of Spot Bitcoin ETFs
  • Tesla Q4 Earnings Preview: Margins Likely To Slip Again
  • Social Media Stocks: One Metric Shows Meta’s Clear Leadership
  • Five Top Stocks Of 2023: Year In Review
  • My Firm called the Bitcoin’s Bottom; Here is Where the Price Goes Next
Posted in Broad Market Today, Market TrendsLeave a Comment on Apple Can’t Save This Tech Rally

AMD Q4 2023 Earnings: 75% GPU Raise, Separating the Wheat from the Chaff

Posted on January 31, 2024June 30, 2026 by io-fund

AMD provided a solid report yet the market is struggling to find room in its valuation. Similar to Microsoft, the only time that AMD has traded this high on sales was in 2020 and again at the top 2021.

By my estimation, the selloff has nothing to do with AMD’s AI potential, or even the sequential decline in the other segments, rather it’s about timing and tech being stretched overall. We covered this in great detail in the Q1 webinar.

It’s true that AMD is trailing a GPU giant, and any guide will pale in comparison to Nvidia’s glorious 2023 performance. Yet it’s also true that AMD is coming out swinging with $3.5B in GPU revenue in the first quarter the GPUs are shipping. In a previous note, I stated: “Technically speaking, this report [Q3] was stronger than Nvidia’s was this time last year despite the GPUs shipping at the same time seasonally – NVDA had 1% QoQ growth for data center revenue in the October quarter and then declined (-6%) QoQ in the Q4 January quarter. To jog your memory, it was the guide provided in May (for the July quarter) when Nvidia had its blowout quarter.” To compare, data center growth for AMD is 38% YoY and 43% QoQ. However, Nvidia enjoyed the luxury of taking the market by surprise, and so expectations were low.

The $2 billion guide for FY2024 GPU revenue from last quarter was raised to $3.5B “plus” this quarter. Part of the issue is that analysts, independently, are creating very high expectations. The whisper number going into the report was $3 billion to $3.5 billion with some pushing for a $6 billion guide. The reason investors should separate the wheat from the chaff is that raising GPU sales by 75% in one quarter is actually very impressive (and more than enough for one quarter for our purposes). As a reminder, this is the first quarter the MI300s are shipping. 

AMD will have to face outsized expectations as the company ramps, yet the 75% raise is a great start. We dissect the rest of the report for you below.

Financials:

Revenue and EPS:

  • Revenue of $6.28 billion was in line with management guidance of $6.1B +/- $300M. Analyst consensus was $6.14B.
  • The guidance for Q1 missed with $5.4B guided versus $5.78B consensus.
  • Adjusted EPS of $0.77 came in as expected with $0.69 adjusted EPS expected next quarter. GAAP EPS was $0.41.

Margins:

The adjusted gross margin guide expanded by one point and this is expected to continue to expand as data center increases in the product mix.

  • Gross margin of 47% was in line with last quarter
  • Adjusted gross margin of 51% and adjusted gross profits of $3.14 billion was in line with management guidance. The company guided for adjusted gross margin of 52% next quarter.
  • Operating margin of 6% expanded by two points and has been steadily increasing over the past few quarters.
  • Adjusted operating margin of 23% was in line with management guidance for adjusted operating profit of $1.41 billion.
  • GAAP net margin of 10.7% is a nice beginning to the bottom-line recovery for AMD, up from 5% in the previous quarter and up from 0% in the year ago quarter. Adjusted net margin was 18.6% for adjusted net income of $1.25 billion.

Regarding margins, it was indicated that the second half of the year would show improvement. Per the CEO: “I would say the headwinds side [of gross margin] continue to be in the first half where we see Embedded business not only Q1 we see sequential decline, Q2 probably are going to be sequentially flattish versus Q1. That is a headwind for us. Because it does have a very nice gross margin. But overall, we feel pretty good about the trajectory of the gross margin improvement, especially second half.”

Cash:

AMD reported operating cash flow of $381 million for a margin of 6.1%. This is lower than the previous quarter at 7% and the year ago quarter at 10%. This was due to “paying $550 million in cash taxes, primarily due to previously deferred taxes from California disaster relief efforts made available by the IRS.”

Free cash flow of $242 million for a margin of 4% was 1 point lower than the previous quarter and 4 points lower than the year ago quarter.

Product Mix:

Data Center:

The data center revenue was $2.3 billion, up 38% YoY and up 43% QoQ. The full year data center revenue was $6.5 billion, up 7% YoY. Next quarter, data center revenue is expected to be flat with “a seasonal decline in server sales offset by a strong Data Center GPU ramp.”

As stated, GPUs are expected to grow sequentially and exceed $3.5 billion in FY2024. In Q4, GPUs were $400 million of the $2.3B in data center revenue. There was an overabundance of questions about the GPU number which I’ve detailed for you below. However, here is one comment the CEO said: “And so, we worked closely with our supply chain partners to ensure that we can ship more than $3.5 billion, substantially more depending on what customer demand is as we go into the second half of the year.”

The CFO stated: “Yeah, Harsh. Let me answer your question about the MI300. Exiting Q4 2024, is it possible to get to $1.5 billion? It is possible, right, because Lisa mentioned earlier, we'll see sequential increase in each quarter and more back-end loaded in second-half and we do have a supplies more than $3.5 billion. And of course we will continue to make progress with our customers. So the math, yeah, it's possible, but right now we are really looking at focus on the execution of the current $3.5 billion plus.”

Client Segment:

The Client segment reported Q4 revenue of $1.5 billion, up 62% year-over-year yet was flat sequentially. This is lower than my notes anticipated as the guide last quarter for Client was “sequentially, Client revenue to increase.”

The CFO stated “Client is very similar to server, typically Q1 is high-single-digit to low-double-digit. That's consistent with past.”

Data center GPUs dominated the Q&A whereas this segment is incredibly important to AMD’s near-term price action (near-term is defined as this year, particularly in the second half). I’m not concerned about “if” it’ll happen rather “when” the AI PC market will become a large contributor to AMD’s revenue. Will it be this year or next? If I had attended the call, I would have asked more about this as a 75% increase in GPU revenue is plenty for one quarter when they’ve only begun to ship these units, whereas more clarity on this segment can help time AMD’s next leg up.

Moving forward, for next quarter, Client is expected to decline sequentially. This is normal for Q4 to Q1 due to seasonality. The CFO stated the following about 2024: “Directionally, for the year, we expect 2024 Data Center and the Client segment revenue to increase driven by the strengths of our product portfolio and the share gain opportunities.”

We dug up the following analyst note regarding the Client segment potentially rebounding in H2 2024: (01/23) Although PC shipments were reduced during the fourth-quarter, "we expect standard server requirements will normalize in the coming quarters, creating upside to server demand beyond the mid-single-digit growth anticipated by industry analysts," Wedbush analyst Matt Bryson wrote in a note. The anticipated recovery is in part due to the "replacement cycle" of PC's purchased during the pandemic, which is expected to occur during the second half of this year, Bryson said. "We are lifting our estimates for 2024 and 2025 given more confidence in our expectation standard server builds lift, and our belief that PC sales dip less seasonally and recover more in the second half of the year," Bryson wrote.

Gaming:

Gaming is weighing on AMD’s numbers as this segment has not bottomed yet. The segment reported $1.4 billion in revenue and was down (-17%) YoY and down (-9%) QoQ.

The guide on gaming was a lowlight: “Gaming segment sales are expected to decline sequentially, with semi-custom revenue expected to decline by a significant double-digit percentage.” This means Q4 is certainly not the bottom on gaming either. The CFO stated the same about FY2024 Gaming revenue which is that “Directionally, for the year […] Gaming segment revenue to decline by significant double-digit percentage.”

It was also stated by the CFO that gaming will decline by more than 30% in Q1: “On the Gaming side, Lisa mentioned during his — her prepared remarks is we have the latest stage of product cycle in the year five of gaming console. But at the same time, we also have inventory at the customers. So, the combination of those impact, we expect the Q1 Gaming sequential declines probably more than 30%, so hopefully that help you a little bit.”

Embedded:

Embedded reported $1.1 billion in revenue, which is a decline of (-24%) YoY and (-15%) QoQ. This is due to increased inventory. The CFO stated the following about 2024 Embedded revenue: “Directionally, for the year […] Embedded segment revenue to decline” yet later stated: “And at the same time Embedded is going through the bottoming process. We do think the second-half we will see the recovery.”

Management did highlight that Embedded drove a 25% increase in design wins to $10 billion. This will come in handy for the automotive push we want to see our portfolio participate in 2026-2028, which I also discussed on the webinar.

Earnings Call:

MI300 GPU Questions Were Plentiful:

Most of the questions on the call were fruitless attempts to get AMD to raise the 2024 GPU guide. Instead, management stuck to the $3.5 billion plus comments. Overall, it’s quite clear that $3.5 billion will become a distant memory as we move through the year but management isn’t willing to give away too much, too soon.

Joseph Moore

Great. And for my follow-up, I guess a lot of the forecasting of your business that I'm hearing is coming from supply chain and we're sort of hearing AMD is building X in Asia. I guess, how would you ask us to think about that? Are you looking at being kind of sold-out for the year and so the supply chain would be close to revenue? Are you building for the best-case scenario? Just I worry about sometimes expectations when people hear the supply chain numbers. And I'm just curious how you bridge the gap.

Lisa Su

Yeah. So, I mean, Joe, I think we updated our revenue expectations this quarter from our original number of $2 billion to $3.5 billion to try to give some bounding on some of the discussion out there. The way to think about the $3.5 billion is these are customers that we're working with, who have given us firm commitments on what they need. As you know, the lead times on these products are quite long. So, it's important to have those forecasts in early and we have a strong order book. So, that gives us good confidence to exceed the $3.5 billion. From a supply chain standpoint, our goal is always to build more supply we — and so, from that standpoint, we have also worked with our supply chain partners and secured significant capacity. Think about it as first half capacity is tight and more comes on in the second half of the year, but we've certainly made more progress there. So, we do have more supply, and we're going to continue to work with our customers on their deployments and we'll update that number as we go through the year.”

Here was another good discussion on the MI300 and the trajectory investors can expect in 2024:

Toshiya Hari

Hi. Thank you for taking the question. I had one on the MI300 as well, Lisa. I guess, first of all, how should we think about the quarterly trajectory beyond Q1? You talked about Q1 being up sequentially. Is it fair to assume kind of a straight line as we progress through the balance of the year? Or is it more second half skewed? How should we think about that? And I guess more importantly, some of the cloud potential customers that have yet to officially sign-up for or sign-off on the MI300. I guess what's the sticking point? Is it just a function of time and you just need a little bit more time to go back-and-forth and tweak things or is there a software kind of concern? I guess what's holding them back at this point?

Lisa Su

Yeah, Toshiya, thanks for the question. So, first on the MI300 trajectory. I think you would expect that revenue should increase every quarter from now through sort of the end of the year, but it will be a bit more second half weighted and part of that is just customers as they're finishing up their qualifications in their lines as well as sort of how our supply chain is ramping. So, yes, it should increase each quarter, but be a bit more second half weighted. And then, to your comment about customers, look, we are engaged with all of sort of the large customers. These are all folks that know what's really well, given our deep relationships in EPYC. I think people just have different adoption cycles as they consider what they're trying to do in their roadmap. But I view this as still very, very early innings for us in this space. And I think the question was asked earlier. I think the key is this is not just about MI300 conversation. But it really is about sort of our long-term multi-generational roadmap. And so, that's the context on which we're working with our largest customers, as well as, as you know, there's a lot of demand coming from folks that are more AI centric and not necessarily typical cloud customers, but more enterprise or let's call it AI-specific companies that we're also very well engaged with.”

More on Embedded and Gaming:

The CFO provided the following color on embedded and gaming:

Jean Hu

Yeah, Aaron, I'll give you some color about Client seasonality and others. So, Client is very similar to server, typically Q1 is high-single-digit to low-double-digit. That's consistent with past. On the Embedded side, it's very consistent with what we said in the past and the consistent with what you see in the industry's Embedded business is going through a bottoming process, and we think Q1, it will have a low-double-digit sequential decline. That's Embedded. On the Gaming side, Lisa mentioned during his — her prepared remarks is we have the latest stage of product cycle in the year five of gaming console. But at the same time, we also have inventory at the customers. So, the combination of those impact, we expect the Q1 Gaming sequential declines probably more than 30%, so hopefully that help you a little bit.

Conclusion:

AMD has been kind to investors over the past year with 200% gains since Jan 1, 2023 – and the kicker is that AI revenue was officially realized in Q4 for the first time, at a mere $400 million. The market is correct to anticipate that AMD will be a major player in AI. How long until AMD becomes officially number two? Right now, Broadcom is expected to report $7 billion in AI revenue for 2024. I think AMD will surpass Broadcom very quickly.

From there, it will be a battle – a fun one for us to observe as we own both NVDA and AMD. Readers on our site know that I call AMD the “Dark Horse” because it’s frequently underestimated. The stock sold off in July when AMD held their AI event to officially announce the MI300s. Today, the stock is selling off in the quarter the company is shipping them. Clearly, the market sees potential, hence the stock performance. Yet, AMD investors should be prepared for periods of doubt, similar to when AMD emerged as a leading CPU design company. We are looking to be entering one of those periods now.

With that said, tech has a way of becoming stretched, especially following a historic year for the Nasdaq (btw, 2023 was the leading year for gains in over 20 years since dot-com era, edging out 2009), and thus we have not been buyers of AMD as of late. In the near-term, following our technical analysis and broad market plan is going to be as equally important as following our stock analysis.

On that note, this Thursday, Pro Members are invited to attend a special 1-hour webinar with Knox Ridley as he goes through what investors can expect for tech stocks in Q1 and the risks present in the market. We encourage our Members to attend the webinar or watch the replay as the I/O Fund continues to deeply strategize for 2024. Keep an eye out for details via your inbox tomorrow.

Housekeeping: Mailchimp was down system-wide for a period of time yesterday, you may have received emails at sporadic times once MC was operable again! We seem to be back up and running just fine now.

Recommended Reading:

  • Super Micro Q2 2024 Earnings: The AI Bullet Train
  • Microsoft Fiscal Q2 Earnings: Accelerating Growth, AI in the Spotlight
  • AMD Q4 Pre-Earnings Report: $2 Billion in FY2024 is the GPU Baseline
  • Tesla Q4: Moving from Margin Issue to Revenue Growth Issue
Posted in Semiconductor StocksLeave a Comment on AMD Q4 2023 Earnings: 75% GPU Raise, Separating the Wheat from the Chaff

Microsoft Fiscal Q2: Cloud Leads the Way

Posted on January 31, 2024June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Microsoft beat on both the top and bottom lines with margins above guided levels, with Azure growth accelerating sequentially once more. Revenue growth of 17.7% reached the highest level in two years, driven by the cloud. Microsoft continues to demonstrate increased operating leverage even as it works to quickly build and scale its AI infrastructure to capture growth across the stack.

Fiscal Q2 revenue beat estimates by $890M, with the beat primarily coming from Intelligent Cloud. Microsoft reported 20% growth in Intelligent Cloud to $25.9 billion, ahead of its guide for 17-18% growth to $25.1 billion to $25.4 billion. Azure growth was 30%, a 200 bp QoQ acceleration on strong demand for consumption-based services.

AI’s impact on Azure was notable: Microsoft said that Azure’s 30% growth stemmed from “strong demand for our consumption-based services including 6 points from our AI services.” This 6 point contribution is impressive, given that AI services contributed 3 points to growth last quarter and 1 point in fiscal Q4. While that may seem small, it is significant considering the scale that this growth is attached to, with Azure’s revenue at a $74 billion run rate.

While Microsoft was optimistic about its Copilot AI subscription offerings, it did not divulge any material numbers about adoption rates. Microsoft said it has more than 400 million 365 Commercial customer seats and 78.4 million 365 Consumer subscribers, giving a nearly ~480 million customer base to target. Assuming just a 2% adoption rate across both Commercial and Consumer by the end of the fiscal year, Copilot would already be surpassing a $3 billion annual run rate.

CEO Satya Nadella said that Microsoft now has moved from “talking about AI to applying AI at scale by infusing AI across every layer of our tech stack.”  Azure has been one of the first growth outlets, in part due to its tie in with OpenAI, with Copilot subscriptions for enterprises and consumers one of the next outlets. It’s this wide-ranging suite of AI services and ability to capture AI growth at multiple parts of the stack that sets Microsoft apart from the rest of Big Tech.

Revenue and EPS:

  • Microsoft reported a fiscal Q2 growth rate of 17.7% YoY for revenue of $62.02 billion, versus expectations for 15.9% growth on revenue of $61.1 billion. This was Microsoft’s highest growth rate since fiscal Q3 2022.
  • This beat flowed through to the bottom line, with EPS of $2.93 versus expectations for $2.77. This represented 33% YoY growth, the highest growth rate in more than 2 years.
  • Microsoft guided for $60 billion to $61 billion in revenue, for YoY growth of 13.4% to 15.3%.

Segment Revenue:

  • Productivity and Business revenue was $19.2 billion, up 13% YoY, driven by 17% growth in Office 365 Commercial. Growth came in 150 bp ahead of the midpoint of the guided range for 11-12% growth.
  • Intelligent Cloud revenue was $25.9B, up 20% YoY, driven by strong demand for consumption based services and Azure. This was a 100 bp acceleration from last quarter and a 500 bp acceleration from 15% two quarters ago.
  • More Personal Computing revenue was $16.9 billion, up 19% YoY. Windows revenue increased 9% with OEM revenue growth of 11%, while devices revenue decreased (9%).

Guidance on Segment Revenue:

  • Productivity and Business revenue guided to decelerate ~185 bp QoQ at midpoint for growth of 10.3% to 12% YoY.
  • Intelligent Cloud revenue guided to decelerate ~185 bp QoQ at midpoint for growth of 17.3% to 19% YoY.
  • More Personal Computing revenue guided to decelerate 700 bp QoQ at midpoint for growth of 10.5% to 13.5% YoY.

Margins:

Margins were ahead of expectations across the board, with Intelligent Cloud continuing to show improvement in operating margin. We previously discussed after fiscal Q1’s earnings in October that Microsoft can drive operating leverage from AI, and Q2’s results further confirm this thesis – Microsoft boosted its operating margin forecast, saying operating margins would increase 100 to 200 bp YoY after calling for flat margins last quarter.

Operating margin for Q2 was 43.6%, 120 bp ahead of guidance for 42.4% and up 490 bp YoY. For the first half of fiscal 2024, operating margin was 45.4%. Microsoft’s guide of 100 to 200 bp expansion implies full-year operating margin between 42.8% to 43.8%, with next quarter’s guide for 42.9%.

We previously discussed how there may be more room for operating margin expansion in Intelligent Cloud as Microsoft continues to stay disciplined with OpEx with implementing the AI transition with Azure. Intelligent Cloud’s operating margin was 48.1% in fiscal Q2, up from 41.4% in the year ago quarter but down from 48.4% in fiscal Q1. Microsoft’s increased operating margin forecast suggests that Microsoft may capitalize on AI growth in the cloud and drive higher margins for both Azure and 365 over the next two quarters.

  • Gross margin of 68.4% was up from 66.9% in the year ago quarter. The guide for next quarter is approximately 69%.
  • Operating margin was 43.6%, up from 38.7% in the year ago quarter. Operating margin is guided for 42.9% next quarter, based on the midpoint of provided ranges, implying a slight sequential decrease.
  • Net margin was 35.3%, up from 31.1% in the year ago quarter.
  • Productivity and Business operating margin was 53.4%, down 20 bp QoQ but expanding 520 bp YoY.
  • Intelligent Cloud operating margin was 48.1%, down 30 bp QoQ but expanding 670 bp YoY due to strength in Azure. IC operating income rose 40% YoY to $12.46 billion.
  • More Personal Computing operating margin was 25.4%, down 1250 bp QoQ due to a 38% increase in operating expenses primarily from the Activision acquisition.

Cash Flows:

Operating cash flow was $18.9 billion, up 69% YoY on strong cloud billings and collections, versus a lower comparable quarter last year.

Free cash flow was $9.1 billion, up 86% YoY, with the high growth rate again coming against a weak comparable quarter.

Key Metrics:

Bookings increased 17% YoY and 9% on a constant currency basis, up from 14% in Q1. This was driven by strength in long-term Azure contracts and “strong execution across our core annuity sales motions, including healthy renewals.”

Azure AI customers totaled more than 53,000, with one-third of these being new customers over the past twelve months. This implies customer growth rate of approximately 50% YoY. In addition, more than half of the Fortune 500 are using Azure OpenAI Services, highlighting the strength of Microsoft’s AI offerings.

GitHub Copilot’s paying subscribers surpassed 1.3 million, meaning the offering has surpassed $150 million ARR at a $10/month price. Paid subscribers rose ~30% QoQ from 1 million last quarter, and are up nearly 90% in just two quarters.

Earnings Call:

Microsoft’s earnings call reflected the optimism the company has for its AI offerings as well as the strong momentum and adoption of said offerings, though Microsoft offered little concrete statistics around its newest Copilot subscriptions for 365 customers.

We have said previously that Copilot 365 is one of the more crucial growth trajectories to watch as we move into calendar year 2024. Microsoft explained that its internal research and external studies have shown “as much as 70% improvement in productivity, using generative AI for specific work tasks. And overall early Copilot for Microsoft 365 users were 29% faster in a series of tasks like searching, writing, and summarizing.” These productivity gains are leading to strong adoption of Copilot: Microsoft said that “two months in, we have seen faster adoption than either our E3 or E5 suites.”

Cloud and Azure’s strength was evident throughout the call. CFO Amy Hood noted that “demand for our Microsoft cloud offerings, including AI services drove better-than-expected growth and large long-term Azure contracts.” In addition, “Microsoft 365 suite strength contributed to ARPU expansion for our office commercial business.”

For Azure specifically, management said that “customers continue to choose Azure to simplify and accelerate their cloud migrations. Overall, we are seeing larger and more strategic Azure deals with an increase in the number of $1 billion-plus Azure commitments.”

One of the most important comments of the call was in regards to Azure’s 30% growth. Management said that both “AI and non-AI Azure services drove our outperformance” in the quarter. For Q3, Azure’s growth is expected to remain stable QoQ, driven by consumption-based services “with continued strong contribution from AI.” Reading between the lines here suggests that cloud optimization trends are ending, with comments of stable growth leaning more towards possible acceleration rather than deceleration.

Nadella further hammered that point home in the Q&A, saying that he believes that the “period of massive optimization only and no new workloads start, that I think has ended at this point. So what you're seeing is much more of that continuous cycles by customers, both whether it comes to AI or whether it comes to the traditional workloads.”

Elevated demand for AI services was a common theme, from Azure’s 6 point growth to GitHub to Power Platform. Management said that “GitHub revenue accelerated to over 40% year-over-year, driven by all-up platform growth and adoption of GitHub Copilot, the world's most widely deployed AI developer tool.” GitHub Copilot subscribers rose 30% QoQ and nearly 90% from ~700,000 in fiscal Q4. For Power Platform, Microsoft said that “more than 230,000 organizations have already used AI capabilities in Power Platform, up over 80% quarter-over-quarter.”

Microsoft’s earnings call reflected growing AI optimism, with strong key metrics for its AI offerings across its product suite. Microsoft is hinting at cloud optimization trends fading away, with high demand for AI services in Azure adding 6 points to growth while non-AI services contributed to outperformance.

Conclusion

Microsoft is at the front of Big Tech’s AI revolution on the software side, and this is unlikely to change given the company’s key advantage in targeting 400 million enterprise seats. Revenue growth has accelerated significantly over the past four quarters, from 2% growth to 17.7% growth, driving 33% EPS growth this quarter. Microsoft is proving that its substantial investments in AI infrastructure and its wide-ranging AI suite is paying off on growth for both the top and bottom line.

Recommended Reading:

  • AMD Q4 2023 Earnings: 75% GPU Raise, Separating the Wheat from the Chaff
  • Super Micro Q2 2024 Earnings: The AI Bullet Train
  • Microsoft Fiscal Q2 Earnings: Accelerating Growth, AI in the Spotlight
  • Tesla Q4: Moving from Margin Issue to Revenue Growth Issue
Posted in Cloud Platforms, SoftwareLeave a Comment on Microsoft Fiscal Q2: Cloud Leads the Way

Microsoft Fiscal Q2: Cloud Leads the Way

Posted on January 31, 2024June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Microsoft beat on both the top and bottom lines with margins above guided levels, with Azure growth accelerating sequentially once more. Revenue growth of 17.7% reached the highest level in two years, driven by the cloud. Microsoft continues to demonstrate increased operating leverage even as it works to quickly build and scale its AI infrastructure to capture growth across the stack.

Fiscal Q2 revenue beat estimates by $890M, with the beat primarily coming from Intelligent Cloud. Microsoft reported 20% growth in Intelligent Cloud to $25.9 billion, ahead of its guide for 17-18% growth to $25.1 billion to $25.4 billion. Azure growth was 30%, a 200 bp QoQ acceleration on strong demand for consumption-based services.

AI’s impact on Azure was notable: Microsoft said that Azure’s 30% growth stemmed from “strong demand for our consumption-based services including 6 points from our AI services.” This 6 point contribution is impressive, given that AI services contributed 3 points to growth last quarter and 1 point in fiscal Q4. While that may seem small, it is significant considering the scale that this growth is attached to, with Azure’s revenue at a $74 billion run rate.

While Microsoft was optimistic about its Copilot AI subscription offerings, it did not divulge any material numbers about adoption rates. Microsoft said it has more than 400 million 365 Commercial customer seats and 78.4 million 365 Consumer subscribers, giving a nearly ~480 million customer base to target. Assuming just a 2% adoption rate across both Commercial and Consumer by the end of the fiscal year, Copilot would already be surpassing a $3 billion annual run rate.

CEO Satya Nadella said that Microsoft now has moved from “talking about AI to applying AI at scale by infusing AI across every layer of our tech stack.”  Azure has been one of the first growth outlets, in part due to its tie in with OpenAI, with Copilot subscriptions for enterprises and consumers one of the next outlets. It’s this wide-ranging suite of AI services and ability to capture AI growth at multiple parts of the stack that sets Microsoft apart from the rest of Big Tech.

Revenue and EPS:

  • Microsoft reported a fiscal Q2 growth rate of 17.7% YoY for revenue of $62.02 billion, versus expectations for 15.9% growth on revenue of $61.1 billion. This was Microsoft’s highest growth rate since fiscal Q3 2022.
  • This beat flowed through to the bottom line, with EPS of $2.93 versus expectations for $2.77. This represented 33% YoY growth, the highest growth rate in more than 2 years.
  • Microsoft guided for $60 billion to $61 billion in revenue, for YoY growth of 13.4% to 15.3%.

Segment Revenue:

  • Productivity and Business revenue was $19.2 billion, up 13% YoY, driven by 17% growth in Office 365 Commercial. Growth came in 150 bp ahead of the midpoint of the guided range for 11-12% growth.
  • Intelligent Cloud revenue was $25.9B, up 20% YoY, driven by strong demand for consumption based services and Azure. This was a 100 bp acceleration from last quarter and a 500 bp acceleration from 15% two quarters ago.
  • More Personal Computing revenue was $16.9 billion, up 19% YoY. Windows revenue increased 9% with OEM revenue growth of 11%, while devices revenue decreased (9%).

Guidance on Segment Revenue:

  • Productivity and Business revenue guided to decelerate ~185 bp QoQ at midpoint for growth of 10.3% to 12% YoY.
  • Intelligent Cloud revenue guided to decelerate ~185 bp QoQ at midpoint for growth of 17.3% to 19% YoY.
  • More Personal Computing revenue guided to decelerate 700 bp QoQ at midpoint for growth of 10.5% to 13.5% YoY.

Margins:

Margins were ahead of expectations across the board, with Intelligent Cloud continuing to show improvement in operating margin. We previously discussed after fiscal Q1’s earnings in October that Microsoft can drive operating leverage from AI, and Q2’s results further confirm this thesis – Microsoft boosted its operating margin forecast, saying operating margins would increase 100 to 200 bp YoY after calling for flat margins last quarter.

Operating margin for Q2 was 43.6%, 120 bp ahead of guidance for 42.4% and up 490 bp YoY. For the first half of fiscal 2024, operating margin was 45.4%. Microsoft’s guide of 100 to 200 bp expansion implies full-year operating margin between 42.8% to 43.8%, with next quarter’s guide for 42.9%.

We previously discussed how there may be more room for operating margin expansion in Intelligent Cloud as Microsoft continues to stay disciplined with OpEx with implementing the AI transition with Azure. Intelligent Cloud’s operating margin was 48.1% in fiscal Q2, up from 41.4% in the year ago quarter but down from 48.4% in fiscal Q1. Microsoft’s increased operating margin forecast suggests that Microsoft may capitalize on AI growth in the cloud and drive higher margins for both Azure and 365 over the next two quarters.

  • Gross margin of 68.4% was up from 66.9% in the year ago quarter. The guide for next quarter is approximately 69%.
  • Operating margin was 43.6%, up from 38.7% in the year ago quarter. Operating margin is guided for 42.9% next quarter, based on the midpoint of provided ranges, implying a slight sequential decrease.
  • Net margin was 35.3%, up from 31.1% in the year ago quarter.
  • Productivity and Business operating margin was 53.4%, down 20 bp QoQ but expanding 520 bp YoY.
  • Intelligent Cloud operating margin was 48.1%, down 30 bp QoQ but expanding 670 bp YoY due to strength in Azure. IC operating income rose 40% YoY to $12.46 billion.
  • More Personal Computing operating margin was 25.4%, down 1250 bp QoQ due to a 38% increase in operating expenses primarily from the Activision acquisition.

Cash Flows:

Operating cash flow was $18.9 billion, up 69% YoY on strong cloud billings and collections, versus a lower comparable quarter last year.

Free cash flow was $9.1 billion, up 86% YoY, with the high growth rate again coming against a weak comparable quarter.

Key Metrics:

Bookings increased 17% YoY and 9% on a constant currency basis, up from 14% in Q1. This was driven by strength in long-term Azure contracts and “strong execution across our core annuity sales motions, including healthy renewals.”

Azure AI customers totaled more than 53,000, with one-third of these being new customers over the past twelve months. This implies customer growth rate of approximately 50% YoY. In addition, more than half of the Fortune 500 are using Azure OpenAI Services, highlighting the strength of Microsoft’s AI offerings.

GitHub Copilot’s paying subscribers surpassed 1.3 million, meaning the offering has surpassed $150 million ARR at a $10/month price. Paid subscribers rose ~30% QoQ from 1 million last quarter, and are up nearly 90% in just two quarters.

Earnings Call:

Microsoft’s earnings call reflected the optimism the company has for its AI offerings as well as the strong momentum and adoption of said offerings, though Microsoft offered little concrete statistics around its newest Copilot subscriptions for 365 customers.

We have said previously that Copilot 365 is one of the more crucial growth trajectories to watch as we move into calendar year 2024. Microsoft explained that its internal research and external studies have shown “as much as 70% improvement in productivity, using generative AI for specific work tasks. And overall early Copilot for Microsoft 365 users were 29% faster in a series of tasks like searching, writing, and summarizing.” These productivity gains are leading to strong adoption of Copilot: Microsoft said that “two months in, we have seen faster adoption than either our E3 or E5 suites.”

Cloud and Azure’s strength was evident throughout the call. CFO Amy Hood noted that “demand for our Microsoft cloud offerings, including AI services drove better-than-expected growth and large long-term Azure contracts.” In addition, “Microsoft 365 suite strength contributed to ARPU expansion for our office commercial business.”

For Azure specifically, management said that “customers continue to choose Azure to simplify and accelerate their cloud migrations. Overall, we are seeing larger and more strategic Azure deals with an increase in the number of $1 billion-plus Azure commitments.”

One of the most important comments of the call was in regards to Azure’s 30% growth. Management said that both “AI and non-AI Azure services drove our outperformance” in the quarter. For Q3, Azure’s growth is expected to remain stable QoQ, driven by consumption-based services “with continued strong contribution from AI.” Reading between the lines here suggests that cloud optimization trends are ending, with comments of stable growth leaning more towards possible acceleration rather than deceleration.

Nadella further hammered that point home in the Q&A, saying that he believes that the “period of massive optimization only and no new workloads start, that I think has ended at this point. So what you're seeing is much more of that continuous cycles by customers, both whether it comes to AI or whether it comes to the traditional workloads.”

Elevated demand for AI services was a common theme, from Azure’s 6 point growth to GitHub to Power Platform. Management said that “GitHub revenue accelerated to over 40% year-over-year, driven by all-up platform growth and adoption of GitHub Copilot, the world's most widely deployed AI developer tool.” GitHub Copilot subscribers rose 30% QoQ and nearly 90% from ~700,000 in fiscal Q4. For Power Platform, Microsoft said that “more than 230,000 organizations have already used AI capabilities in Power Platform, up over 80% quarter-over-quarter.”

Microsoft’s earnings call reflected growing AI optimism, with strong key metrics for its AI offerings across its product suite. Microsoft is hinting at cloud optimization trends fading away, with high demand for AI services in Azure adding 6 points to growth while non-AI services contributed to outperformance.

Conclusion

Microsoft is at the front of Big Tech’s AI revolution on the software side, and this is unlikely to change given the company’s key advantage in targeting 400 million enterprise seats. Revenue growth has accelerated significantly over the past four quarters, from 2% growth to 17.7% growth, driving 33% EPS growth this quarter. Microsoft is proving that its substantial investments in AI infrastructure and its wide-ranging AI suite is paying off on growth for both the top and bottom line.

Recommended Reading:

  • Microsoft Fiscal Q2 Earnings: Accelerating Growth, AI in the Spotlight
  • Positions Update: Microsoft, Nvidia, and Bitcoin
  • Broad Market Analysis
  • Q1 2024 Webinar Highlights
  • Bitcoin and Microsoft Positions Update
Posted in Cloud Platforms, SoftwareLeave a Comment on Microsoft Fiscal Q2: Cloud Leads the Way

Coinbase, Robinhood: Examining The Impact Of Spot Bitcoin ETFs

Posted on January 30, 2024June 30, 2026 by io-fund
Coinbase, Robinhood: Examining The Impact Of Spot Bitcoin ETFs

This article was originally published on Forbes on Jan 25, 2024,05:31pm ESTForbes Forbes on Jan 25, 2024,05:31pm EST

The SEC approved nearly a dozen spot Bitcoin ETFs on January 10 in what was heralded as a “watershed” moment for the crypto industry, opening the door for investors to gain exposure to Bitcoin without directly holding it. It’s widely expected that this approval and subsequent widespread access for institutions and retail investors will shape up to be one of the most bullish fundamental moments in Bitcoin’s history.

We have been anticipating this moment since 2019 when we stated: “One of the biggest hurdles for institutions, however, is not the idea of a world run on digital currencies, but rather the decentralization concept and the need for cryptocurrency storage. Institutional investors need to know the assets are secure, insured, and under the care of a trusted third party, per SEC rules, which requires advisers to keep client funds with a qualified custodian.”

With a first batch of spot BTC ETFs approved, it’s prudent to assess the potential impact to exchanges and platforms, given that exchanges will now be competing on fees with ETFs, while increasing BTC prices and the next halving serve as potential tailwinds for miners.

Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 221% – Click hereClick hereClick here

Trading Volumes Have Declined Significantly for Coinbase, Robinhood

For exchanges and trading platforms, such as Coinbase and Robinhood, that allow direct ownership of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, the ETF approval serves as a double-edged sword. The bull thesis is centered around how the approvals will help usher in a wave to new all-time highs for Bitcoin, and how that could translate into higher transaction revenues (which have declined significantly), while the main headwind and primary story is that the two may now be forced to compete on fees in the long run, which can keep transaction revenues depressed as trading volumes remain far below peak levels.

Coinbase has expressed no desire to change its fee structure to compete with ETFs in the immediate term, per President and COO Emilie Choi’s remarks in its Q3 earnings call:

Q: “Will Coinbase consider reducing transaction fees to make them more competitive with other platforms where ETFs are being traded at significantly lower prices?”

A: “We have no current plans to reduce transaction fees because of ETFs. If you just zoom out a little bit, spot ETF should be a positive catalyst for the entire crypto space. They should add credibility to the market, and we should see increased liquidity and market stability as we've seen with other asset classes such as gold.”have no current plans to reduce transaction fees because of ETFs. If you just zoom out a little bit, spot ETF should be a positive catalyst for the entire crypto space. They should add credibility to the market, and we should see increased liquidity and market stability as we've seen with other asset classes such as gold.”

Choi’s answer hinted towards a potential headwind to Coinbase’s model – market stability. Coinbase noted that in Q3, “crypto asset volatility, a driver of our trading business, continued to decline, and it reached levels that we haven't measured since 2016.”

Coinbase Chart

Source: GOOGLE FINANCE

A majority of Q3 witnessed little to no volatility in Bitcoin prices – August saw one decline of more than (10%) and a 6% rise, but aside from that, prices were relatively stable. Volatility heightened in October as Bitcoin broke the $30,000 mark and ascended towards $35,000, while the remainder of Q4 witnessed relatively heightened volatility as well.

Due to stable crypto prices, Coinbase’s trading volume dipped more than (17%) QoQ and (52%) YoY to $76 billion in the quarter, while transaction revenues declined nearly (12%) QoQ and (21%) YoY to $289 million.

Heightened crypto volatility is a primary driver of Coinbase’s trading business, so periods with less volatility, i.e. stability, correlate to lower trading volumes and transaction revenues. Coinbase noted that its October transaction revenue was $105 million (around 9% higher than Q3’s monthly average), but cautioned investors not to extrapolate that figure for Q4. If you do extrapolate that sum, Q4’s transaction revenues would fall between $310 million to $320 million, signaling flat to a low single-digit YoY decline in transaction revenue despite an ~80% rally in Bitcoin.

In a broader view, both trading volume and transaction revenue have declined significantly since peaking in Q4 2021, when Bitcoin made a round trip from $47,000 to new highs above $64,000 before pulling back to $47,000. Trading volumes in Q3 were nearly (83%) lower than Q4 2021, at $76 billion compared to $547 billion.

Coinbase Trading Volume Trends

Source: COINBASE

Transaction revenues similarly are down more than (87%) since then, with five straight quarters below $400 million. Transaction revenues accounted for more than 46% of Coinbase’s total revenue in Q3, so there is heightened risk to Coinbase’s model now that a fee-competitive asset class exists, as it may potentially draw away trading volume and thus transaction revenue via lower fees.

Coinbase Transaction Revenue Trends

Source: COINBASE

Monthly transacting users have also declined (40%), from 11.2 million in Q4 2021 to 6.7 million in Q3 2023, with the decline accelerating over the past two quarters.

Coinbase Monthly Transacting Users

Source: COINBASE

These trends in trading volumes and transaction revenues are not exclusive to Coinbase, as Robinhood is reporting similar weaknesses in both metrics.

Robinhood’s notional crypto trading volume was ~$6.8 billion in Q3, a (25%) QoQ and (53%) YoY decline. Since Q4 2021, trading volume has fallen (85%), interestingly nearly the exact percentage drawdown as Coinbase.

Robinhood Notional Crypto Trading Volume

Source: ROBINHOOD

Transaction revenues peaked in Q2 2021 for Robinhood at $233 million, before plunging to $51 million the next quarter; unlike Coinbase, Robinhood did not see a second higher peak in transaction revenue. For Q3 2023, Robinhood reported $23 million in transaction revenue, representing a (26%) QoQ and (55%) YoY decline; unlike Coinbase, crypto transaction revenues are under 5% of Robinhood’s total revenue, so there is less risk from ETFs, as investors could choose to invest in the ETFs directly on Robinhood’s platform.

Robinhood Crypto Transaction Revenue

Source: ROBINHOOD

Robinhood hinted that it is more willing to be competitive on fees, saying that it rolled out some UI changes in Q3 so its crypto customers “can clearly see the spreads that we offer on our crypto transactions. This makes it easier for customers to see their all-in cost of execution, compare it against other platforms and see how great of a deal Robinhood is giving them.” see their all-in cost of execution, compare it against other platforms and see how great of a deal Robinhood is giving them.” By focusing on offering a better deal than competitors, Robinhood is potentially limiting upside to transaction revenues via a lower average fee – its average fee rate in Q3 of 0.338% was more than 10% lower than Coinbase’s average fee rate of 0.380%.

With a basket of ETFs now approved, Robinhood and Coinbase will have to compete on fees, as certain classes of investors are likely to choose ETFs over directly holding crypto for exposure due to trust. In just the first week after the approval of the ETFs, we’ve seen strong demand for top of the class funds: BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust has surpassed $1 billion AUM in its first week, a rare milestone that few ETFs share.

This is the first major speed bump for the bull case – how Coinbase and Robinhood can find ways to drive trading volumes higher, while maintaining higher fees than ETFs, to drive an inflection in transaction revenues.

Retail trading accounts for more than 95% of Coinbase’s transaction revenue while accounting for less than 15% of trading volume – this suggests that to drive a meaningful uptick in transaction revenues, Coinbase will need to see strong growth in retail trading volumes. More volatile Bitcoin prices, or a run to higher highs, can serve as a catalyst for higher trading activity; however, Coinbase holds the view that the ETFs will lead to more stability in the market, meaning more investors may choose to buy and hold with less active trading.

Every Thursday at 4:30 pm Eastern, the I/O Fund team holds a webinar for premium members to discuss how to navigate the broad market, as well as various stock entries and exits. We offer trade alerts plus an automated hedging signal. The I/O Fund team is one of the only audited portfolios available to individual investors. Learn more here.Learn more hereLearn more here.

Custodial Fee Benefits & Risk for Coinbase

The ETF approvals offer one direct benefit to Coinbase, in that it stands to earn custodial fees by serving as the custodian for 8 of the 11 approved ETFs, including the most popular of the class, the iShares Bitcoin Trust.

Coinbase Dominance

Source: BLOOMBERG

Coinbase will be providing custodial, trading and lending services to the ETF issuers, giving it a stream of revenue via fees for these services, but opening up the door to a significant concentration of risk. Custodial fees currently account for ~2.5% of Coinbase’s revenue at less than $16 million in Q3, leaving opportunity for significant growth via ETFs – however, impacts from ETFs will not be visible until Q1 earnings, given the recent launch date.

Serving as the sole custodian for more than three-quarters of the approved ETFs heightens risks to investors, as a security compromise, hack or other operational failure on Coinbase’s part could significantly impact the ETF’s value or increase difficulty in accessing funds.

A multi-custodian approach helps safeguard investor assets by reducing the dependency on a single entity for providing all of the necessary services for an ETF to function. Therefore, it is likely that these ETFs, and other approved ETFs, will diversify away from relying on Coinbase as a sole custodian to having multiple custodians. This could reduce custodial fees should Coinbase lose its status as custodian for more than 75% of spot Bitcoin ETFs.

Conclusion

The approval of the spot Bitcoin ETFs is expected a game-changer for crypto, as it is widely believed that the approval and subsequent widespread access for institutions and retail investors will shape up to be one of the most bullish fundamental moments in Bitcoin’s history.

To attempt to size the demand the ETFs may create, Grayscale has $18 billion assets under management, and iShares has surpassed $1 billion already. If we assume over the long run that these Bitcoin ETFs average $5 to $8 billion AUM, this could add an additional $55 to $90 billion in demand for a limited supply of Bitcoin. As a reminder, Bitcoin is limited to 21 million Bitcoins and the next halving occurs in 2024. Halving can lead to a higher value for Bitcoin as it reduces the number of new bitcoins being generated by the network.

A push to new all-time highs for Bitcoin sits at the core of the bull thesis for crypto platforms such as Coinbase, as higher prices theoretically would lead to higher volatility and thus higher trading volumes and higher transaction revenues. Even with Bitcoin’s 80% push back to the high $40,000 level, Coinbase’s clues suggest that transaction revenues may not meaningfully accelerate in the high-teen to low-20% range.

Given this substantial decline in trading volume and resulting declines in transaction revenue for both Coinbase and Robinhood, the bull case centered around ETF approval ushering in strong revenue growth is weakened. There are many moving parts with how the ETFs will alter the crypto landscape, but unless both platforms witness trading volume more than double over the next few quarters, it is hard to see how this creation of a fee-competitive environment can serve as a tailwind to revenue growth over the short to medium-term.

If you own crypto stocks or Bitcoin, or are looking to own crypto stocks and Bitcoin, we encourage you to attend our weekly premium webinars, held every Thursday at 4:30 pm EST for premium members to discuss how to navigate the broad market, as well as various stock entries and exits. We offer trade alerts plus an automated hedging signal. The I/O Fund team is one of the only audited portfolios available to individual investors. Learn more here.

Please note: The I/O Fund conducts research and draws conclusions for the Fund’s positions. We then share that information with our readers. This is not a guarantee of a stock’s performance. Please consult your personal financial advisor before buying any stock in the companies mentioned in this analysis.

Recommended Reading:

  • My Firm called the Bitcoin’s Bottom; Here is Where the Price Goes Next
  • Tesla Q4 Earnings Preview: Margins Likely To Slip Again
  • Social Media Stocks: One Metric Shows Meta’s Clear Leadership
  • Ad Spending Growth to Accelerate In 2024
Posted in Applications, Crypto InvestmentLeave a Comment on Coinbase, Robinhood: Examining The Impact Of Spot Bitcoin ETFs

Microsoft Fiscal Q2 Earnings: Accelerating Growth, AI in the Spotlight

Posted on January 30, 2024June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Microsoft kicks off Big Tech’s earnings alongside AMD and Alphabet, with AI in the spotlight as the company posted a sizable beat last quarter while seeing “higher-than-expected AI consumption.” Revenue and EPS estimates have inched higher, with the current revenue estimate of $61.1 billion slightly above management’s guide for $60.9 billion, highlighting the optimism the Street has on AI-related tailwinds.

Azure and Copilot will be closely watched, as Intelligent Cloud drove $850M of Microsoft’s ~$2 billion beat in fiscal Q1 due to AI tailwinds, while analysts are optimistic on Copilot creating a new stream of revenue over the next few fiscal years. Microsoft has been a big investor in scaling its data center and AI capabilities, and the Street is looking for these investments to bear fruits in Q2.

Notably, as stated in our AMD write-up, keep an eye out for a PC super cycle which could occur in H2 2024. Microsoft will be a clear beneficiary of this given Windows is expected to get its most important upgrade in many years (decades?) with many AI features.

Revenue and EPS:

Microsoft is currently expected to report $2.77 EPS on $61.13 billion in revenue, representing 19.3% and 15.9% YoY growth respectively. This would mark a significant acceleration in revenue growth, from 8.3% in fiscal Q4 to 12.8% in fiscal Q1. To put this in perspective, revenue growth estimates for fiscal Q2 were just 10.6% in October, with Q1’s beat and guide leading to a 530 bp acceleration.

Revenue growth rates are expected to hover around 15% through fiscal Q1 2025 as Microsoft captures AI related growth in Azure and Copilot. However, Microsoft’s guide for operating margins look to be weighing on EPS estimates, which are pointing to growth decelerating to the low single-digit range in fiscal Q4.

Margins:

Fiscal Q1 saw Microsoft post strong operating margin expansion, rising 440 bp from 43.2% to 47.6%, driven by a 450 bp margin expansion in Intelligent Cloud. However, Microsoft guided for operating margin of 42.4% in fiscal Q2 and flat for the full year.

The concern here is that margins continue to deteriorate through the end of the fiscal year. Last quarter’s guide for flat YoY operating margin suggests FY24’s margin will hover around 41.8%, or a ~320 bp decline over the next two quarters. Management explained that the flat guide “speaks to the pace at which we're delivering AI revenue with the increasing cost expense and capital investment ahead with the demand we see.”

There may be some room for margin expansion in Intelligent Cloud should Microsoft remain disciplined within its spending as it progresses with Azure’s AI transition. There is potential upside to operating margins on better-than-expected integration of the Activision acquisition and Microsoft’s continued efforts to improve Azure and Microsoft 365 gross margins, given recent Copilot subscription launches.

What to Watch: Azure and Copilot

Microsoft will give the first insight into Copilot’s revenue this quarter, after launching commercial subscriptions on November 1 for its AI assistant. We highlighted previously that Copilot was among one of six levers that could drive an additional $100 billion in revenue for Microsoft by 2027.

Microsoft has ~160 million users on 365 Enterprise plans, meaning that it needs just 18% adoption of Copilot to reach a $10 billion annual revenue run rate. For the consumer Copilot, priced at $20/month compared to $30/month for enterprises, just over 5% adoption from its ~77 million user base is needed to reach a $1 billion revenue run rate.

Analysts are similarly bullish on Copilot, with Citi highlighting how “a 5% adoption rate by its 77M customers using Microsoft 365 could add $925 million in revenue by fiscal year 2025. An adoption rate of 15% could add $2.7 billion in sales.”

The immediate impact of Copilot is likely to be minimal to start given the timing of the launch, while any clues as to the initial adoption rate among enterprises will be watched closely.

Microsoft’s predominant stream of AI-related revenues at the moment stems from Azure, as it is powering a handful of the largest LLMs and AI assistants on the market, from OpenAI’s ChatGPT to Meta’s Llama and Llama 2 to Microsoft’s own Bing Copilot.

A consumption pricing model offers tailwinds to Azure, as a majority of OpenAI’s APIs for ChatGPT were all new workloads for Azure over the last twelve months. In addition, Azure Open AI Services has been adopted by 18,000 organizations, which allows companies to use OpenAI’s APIs for new development purposes. Essentially, OpenAI is helping drive growth for Azure even if startups or companies are not direct Azure customers.

Q3 saw Azure’s growth inflect whereas Google Cloud’s growth decelerated, reflecting the benefits of this consumption pricing model. Microsoft’s CFO Amy Hood explained last quarter that Azure’s “growth was ahead of expectations, primarily driven by increased GPU capacity and better-than-expected GPU utilization of our AI services as well as slightly higher-than-expected growth in our per-user business.”

What will be key for Microsoft is a sequential acceleration in Azure in fiscal Q2 – this confirms the bull thesis that AI is driving stronger revenue growth in the early innings of monetization while rivals AWS and Google falter, and the long-term thesis that AI will drive tens of billions in additional revenue. However, if Azure decelerates even slightly, such as by 1 percentage point QoQ, Microsoft’s stretched valuation leaves it vulnerable to the downside with no room for error.

Capex:

Capex commentary will be watched closely as well, given that Microsoft is estimated to have devoted 13% of Capex to AI in 2023, the most among the top cloud service providers. CFO Amy Hood said last quarter that “Capital expenditures, including finance leases were $11.2 billion to support cloud demand, including investments to scale our AI infrastructure. … We expect capital expenditures to increase sequentially on a dollar basis, driven by investments in our cloud and AI infrastructure. As a reminder, there can be normal quarterly spend variability in the timing of our cloud infrastructure buildout.”

Capex here is important as it not only allows Microsoft to rapidly deploy and scale its AI infrastructure, but it opens the door for further leverage in the future. Management explained that for “every capital dollar we spend, if we optimize revenue against it, we will have great leverage. Because wherever demand shows up in the layers, whether it's at the SaaS layer, whether it's at the infrastructure lower, whether it's for training workloads, we're able to quickly put our infrastructure to work generating revenue.”

Being able to meet high consumption and demand for AI regardless of where it is in the stack serves as a crucial tailwind in that it should allow Microsoft to fare better than its peers whenever budgets are optimized, for short or extended periods of time. To do so, Microsoft has to spend quite aggressively – its Capex to revenue ratio is nearing the highest level in 33 years, at 0.145 compared to a peak at 0.148 in March 1991.

Management may not provide a concrete capex number this quarter, given the commentary last quarter was fairly vague in terms of sequential increases. What’s critical for the company will be showing how this elevated capex spend can flow directly through to the cloud and Azure.

Valuation:

The primary risk here is that Microsoft’s valuation is back at peak levels, opening up downside risk should it show any hint of weakness, whether that surfaces in margins, EPS forecasts, Azure growth, or overall cloud revenue.

Microsoft is trading at all-time highs just below $410 after rallying more than 11% since January 5. Shares are trading at a PE of 39.7x and a forward PE of 36.5x, levels that it has historically failed to hold, with the most notable being 2021’s top. Shares are also trading at a large premium to its 5-year median PE of 31.6x.

A look at sales-based valuation metrics shows a similar trend. Microsoft is trading at 14x sales and 12.5x forward sales, both far above the 5-year median of 10.9x. Microsoft historically has struggled to hold a forward PS above 12.9x, suggesting that shares are closing in on a top if the report is nothing less than stellar.

Conclusion:

Microsoft kicks off a jam-packed week for Big Tech and AI, with the focus likely to be primarily on initial revenue generation for Copilot and any outlook provided (if any) as well as Azure’s growth and if AI can drive a meaningful sequential increase in growth. Microsoft is demonstrating that it has multiple levers within its product suite to capture AI growth and multiple outlets to capture AI growth via Azure. Fiscal Q2 is expected to start a multiple quarter streak with revenue growth near the 15% range, but EPS estimates raise concerns that margins may weigh on the bottom line. Microsoft’s valuation leaves little room for error, with shares at peak valuations and hard-to-hold levels historically. Yet, AI has been a powerful trend – let’s see if Microsoft’s AI commentary can push the stock higher, or perhaps Microsoft will instead be a reminder of just how far the Mag 7 has come in price in a brief period of time.

Recommended Reading:

  • AMD Q4 Pre-Earnings Report: $2 Billion in FY2024 is the GPU Baseline
  • Tesla Q4: Moving from Margin Issue to Revenue Growth Issue
  • 2023 Year in Review: I/O Fund Webinar
  • Cloud Earnings Review: Signs of Stabilization
Posted in Cloud Software, SoftwareLeave a Comment on Microsoft Fiscal Q2 Earnings: Accelerating Growth, AI in the Spotlight

Tesla Q4: Moving from Margin Issue to Revenue Growth Issue

Posted on January 30, 2024June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Tesla missed on both the top and bottom line as weak ASP cut into revenues, with the EV manufacturer posting automotive revenue growth of just 1.9% YoY despite a 19.5% YoY increase in deliveries. That statistic is key, as it reflects the idea that Tesla may be moving from a margin issue to a revenue growth issue.

We are starting to see signs of margins stabilizing, with automotive gross margin rising ~85 bp QoQ to 17.2% and operating margin improving 60bp QoQ to 8.2%; however, margins are not in the clear based on recent price cuts and commentary from management regarding cost reductions. This now raises red flags that Tesla will face revenue growth issues moving forward stemming from “notably lower” volume growth and heightened competition from BYD in China and globally. We covered this for our free readers early-on here and here.

Revenue and EPS:

As stated, Tesla missed on the top line and bottom line.

  • Q4 revenue of $25.17 billion missed estimates by 2.3%, representing YoY growth of 3.5%.
  • Q4 non-GAAP EPS of $0.71 missed estimates by 4%, representing a YoY decline of (-40.3%).
  • FY23 revenue of $96.77 billion increased 18.8% YoY from $81.46 billion in FY22.
  • FY23 non-GAAP EPS of $3.12 declined (-23.3%) YoY from $4.07 in FY22.

Margins:

In Q4, average selling prices declined (4.3%) QoQ to $42,579 as price cuts continued; this also represented a (17.9%) YoY decline from an ASP of $51,887 in Q4 2022. This major weakness in pricing is significantly impacting revenue growth and margins.

  • GAAP gross margin was 17.6% in Q4, representing a decline of 612 bp YoY and ~300 bp QoQ.
  • Automotive gross margin (excluding regulatory credits) was 17.9%, a 707 bp YoY decline but improving 86 bp QoQ.
  • Operating margin was 8.2%, a 784 bp YoY decline but improving ~60 bp QoQ.
  • Adjusted EBITDA margin was 15.7%, down 652 bp YoY and ~400 bp QoQ.
  • FY23 GAAP gross margin of 18.2% declined 735 bp YoY from 25.6% in FY22.
  • FY23 operating margin of 9.2% declined 758 bp YoY from 16.8% in FY22.
  • Adjusted EBITDA margin of 17.2% declined 637 bp YoY from 23.6% in FY22.

Cash and Debt:

Operating and free cash flow growth was one of the strongest parts of the report.

  • Cash and equivalents totaled $29.09 billion.
  • Debt and finance leases totaled $5.23 billion.
  • Operating cash flow increased 33% YoY to $4.37 billion in Q4. FY23 operating cash flow of $13.26 billion declined (10%) YoY.
  • Free cash flow increased 45% YoY to $2.06 billion in Q4. FY23 free cash flow of $4.36 billion declined (42%) YoY.

Other Segments:

  • Energy storage deployments were 3,202 MWh in Q4, up 30% YoY. FY23 energy storage deployments rose 125% YoY to 14,724 MWh.
  • Energy storage revenues increased 54% YoY to $6.04 billion, generating gross profit of $1.14 billion. Energy storage now represents more than 6% of revenue, compared to less than 5% in 2022.
  • Solar deployments were 41 MW in Q4, down (59%) YoY. FY23 solar deployments declined (36%) YoY to 223 MW, reflecting global weakness in solar deployments.

Volume Growth Concerns

One of the most telling comments from the Q4 release was Tesla’s call for reduced vehicle volume growth, with CEO Elon Musk saying that the weak growth forecast stems from Tesla gearing up to produce a next-generation model.

Tesla explained that in 2024, its “vehicle volume growth rate may be notably lower than the growth rate achieved in 2023.” Production grew 35% to 1.845 million vehicles while deliveries grew 38% to 1.808 million vehicles.  Calling for a notable slowdown in volume growth raises some substantial red flags as Tesla has recently prioritized volume growth over margins. This is important here as primary rival BYD has surpassed Tesla as the largest BEV market on a quarterly basis and is on track to likely overtake Tesla on an annual basis this year.

CEO Elon Musk emphasized said just in Q2 that “it does make sense to sacrifice margins in favor of making more vehicles because we think in the not too distant future, they will have a dramatic valuation increase.” CFO Vaibhav Taneja reiterated that in Q3, saying Tesla is “focused on reducing costs, maximizing delivery volumes, and continuing making investments in the future.”

What the bull case needs here is irrefutable evidence that this next-generation platform will aid significant growth in vehicle volumes in 2026, as not only is Tesla increasingly at risk of losing its top spot to BYD, but it’s also now opening the door for revenue growth issues.

We do want to reiterate our stance, that this is not a Tesla-specific issue, rather is widespread throughout the automotive sector. We stated this in the July earnings write-up: “While some will talk about recurring software revenue from robotaxis as the most important catalyst, the harsh reality is that the FED lowering rates is the most important catalyst for Tesla today. That may not be as exciting as AI, but Tesla is one of many tech stocks whose revenue growth and profitability is on borrowed time until the Fed instills a more dovish policy.”

What is Tesla-specific is BYD passing the company last quarter, which we made sure to highlight for our readers. This means Tesla is battling both the FED and China, two foes that are known to either stifle innovation by making cash harder to come by or known to undercut innovation in the United States by creating pricing wars.

From Margins to Revenue Growth Issues

Q4’s earnings highlighted the idea that Tesla may be shifting from margin issues to revenue growth issues, especially as vehicle selling prices remain depressed. In Q4, average selling prices declined (4.3%) QoQ to $42,579 as price cuts continued; this also represented a (17.9%) YoY decline from an ASP of $51,887 in Q4 2022. This major weakness in pricing is significantly impacting revenue growth and margins.

Deliveries grew 19.5% YoY to 484,507 vehicles, but the sharp decline in ASP weighed heavily on automotive revenue (excl. reg credits), which came in at 1.2% YoY to $21.13 billion. This was also evident compared to Q2: Q4’s deliveries were nearly 4% higher than Q2’s, but automotive revenues were just 1% higher because ASPs continued to fall.

Revenue Being Revised Lower:

Tesla has already cut prices twice in January, by (3%) to (6%) on the Model 3 and two Model Y variants in China, followed by (4%) to (8%) cuts on Model Y variants across Europe. This raises the risk that revenue growth in Q1 and Q2 will remain in the single-digits, with revenue revisions being pulled lower for both quarters and the full year.

  • Q1’s revenue estimate already has been revised 4% lower following Q4’s miss, from $26.8 billion to $25.7 billion
  • Q2’s revenue estimate has been revised 4.5% lower, from $28.8 billion to $27.5 billion.
  • As a result, FY24’s revenue estimates has been revised 7% lower, from $118 billion to $109.8 billion, pointing to just 13.5% YoY growth, a 5 percentage point slowdown from 2023.

Commentary:

The conference call shed light on how Tesla was able to drive a small improvement in automotive gross margin, but comments from Musk portrayed the difficulty in finding a concrete bottom for margins.

Management explained that Tesla continues “to see improvements in our per unit cost despite us being in the early phase of Cybertruck ramp. As a result, our auto gross margin improved sequentially.” This was evident with the (5.3%) QoQ decline in vehicle production cost to $35,504, which was likely driven by decreasing lithium prices.

While this decline aided margins by offsetting a (4.3%) QoQ decline in ASP, management added that “while the teams are focused on cost reductions, we are approaching the limits within our current platforms.” This suggests that the pace of cost reductions is slowing and may reach a point where it is unable to fall further, meaning that cost reductions may not be enough to offset the price cuts already seen in Q1.

Musk added that if “interest rates come down quickly, I think margins will be good. And if they don't come down quickly, they won't be that good.” Rates are expected to remain above 4% until December, so vehicle affordability may remain pressured from a consumer standpoint and require more price cuts, thus impacting margins.

When discussing competition, Musk did little to assuage concerns that Tesla may fall behind BYD as volume growth slows. Musk said that the “Chinese car companies are the most competitive car companies in the world. So I think they will have significant success outside of China depending on what kind of tariffs or trade barriers are established. Frankly, I think if there are not trade barriers established, they will pretty much demolish most other car companies in the world.”

In 2023, BYD delivered 1.57 million BEVs, up 73% YoY to land about 13% shy of Tesla’s 1.808 million deliveries. Assuming a 20% growth rate for deliveries next year, Tesla would be on track to deliver approximately 2.15 million vehicles, meaning BYD’s growth would only need to be 40% to overtake Tesla next year. Given that BYD is growing tremendously in China, maintaining a growth rate above 40% might not be extremely difficult.

Conclusion

Tesla’s double miss in Q4 came despite a sign of stabilizing margins, with the automaker now opening itself up to revenue growth risks as ASPs are declining nearly as quickly as deliveries are growing. Q4’s automotive revenue rose just 1.9% YoY despite 19.5% YoY growth in deliveries, and high single-digit percentage price cuts in January raise the risk that revenue growth remains weak in Q1 and Q2. Comments about notably lower volume growth in 2024 due to a focus on ramping up a next-generation vehicle platform with a start of production date in late 2025 paves the way for BYD to surpass Tesla’s annual volumes this year.

In light of the weaknesses in Q4, Tesla’s valuation is starting to approach levels where it has previously bottomed: shares are now trading below 5x forward sales, the lowest level since May and approaching January 2023’s bottom at 3.5x.

We will keep watching Tesla’s valuation should shares keep declining. Please follow Knox’s technical analysis and webinars for more details.

Recommended Reading:

  • Q1 Earnings Kickoff Webinar
  • Netflix Q4: Paid Net Adds Impress, Return to Double-Digit Growth
  • 2023 Year in Review: I/O Fund Webinar
  • Micron Q1: The Memory Rebound Has Arrived Fueled by HBM3e
Posted in Consumer Tech, Electric VehiclesLeave a Comment on Tesla Q4: Moving from Margin Issue to Revenue Growth Issue

Super Micro Q2 2024 Earnings: The AI Bullet Train

Posted on January 30, 2024June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Supermicro has produced a neck-breaking 1-month return of 84% in four weeks, if we assume it opens at $547 tomorrow. This is exceptional as QQQs are only up 4%. As a reminder, it’s been one of the best performing stocks for two years in a row. Supermicro personifies the saying “winners keep winning.”

Last quarter, we had stated that Super Micro’s guidance appeared to be conservative: “By far, the most important question on the call was if management was being conservative in their fiscal year guide OR are there challenges ahead for the March and June quarter? Management provided a straightforward answer that Q4 and the fiscal year guides are conservative, implying that we have chance for a beat again in the near-term.”

The CEO further repeated the word “conservative” a few times last quarter. We like this as it creates trust with the management team, especially as SMCI was being doubted in a bout of weakness for the stock during the last report, being down (-12.7%) that month. We were able to rely on management’s comments irrespective of what the market was doing, and this is our preferred path.

The word “conservative” was used again, and an analyst attempted to model how SMCI could exit the year. If the analyst is correct in modeling the opportunity, then there’s roughly 60% room in the stock’s valuation. Each investor will need to decide for themselves how to interpret the Q&A. However, that was my takeaway and it’s likely we take a shot at adding to our position tomorrow.

Before I get too caught up in describing the revenue beat, I do want to say that cash was a blemish for this report and it’s important to file a note that cash flow needs to be watched. We detail this below under the Cash section.

Revenue and EPS:

Similar to Nvidia’s streak last year, analysts cannot keep up with Super Micro this month. As soon as the analyst consensus is revised, Super Micro delivers again.

Here is what that has looked like:

  • Originally, the current Q2 quarter consensus was $2.49B at the midpoint with analysts revising it to $3.26B. Super Micro beat this with actual revenue of $3.7B for growth of 103% YoY and 73% QoQ.
  • For the forward Q3 quarter, consensus was $2.99B and Super Micro has now guided for revenue of $3.7B to $4.1B, representing YoY growth of 204% at the midpoint.
  • Fiscal year estimates were revised upward to $11.5B on January 22nd, yet Super Micro guided for $14.3 billion to $14.7 billion, at the midpoint. This represents growth of 103.6% for the fiscal year. In the opening remarks, the CEO referred to “continued strength in the second half of 2024.”

GAAP EPS for December was $5.10 compared to the analysts’ consensus estimates of $4.90. This is nearly 80% higher sequentially with $2.85 GAAP EPS in the previous quarter and is 62% growth from the year ago quarter. Adjusted EPS was $5.59 for similar YoY and QoQ growth.

Looking forward, next quarter’s GAAP EPS is expected to be between $4.79 and $5.64 for over 240% growth from the year ago quarter. Adjusted EPS of $5.60 at the midpoint will see similar YoY growth.

Margins:

The margins on SMCI are thinner than most semiconductors, and this leads to questions on the earnings call. We detailed you this quarter’s questions about the margins for you below.

  • Gross margin was 15.4% for gross profit of $564.4 million
  • Operating margin was 10.1% for operating profit of $371.5 million and adjusted OPM was 11.3%
  • Net margin was 8% for net profits of $295 million. Adjusted net margin was 9%.

Cash:

Operating cash flow was (-$595) million for a negative margin of (-16.2%). This compares to +12.8% last quarter and +9% in the year ago quarter. Per the CFO: “Cash flow used in operations for Q2 was $595 million compared to cash flow generated by operations of $271 million during the previous quarter. Strong profitability and higher level of accounts payable was offset by higher inventory and accounts receivable due to build plans for Q3 and the timing of shipments during Q2.”

Free cash flow was (-$610) million for a margin of (-16.6%) compared to +12.7% last quarter and +8.4% in the year ago quarter.

The company has $726 million in cash on its balance sheet and $376 million in debt. This is up from $543 million in cash last quarter and net debt of $146 million. This results in net cash position of $350 million compared to a net cash position of $397 million last quarter.

The company was able to increase its cash through an equity offering: “During the quarter, we executed an equity offering and raised approximately $583 million in net proceeds after underwriting discounts and other issuance costs from the sale of 2.3 million shares at a price of $262 per share. The proceeds will be used to strengthen our working capital, enable continued investments in R&D and expand global capacity to fulfill strong demand for our leading platforms.” 

Key Metrics:

Revenue Segments:

  • OEM Appliance and Large Data Center segment was $2.15 billion for 59% of revenue. This was up 175% YoY and 83% QoQ. Per management: “Two existing CSP/large data center customers represented 26% and 11% of total revenues for Q2"
  • Organic (Enterprise & Channel), AI/ML was $1.48 billion for 40% of revenue, up 55% YoY and up 62% QoQ. This was driven by “enterprise AI and CPU upgrade programs.”
  • 5G, Telco and Edge/IoT was 1% of revenue for $35 million. 

Revenue Mix:

  • Server and storage systems were $3.4 billion in revenue for growth of 107% YoY and was 94% of Q2 revenue
  • Subsystems and Accessories were $229 million, up 61% YoY and was 6% of Q2 revenue.

Inventory: 

Inventory days decreased to 67 days compared to 91 days in the previous quarter. This is aligned with management’s comments on tight supply.

Geography:

All revenues were up by a wide margin QoQ.

  • United States was 71% of revenue, slightly down from 76% last quarter. Revenues increased 139% YoY.
  • Asia was 18% of revenue, up from 11% last quarter. Revenues increased 98% YoY.
  • Europe was 8%, down marginally from 9% last quarter. Revenues decreased 8% YoY.
  • ROW was 3% compared to 4% last quarter. Revenues increased 67% YoY.

Earnings Call Q&A

“Conservative” Referenced Again 

My ears perked up when I heard the following from question:

Samik Chatterjee

Got it. And then just this more near-term question when I look at the revenue guide for 3Q and 4Q. Is a step-up here in revenue of about sort of call it $0.5 billion a bit less going from 2Q to 3Q. And then a bigger step-up to get to the mid-point to be annual guide into 4Q, how much of that is driven by just being a bit more cautious about when supply comes in and pushing that the revenue guide a bit more to the 4Q or is that really what the visibility currently of supply of just trying to get sort of what's driving the cadence from 2Q to 3Q to 4Q. And the guide that you provided. Thank you.

David Weigand

Yeah, so Samik, we have a very large and growing backlog, which grew again this quarter. And so really as Charles mentioned earlier, our only constraint is supply. However, the good news is, supply is improving. And so to your point, we have to be somewhat conservative, because we are constrained still by supply. 

Regarding how far and how quick the company can grow, it doesn’t hurt that Super Micro is preparing supply to break the $25 billion revenue mark:

“Today, our production utilization rate is about 65% across our USA, Netherlands and Taiwan facilities, and they are quickly filling. To address this immediate capacity challenge, we are adding two new production facilities and warehouses near our Silicon Valley headquarter, which will be operating in a few months. The new Malaysia facility will focus on expanding our building blocks with lower costs and increased volume, while other new facility will support our annual revenue capacity above $25 billion.”

Later in the call, an analyst modeled SMCI ending the year with a $5.6 billion quarter. The CEO seemed to agree. I’m quoting it here in full so each investor can form their own takeaway.

“Ananda Baruah

Yeah, good afternoon guys. And thanks for taking the question. Appreciate it. Congrats on the really solid execution. Yeah, congrats on that. I guess, two if I could, Charles. And maybe a clarification, I did some math on the 15,000 racks per month. And they came up with — I guess $5.6 billion a quarter, let's call it 5.5%. I guess, plus or minus but that came to $5.6 billion, is that kind of accurate and I guess the question is — if it stood at midyear, you're talking about getting to that point. Is that the kind of run-rate opportunity that we can be thinking about quarterly and not like a guidance, but like an opportunity when you get into sort of the back half of the calendar year. Just wanted to make sure that we're interpreting that kind of accurately and then I have a quick follow-up. Thanks. 

Charles Liang

Yeah, again, we see, we recommend green computing everywhere. That's why wherever, whenever we can help a customer at base, we will. That's why we have been building really large-scale capacity for liquid cooling and other green computing solutions. So yes, that capacity will be huge, but its capacity there, when customer need, we are ready. And indeed our facility also very flexible. Lots of facility can support liquid cooling and air cooler, or combination cooling. So yes, we have a huge capacity ready for growth, but not necessarily all for liquid cooling, they support air cooler or combination hybrid cooling as well.”

This is based on comments from the CEO that: “By this June quarter, we will have high volume, dedicated capacity for manufacturing 100 kilowatt to 120 kilowatt racks with liquid-cooling capabilities, providing DLC, direct liquid cooling racks capacity up to 1,500 racks per month and our total rack production capacity will be up to 5,000 racks per month by then.” This means SMCI will exit the calendar year capable of 14,000 racks.

Questions on the Margins

Notably, Super Micro has weaker margins than was Wall Street prefers. There is always a question about margins on the call. There was a large revenue beat that did not flow through to a higher gross margin or operating margin, and in this Q&A session, the CFO stated: “And so, at this time we are we are growing really quickly. And in order to do that and in order to take market share, we will take opportunities by being more competitive on pricing.” The CEO followed up with: “The good thing is that when we continue to grow our economies of scale, our operation margin indeed will be still able to keep in healthy position.”

Here was a more specific question:

Jon Tanwanteng

Got it, and to ask one of the questions that's been mentioned in a different way, is there a gross margin floor as you pursue this share gain. And when do you see a possible inflection? I'm just wondering what is the limit. When you go in terms of gaining share versus the margin that you generate?

David Weigand

Sure, so we set out a target back in March of 2021 of 14% to 17%. But that's and we've actually done pretty well against that target.

The Mystery 11% Customer

With Intel clearly stumbling (again!), I think the 11% Mystery Customer could be AMD. This is pure speculation, and one we don’t have to wait too long to find out given AMD reports tomorrow night.

Aaron Rakers

Yeah, thanks for taking the questions and also great results. Just curious, when you talk about your customer concentration and the diversity of the business, when you talk about 26% and 11% of your revenue coming from two customers, are those the same customers, like last quarter I think you had a customer that was 25%, or are you seeing these customers kind of bounce around. I guess the simple question is just, is that the same customer 26% and 25%? 

David Weigand

So, Aaron. The 26% customer is the same customer. But the 11% customer is not a new customer, and it's a longer-term customer. But first time in 11% and to your point, yes, we do see a bouncing in and out, and we're very happy. Anytime they do bounce about by the way.

Liquid Cooling Reaches Inflection with Nvidia’s B100s

Super Micro is primarily air cooled right now, yet liquid cooling is growing. Per the CEO in the opening remarks: “By this June quarter, we will have high volume, dedicated capacity for manufacturing 100 kilowatt to 120 kilowatt racks with liquid-cooling capabilities, providing DLC, direct liquid cooling racks capacity up to 1,500 racks per month and our total rack production capacity will be up to 5,000 racks per month by then.” To read more on liquid cooling, reference our previous Super Micro analysis here.Super Micro analysis here.

Here was another comment from the CEO regarding liquid cooling reaching an inflection point with Nvidia’s upcoming release of the B100s:

Quinn Bolton

Okay, got it and then as Charles said, question on liquid cooling. Just as you look forward, you guys are ready, it sounds like the infrastructure may still need some improvements, but I guess as you look at data center customers CSPs that are looking to deploy liquid cooling. Is that sort of does that include current-generation sort of 700-watt, GPUs are, is it really the next generation, the B100s and sort of the 1,000 watt GPU class that really drives the adoption at your CSP customers, drives that need for liquid cooling.

Charles Liang

You are right. In these current 600 watt, 700, watt module, people can still take care very well, we say air conditioning. And that's why people still are comfortable with our traditional air cooler. But when that system grows to 1,000 or even 1,000 watt per module, yes. I mean — I think cooling becomes even much more critical. So, by that time, I believe. Most of the data center will have facility ready for that. So we are very optimistic and very patient to continue to improve our quality, especially that reliability and easy for maintenance. So when customers are ready, we can dwell quickly to support them.

Conclusion:

If the analyst’s model of the opportunity is correct, then Supermicro’s valuation just became quite attractive. The market cap is 27.5 billion at market close, and the run rate would be $22.4 billion in this case, leading to a 1.2 P/S on a company that was trading at a 1.9 P/S, as of market close if we use the previous December quarter estimate of $3.68 billion. This could translate to 60% room in the valuation. For our risk profile purposes, we think it’s worth a shot to add to our position tomorrow and will keep you posted.

Recommended Reading:

  • Microsoft Fiscal Q2 Earnings: Accelerating Growth, AI in the Spotlight
  • AMD Q4 Pre-Earnings Report: $2 Billion in FY2024 is the GPU Baseline
  • Tesla Q4: Moving from Margin Issue to Revenue Growth Issue
  • Netflix Q4: Paid Net Adds Impress, Return to Double-Digit Growth
Posted in Semiconductor StocksLeave a Comment on Super Micro Q2 2024 Earnings: The AI Bullet Train

AMD Q4 Pre-Earnings Report: $2 Billion in FY2024 is the GPU Baseline

Posted on January 30, 2024June 30, 2026 by io-fund

What we want to see from AMD this year, and why the company has a solid shot at bringing the heat with Nvidia.

There are also a few major positives that are in AMD’s favor – some of these were listed in our July write-up on AMD’s AI strategy:

  • Demand is too high for GPUs with long lead times, this is an excellent window of time for a competitor to enter the picture.
  • The MI300s should be able to compete on performance once the GPUs are benchmarked as AMD’s GPUs power the world’s largest supercomputers.
  • AMD is exceptional at undercutting on price. This is primarily how AMD overtook Intel coupled with a better design (the Zen 2 architecture)
  • AMD’s designs are excellent at improving power efficiency. Power efficiency is important for total cost of ownership. Not only will AMD’s GPUs likely be cheaper (no confirmation on pricing just yet) but they will also cost less to own over a four-year life span.
  • Hyperscalers will support competition to Nvidia. You can think of Nvidia as more of a frenemy to Big Tech. This is due to pricing power, CUDA being closed source, and also now Nvidia will be competing with Big Tech in some areas. For example, Omniverse will compete with Meta’s metaverse ambitions. For the MI300 release, AMD is primarily focused on hyperscalers with the CDNA GPUs and not consumer-level RDNA GPUs.

Here are the challenges AMD faces:

  • Lacks a popular software platform and CUDA competitor. AMD’s recently released software platform ROCM is promising but is no CUDA.
  • AMD is later to market on AI acceleration in terms of GPUs. Although AMD has accomplished what is nearly impossible by being a second-place contender that crushed first-place Intel, the reality is that being in second place is a major obstacle.
  • On that note, the company has its hands full competing against Intel on CPUs. It will now go up against Nvidia on GPUs. Lisa Su is one of the best CEOs in the history of the tech industry, but can she and her team take on both at the same time? 

Revenue and EPS:

AMD bottomed in June with (-18%) growth for revenue of $5.4 billion. The company reported growth of 4% YoY in the June quarter for revenue of $5.8 billion.

  • In the upcoming December quarter, AMD is expected to report $6.14 billion for growth of 9.64%. This is within range of what management guided last quarter:
  • “For the fourth quarter of 2023, AMD expects revenue to be approximately $6.1 billion, plus or minus $300 million. At the mid-point of the revenue range, this represents year-over-year growth of 9% and sequential growth of 5.2%.”
  • Next quarter, AMD is expected to report revenue of $5.78B for growth of 7.97%.
  • Note, revenue has been revised downward recently as we had estimates at 15.65% following the last earnings report. As a reminder, AMD’s stock was rocky last earnings report as it sold off based on the print reflecting a Q4 miss, the stock later recouped when it was clarified the miss was not coming from the data center, rather the gaming sector and the embedded segment are weighing on revenue.

AMD is expected to double adjusted EPS over the next seven quarters with estimates at $0.77 this quarter and $0.68 next quarter.

Margins:

AMD guided for gross margin of 51.5% this quarter for adjusted gross profit of $3.14B. This is in line with previous quarters.

Adjusted operating margin was guided to be 23% with $1.74B in opex, which leaves adjusted operating income of $1.4 billion. This will be higher than the previous three quarters, and flat YoY.

Last quarter, adjusted net margin was 5% for adjusted net income of $1.13B. This has been trending upward and reflects the rebound in revenue.

Cash:

Operating cash flow last quarter was $421 million for a 7% margin. Free cash flow was $297 million for a 5% margin. The company has cash and short term investments of $5.8 billion and debt of $2.47 billion.

Revenue Segments:

Data Center:

Last quarter, data center reported growth of $1.6 billion. From there, management has guided data center and the Client segment to be “up by strong double-digit percentage. Sequentially, expect Data Center segment to grow by strong double-digit percentage.”

As stated in our previous earnings write-up, it was confirmed the Q4 data center will grow 50% QoQ for an estimated $2.4 billion. To jog your memory, for Q4, the $400 million in GPUs are mainly from the El Capitan supercomputer.

Per the opening comments last quarter: “Based on the rapid progress we are making with our AI road map execution and purchase commitments from cloud customers, we now expect Data Center GPU revenue to be approximately $400 million in the fourth quarter and exceed $2 billion in 2024 as revenue ramps throughout the year. This growth would make MI300 the fastest product to ramp to $1 billion in sales in AMD history.”

As you’ll recall, this comment was important because it means commercial customers will contribute in 2024. This is primarily what the market will be watching – not only data center growth but any color provided for GPUs. Right now, $2 billion is the benchmark – let’s see if AMD can give us a higher number for FY2024.

Client Segment:

Last quarter, the Client segment reported revenue of $1.5 billion, which was up 42% YoY and 46% QoQ driven by Ryzen mobile processor sales. Management has stated the Client segment is also expected to fully rebound by a “strong double-digit percentage.” Also, management stated that sequentially, “client segment revenue to increase.”

Gaming Segment:

Last quarter, the gaming segment reported (-8%) YoY and was down (-5%) QoQ due “to a decline in semi-custom revenue partially offset by an increase in Radeon GPU sales.” This quarter, gaming is expected “to decline by double-digit percentage”

Embedded Revenue:

Last quarter, Embedded reported (-5%) YoY and was down (-15%) QoQ. This was due to “an inventory correction at customers in several end markets.” The guide for this quarter is that the Embedded segment will decline “due to additional softening of demand in the embedded market. Sequentially, the embedded segment is expected to decline by double-digit percentage.”

More comments on the $2B

Toshiya Hari:

[…] My first one is on the Data Center GPU business. You talked about '24 revenue potentially exceeding $2 billion. I was hoping you could provide a little bit more color. What percentage of this is AI versus supercomputing or other applications?

Lisa Su:

Your question as to how the revenue evolves, so the way to think about it is, in the fourth quarter, we said revenue would be approximately $400 million, and that's mostly HPC with some — the start of our AI ramp. And then as we go into the first quarter, we actually expect revenue to be approximately similar in that $400 million range. And that will be mostly AI so with a very small piece being HPC. And as we go through 2024, we would expect revenue to continue to ramp quarterly, and again, it will be mostly AI.

The CEO let a comment slip that it would be “greater than $2 billion” for next year, and given how careful this management team is, I do think it’s important to note here:

Lisa Su:

Sure, Aaron. So, we've been planning the supply chain for the last year and we're always planning for success. So, certainly, for the current forecast of greater than $2 billion, we have adequate supply. But we have also planned for a supply chain forecast that could be significantly higher than that, and we would continue to work with customers to build that out.

For our purposes, as far as where this can go, the management team goes back to quoting 50% CAGR in this segment over the next few years: “So, I think we are big believers in the strength of the market. We previously said we believe that the compound annual growth rate could be 50% over the next three or four years.”

Keep an Eye on PCs:

Per the last write-up:

What is a bit unfortunate is that the gaming segment and embedded is weak, and these two segments overshadow AMD continuing to take market share on the CPU data center, and the company’s highly anticipated answer to Nvidia’s H100s.

Per the CFO’s opening remarks: “In the fourth quarter, we expect to benefit from strong Data Center and Client momentum, driven by MI300 AI accelerated ramp and the strength of our high-performance leadership Zen 4 family of products despite lower sales in the Gaming segment and additional softening of demand in the embedded market.” 

What is quite fortunate, however, is that some of AMD’s AI story is undercover, which is the PC and mobile market. There’s a bonus waiting for AMD investors as the AI story plays out, and while data center GPUs take up all of the attention, there is another powerful AI trend that is silently building strength in the background. I mentioned this in a previous write-up: “When discussing AMD’s AI opportunity, it is vitally important that we not lose sight of the opportunity AMD will have to expand its AI portfolio to the Client Segment.” This has already begun with the Ryzen AI on-chip accelerator contributing to the rebound in the client segment this quarter.

From the CEO in the last earnings report: “What I'm most excited about in PCs is actually the AI PC. I think the AI PC opportunity is an opportunity to redefine what PCs are in terms of productivity tool and really sort of operating on sort of user data. And so, I think we're at the beginning of a wave there. We're investing heavily in Ryzen AI and the opportunity to really broaden sort of the AI capabilities of PCs going forward.”

Our post-earnings report will hit your inboxes tomorrow night.

Additional Reading:

AMD Q3 Earnings: $2B in GPU Revenue for 2024 

AMD Q3 Pre-Earnings: With Bated Breath for Q4 Commentary

Posted in Semiconductor StocksLeave a Comment on AMD Q4 Pre-Earnings Report: $2 Billion in FY2024 is the GPU Baseline

Microsoft Fiscal Q2 Earnings: Accelerating Growth, AI in the Spotlight

Posted on January 30, 2024June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Microsoft kicks off Big Tech’s earnings alongside AMD and Alphabet, with AI in the spotlight as the company posted a sizable beat last quarter while seeing “higher-than-expected AI consumption.” Revenue and EPS estimates have inched higher, with the current revenue estimate of $61.1 billion slightly above management’s guide for $60.9 billion, highlighting the optimism the Street has on AI-related tailwinds.

Azure and Copilot will be closely watched, as Intelligent Cloud drove $850M of Microsoft’s ~$2 billion beat in fiscal Q1 due to AI tailwinds, while analysts are optimistic on Copilot creating a new stream of revenue over the next few fiscal years. Microsoft has been a big investor in scaling its data center and AI capabilities, and the Street is looking for these investments to bear fruits in Q2.

Notably, keep an eye out for a PC super cycle which could occur in H2 2024. Microsoft will be a clear beneficiary of this given Windows is expected to get its most important upgrade in many years (decades?) with many AI features.

Revenue and EPS:

Microsoft is currently expected to report $2.77 EPS on $61.13 billion in revenue, representing 19.3% and 15.9% YoY growth respectively. This would mark a significant acceleration in revenue growth, from 8.3% in fiscal Q4 to 12.8% in fiscal Q1. To put this in perspective, revenue growth estimates for fiscal Q2 were just 10.6% in October, with Q1’s beat and guide leading to a 530 bp acceleration.

Revenue growth rates are expected to hover around 15% through fiscal Q1 2025 as Microsoft captures AI related growth in Azure and Copilot. However, Microsoft’s guide for operating margins look to be weighing on EPS estimates, which are pointing to growth decelerating to the low single-digit range in fiscal Q4.

Margins:

Fiscal Q1 saw Microsoft post strong operating margin expansion, rising 440 bp from 43.2% to 47.6%, driven by a 450 bp margin expansion in Intelligent Cloud. However, Microsoft guided for operating margin of 42.4% in fiscal Q2 and flat for the full year.

The concern here is that margins continue to deteriorate through the end of the fiscal year. Last quarter’s guide for flat YoY operating margin suggests FY24’s margin will hover around 41.8%, or a ~320 bp decline over the next two quarters. Management explained that the flat guide “speaks to the pace at which we're delivering AI revenue with the increasing cost expense and capital investment ahead with the demand we see.”

There may be some room for margin expansion in Intelligent Cloud should Microsoft remain disciplined within its spending as it progresses with Azure’s AI transition. There is potential upside to operating margins on better-than-expected integration of the Activision acquisition and Microsoft’s continued efforts to improve Azure and Microsoft 365 gross margins, given recent Copilot subscription launches.

What to Watch: Azure and Copilot

Microsoft will give the first insight into Copilot’s revenue this quarter, after launching commercial subscriptions on November 1 for its AI assistant. We highlighted previously that Copilot was among one of six levers that could drive an additional $100 billion in revenue for Microsoft by 2027.

Microsoft has ~160 million users on 365 Enterprise plans, meaning that it needs just 18% adoption of Copilot to reach a $10 billion annual revenue run rate. For the consumer Copilot, priced at $20/month compared to $30/month for enterprises, just over 5% adoption from its ~77 million user base is needed to reach a $1 billion revenue run rate.

Analysts are similarly bullish on Copilot, with Citi highlighting how “a 5% adoption rate by its 77M customers using Microsoft 365 could add $925 million in revenue by fiscal year 2025. An adoption rate of 15% could add $2.7 billion in sales.”

The immediate impact of Copilot is likely to be minimal to start given the timing of the launch, while any clues as to the initial adoption rate among enterprises will be watched closely.

Microsoft’s predominant stream of AI-related revenues at the moment stems from Azure, as it is powering a handful of the largest LLMs and AI assistants on the market, from OpenAI’s ChatGPT to Meta’s Llama and Llama 2 to Microsoft’s own Bing Copilot.

A consumption pricing model offers tailwinds to Azure, as a majority of OpenAI’s APIs for ChatGPT were all new workloads for Azure over the last twelve months. In addition, Azure Open AI Services has been adopted by 18,000 organizations, which allows companies to use OpenAI’s APIs for new development purposes. Essentially, OpenAI is helping drive growth for Azure even if startups or companies are not direct Azure customers.

Q3 saw Azure’s growth inflect whereas Google Cloud’s growth decelerated, reflecting the benefits of this consumption pricing model. Microsoft’s CFO Amy Hood explained last quarter that Azure’s “growth was ahead of expectations, primarily driven by increased GPU capacity and better-than-expected GPU utilization of our AI services as well as slightly higher-than-expected growth in our per-user business.”

What will be key for Microsoft is a sequential acceleration in Azure in fiscal Q2 – this confirms the bull thesis that AI is driving stronger revenue growth in the early innings of monetization while rivals AWS and Google falter, and the long-term thesis that AI will drive tens of billions in additional revenue. However, if Azure decelerates even slightly, such as by 1 percentage point QoQ, Microsoft’s stretched valuation leaves it vulnerable to the downside with no room for error.

Capex:

Capex commentary will be watched closely as well, given that Microsoft is estimated to have devoted 13% of Capex to AI in 2023, the most among the top cloud service providers. CFO Amy Hood said last quarter that “Capital expenditures, including finance leases were $11.2 billion to support cloud demand, including investments to scale our AI infrastructure. … We expect capital expenditures to increase sequentially on a dollar basis, driven by investments in our cloud and AI infrastructure. As a reminder, there can be normal quarterly spend variability in the timing of our cloud infrastructure buildout.”

Capex here is important as it not only allows Microsoft to rapidly deploy and scale its AI infrastructure, but it opens the door for further leverage in the future. Management explained that for “every capital dollar we spend, if we optimize revenue against it, we will have great leverage. Because wherever demand shows up in the layers, whether it's at the SaaS layer, whether it's at the infrastructure lower, whether it's for training workloads, we're able to quickly put our infrastructure to work generating revenue.”

Being able to meet high consumption and demand for AI regardless of where it is in the stack serves as a crucial tailwind in that it should allow Microsoft to fare better than its peers whenever budgets are optimized, for short or extended periods of time. To do so, Microsoft has to spend quite aggressively – its Capex to revenue ratio is nearing the highest level in 33 years, at 0.145 compared to a peak at 0.148 in March 1991.

Management may not provide a concrete capex number this quarter, given the commentary last quarter was fairly vague in terms of sequential increases. What’s critical for the company will be showing how this elevated capex spend can flow directly through to the cloud and Azure.

Valuation:

The primary risk here is that Microsoft’s valuation is back at peak levels, opening up downside risk should it show any hint of weakness, whether that surfaces in margins, EPS forecasts, Azure growth, or overall cloud revenue.

Microsoft is trading at all-time highs just below $410 after rallying more than 11% since January 5. Shares are trading at a PE of 39.7x and a forward PE of 36.5x, levels that it has historically failed to hold, with the most notable being 2021’s top. Shares are also trading at a large premium to its 5-year median PE of 31.6x.

A look at sales-based valuation metrics shows a similar trend. Microsoft is trading at 14x sales and 12.5x forward sales, both far above the 5-year median of 10.9x. Microsoft historically has struggled to hold a forward PS above 12.9x, suggesting that shares are closing in on a top if the report is nothing less than stellar.

Conclusion:

Microsoft kicks off a jam-packed week for Big Tech and AI, with the focus likely to be primarily on initial revenue generation for Copilot and any outlook provided (if any) as well as Azure’s growth and if AI can drive a meaningful sequential increase in growth. Microsoft is demonstrating that it has multiple levers within its product suite to capture AI growth and multiple outlets to capture AI growth via Azure. Fiscal Q2 is expected to start a multiple quarter streak with revenue growth near the 15% range, but EPS estimates raise concerns that margins may weigh on the bottom line. Microsoft’s valuation leaves little room for error, with shares at peak valuations and hard-to-hold levels historically. Yet, AI has been a powerful trend – let’s see if Microsoft’s AI commentary can push the stock higher, or perhaps Microsoft will instead be a reminder of just how far the Mag 7 has come in price in a brief period of time.

Recommended Reading:

  • Positions Update: Microsoft, Nvidia, and Bitcoin
  • Broad Market Analysis
  • Q1 2024 Webinar Highlights
  • Bitcoin and Microsoft Positions Update
Posted in Cloud Software, SoftwareLeave a Comment on Microsoft Fiscal Q2 Earnings: Accelerating Growth, AI in the Spotlight

Posts navigation

Older posts

Recent Posts

  • The IPO Glut of 2020: Why Valuations Have Gone Too Far
  • Zoom Discusses Two Important Catalysts In Q1 Earnings
  • Three Risk Management Tools the I/O Fund Offers
  • Micron Is Up 900%. Here’s Why the AI Memory Trade May Still Have Room to Run
  • Credo: Reliability Leader Aggressively Moves into Optics

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018

Categories

  • 5G
  • About
  • Accounting Tips
  • AdTech
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • AI Stocks
  • AI Stocks
  • Analysts
  • Application Monitoring
  • Application Monitoring
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • AR
  • Audit Reports
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Avod
  • Avod
  • Battery Charging
  • Bear Market
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Broad Market Today
  • Bull Market
  • Bull Market
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • China Stocks
  • Cloud
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Platforms
  • Cloud Platforms
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Technology
  • Company
  • Company
  • Console Gaming
  • Console Gaming
  • Console Gaming
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer Tech
  • Corrections
  • Crypto Investment
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center and Processing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Dating
  • Defi
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • E-Commerce
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • ECommerce
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Energy Stocks
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Ethereum
  • Events1
  • Events1
  • Exchange
  • Faq
  • Finance
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Markets
  • FinTech
  • Fundamental Analysis
  • Gambling
  • Gaming
  • Genomics
  • Glossary
  • Green Energy
  • Growth Stocks
  • Growth Stocks
  • Growth Stocks
  • Headsets
  • Headsets
  • Health Tech
  • Hydrogen
  • Identity
  • Identity
  • Identity
  • Inflation
  • Inflation
  • Inflation
  • Internet of Things
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Investing
  • Investing
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Macro Trends
  • Macro Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Media
  • Membership
  • Mining
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Multimedia
  • Music Streaming
  • NVDA | NVIDIA Corporation
  • Performance Updates
  • Pin Content
  • Podcasts
  • Podcasts
  • Podcasts
  • Portfolio
  • Premium Research
  • Press Releases
  • Press Releases
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Reports and Whitepapers
  • Research Services Preview
  • Resources
  • Resources
  • Semiconductor Stocks
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Solar
  • Solar
  • Stock Analysis PDFs
  • Stock Updates
  • Stock Updates (Blogs)
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Tech Podcast
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Technical Analysis
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Testing Equipment
  • Testing Equipment
  • Top Tech Stock News
  • Travel
  • Trends Report
  • Tutorials
  • Uncategorized
  • Updates
  • Updates
  • Updates
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video Footage
  • VR
  • Webinar Alerts
  • Webinar Alerts
  • Webinars
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: iofund by iofund.co.uk.