Skip to content
Logo-main-white.860316a8

I/O Fund

  • Home
  • Free Stock Analysis
  • AI Stocks
  • BEST OF 2025
  • Analysts
  • Nvidia Hub
  • About
    • Case Studies
    • About Us
    • Premium Services
    • Pricing
    • Notable Wins
    • I/O Fund Reviews
    • Media
  • Contact Us

Month: May 2021

UiPath: Robotics Process Automation

Posted on May 27, 2021June 30, 2026 by io-fund

c15d441a-5b32-4147-8bb9-d78d991e3263_UiPath+Robotics+Process+Automation+Premium+Analysis.pdf

I’m genuinely curious as to whether UiPath will be the first in the tech universe to hold its opening IPO price. There’s a chance it does and I will attempt to communicate why this company could be one of the strongest performers the public markets have seen from my industry.

UiPath is becoming a darling within tech circles. That’s maybe the most critical thing to understand as the Partner Network for UiPath could potentially form a moat. The high switching costs most certainly help the company to become defensible. UiPath makes the choice very clear on what company to choose for RPA, no matter what your organization’s needs are, and from there they give enterprises no reason to switch by continually iterating a cutting-edge approach to RPA.

The last time I was this excited about an IPO was two years ago with Zoom Video. We held off to buy the stock post-lockup. That decision will be yours to make. What distinguishes UiPath for me is that AI stocks have a way of sneaking upward in price. We saw this with Nvidia during the tech rout as Nvidia (the AI bellwether) has performed well this year compared to other leading tech stocks with strong earnings.

Pictured above: Nvidia, the AI bellwether, has outperformed other leading tech companies this year. Little does the market know, that AMD is also becoming a force in AI with the Xilinx acquisition.

 

What is RPA – Macro Overview

Robotics process automation has many supporting macro statistics because its essentially machines replacing humans. The ROI is astounding when you have an error-free employee who works 24/7 and does not tire or need bathroom breaks. To illustrate, a few automations can save 20 minutes of work per person daily and enabling 10K employees with a software robot could save more than $30 million a year (based on an average salary of $35/hour).

There are many fears that RPA will eliminate jobs to the detriment of society. Proponents say this isn’t exactly true, rather RPA will eliminate menial and low satisfactory tasks. According to analysts like Forrester, 14.9 million jobs will be created by 2027 to work alongside robots. It’s not clear though how many jobs robots will replace and if the 15 million is actually a deficit.

According to McKinsey, $3.6 trillion of work can be automated. The piece of the pie that UiPath is after is the automation of applications for enterprises. The number of applications deployed by enterprises has increased by “approximately 70% over the past four years,” according to Wall Street Journal.

The 10,000-foot view of what RPA solves is that interoperability of applications is cumbersome with “a compounding effect on the complexity of business processes” and work done by IT departments.

According to McAfee, the average enterprise has deployed 464 custom applications and deploys an additional 37 new applications in a 12-month time span. Companies with fewer than 1,000 employees run 22 custom applications while companies with over 500,000 run 788 custom applications, on average. The majority of these applications (58%) are used internally while 36.2% are used by customers, partners and suppliers. These larger enterprises – with the 788 applications on average — are the companies that UiPath is targeting.

 

Source: McAfee, 2017

In the United States, real output per hour grew 31% during the decade ending December 2009 while it grew 13% in the subsequent decade through 2019. UiPath believes this decline in output is due to the overwhelming number of applications and software within enterprises.

This is partly because applications are specialized and are not able to address the end-to-end processes that enterprises require. The concept that UiPath proposes is to automate those steps and have a human review the exceptions rather than every detail of every order.

Product Overview:

It’s important to start with product for a company like UiPath – and most companies in tech, really – because without knowing what the special sauce is, companies can get lost in the noise. UiPath is a platform that allows companies to run software bots that process automations. What separates UiPath is the use of AI computer vision to read information, hence having the acronym “UI” in the name, which stands for user interface. The company also leverages machine learning to think and process the information and robotics process automation (RPA) to interact with applications.

The combination of computer vision and machine learning is UiPath’s special sauce. The AI-based computer vision increases the reliability of automation. The AI-based computer vision is able to adapt and interpret varied document types and user interfaces. This is the missing piece in automation that other forms of orchestration or choreography do not have.

The key sentence in the S-1 filing is this: “Our platform enables the reusability and reliability of UI elements by capturing them as objects in a repository.” This means that the AI computer vision is able to dynamically recognize and interact with variables and dynamic objects or applications. In plain terms, it means UiPath can emulate a human by responding to variables the way that humans can. (Anyone working on autonomous vehicles will tell you, the issue with full autonomy is the variables, not the mechanics of driving). 

UiPath’s architecture is UI-based orchestration. This increases the reliability of the automation as it’s able to adapt and interpret varied document types and UIs. As stated, the platform captures UI elements as objects in a repository.

To compare, here are other ways automation and/or integrations are handled:

· Integration orchestration: When on-prem wants to integrate with SaaS platforms, companies like MuleSoft and Webmethods offer third-party connectors. This is called Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

· Business process orchestration: Offers business processes a central process, yet requires human intervention.

· API based orchestration: Lacks a central component and is event driven

· Event driven architecture: Event driven to where the events are autonomous through choreography rather than orchestration (the difference being that orchestration requires a composer while choreography establishes a pattern that does not require supervision).

 

Source: Solace, Microservices

UiPath recently acquired Cloud Elements to add API-based automation to its core offering of UI-based automation. This is the first time the combination will be offered in a single platform. This places UiPath on the same playing field as the orchestration methods listed above, yet with the combination of computer vision/UI-based orchestration. This acquisition takes aim at that market share by providing the best of both worlds. The acquisition brings 200 new native integrations to UiPath

Why is UiPath Better?

The next question to answer is why is computer vision/UI method better? The first is that UI-based automation is not confined to specific APIs. The result of using computer vision (and the other components that I review below – but let’s keep the focus on computer vision for now) is that UiPath is an end-to-end solution rather than a point solution. The goal is to automate the process, not the API, and other orchestrations lack the ability to automate across many applications and link AI capabilities to execute. Without computer vision, the end result will not be human emulation.

The company points out in the S-1 filing that the typical AI/ML environments are developed by data scientists yet need to be used by other departments that carry the processes out (billing or customer service, for example). My takeaway on this is that the other methods for integration and automation do not necessarily cut down on the number of people required and/or does not reduce the technical abilities required to work with the automations. By requiring data scientists to be the central and only hub, end-to-end automation is not possible.

The modular setup is also an advantage. Solutions can be integrated into new, third-party technologies for future development.

When we talk about robots, we are talking about software robots that are on a desktop computer, can work across programs in the background, are able to build applications, send emails, and interact with chatbots. This is achieved with this build:

· AI computer vision can dynamically recognize and interact with variables and dynamic objects and applications

· AI-enabled platform helps identify which processes should be automated including interoperability with 75 AI technology partners

· Document Understanding leverages optical character recognition (OCR) and natural language processing (NLP) and ML to handle processes with humans handling only the exceptions

· Low-code Development drag-and-drop tools to serve a range of technical skills

· Governance and Security ensures compliance

 

Product Specifics:

UiPath is an expensive product and this is reflected in its customer concentration at the enterprise level. There is a Community Edition that is free, which is a smart way to onboard more developers at the student level.

Studio is UiPath’s integrated development environment (IDE) that allows access to the Automation Cloud. There are three variations: Studio, Studio Pro and StudioX. The difference is what technical level the user has with StudioX requiring very little skills (i.e. “low code”) with drag-and-drop while StudioPro requires Advanced skills.

Automation Hub:

Automation hub allows for central management of the automation pipeline. It’s a command center to see and control the end-to-end system. It also allows the administrator to visualize automation complexity and understand the impact and ROI.

Process Mining:

Process mining taps into a data source from enterprise applications and makes use of this event data. The goal is to streamline processes to become more efficient. For instance, if your goal is to improve customer retention rate, then you can track how long customer service responses take, delivery rates, and what is causing delivery problems so you can address the situation. Process mining also helps you identify bottlenecks that can benefit from automation.

Process mining changes all this by tapping into a data source that already exists. This is done through the ETL “extract, transform, load” process. Most of your enterprise applications (like SAP and Salesforce) record every activity and transaction that happens within each stage of a process. This is called event data.

Business processes suitable for process mining include accounts receivable, claims and accounts payable. In financial services, it can be used for loan approval, risk and investment management or fraud. In health care, process mining can be used to reduce paperwork and streamline processes like the spike in demand for testing we saw during Covid.

Task Mining and Task Capture:

Task capture allows for the mapping of business workflows. Employees can record the process they want to automate and Task Capture will gather data for each step. The software generates a process map into a file for the development team to use to create automations.

Task mining will have its public launch in 2021 and will allow enterprises to record work performed by users across a list of applications.

Business Model and Automation Flywheel:

UiPath benefits from a flywheel effect. The reason that a flywheel effect occurs is because when companies use UiPath to add robots, they see a substantial return on investment, and then deploy more robots.

The company is built and ready to scale with flywheel effects as UiPath can be customized for every need of the enterprise. The robots are designed to work in any environment (cloud, hybrid, on-premise), for any level of technical ability (low code to advanced code), is licensed through subscriptions annually or multi-year, and can work alongside a human or be fully automated, is additive, and can be used as a unified solution or individually (that’s a mouthful).

The point is that UiPath is prepared to offer a solution for any customer need and to scale as the needs of the enterprise changes.

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then perhaps this helps illustrate the flywheel effect:

The graph above shows that the 2016 cohort of customers have increased their ARR from $395,368 to $22.7 million in a five-year time span. This is a multiple of 57X. The company’s top 50 customers have grown ARR by 81X. This is measured by the ARR generated in each customer’s first month as a customer.

There are some examples in the S-1 filing that show up to 69X increase in customer ARR within one year. That’s an outlier with others increasing 32X, 6X and 4X in one year. Even the lowest number here is impressive, and is driven by cross-department sales, increase of robots per employee, increased adoption across products, and expanded use cases.

Partner Program and Developer Ecosystem:

Partner programs are especially important for a company like UiPath as it can help to extend business models and also help to scale a product very quickly. It’s also important for global growth across various regions. UiPath is the automation back bone to many other products that you’re familiar with: Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services are integrated with UiPath so their cloud computing customers can utilize cloud-based AI capabilities. Other integrations include Adobe, Alteryx, Oracle, Salesforce, SAP, ServiceNow and Workday.

UiPath is unique in that it’s tailored to citizen developers who prefer low code and also advanced developers. Right now, the company counts 750,000 registered developer accounts. There is a marketplace with 1,200 vetted and pre-built automation activities that can be used for enterprise workflows. UiPath says there are 10,000 downloads per month in the Marketplace.

Market Size and Valuation:

I expect that UiPath will trade at a high valuation into the foreseeable future. This is because of the specific trend the company is capturing. I think individual investors can get lost in the noise of popular stocks, but I don’t think institutions fall prey to this as easily. You’ll notice the companies that are favorites among retailers are not favorites among institutions. That’s one reason we run this site, is to bring to your attention to companies that you won’t want to miss out on.

What about sector rotations, like we just had? Even still, companies like Snowflake retained their position of highest valuation, comparatively speaking. It went from a jaw-dropping 80 forward P/S in February to about 50 forward P/S – yet this company still led the pack of cloud software valuations.

We typically don’t buy above 40 forward P/S (you can reference when I discussed this during heightened exuberance in this Motley Fool video). We don’t know UiPath’s forward valuation until we see more analyst consensus numbers come out. The earnings report on June 8th will help quite a bit. However, if we adjust the revenue growth to a reasonable 65% forward, then we see UiPath trading at 41X.

Please note, this is calculated on 65% revenue growth next year, which is an educated guess. We will know more about UiPath’s forward estimates in the coming weeks.

If we take the LTM valuations, we see UiPath stretching the upper limits again. LTM is important here since UiPath’s forward is not available yet.

The I/O Fund does not give financial advice and highly valued tech companies require an appetite for risk. We simply tell you what we are doing with our own money. We bought UiPath starting last week after the blog notification went out and we will be watching it closely near the lock-up expiration as to whether we need to exit and enter again. This extra work is worth the long-term trajectory that robotics offers us as tech investors.

The reason UiPath is unique from the others on this list is because the opportunity for RPA is fully in front of the company, whereas many of the others are centered in a trend that is in motion.

I also think UiPath will continue to take more market share relative to the RPA market, and the key metrics around increased ARR help prove this as they are a bit mind-blowing. Other than ARR, I can’t quantify exactly why I think UiPath will take more market share other than it has a solid reputation and there is a buzz around the company that is hard to communicate. People are pleased with UiPath, they’re upgrading and buying more, and it’s becoming the company that everyone (who is anyone) needs to partner with.

Market Size:

There are a range of estimates on the size of the Robotics Process Automation market.

According to the S-1 filing, IDC places a $17 billion value for 2020 to reach $30 billion by 2024. Meanwhile, UiPath states in the S-1 that the “fully automated” enterprise is a market of $60 billion. There is also a reference in the S-1 to an estimate from Bain & Company placing the market for automation software at $65 billion.

Forrester states there are 1.69 billion knowledge workers globally. So, that’s helpful to picture TAM.

Third-party analysts are more conservative – no surprise there as S-1 filings usually publish the highest numbers available. According to Statista, the market will be worth $10 billion by 2023.

Global Market Insights places the market at $23 billion by 2026. Grand View Research states the market will reach $13.74 billion by 2028 at a CAGR of 32.8%.

That’s quite the range and is tough to extract a real market size from these numbers. However, there is agreement across the third-party sources that the robotics process automation market (specifically, RPA only) was $2 billion in 2020. This means UiPath owned about 30% of this specific market at $600 million in revenue. If we take the $10 billion Statista is putting out there, then UiPath can see a path to $2 to $3 billion in revenue by 2023 in RPA specifically. I always give room in these market growth estimates, by the way, so 2023 should be considered 2024 by Statista. It’s hard to nail down market growth with adoption in tech products.

Financials:

Please note, UiPath’s fiscal year ends January 31st.

We covered the financials here in a short write-up.

The good news about UiPath is that as the top line improves, the bottom line is also improving. Revenue growth from $336 million to $608 million, represents 81% growth for fiscal 2021. As mentioned in the valuation section, we won’t have a complete picture on forward growth until the upcoming earnings report on June 8th. Right now, I’m assuming we will see growth this year in the 60-percentile range. This is a guess so I will update you when we get real numbers from the earnings and analyst consensus reports.

In the past, operating margins have been an issue for the company with an operating margin that was triple digits in the red (154%) in 2019. The company’s current operating margin is (18%). Adjusted operating margins were (113%) and (4%), respectively.

The net losses have also improved from ($520) million in 2020 to ($92) million in the current year. The fiscal year 2020 losses were at (155%) of revenue compared to (15%) of revenue in the current fiscal year.

The bottom-line losses were partly driven by sales and marketing costs which were at 144% of revenue in fiscal year 2020. Surprisingly, R&D is low at 39% of revenue in 2020 and 18% of revenue in 2021.

The current gross margins of UiPath are at 89% which is among the highest in the software industry. This has been consistent with 82% margins in fiscal 2020. Free cash flow is at 4% of revenue, or $30 million in fiscal 2021.

The company is an enterprise-focused company and is well utilized. As of last year, the company counted 80% of the Fortune 10 and 61% of the Fortune Global 500 as customers. This grew to 63% of the Fortune Global 500.

As stated, the main business model is to increase spend per customer as enterprises will deploy more robots across more departments, increase number of products used, and expand use cases for automation. That’s important to repeat because typically this high of penetration could actually be a headwind for growth.

The dollar-based net retention rate for the company was 153% in 2020 and 145% in 2021. After subtracting churn, the gross retention rate is 96% and 97%. With that said, this metric is becoming less meaningful the more cloud and subscription-based companies come on the market. We have many in the 130 to 160 range and it’s similar to checking vitals – we want to know the company is healthy but it doesn’t tell us much about the nuances of longevity.

The company has a NPS rating of 71, helping to illustrate a high level of customer satisfaction. Despite serving large enterprises, including 8 of the Fortune 10, UiPath does not have any customer making up more than 10% of revenue.

Conclusion:

We finally have the AI pureplay we’ve been waiting for in the software category. This company is likely to be valued high into the foreseeable future due to the attractiveness of the trend (robotics). We feel institutions will want to participate in this trend with this risk/reward ratio that UiPath offers, which to reiterate, is lower risk on execution due to the excellent end-to-end platform, strong partner program, leading market share and ability to scale quickly across enterprises, with the differentiation of computer vision.

Please look for Knox’s trade notifications as he patiently builds this to become a core position of ours. If you made me choose, (and we do have to choose as we disclose allocations to you), I would place UiPath above Snowflake on conviction. Post-IPO lockup, and pending Knox’s excellent skills in finding the right entry, you can expect to see UiPath in our top 10 by year-end or shortly thereafter. Note that we aren’t rushing into a position at this valuation, rather keeping our toe in the water, and navigating as we see what the market does.

Posted in Ai Platforms, AI Stocks, Stock UpdatesLeave a Comment on UiPath: Robotics Process Automation

Q1 Earnings Analysis for Etsy, Square, and Palantir

Posted on May 27, 2021June 30, 2026 by io-fund
Q1 Earnings Analysis for Etsy, Square, and Palantir

As earnings season winds down, we review earnings reports for popular growth tech stocks Etsy, Square, and Palantir. 

Regarding Etsy, e-commerce valuations have come down as a result of the correction in growth tech, and when compared with other e-commerce stocks that are facing tougher comps, Etsy is showing slowing projected growth of 32% this year.

We also discuss Square, a fintech stock whose topline beat was driven by a surge in Bitcoin revenue. Excluding Bitcoin revenue, the company still reports decent growth of 44%. We look at Square from both perspectives below.

Palantir is guiding for Q2 revenue growth of 43%, but to prove product-market fit, the company needs to show higher growth in commercial revenue. Beth Kindig previously wrote about this in Forbes when she analyzed the product at its IPO.

Etsy: 

Like many beneficiaries of Covid-19, e-commerce benefitted from the economic shutdown through an acceleration in revenue. In 2020, consumers spent approximately $861B online with U.S. retailers, up 44% YoY, nearly three times the growth in 2019 at 15.1%, according to estimates from Digital Commerce 360. 

E-commerce valuations peaked for the industry in early 2021 as investors worried about more difficult comps. As you can see from the chart below, Etsy’s valuation peaked at 15x forward revenues, based on data from YCharts. As of May 25, Etsy was trading at 9x forward revenues.

e-commerce companies ev to revenues (forward) chart

Etsy is projected to show slower revenue growth of 32% this year than popular e-commerce stocks like Sea Limited, 89%, Mercado Libre, 89%, and Shopify, 51%. Etsy is facing noticeable deceleration from its 111% YoY revenue growth in 2020.

Revenue growth for Etsy is on par with BigCommerce, which is valued at 16x revenue versus 9x revenue for Etsy. Meanwhile, Etsy is already profitable with 74% gross margins and projected EPS growth in 2021 of 12%. The company also beat on its top and bottom lines with 141% YoY revenue and EPS of $1.

e-commerce stocks metrics

GMS represents total sales and is an important metric for e-commerce stocks. In Q1, consolidated gross merchandise sales (GMS) for Etsy was up 132.3% YoY to $3.1B, while Etsy marketplace GMS was up 144.1% YoY to $2.9B. Etsy estimates that stimulus payments drove approximately 8% of GMS growth in Q1. In its guidance for Q2, Etsy is estimating consolidated GMS growth of 5% to 15% YoY.   

In Q1, the Etsy marketplace reported the highest growth rates for active buyers, repeat buyers, and habitual buyers since becoming a public company, acquiring 16.3M new and reactivated buyers. Active buyers grew 91% YoY; repeat buyers who made two or more purchases in the last year grew 114%; while habitual buyers, the company’s most loyal consumers, grew more than 205%. 

Conclusion

Like many e-commerce stocks, in 2020 Etsy benefited from Covid-19 through an acceleration in revenue. The company is now facing tougher comps and is guiding for decelerating growth. E-commerce valuations have contracted, and Etsy is not the cheapest e-commerce growth stock we analyzed above. 

As of May 25, Etsy was trading at 9x forward revenue versus 6.36x for Farfetch and 7.78x for Poshmark, which we previously covered. Unlike other popular e-commerce stocks, Etsy is profitable with a gross margin of 74%, and projected revenue and EPS growth in 2021 of 32% and 12% respectively.

 

Square:

Covid-19 accelerated the trend towards digital payments, with more than 70 million transactions being processed globally in 2020, representing growth of 41% YoY, according to a recent report from ACI Worldwide and GlobalData. 

The value of those transactions rose 32.8% YoY to $69T, while the share of digital transactions was 9.8%, up from 7.6% in 2019. 

Digital payments are nascent with plenty of room for growth, according to the report. 

top 10 countries by number of digital transactions in 2020

Digital transactions have a projected CAGR of 12% by 2025, with the fastest growth of digital payments from 2020 to 2025 in Croatia, 374.4%, Columbia, 112.7%, Malaysia 83.9%, Peru, 74.4%, and Finland 71.4%. 

North America is expected to be the fastest growing region, with a CAGR from 2020 to 2025 of 36.5%.

Square, a popular fintech stock, allows users to trade Bitcoin via its mobile application. Square’s Cash App has outpaced PayPal’s Venmo in quarterly downloads every quarter since launching Bitcoin trading in Q4 2017, based on data from Sensor Tower. 

cash app & venmo app quarterly downloads

Square reported Q1 earnings May 6, beating on the top and bottom lines, driven by a surge in Bitcoin revenue. Revenue of $5.06B, up 266% YoY, beat by $1.73B. Excluding bitcoin, total net revenue was up 44% YoY to $1.55B. 

 Cash App revenue was $4.04B, up over 650% YoY, with gross profit of $495M, up 171% YoY. Cash App generated Bitcoin revenue of $3.51B with gross profit of $75 million. Excluding Bitcoin, Cash App generated revenue of $529M, up 139% YoY.

Gross profit grew 79% YoY to $964M. Seller generated revenue of $1.02 billion, up 19% YoY, and $468 million of gross profit, up 32% YoY. 

To bring in new customers, last March, Square began offering Cash App users the ability to send Bitcoin for free. During the quarter, Square also integrated Square Loyalty into Cash App, which it says is “a flywheel for seller and buyer discovery, engagement, and retention.” 

Square officially launched its industrial bank, Square Financial Services, last March. It is expected to launch business checking and savings accounts, according to a recent report. 

Excluding Bitcoin revenue, Square trades at a premium compared to peers PayPal, Fiserv, and Shift4. However, for 2021, Square is projected to grow revenue 115% YoY and EPS 80% YoY, which is higher than other fintech stocks. Gross margins for Square are lower than its competitors, as Bitcoin boosts revenue but reduces gross margins. 

fintech companies metrics

Conclusion 

Moving forward, Square faces increasingly difficult comps and trades at nearly 16x forward revenue, which is a premium compared to peers and related to its higher revenue growth.

 

Palantir:

Total commercial revenue grew 19% YoY to $133M, while US commercial revenue grew 72% YoY. Commercial growth was more muted due to the ongoing impacts of Covid-19, including in Europe, according to the report.

Palantir is continuing to make progress on commercial customer growth, according to the report. CEO Shyam Sankar struck a bullish tone, reporting a substantial increase in new leads: 

“We see strength and forward looking indicators and customer interest,” he said. “Since the beginning of February, qualified commercial opportunities in the US and the UK are up 2.5 times. Active commercial pilots across the business have more than doubled and opportunities across the US and UK government continue to develop at pace.” 

Right now, the closest competitor to Palantir is Semantic AI, a private company headquartered in San Diego, but more competitors are likely being developed in the startup ecosystem. We cover this and more in a previous write-up by Beth Kindig here.

Last April, Palantir demonstrated Apollo for Edge AI. The product is now live and takes a “pioneering approach” to AI using micro models, Sankar said: 

“Apollo for Edge AI is the next evolution to transform AI into alpha, enabling customers to train, manage and deploy multiple independently versioned chained models to the Edge with ease,” he said. 

Below we compare Palantir with other high growth tech stocks. While Palantir has healthy gross margins of 78%, projected 2021 revenue growth is lower than growth tech stocks like DDOG, SHOP, and ZS, which also trade at valuations under 30x. 

 

palantir compared to other high growth tech stocks

Conclusion

Although Palantir is guiding for revenue growth of 30% or more through 2025, we believe the company will needs to do a lot to execute in the Commercial market against the thriving AI startup ecosystem. However, it may take a few years before AI startups can effectively compete against Palantir. The number to watch will be commercial revenue growth, which was low at 19% this past quarter. Without more growth here, the product may not show signs of product-market fit in the commercial sector.   

Disclaimer: The author, Jessica Ablamsky, owns shares of Etsy and Square. The content in this article is intended to be used for informational purposes only. The author has not received any compensation from any third party or company discussed in this article. The content is the expressed opinions of the author and is intended for educational and research purposes. Any thesis presented is not a guarantee of any particular stock’s future prices, so please factor this risk into your own analysis. It is very important that you do your own analysis before making any investments based on your personal circumstances. The author is not a licensed professional advisor. Please seek counsel form a licensed professional before acting on any analysis expressed in this article, to see if it is appropriate for your personal situation.

Posted in Broad Market Today, Earning UpdatesLeave a Comment on Q1 Earnings Analysis for Etsy, Square, and Palantir

FuboTV: Why I Like This Stock Better Than DraftKings

Posted on May 25, 2021June 30, 2026 by io-fund
FuboTV: Why I Like This Stock Better Than DraftKings

This article was originally published on Forbes on May 21, 2021,12:31am EDToriginally published on Forbes on May 21, 2021,12:31am EDT

FuboTV has been dismissed by quite a few analysts and investors for its negative gross margins. This dismissal, that leans heavily on the lagging financials, is reminiscent of the many times that tech stocks have been misunderstood.

As a tech analyst who is trained in product, I see a sizable runway in live sports OTT and sports betting with Fubo having key advantages over DraftKings. The management has to execute, and while the market calls this speculation, I call it a product road map.

First, FuboTV must continue to grow its audience. I made the argument that this is the most essential piece over the coming quarters when the shorts attacked this company. The bearish reports ignored the most important piece to a media company: audience growth. Fubo has handily overcome the challenge of growing its audience year-over-year regardless of the seasonality in sports. The last two quarters could not have gone better in this regard.

Second, FuboTV must execute on launching a sports betting book. This is easier than the public markets think as Fubo has every required ingredient. Most importantly, competitors such as DraftKings do not have all of the essential ingredients that FuboTV has, and we expect Fubo will see a healthy uptake for this product launch. 

You can read my previous write-up on FuboTV here.previous write-up on FuboTV here.

Financials do matter, of course, and as mentioned Fubo is the ultimate challenge for those who rely on financials alone and ignore product. This is because live sports were canceled last year. Short seller reports that dissect a live sports company following covid are exaggerating the effects of a lagging, one-time event. Forward-looking, we have an ad rebound in digital ad spend from 5% last year to 17% this year. Plus, the World Cup is on deck (and hopefully the Olympics) which bodes well for point #1 – audience growth.

The more popular bet is to go with DraftKings. However, DraftKings is a well-known story that is fully priced. We like the risk/reward of Fubo better due to the fact that this particular company is capturing the live sports OTT trend and will be able to convert high-value users for the sports playbook because they own their audience. 

Audience Growth

FuboTV put quite a few triple digits on the scoreboard in the last earnings report, which was the strongest first quarter in company history. Due to the seasonality of sports, Q1 is typically lighter in terms of growth for Fubo, yet the company reported sequential revenue and subscriber growth.

GAAP of -$0.59 missed by $0.03 and included -$0.02 from expenses associated with the launch of sports betting and -$0.02 due to paying off debt related to senior convertible notes.

Prior to the earnings report, we reached out to Apptopia to check the app data on Fubo. Apptopia is a provider of competitive intelligence on mobile applications.

With the information, we issued the following note to our subscribers on April 20th: "Fubo guided to end Q1 with subscribers of 520,000 to 530,000, representing growth of 82% YoY at the midpoint. Data from Apptopia shows that Fubo ended March with approximately 585,000 daily active users (DAU) versus the Q1 guide for 525,000 paid subscribers at the end of Q1Fubo ended March with approximately 585,000 daily active users (DAU) versus the Q1 guide for 525,000 paid subscribers at the end of Q1." 

On May 11th, the company went on to report 105% year-over-year growth and 8% sequential growth for 590,430 MAUs with subscription revenue increasing 131% YoY to $107.1M. Therefore, we were within 6K subscribers on the estimate.

Net subscriber additions were approximately 43,000 versus a loss of 28,000 in the same quarter last year, which the company achieved while reducing sales and marketing as a percentage of revenue. Monthly ARPU increased 28% year-over-year and advertising ARPU was up 57%.

Paid and trial users streamed more than 228 million hours, up 113% YoY. MAUs on average watched 129 hours per month, up 8% YoY.

This is the second time we accurately tracked Fubo’s audience growth with Apptopia data. The first was when we pointed out during a flurry of short reports that the audience growth in Q4 was quite healthy.

According to Q2 data from Apptopia, as of May 12th, Fubo’s growth remains strong on a year-over-year basis. We are currently seeing app downloads tracking at 181% YoY against weak Q2 ’20 comps due to the cancellation of sporting events last year.

Please note that we have extrapolated the data through May 12th to the end of Q2 and we were roughly 46% through the quarter as of last week. 

Note: this data is not for earnings calls and readers must do their own due diligence. We are simply sharing information from a mobile analytics firm, which is one of the many channel checks we do when looking at tech stocks.

Fubo is tracking for a sequential QoQ decline in downloads in Q2, but it should be noted that Q2 is historically a weaker quarter than Q1 for Fubo, as evidenced by 2019 pre-pandemic data.

We are seeing similar trends in average daily active users (DAUs) thus far through Q2, with Fubo on pace for 172% YoY growth and a modest decline sequentially.

Total time spent in the Fubo app is currently on pace for a large YoY increase of 237%, with another modest decline sequentially from Q1. This helps support how sticky Fubo’s product is to its audience.

Fubo raised guidance and expects Q2 revenue of $121M at the midpoint, up 174% YoY, versus consensus of $98.37M, and FY2021 revenue of $525M at the midpoint, up 101% YoY versus consensus of $472.69M.

The company also raised guidance for subscribers. For Q2 the company expects 600,0000 to 605,000 subscribers, up 111% YoY and for the full year expects 830,000 to 850,000 subscribers, up 53% YoY at the midpoint.

Live Sports OTT

Not surprisingly, we saw the biggest drop ever in households with cable packages this past year with a record 7.5% decline. Tech Crunch recently stated the 2020 pandemic accelerated the projected cord cutting rate to 31.2 million households last year and is expected to reach 46.6 million households by 2024.

Even more pertinent, according to a survey compiled by Parks Associates, 55% of cable subscribers state that live sports is an important factor in why they are staying with expensive cable packages. That means of the 77.6 million currently subscribing to cable, satellite and telecom packages, 42 million are live sports fans. This is 10 million more than the size of the current cord-cutting audience, which has taken nearly 15 years to amass (circa 2007).

In September of last year, AT&T paid $3.75 billion for the exclusive rights to segments of major league baseball. This is a renewal of prior contracts and is a 65% increase from their prior exclusive price tag. The fact that ATT is willing to pay a 65% premium from their last contract shows the importance placed on live sports.

We can see a similar evidence as to the value placed on live sports with Amazon’s purchase for the exclusive rights to the Thursday night NFL games through 2033 at an astounding $100 billion.

As an investor, I understand FuboTV will not stream every game in every league, and I am aware exclusive rights to various sports may shift through negotiations. In fact, the Tokyo Olympics may be canceled. However, FuboTV is offering me a pure play and the company only needs to corner a percentage of live sports cord-cutters in order to be successful. FuboTV could end up owning 5% of the market or 20% of the market – both look good from this market cap.

When asked about competitors, Anthony Wood of Roku has stated a few times that any cord-cutting is a windfall for their platform. Similarly, I believe that any NFL fans cutting the cord will be a windfall for Fubo.

On that note, Fubo offers comprehensive sports coverage. According to a March 2021 press release, Fubo offers “42 of the top 50 Nielsen-ranked networks across sports, news and entertainment channels,” plus more than 30,000 movies and TV shows on-demand.

It’s also important to note that Fubo has the exclusive streaming rights to the South American Qatar World Cup 2022. When you consider there are 3.5 billion soccer fans globally, suddenly Amazon’s Thursday night NFL deal doesn’t seem so make or break (far from it, Thursday is the least popular night).

Sports Betting

In the United Kingdom, sports betting is a $20 billion industry today. There are projections that sports betting will be a $155 billion industry by 2024. To find an opportunity with exposure to this market at a $3 billion market cap is worth a closer look.

Fubo acquired Balto Sports on December 1st in the company’s first strategic move to launch free-to-play games this year. Balto Sports develops tools and contest automation software for users to organize and play fantasy sports games and is a Y-Combinator graduate.

There was criticism from the short sellers that FuboTV had bought a headline. Yet, there is nothing unusual about a stealth product that needs to attach the technology to an audience. In fact, Fubo plans to beta test its free gaming experience in the next few weeks and this rapid release is likely due to the incubation period that Balto Sports underwent beginning with its time at Y Combinator. 

In Q1, Fubo acquired Vigtory, a sports betting and interactive gaming company, for $37.2 million. The company was founded in 2019. The company is co-founded by a former gaming executive at MGM Resorts and has regulatory approval in New Jersey. Notably, the app has not gone live which is reflected in the price. 

Fubo Sportsbook is expected to launch in Q4. The company has $400 million cash and is planning to spend less than $50 million to launch sports betting, per the Q1 earnings report. Fubo plans to deliver streaming and gaming in one data analytics platform, offering users a seamless experience. We expect the company will see lower customer acquisition costs as a result of owning the audience. Fubo’s CEO, David Gandler, said during the most recent earnings call that 30% of users are willing to participate in free-to-play, according to surveys done on the platform, while 22% of paid subscribers are willing to place bets on Fubo.

Despite short sellers not seeing how or why a sports betting app could merge with live sports content, we now see DraftKings partnering with Sling/DISH. I guess content and sports betting does go together, after all (yes, I’m being sarcastic!) It’s surprising that the critics said it cannot be done despite Sky Media having the most successful sports betting model globally.

From purely a user acquisition standpoint, in-app ads with your own content is nearly frictionless and you have a mountain of data to effectively target. Fubo’s ability to gather audience data and appropriately market them, with a deep understanding of preferences, is an advantage that is currently understated. Fubo has first-party data and can specifically tailor an experience, which will either result in higher ARPU from betting or higher ARPU from ad spend.

DraftKings, meanwhile, has partnered with the number six over-the-top provider, DISH Network/Sling. We think DraftKings sees the potential threat in Fubo having access to first-party data and a closed-circuit loop for user acquisition in sports betting. Notably, DraftKings faces friction here when introducing a new brand name that is not DISH/Sling. Essentially, whatever DraftKings can do with the #6 partnership, Fubo can do better. For example, Fubo can give free sports content away to high value users who spend over $100 on sports betting and offer other rewards that are not possible unless you own the audience. The CEO talks about this here.

Fubo is already on par with DraftKings in terms of ARPU and has not added sports betting yet. These numbers show that with sports betting, Fubo could potentially see $100 ARPU or greater.

Notably, DraftKings spends an exorbitant amount on sales and marketing at 82% of revenue. This reflects the cost of acquiring users when you don’t own an audience. It’s interesting, of course, that the critics of Fubo do not look at the $1.5 billion in net losses that DraftKings accrues on its bottom line. On a forward basis, DraftKings is estimated to report ($2.82) EPS for fiscal year 2021 compared to Fubo’s estimated ($1.96) EPS.

Notably, despite having 1/3 the revenue and audience size of DraftKings, Fubo is trading at 1/6 the market cap. It’s not hard to see the potential here, and clearly a healthier bottom line isn’t the reason that DraftKings trades at a 300% higher valuation.

Conclusion:

We officially recommended FuboTV in October and did not hesitate to challenge the shorts in January before the last two earnings reports confirmed the company’s strong growth. We specialize in spotting opportunities in tech growth based on product and we were the first analyst (anywhere) to recommend Roku, we were very early to call Nvidia the future for AI during the crypto bust nearly two years before AI drove the data center segment, and we said Zoom’s product would go viral six months before covid.

We are not concerned with broader market weakness that affects short-term price movements. Instead, we look for companies that are executing on a product road map, are capturing a microtrend and are able to scale. Not only do we think Fubo can do this, but we think Fubo will overtake DraftKings in the next 2-5 years.

Please note: The I/O Fund conducts research and draws conclusions for the Fund’s positions. We then share that information with our readers. This is not a guarantee of a stock’s performance. Please consult your personal financial advisor before buying any stock in the companies mentioned in this analysis.

Posted in Gambling, Media, Svod, Tech StocksLeave a Comment on FuboTV: Why I Like This Stock Better Than DraftKings

UiPath: LTBH Position – Report Coming Soon

Posted on May 16, 2021June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Please note, Mailchimp was down for a period of time on Friday. If you rely on Mailchimp only for real-time trade notifications, then please check this page for current updates. SMS/text messages and Forum Buys/Sells are additional places the alerts are sent to.

UiPath: Robotics Process Automation (RPA)

When I think of artificial intelligence, one of the first things that comes to mind is robotics process automation (RPA). To be clear, these two are not the same – but together, advanced AI skills can be integrated into robots to understand documents including structured and semi-structured data, visualizing screens, and comprehending speech. You can think of RPA as the last-mile delivery for artificial intelligence. In other words, what do you do with AI, ML and NLP – what’s the outcome? A popular choice will be to automate processes with robotics.

I’ll go into greater detail in the upcoming PDF report but the main takeaways from the S-1 Filing are:

· Revenue growth of 81% to $608 million

· Dollar-based net retention rate of 145%, ranking it in the top 5 among public SaaS stocks who disclose this metric

· Gross margins of 89% which are among the highest in the software industry

As the top line increases, the bottom line is improving.

Over its last 12 months, UiPath has a free cash flow margin of 4% to go along with a -18% operating margin.  The -18% operating margin is a significant improvement from the -154% operating margin the company recorded in 2019. 

UiPath logged a $92M net loss in its last fiscal year, an improvement from the $520M net loss the company announced the year prior.

At the time of its S-1, UiPath had a total of 7,968 customers, exceeding a 70% CAGR in customer growth over the last 2 years.  Customers with over $100K+ ARR totaled 1,002.  UiPath automates millions of repetitive tasks for an impressive list of customers that includes 63% of the Fortune 500 and 8 of the Fortune 10. 

UiPath has an EV/NTM Revenue valuation of 35.9x using its 81% YoY growth run rate.  Below is a comparison of UiPath to some other high growth software stocks.  PATH currently ranks 3rd among the highest valuations in the software industry. 

 

Caution: IPO lockup periods usually see a decline in price

We’ve stated many times in the past that IPOs are tricky and we tend to not participate. We patiently waited for Snowflake, for example. We did the same on Zoom as we were prepared to find our lowest entry post-IPO.

The reason a lock-up period is followed by a lower stock price, even when the company is fundamentally strong and will go on to make bigger gains, is because some investors need to exit and go find their next big win. These are seed round and Series A investors who made plenty in the public offering and prefer to go find new portfolio companies.

Therefore, if we enter UiPath, we could exit again prior to the lock-up period expiring. This isn’t because we don’t want a position in the company, rather it’s that we need to compete on performance, and to also be transparent so our subscribers are fully aware of how we navigate volatile tech growth. 

Maybe UiPath will be the first to hold its opening price after lock-up. In the meantime, I want to give you a heads up in case the I/O Fund initiates before we release the deep dive research.

Posted in Ai Platforms, AI Stocks, Stock Updates (Blogs)Leave a Comment on UiPath: LTBH Position – Report Coming Soon

Fiverr Q1 Update

Posted on May 13, 2021June 30, 2026 by io-fund

I covered Fiverr here in November 2020 as part of our free newsletter.  In this report, I made the case that the trends we were seeing from Fiverr were not dependent on Covid, but rather accelerated by the pandemic. 

I argued that these trends would be sustained post-pandemic and that the shift to a more remote and flexible workforce was permanent, especially in younger generations.  Six months later, lockdowns have eased amidst the vaccination rollout, but we continue to see positive momentum in Fiverr’s platform.

I/O Fund is looking for signs of high-level business performance among indiscriminate selling in growth tech. When the value rotation ends, I believe FVRR is one of the stocks poised to benefit most. Moving forward, FVRR is unlikely to see triple digit revenue growth again. However, consensus projections show 40% revenue CAGR over the next three years, with tremendous growth on the bottom line as the company improves profitability. 

Below I examine Q1 results and guidance, evidence of increased usage and engagement of the platform, and valuation.

Q1 Results and 2021 Guidance      

Fiverr announced Q1 results on May 6, comfortably beating top and bottom line estimates while also raising guidance.  Revenue came in at $68.3M in the quarter, representing an acceleration to 100% YoY growth.  Non-GAAP EPS of -$0.01 beat by $0.10, while adjusted EBITDA improved to ($0.7M) compared to ($2.9M) in Q1 ‘20. 

Active buyers grew 56% YoY to 3.8M, an acceleration from the 45% growth rate Fiverr announced last quarter.  Spend per buyer came in at $216, representing 22% YoY growth.  Take rate improved 10 basis points YoY to 27.2%, while the company also announced an impressive 84.1% gross margin. 

Fiverr guided for $74M in revenue for Q2 (+57% YoY) and positive EBITDA of $6M.  For the FY 2021, Fiverr raised revenue guidance to $305M at the midpoint.  The company is now expecting YoY revenue growth of 61% in 2021 versus previous guidance for a 48% YoY growth rate.  The FY outlook came in 6% above consensus estimates.  Management also guided for positive adjusted EBITDA of $22M at the midpoint, representing 142% full year EBITDA growth. 

Continued Momentum

In the company’s Shareholder Letter, Fiverr management talked about its expectation for continued strength and an elevated spend level that will be sustained well into the future.  The platform saw its most ever monthly app downloads in March 2021, reaching 215,000 downloads from US app stores (+57% YoY).  US monthly active users grew 40% YoY in March 2021, representing Fiverr’s highest ever monthly growth rate.

The Fiverr app is currently ranked 31st in “Business” on Apple’s app store and 22nd on Google Play.  When I covered Fiverr on November 20, 2020, the app had a ranking of 39th in “Business” on Apple’s app store and 26th on Google Play.  This data indicates that we are seeing continued strength from Fiverr’s platform into mid-May, even as over 32% of the US population is now fully vaccinated and over 45% of the population has received at least one dose.       

We continue to see evidence that Fiverr’s platform is performing better than ever as lockdowns ease.  Global internet and engagement trends from Alexa show Fiverr’s site currently ranks 139th in traffic and engagement over the past 90 days.   

 

Source: Alexa

Fiverr’s ranking has improved 79 spots from mid-February, and is currently sitting at peak traffic levels.   

Over the last 6 months, total visits to Fiverr have trended upwards and the platform is currently near peak levels with 60.6M average daily visits (+3% from 11/20).  Fiverr ranks 530th globally in total visits according to SimilarWeb.    

Source: SimilarWeb   

In comparison to my coverage of Fiverr in November 2020, we continue to see evidence of increased usage and engagement.  The trends towards adaptation of remote work and shifting businesses online are examples of lasting changes brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic.  A key component of the “New Economy” includes more remote and flexible work, where Fiverr continues to show it will be a key beneficiary.

Valuation

FVRR stock has historically commanded a premium valuation as the company has an exceptional revenue growth rate, 84.1% gross margins, and is already profitable on the bottom line.  FVRR stock currently trades at 16.0x EV/NTM revenue after reaching a peak valuation of above 40x EV/NTM revenue in early 2021. 

The sell off in high multiple stocks has hit FVRR hard and the stock is over 50% off all-time-high prices of $336.  16.0x EV/NTM revenue is the lowest forward valuation FVRR stock has traded at in the last 9 months.     

Conclusion

We are unlikely to see a triple digit revenue growth rate again from Fiverr as the company now faces tougher comps. But consensus projections show expectations of 62% YoY growth in 2021 and a 40% revenue CAGR over the next 3 years.  Analysts are also expecting tremendous growth on the bottom line as Fiverr ramps up profitability, with consensus projections for EPS of $2.09 in FY 2023 compared to the $0.29 FY 2020 EPS Fiverr just announced.        

When the value rotation eventually ends and we see a rotation back to high growth tech stocks, FVRR is one of the stocks poised to benefit the most.  We are looking for signs of high-level business performance during the indiscriminate selling in tech, and Fiverr continues to show why its business is performing better than ever. 

Disclosure: I am long FVRR; I/O Fund is long FVRR

Posted in Cloud Software, Productivity, Stock Updates (Blogs)Leave a Comment on Fiverr Q1 Update

Earnings Update: TWLO, DDOG, MGNI and ROKU

Posted on May 10, 2021June 30, 2026 by io-fund

If you want to see Knox’s recent thoughts on the market, please click here. He wrote out a long explanation on the forum as to what he’s seeing and correlates this to inter-market analysis, including money flow, breadth and sector rotations.

Below, I discuss TWLO, DDOG, MGNI and ROKU. We review what was pertinent from the earnings reports. Our thesis has not changed on these 4 companies.

Also, I have a LTBH webinar planned for next Monday to go over the IDFA changes from Apple with a highlight on Magnite and also Roku. We will briefly touch base on all ad-tech stocks we own and IDFA but this is mainly a CTV ads webinar from the product perspective. I’ll send instructions on the LTBH webinar mid-week.

Last but not least, if you have not transitioned over to the new website io-fund.com, please do so soon. You will need to set a new password. The Beth.Technology password will not work on the new site. You must also use the same email address you signed up with. We are redirecting the URLs on Beth.Technology this week in anticipation of our forum launching next week. Our old site will be archived and new content will not be published starting 5/13. Thank you! J

Twilio:

We recently had our second LTBH webinar on Twilio. I thought it was important to highlight this company for the important pivot taking place. In the webinar, we stressed the first-party customer data platform and why this was an important strategic approach for a company that has PII from phone numbers in its core product and PII from emails from the SendGrid acquisition. The vehicle to maximize Twilio’s position is Segment, and the company is showing us very clearly the future for by separating R&D into three departments and placing the former CEO of Segment in charge of two of those departments.

The earnings call also communicated the importance of Segment with management stating two-thirds of their sales calls centered around this product. There was an analyst on the call who nearly verbatim discussed what we talked about on our webinar. I find management’s response encouraging as to the accuracy of our thesis (and, I guess good to know that Alex Zukin shares in this exact thesis).

Alex ZukinAlex Zukin

That makes perfect sense. And then another again kind of big picture question, if you think about the rise of IDFA, the demise of – potential demise of third party cookies, it's our thesis that we're entering the world where the notion of CDP for first-party data is going to rapidly accelerate in strategic performance.

You guys mentioned – I think George you mentioned that Segment is now in two thirds or was in two thirds of your customer conversations. I guess a couple of angles around this question. Is this something – is this future world something you contemplated when making that acquisition? Are you, you know just now reaping even greater amount of strategic benefit? Just talk to us about how you think about segments in this new world, both integrated with the rest of your solutions as part of the platform, but also on a stand-alone basis with respect to Strategic impact to all these things.

Jeff LawsonJeff Lawson

This is Jeff. I'll answer, unless George, you want to?

George HuGeorge Hu

Go ahead, Jeff. I'll chime in.

Jeff LawsonJeff Lawson

Well, I'll give my point of view and I'll let George give his point of view. You know collaboration is the answer and is harder in this virtual world.

My point of view is yes, you know we did think about the importance of first party data and how every company is having to become great digital marketers and great digital executors, and you can't necessarily rely on some of the, let's say, sloppier ways of acquiring and re-engaging your customers when you've got a lot of third party data floating around that. So we did believe – we do believe that the CDP market in and of itself as a standalone becomes ever more important to companies, not just because of the plurality of systems you have to figure out how to make sense of, but also because outside their walls it's getting more complex to actually target and reach your own customers.So it becomes even more important that once you meet a customer, so there's your marketing and they buy something or whatever it is, you do a really good job of continually engaging them, because going back out to kind of reacquire that customer is getting harder and harder and harder. And so companies have to treat their existing customers incredibly well, and those relationships are getting even more valuable. And then you add in all the value of – and then integrating that and creating that journey that's going to achieve that using Twilio's customer engagement cloud, that is the next level of benefit on top of the core CDP.

Twilio grew revenue 62% year-over-year for $590 million and guided for $596 million next quarter, or 49% year-over-year at the midpoint. This represents a 4% raise above consensus estimates of $579 million, according to FactSet.

Adjusted EPS came in at $0.05, or $0.15 ahead of estimates. Active customer accounts totaled 235,000 at the end of the Q1 compared to 190,000 in 2020, representing 24% growth YoY.  Dollar-based net expansion rate came in at 133% for the quarter compared to an organic DBNER of 135% in Q1 of 2020.  Gross margins were 55% for the quarter and the company recorded a -2% free cash flow margin.    

The blemish on the report was Twilio’s forward EPS as the company guided for adjusted losses of $0.14 per share compared to analyst expectations of adjusted losses of 4 cents per share. We posted on the forum that this does not concern us as the company had planned investments that did not materialize in 2020 due to Covid. These investments are focused on enterprise sales, flex and new growth products, plus core systems and infrastructure. Twilio management expects these investments to generate losses in the short term, but in the long term it will allow the company to grow at elevated levels.

Additional Research:

Twilio 2021 PDF here

Twilio 2019 PDF here

Datadog:

Datadog allows us exposure to the market that AWS, Azure and Google Cloud participates in but with a pureplay. If the tech giants are communicating that cloud infrastructure-as-a-service is one of the most critical markets in the future, then who are we to argue with this by not investing in the leader across cloud monitoring products?

The company capitalizes on the trend that vendor-specific is becoming unpopular due to issues that vendor lock-in creates. On the flip side, the company competes with open-source options, such as OpenTelemetry.

Here is what the company stated as to why customers choose Datadog in light of many competitors: “We lean into open-source format and libraries to instrument obligations for a very long time. And we support a large number of them. The way we see the problem is not like what matters is not with technology we use to get from here to there. What matters is to solve the end-to-end problem for our customers. And to make it as easy as possible for them to just plug us in and everything just work everything to show that we don’t get our mess, a gigantic mess with all these different technologies and applications and clouds, everything else. We turn that into something that the understanding is well ordered, without any effort.”What matters is to solve the end-to-end problem for our customers. And to make it as easy as possible for them to just plug us in and everything just work everything to show that we don’t get our mess, a gigantic mess with all these different technologies and applications and clouds, everything else. We turn that into something that the understanding is well ordered, without any effort.”

Datadog deserves an updated LTBH report as the product has evolved since we last covered the company with the acquisition of Sqreen. Keep an eye out for this after we get through cloud earnings.

I had said on a Motley Fool podcast in February that we faced a unique environment for cloud stocks this year with a tight pack of cloud stocks guiding between 20-30% and then another tight pack guiding between 30-40% on forward growth. Only Snowflake and Kingsoft Cloud were guiding higher than 50%. We provided a chart here. This is unusual as cloud guidance usually tells us our leaders in advance. Tougher comps from last year require cloud companies to show endurance and prove that any growth last year was not a pull forward from the one-time event of Covid.

You can view my explanation of cloud valuations going into 2021 here at minute 2:15 – YouTube linkYouTube link

What we want to see are cloud companies breaking through the ceiling of 40% growth. That is exactly what Datadog did this quarter and also provided >40% guidance for next quarter and full-year guidance, as well.

Notably, the tone on the earnings call was that their guidance is conservative in light of many unknowns. I can’t guarantee this but I’m hoping to see Datadog come in above guidance in the future, per comments like this: “Now, some notes on our guidance, while usage growth was strong in Q1, when providing guidance as usual, we use more conservative assumptions.”, we use more conservative assumptions.”

The company grew revenue 51% YoY to $198.5M, representing a 6% beat above consensus estimates.  Management attributed the revenue beat in Q1 to stronger than expected usage growth from existing customers. On the bottom line, EPS came in at $0.06, topping consensus estimates by $0.03.  The company logged a record EBITDA total of $24M in the quarter and free cash flow of $44M (22% FCF Margin). 

Customers with $100K+ ARR totaled 1,437 at the end of Q1, representing growth of 50% YoY.  These customers generate over 75% of Datadog’s ARR.

 

Additionally, Datadog announced that 75% of its customers are using two or more products at the end of Q1.  This is up from 63% in Q1 of 2020. 

For Q2, Datadog guided for $212M of revenue, or 51% year-over-year at the midpoint, beating the consensus estimate by 8%. The company is expecting $0.03 of EPS and $10M of operating income in Q2. 

For the FY21, DDOG raised revenue guidance to $885M, or 47% year-over-year at the midpoint, and 6% above consensus estimates. The company is expecting EPS of $0.15 and operating income of $50M for the full year.             

I touch on Datadog here around minute 53:00 – click here for YouTube link

Additional Research:
Datadog Premium Research
H1 2021 Cloud Software Update

Magnite:

We laid out our thoughts here on Magnite and our conviction and thesis remains the same. We go over why Magnite’s Q1 report came in weaker than expected and why we aren’t concerned as management has provided enough statements Q2’s guidance being stronger than expected. We take short-term misses as long as guidance remains strong and the story is intact.

Per my post on the forum, I do believe some of the weakness we saw in ad-tech today is due to IDFA changes from the April 30th iOS update. There was a report from Flurry, as reported by Mashable, over the weekend that stated “only 4 percent of iOS users in the United States let apps track them.” Here’s the full post from Flurry. I believe this partly caused the weakness today in TTD, MGNI, Unity plus other ad-tech companies as there is a lot of confusion in regards to IDFA.

On one hand, we have companies like Unity saying it’ll impact low single digits for their revenue, and on the other hand we see sensational comments from mobile analysts that this is an Apocalypse and “Book of Revelation” stuff  

I’ve been covering the IDFA specifically since October of 2019 after attending Advertising Week and I followed up again in 2020 with free version here. I also covered Facebook’s tracking behaviors in-depth for public investors around Q1 2018, when I criticized the company for not talking about Audience Network in their earnings calls (the IDFA threatens Facebook’s Audience Network the most). 

As the lead technology analyst at the I/O Fund, I made sure my readers were up to speed on the IDFA, such as the July 2020 Update and also here when I first covered Magnite. 

With that said, I don’t think information is easily accessible to public investors on this topic, and meanwhile, iOS 14.5 rolled out at the end of April. Therefore, seeing the reaction to Magnite and The Trade Desk today, Citi’s downgrade, and Flurry’s report, I think it makes sense to have our next LTBH webinar on the IDFA this Monday with a primary focus on Magnite and Roku but we will touch on other ad-tech stocks we own too (Unity, Snap, Pinterest, etcetera).

The summary of my thoughts can be found in the links above if you want the information before Monday. Similar to the tide of all boats, I believe we will see the supply side come out better than the demand side – but that’s my personal opinion and the way that we’ve structured I/O Fund with our positions. I’ll present the information from a product perspective and you can make your own conclusions when we review this on Monday.

Although I don’t think it will be Apocalypse, I do believe it will affect the ad industry enough that we should do the next LTBH webinar on this topic. We will dive deeper into Magnite and Roku, as well.

Magnite’s Earnings:

I had said that Magnite is not the “shiniest company to analyze if you’re a financial analyst” and this earnings report validated that statement. There have been two acquisitions and a major rebranding, so what we really have is really three companies reporting earnings: Telaria, Rubicon and SpotX.

Magnite reported revenue growth of 67%, up 18% on a pro-forma basis. CTV revenue was up 32% on a pro-forma basis or $12 million. Compare this to last quarter’s report which was 69% revenue growth, up 20% on a pro-forma basis, with CTV revenue up 53% on a pro-forma basis, or $15.4 million. Therefore, Q1 was meaningfully weaker than Q4 on CTV (more on this below).

The company was profitable on an adjusted basis at $0.03 EPS compared to a loss of $0.06 EPS in the year-ago quarter.

SpotX results showed considerable strength on CTV with overall revenue excluding traffic acquisition costs of $31.2 million. CTV revenue was at $19.7 million, up 70% year-over-year.

Management is guiding for revenue of $94 million with CTV revenue of $32 million, at the midpoint. This represents 90% growth if the company had closed the acquisition on SpotX on April 1st rather than April 30th. The company raised its long-term revenue targets from 20% to 25% and had raised long-term adjusted EBITDA targets to 30% to 35% in the last quarter.

This comment here provides color for the weaker-than-expected CTV revenue:

Yes, so I think, March was a bit of a disappointment for us at Magnite. I think if you look at the combined company going forward, you're just going to have a greater line of CTV products that each kind of address a different sliver of the marketplace. We talked a bit about the SpotX managed service business, which was able to extract linear dollars into CTV capability that we did not build out at Magnite, but saw as something incredibly attractive in its products, along with a few other products. But as we said, severe acceleration in Q2 for Magnite's business, and if you look at the two combined, you're 90% plus growth range for Q2. So, so all is well there.which was able to extract linear dollars into CTV capability that we did not build out at Magnite, but saw as something incredibly attractive in its products, along with a few other products. But as we said, severe acceleration in Q2 for Magnite's business, and if you look at the two combined, you're 90% plus growth range for Q2. So, so all is well there.

Another analyst also asked about March, which management provided this answer:

Suffice to say, Magnite is growing in terms of — its back to where we always thought it would be and then some. So, I think that this isn't a case of — in q2, particularly SpotX coming in and saving the show, if you will, I think both are growing exceptionally well. And any kind of slowdown that we witness in Magnite in March has been more than made up for, but David, do you have any more color to bring to that?its back to where we always thought it would be and then some. So, I think that this isn't a case of — in q2, particularly SpotX coming in and saving the show, if you will, I think both are growing exceptionally well. And any kind of slowdown that we witness in Magnite in March has been more than made up for, but David, do you have any more color to bring to that?

And there was yet another question about the weaker guidance in March. Management stressed how early in the cycle the Connected TV market is and how some inventory is still being sold direct versus programmatic.

So, I think that there's in any kind of nascent marketplace and CTV is certainly nascent … I would say that Q2 is behaving what in excess of what we would have thought going into it, and that Q1 was strong going in, and then had a weaker March. And, again, probably a handful of reasons there, but nothing systemic or anything that takes the bloom off the rose in terms of our position in CTV or the attractiveness of that marketplace.

As I said, we are comfortable with short-term misses as long as the story is intact and guidance remains strong. There was also more to the earnings call in terms of IDFA, which we will unpack during the upcoming webinar on Monday.

Past Magnite Research here

Roku:

I’ve written a library of research about this company from very early-on. If you want more information as to how we arrived here, I encourage you to read my analysis as it dates back to a time when the market doubted Roku and we withstood two 60% drawdowns.

On that note, Roku is the perfect example of how long it takes for a trend to play out. While many investors are conditioned for instant gratification following last year, we know that tech trends are a 3-5 year exit or longer. In the meantime, our job is to make sure a company is consistently reporting along the thesis we’ve laid out.

Here’s what I want to emphasize: the 3-5 year investment period for Roku begins this year. If someone were to learn about Roku for the first time today, I’d say they’re right on time. In fact, there is less risk now as Roku is a mature and consistent performer. As an analyst, I’m on cruise control with this stock as it’s been performing as we laid out nearly three years ago.

Rarely, do we get a full-stack opportunity that is centered in the middle of a future trend. It’s my belief that Apple’s IDFA deprecation will positively impact Roku – and I hope a few others we have picked out too.

That’s what my library of research answered through the past few years. We will touch on this in the upcoming webinar, as well. The simple answer is Roku delivers the targeting capabilities of mobile with the completion rates of Pay TV. This was outlined in May of 2018.

“For example, according to Nielsen in March, ratings, linear TV ratings for adults 18 to 24 was down 22%. Q1 TV ad spending was down 11% and according to Media Radar. Meanwhile, we doubled, monetized video ad impressions on the platform, ad spending by major agency holding companies with Roku more than doubled. We saw strength really up and down the ad business.”linear TV ratings for adults 18 to 24 was down 22%. Q1 TV ad spending was down 11% and according to Media Radar. Meanwhile, we doubled, monetized video ad impressions on the platform, ad spending by major agency holding companies with Roku more than doubled. We saw strength really up and down the ad business.”

Since my coverage began, Roku has become an even bigger force in the Connected TV ad space. OneView is Roku’s move into the demand side while The Roku Channel provides original content to optimize ad formats.

This sums up some of Roku’s strength competitively speaking:

I will say that the use of OneView to buy media on Roku, whether that's media we're selling, for example, a video ad that runs in The Roku Channel or an ad bought from a publisher on Roku through one year. That segment is growing even faster because, of course, we have data and identity and optimization capabilities to help them do that better than were they to buy through a third-party DSP.we have data and identity and optimization capabilities to help them do that better than were they to buy through a third-party DSP.

And also here …

“The second part of your question was about volume and CPMs. Our product remains a premium product. If anything, we've added, better data, better targeting, better measurement, newer ad products over time. And I think that, that bodes well for continuing to be able to command premium CPMs, but I will also call out to the earlier question from Ralph that streaming is increasingly also a performance media.”we've added, better data, better targeting, better measurement, newer ad products over time. And I think that, that bodes well for continuing to be able to command premium CPMs, but I will also call out to the earlier question from Ralph that streaming is increasingly also a performance media.”

Roku also recently acquired Nielsen’s advanced video advertising business and is expected to close in Q2 2021. The automatic content recognition and dynamic ad insertion will help Roku show different ads to different households based on Nielsen data.

We’ve written quite a bit on Roku and I hesitate to spend more time on the company when we have other stocks we are forming a thesis on and/or need a reiteration of our conviction. However, that should not be confused for lack of conviction by any means as Roku has received my highest conviction for some time and continues to.

Here’s a clip we created of me explaining Roku in October of last year – view on YouTube here.

Roku and The Trade Desk: 2019 Analysis
Roku Update & What’s Next in June
Disney+ Killing it on the App Store – Roku Downstream
Check-in: ROKU, TTD, BABA, UBER, TLRA, and upcoming 5G – Nov 6th
Checking in on Tech Trends and My Current Convictions – January 2020
The Crucial Difference Between Roku and Netflix
Q4 Earnings Analysis for Shopify, Roku, Fiverr And Palantir

On Earnings …

Roku delivered excellent Q1 results on May 6th led by strong growth in advertising and the expansion of content distribution partnerships. Total revenue grew 79% YoY to $574.2M, representing a 17% beat above consensus estimates. 

The growth was led by platform revenue, which increased 101% YoY to $466.5M. Gross profit rose 132% YoY to $326.8M while operating income came in at $75.8M after negative operating income $55.2M in the year-ago quarter. 

Roku also announced positive EBITDA of $125.9M in Q1 from a loss of $16.3M in the year-ago quarter. Roku added 2.4M active accounts in Q1 to reach 53.6M in total, representing 35% growth YoY. 

Streaming Hours increased 49% YoY to 18.3 billion, while average revenue per user (ARPU) grew 32% YoY to $32.14. 

For Q2, Roku management is guiding for $615M of revenue at the midpoint (73% YoY growth), representing a 13% raise above consensus estimates. The company is also guiding for total gross profit to rise 104% YoY to $300M and EBITDA of $65M after recording negative EBITDA of $3M in Q2 ’20. 

Posted in Cloud Infrastructure, Cloud Software, Ctv, Data Center, Data Center and Processing, Media, Productivity, Stock Updates (Blogs)Leave a Comment on Earnings Update: TWLO, DDOG, MGNI and ROKU

Podcast with Motley Fool: I/O Fund’s View of the Growth Market Right Now  

Posted on May 6, 2021June 30, 2026 by io-fund
Podcast with Motley Fool: I/O Fund’s View of the Growth Market Right Now  

I recently joined the Motley Fool podcast with Brian Feroldi and Brian Stoffel where we discussed electric vehicles, artificial intelligence, and whether growth tech investors should rotate into value. Below, we provide a summary of each video and YouTube clips. 

As a bonus, I’m also adding my take on Fastly from podcasts with the Motley Fool and Chit Chat Money. While I remain bullish on the future of edge computing, I voiced my doubts about Fastly when the stock was skyrocketing, reaching a peak of $136.30 last October and a lower high of $122.75 early this year. I summarize my view below. 

Why I/O Fund Is Not Selling Growth Stocks

 For us, the most important question is whether we are in a secular bear market. We believe in long term buy and hold—except in a secular bear market and a long economic recession. This is because the goal is to avoid holding positions at a loss during an extended period of time.  Therefore, in any selloff, the question we ask ourselves is whether this is a quick correction or secular bear market. Unless you are a day trader, most investors are better off holding through these quick corrections than trying to time both an exit and an entry. 

We are not financial advisors, but based on the indicators we follow for our portfolio, we are positioned for a continuation of the long-term uptrend. We anticipate potential strength into the summer months with a high consumer savings rate, strong GDP, and dovish monetary policy from the Fed. Those are excellent signs for a strong economy. The I/O Fund did some buying in late March and are not letting the news headlines push us to close our long-term positions. 

On that note, I only recommend a stock if my conviction can withstand a 30% selloff. This is because most tech growth stocks go through periods of exuberance and fear/doubt a few times.

Why I’m Bullish on Electric Vehicles 

Last time I spoke with Motley Fool, we discussed electric vehicles. Although stock prices have come down, we remain long. The personal savings rate in the U.S. has soared, reaching 13.9% in February and 27.6% in March. As a result, we expect the auto sector to be strong. Electric vehicles are also answering multiple problems. For example, in China where there is less access to oil the government incentivizes EVs through subsidies. Manufacturers are also producing EVs with cutting edge technology at close to the price of a traditional vehicle.

The AI Economy Will Be 4x Larger Than the Mobile Economy 

We are long Nvidia for the trend of artificial intelligence. The AI economy is projected to be four times larger than the mobile economy, and the mobile economy brought us FAANG stocks like Apple, Facebook, and Google. I expect to see some FAANG-level companies arise from the AI economy.  

Fastly: Not a Slam Dunk 

Last December, I joined the Motley Fool Podcast and voiced my doubts about Fastly. I later discussed Fastly with Chit Chat money. Fastly is not a slam dunk, and I voiced my doubts when the stock was skyrocketing. Below I summarize both videos. 

Content apps are a great market for Fastly, but for the really big problems that edge computing will solve, it will be difficult for Fastly to be a clear leader in that market. That doesn’t mean Fastly can’t pull it off, and I’m always for everyone making gains. But I prefer slam dunks and my point was that Fastly would face serious challenges and investors were not factoring that in by saying “Fastly was an edge computing leader.” In fact, Fastly has not had edge computing revenue for nearly 16 months after the launch of the Edge Compute product. 

Content app developers will say that Fastly is delivering content in under 20 milliseconds and therefore it is edge. However, Fastly’s core competency is a CDN, which is a space that has been highly competitive for 25 years. CDNs saw major tailwinds from streaming and usage last year, however, this was revenue was not due to edge computing.

As a tech analyst, I stuck my neck out to make sure people knew the real story. It was bold, as this was a favorite stock on social media, and there was a flood of negative responses after I simply pointed out that edge computing was not contributing to the current growth.

There are big problems that can be solved with edge computing and I outline this in the video. There also still seems to be an absence of discussion in the retail community around AWS, Azure and GCP moving into this space with telecom partnerships. Projections show that 75% of data will come from the edge. That will be mainly answered by the companies who own the cloud computing market—Amazon, Microsoft and Google. 

In the past, I was also asked what company I would choose between Cloudflare and Fastly; I said Cloudflare due to their strategic approach to capture SMBs. This is a market where Cloudflare performs well. 

Posted in Market Trends, Podcasts, Tech Podcast, Tech StocksLeave a Comment on Podcast with Motley Fool: I/O Fund’s View of the Growth Market Right Now  

Update on LTBH Portfolio: SHOP, SNAP, TDOC and ATOM

Posted on May 4, 2021June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Shopify: Increasing LTBH Position

We made a point to cover Shopify last December to emphasize that we did not believe the company was covid-dependent. We spelled out exactly why we were writing a second LTBH PDF on the company during a time of doubt for “covid stocks” (and during the exuberance for small caps).

Most importantly, the trends we outlined in December were recently confirmed in the most recent earnings report. This is what we want to see – analysis that gets in front of results so that we can confirm our ongoing conviction and increase our position (transparently with real-time trades).

The reason we want to increase our position in Shopify throughout the year is fairly straight forward – Shopify is now reaching billions of consumers through social media. The distribution potential of these partnerships reminds me of an avalanche trigger as Shopify will reach billions with Facebook and Tik Tok and hundreds of millions with Pinterest. Now, they only need to build out the Fulfillment Center and focus on improving their own app; although borrowing these mega size audiences is probably the fastest path to growth for our purposes.

I don’t believe Facebook will let Shopify dominate its platform, so keep an eye out for attempts to strengthen Facebook Marketplace. I’m not too worried because Shopify has merchant relationships and it’ll be hard for Facebook to replicate their business model although they may certainly try.

Here are some highlights regarding Social Commerce from the call:

· “The number of shops actively selling on Facebook Shops has more than quadrupled since Q1 a year ago, as well as the GMV through Facebook. While still small, the launch of Facebook Shops in May of last year is clearly starting to make a difference here.”

· “In Q1, we expanded our marketing partnership with TikTok internationally to an additional 14 countries in North America, EMEA and APAC. So far, we've seen good traction in the adoption of TikTok in the U.S. since we launched the integration last October. And we've recently expanded our Pinterest channel into 27 additional markets, opening discoverability and sales opportunities worldwide.”

There are many exciting things going on at Shopify, which we’ve covered at length in the past, including the Fulfillment Center and Shop Pay. Most importantly, we covered exactly why Shopify had taken market share from Amazon and eBay shortly after we launched our premium site. Access October 2019 analysis here.

We also covered Shopify’s positioning in terms of taking over eBay here when we re-iterated our LTBH conviction back in December of 2020. We had been discussing why this was important leading up to the report, and why moving from third position to second position was key for investors during a time of doubt for Shopify.

We also discussed in the LTBH PDF in December of 2020 that “e-Commerce is eating retail” and the various demographics that a company like Shopify can target when partnering with social media apps. The younger demographics is key for social commerce.

To summarize, there are a few reasons that Shopify is set to continue its winning streak and why we plan to increase our position:

1. New distribution channels will reach billions of customers via social media

2. Product-market fit to be achieved in 2021-2023 (we covered this in 2019)

3. Social media spending on ads will increase 18% this year as covered in our free newsletter

4. Second place and has overtaken eBay (we covered this in December)

5. Behavioral ad targeting coming under pressure with Apple’s IDFA – look for an increase in social commerce to offset the shift towards potentially lower CPMs.

Underlying key metrics on Shopify were strong and covered by CNBC here. Shopify’s Q1 2021 Results can be found here.

Snap: Increasing LTBH Position

We were the first to talk about Snap as an AR/VR stock. The story is moving faster than we previously predicted and we hope you remember the site that brought you this trend first. J

One day, every person on Twitter will say “Snap was clearly a AR/VR story from the beginning” but nobody is talking about this right now. In fact, it’s buried under Facebook’s beat, Pinterest’s DAU concerns and Twitter’s nose dive.

Our job is to talk to you about future trends, and to also silence the noise during periods of extreme sentiment or even around earnings (lots and lots of noise around earnings). We wouldn’t want to add to that noise and assume you read the highlights of any companies you own from the dozen or so sources who cover them.

What’s not being spoken about is that Snap owns the perfect audience for AR/VR. Facebook is in a dilemma here as their subscribership skews older and are less likely to adopt a visually stimulating technology. We will see as time goes on but our money is on Snap. What is the 18-35 year old demographic and also the under 18 demographic really worth? We have yet to find out. Where most tech companies must aggressively take market share or compete at a high level, Snap has to simply keep doing what it’s doing.

Here is the more important take-aways and why are looking to increase our position:

· The company is positive free cash flow for the first time and has strong forward EPS growth this year and next year

· Off-platform AR opportunities such as Camera Kit plus partnerships with companies like Samsung and expanding Android base to reach audiences outside the United States

· Ability to surface premium content through Spotlight and Snap originals and augment these with AR; i.e., Snap is moving beyond social media into original content

· Increased monetization opportunities with AR merging with e-commerce. An example of a successful campaign can drive 30%-40% lift in incremental sales

· Although DAU growth is slow in the United States, it’s strong internationally at 57% this past quarter for Rest of World. Forward growth of 22% on DAU next quarter is impressive considering tough covid comps

· United States ARPU is on a tear at 66% growth leading to 75% revenue growth in this region. Rest of World ARPU is also healthy at 46% growth YoY. Strong guidance on revenue of 85%

Probably the most important statistic from the ER is of the countries that comprise over half of the world’s digital ad spend, Snapchat reaches 70% of 13 to 34-year olds. We want to be AR/VR investors and this is the correct demographic for this trend. Plus, this is important for targeting purposes assuming we do see the IDFA changes from Apple.

Telehealth: We remain in Teladoc …but also still like Amwell

If you want to know what it feels like to invest in the early stages of a trend, telehealth is the perfect example. Remember when I said Nvidia would be an AI leader and dominate the data center, and then there was negative growth in this segment for the first two quarters after my analysis? Seems preposterous that the data center was a low-yielding segment for Nvidia and had negative growth YoY with barely a blip being reported from AI only two years ago.

However, Nvidia/data centers is not an apples-to-apples example for Teladoc because this company faces a much bigger challenge … and nobody knows how it’ll turn out.

I’m not talking about the need for the health insurance companies to reimburse telemedicine permanently (rather than a temporary covid provision). I’d consider this a hurdle and one that I think telemedicine will clear over time.

The big challenge I am talking about is the incredible amount of competition that Teladoc faces. There are many startups receiving funding in the private markets. Zocdoc, a professional booking platform for doctors, launched video consultations last May with the help of Twilio. The company raised $150 million in its last round. Kry is a company popular in Europe that has helped over 3 million patients see a doctor, nurse or psychologist. The company recently closed a $312 million Series D round after its telehealth tools grew 100% year-over-year. Epic Systems, a medical records software company that is used by 54% of patients in the United States, also tapped Twilio for telehealth video conferencing at the start of covid.

Last year, health-tech funding broke records in 2020 with $15.3 billion in funding in the private markets, up from $10.6 billion in 2019. For the first time, healthcare surpassed biopharma with 614 total deals.

Health insurance companies are also in the space, such as United Health Care, with a motivating drive to offset reimbursement costs. This many players commoditizes telemedicine and puts pressure on pricing. This isn’t reflected in the current earnings right now, and in fact, Teladoc is able to increase revenue per user. However, the market is growing nervous because key metrics are flat and there is uncertainty as to how telemedicine will perform in a post-covid world.

Telehealth Trend Overview:

Prior to 2020, telehealth was projected to grow at a CAGR of 25.2% with the global market growing from $61.4 billion in 2019 to reach $559 billion by 2027. The global market is especially important to ensure healthcare is available in remote areas of underdeveloped countries. Internet access remains a barrier for telehealth in remote regions, such as rural India for instance, which has a 20.2% high-speed internet penetration.

In the United States, telehealth was a $26 billion market in 2019.

According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the U.S. spent 17.7% of GDP, or 3.6 trillion on health care in 2018, partly due to an increase in mental and chronic health conditions. The study also highlights that patient monitoring is popular with the elderly with 1 million remote cardiac monitors being used in America.

There is no denying that telehealth had a breakthrough year in 2020. Despite the many breakthroughs ushered in by covid, such as remote work (Zoom, Teams), gym workouts at home (Peloton) and online shopping (Etsy, Overstock), telehealth showed the most rapid growth by far of nearly 4,000% growth across key metrics. Therefore, it’s understandable that the market is attempting to weigh what the growth in telehealth will look like after the one-time event of 2020.

In addition to the market and management attempting to predict what a normal rate of growth will be, the telehealth trend is dependent on federal and state legislation dictating how private payers reimburse telehealth. Full reimbursement is called “payment parity.”

There are 43 states that have some state telehealth statute for commercial payers, yet only 22 states maintain laws that address telehealth reimbursement with a mere 14 states that offer payment parity for telehealth. This is up from 16 and 10 states in 2019.

In the meantime, temporary waivers were offered during covid. We’ve covered in the past how the federal government has passed telehealth bills for Medicare under the CARES Act and other covid legislation. As of now, many of the temporary waivers and emergency legislation is set to expire 90 days after covid’s emergency status is removed.

According to Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, the insurance company will continue to support and cover telehealth. However, states like New Hampshire are discussing a bill that would eliminate payment parity as the bill asserts that in-patient care should be paid at a higher rate than telehealth. Opponents point towards mental health and substance abuse as primary reasons the bill should be struck down.

Teladoc ER Overview – Big Revenue Growth but Flat Key Metrics

Teladoc beat on revenue of $453 million, representing 151% growth. The company raised guidance for the year to $2 billion at the mid-point for FY2021 for an increase of $20 million. Revenue in the United States was up 175% and international up 29%.

Despite a strong report on revenue, Teladoc reported a net loss of $1.31 per share – missing expectations by $0.71 for a net loss of about $200 million. This partly contributed to the stock selling off nearly 12% since the report. According to management, “the larger net loss was primarily attributable to increase stock-based compensation, amortization of acquired intangibles, and income tax adjustments primarily related to the merger at Livongo.”

Gross margins increased to 67% up from 59.2% in the year-ago quarter. The adjusted gross margin was 67.8% compared to 60% in the year-ago quarter.

Total visits were up 56% to 3.2 million with the number of consumers enrolled in more than one chronic care program “tripling year-over-year.” The United States made up the bulk of this growth at 69% with international growth at 8%.

Forward revenue guidance is quite strong for Teladoc in the next quarter with $500 million at the mid-point on revenue and positive adjusted EBITDA of $61 million to $64 million up from $56 million adjusted EBITDA in the current quarter.

The management points towards increased revenue per customer as to one reason they are able to sustain this level of revenue growth. Average per member per month (PMPM) was $2.24 in the first quarter, up from $1.76 in the prior quarter. According to management, of the $0.48, half was driven by an extra month of Livongo revenue in the first quarter.

The key metric that showed lower growth (and was most alarming) was 20% growth in paid memberships from 43 million to 51.5 million and 15% growth in U.S. Visit Fee Only access from 19.2 million to 22 million. Forward guidance on this important key metric is expected to be in the range of 52 million to 53 million – in other words, flat sequentially.

For full year, the guidance isn’t much better for this metric with paid membership in the 52 million to 54 million range. Visit fee access is also flat per guidance at 22 to 23 million for FY 2021.

Pictured above: Teladoc US Paid Members are to remain flat year-over-year (YoY)

Total visits are re-accelerating, however, from a plateau in Q2-Q3 2020 where the company stagnated at 2.3 million and 2.4 million, or growth of about 100K visits. Teladoc grew to 200K visits in the last two quarters and is guiding for growth of 400K to 600K visits between Q1 and Q2 2021.

The utilization rate is also climbing, which is important to note. Telemedicine utilization is equal to the number of consults divided by the number of covered employees. Industry averages were between 1-10% prior to covid, yet we see strength in this number sequentially even after many doctor offices have opened up. Besides showing the penetration of telemedicine, the number is important because it affects the cost savings to employers.

Data points from Livongo are also growing nicely and actually accelerated in the most recent quarter compared to when Livongo was a standalone company in Q1-Q2 2020.

Teladoc has strategically added debt over the past several years as the company focuses on growth at all costs.  TDOC ended Q1 with $1.35B in long term debt and $723 million in cash. 

While debt has increased notably over the past year, Teladoc’s balance sheet still appears to be in very good health.  Teladoc’s Debt to Equity Ratio currently stands at 0.086, which is near its 5 year low.  A low debt to equity ratio indicates lower risk, because debt holders have less claims on the company's assets.

A Debt to Equity Ratio under 1.0 is ideal because it indicates that for every $1 of equity, the company has less than $1 of debt.  In the case of TDOC, we are seeing a strong Debt to Equity ratio of 0.086 that has improved over time, even as the company has taken on more long-term debt.

Teladoc also has a strong Debt to Assets ratio, which is a ratio used to determine how much debt a company has on its balance sheet relative to total assets. 

A Debt to Assets ratio under 100% is ideal because it indicates that the company owns more assets than debt.  The lower the Debt to Assets Ratio, the less risk the company is carrying on its balance sheet.    

Teladoc’s Debt to Assets Ratio is currently standing at a healthy 7.7% and near a 5-year low.  Teladoc’s Debt to Assets Ratio means the company is backed by 7.7% of debt, which is a significant improvement from 2020. 

While Teladoc’s debt has increased over time, it is much more a factor of a company that is in hypergrowth mode than a company that is struggling financially. This becomes evident when we compare Teladoc’s long-term debt to its equity and assets. Management appears content to strategically use debt in order to fuel growth. This is not uncommon for a company in hypergrowth mode and it is evident in analyzing Teladoc’s balance sheet that the company’s debt is at sensible levels and not a major risk to the business. 

Valuation

Teladoc is now valued at 13.58x forward revenue after peaking above 25x at the end of 2020. 

In comparison to some others in the space, TDOC looks attractively valued with forward growth expected to eclipse 80% in 2021. The other three stocks we listed for comparison (VEEV, GDRX, AMWL) are not projected to eclipse 40% YoY revenue growth in 2021. 

In Q1, legacy Teladoc grew roughly 69% YoY and 9% QoQ.  Below is a breakdown of Teladoc’s revenue mix in Q1 from Credit Suisse:

Credit Suisse notes that it is not an apples-to-apples comparison as if Livongo were still a standalone company due to the realization of deferred revenue following the acquisition of Livongo. We are still seeing strong growth from Livongo and legacy Teladoc with 9% and 10% QoQ growth rates, respectively.

It should also be noted that InTouch is now part of TDOC’s single Hospital & Health System business. In Q1, TDOC’s Hospital & Health System business grew YoY as well as QoQ.

There is some investor concern about TDOC missing on EPS two quarters in row, with both misses being caused by expenses related to M&A. 

While some Teladoc’s M&A has been more expensive than originally thought in the short-term, this does not affect the long-term thesis. Teladoc is built to be able to incur short term losses and focus primarily on top line revenue growth.

Amwell:

We closed our Amwell position after the company provided low revenue guidance for FY2021 and analyst estimates also showed low revenue guidance for 2022. We simply can’t force timing on a trend even though we continue to keep Amwell on our radar. Notably, Knox trimmed Teladoc in the high-$200s as his technical were also telling us we were too early to the trend.

After Teladoc’s earnings report, there were a few press releases that telehealth has become commoditized. If we were talking strictly about the ability to have a video call with a doctor, then this would be true. But obviously, the goal is how to provide multiple data touchpoints for virtual care. Teladoc has moved into remote monitoring while Amwell is gearing up for AI assistants/carts.

What is intriguing about Amwell is the Google backing, which we covered in the Amwell PDF last year. Google has $100 million of stock in the company with plans to merge AI with health care, including digital waiting rooms, language translations, offloading tasks from the provider to conversational AI and to help manage chronic conditions. Anthem is a large client of Amwell’s and accounts for about 25% of revenue.

The company’s customers often deploy telemedicine through a variety of proprietary Carepoints, which are medical carts and kiosks designed for various clinical and community settings. The company also offers software development kits (SDKs) and APIs to integrate telehealth digitally and to embed into workflows. This includes web and mobile apps, 24-hour nurse and customer support, and electronic health record (EHR) software.

On the same day as Teladoc’s earnings report, Amwell released an announcement on their new telehealth platform that will allow developers to host and deploy telehealth applications. The platform offers a single code base to build a unified care experience to develop apps that utilize Google Cloud’s AI and NLP technologies, TytoCare’s handheld exam kit, connections to clinic physicians (looks like the beta version will be in Cleveland), and Biobeat’s patient monitoring devices. I assume the list of integrations will grow over time.

The new platform may not change Amwell’s revenue trajectory in the short-term but it’s certainly something we are keeping our eye on.

To be frank, we don’t with who the winner is between TDOC and AMWL as long as we get to participate. Therefore, the I/O Fund is remaining flexible between these two and will be looking for signs of strength to determine what position(s) we hold and our allocation as time goes on. Notably, there is a lot of deal flow in the private markets because this a big market to crack for the company who does it.

Atomera:

You can read my update regarding Atomera on the forum here: https://community.beth.technology/post/atomera-update-608b8644ea42db67cf9b54b4

Posted in AI Stocks, AR, Consumer, E-Commerce, Enterprise, Health Tech, Semiconductor Stocks, Stock Updates (Blogs), Telehealth, VRLeave a Comment on Update on LTBH Portfolio: SHOP, SNAP, TDOC and ATOM

Recent Posts

  • The IPO Glut of 2020: Why Valuations Have Gone Too Far
  • Zoom Discusses Two Important Catalysts In Q1 Earnings
  • Three Risk Management Tools the I/O Fund Offers
  • Micron Is Up 900%. Here’s Why the AI Memory Trade May Still Have Room to Run
  • Credo: Reliability Leader Aggressively Moves into Optics

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018

Categories

  • 5G
  • About
  • Accounting Tips
  • AdTech
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • AI Stocks
  • AI Stocks
  • Analysts
  • Application Monitoring
  • Application Monitoring
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • AR
  • Audit Reports
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Avod
  • Avod
  • Battery Charging
  • Bear Market
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Broad Market Today
  • Bull Market
  • Bull Market
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • China Stocks
  • Cloud
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Platforms
  • Cloud Platforms
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Technology
  • Company
  • Company
  • Console Gaming
  • Console Gaming
  • Console Gaming
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer Tech
  • Corrections
  • Crypto Investment
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center and Processing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Dating
  • Defi
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • E-Commerce
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • ECommerce
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Energy Stocks
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Ethereum
  • Events1
  • Events1
  • Exchange
  • Faq
  • Finance
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Markets
  • FinTech
  • Fundamental Analysis
  • Gambling
  • Gaming
  • Genomics
  • Glossary
  • Green Energy
  • Growth Stocks
  • Growth Stocks
  • Growth Stocks
  • Headsets
  • Headsets
  • Health Tech
  • Hydrogen
  • Identity
  • Identity
  • Identity
  • Inflation
  • Inflation
  • Inflation
  • Internet of Things
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Investing
  • Investing
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Macro Trends
  • Macro Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Media
  • Membership
  • Mining
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Multimedia
  • Music Streaming
  • NVDA | NVIDIA Corporation
  • Performance Updates
  • Pin Content
  • Podcasts
  • Podcasts
  • Podcasts
  • Portfolio
  • Premium Research
  • Press Releases
  • Press Releases
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Reports and Whitepapers
  • Research Services Preview
  • Resources
  • Resources
  • Semiconductor Stocks
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Solar
  • Solar
  • Stock Analysis PDFs
  • Stock Updates
  • Stock Updates (Blogs)
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Tech Podcast
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Technical Analysis
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Testing Equipment
  • Testing Equipment
  • Top Tech Stock News
  • Travel
  • Trends Report
  • Tutorials
  • Uncategorized
  • Updates
  • Updates
  • Updates
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video Footage
  • VR
  • Webinar Alerts
  • Webinar Alerts
  • Webinars
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: iofund by iofund.co.uk.