The Teflon Market: Why the 12-Year Bull Will Bounce Back

Posted on March 25, 2022June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Last week, we discussed how negative sentiment is often the catalyst that takes a market to new highs even in light of an ongoing negative news cycle. In fact, we are beginning to see broad indexes and key stocks make their first series of higher highs after going through the longest correction we’ve seen since 2018.

The S&P 500 (SPX) corrected more than 14% from the recent top, while the NASDAQ100 corrected more than 20%. Regarding the S&P 500, this depth of a correction has only happened four other times since 2009, so it's quite rare to see a drawdown of this size.

Each time we've seen this type of cyclical bear/deep correction (2011, 2016, 2019, 2020) the belief of a secular bear market starting up (again) is usually quite high. Maybe this time is different, but secular bears historically coincide with recessions and are not led by the equity markets.

If we are not heading towards a recession in 2022, the unwinding of this bearish sentiment would be what drives this next move higher, and I believe we are starting to see evidence of this. In fact, since Russia invaded Ukraine, the SPX is up over 450 points, the 10-year yield is up +70 bps, crude oil is comfortably over $100, and many high beta tech names are leading the current move up in equities.

The reason the news cycle is rarely in line with the market is because markets are always forward-looking, and news is always a lagging report. Below, I review some important factors for tech investors to consider and also statistics around bear markets that are conveniently forgotten when bear market warnings are issued.

The two single most important factors a tech investor needs to know:

What is my risk tolerance? Or, what level of risk am I willing to take and still be able to sleep at night? Most investors play lip service to this until they experience a large drawdown.
“What is my time horizon” is an essential question. Again, most investors will say +3-5 years; however, when they see their portfolio decrease with the markets, emotions tend to force bad decisions and they will suddenly sell right now.
Notably, many financial advisors will advise their clients to not buy stocks (at all) if the money is needed in a 1-2 year time frame, and yet a four-month drawdown is enough to cause many with “long-term horizons” to fold their hands, which defeats the purpose of buying a stock, which is to not be in a position to where one must sell.

A Famous study led by mathematical psychologist Amos Tversky and Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman discovered that “Investors feel the pain of a loss twice as much as the joy of an equivalent gain”

In fact, they found that the feeling from a win tends to flatten after a certain percentage gain. In other words, the feeling an investor gets from a 100% gain is roughly the same as an investor gets from a 200% gain. However, the study found that there is no limit to the feeling that we experience as humans from an ongoing loss. What makes this even more interesting is that losses are capped at 100% while wins can extend to +1,000% or even +10,000%. Therefore, wins should be exponentially celebrated and yet the human psyche does not allow positive emotions to compound. Instead, investors feel negative emotions more deeply and the fear of unrealistic outcomes (such as a stock going to $0) catalyzes selling at the low.

Without a plan to rationally counter the emotional side of investing, investors are prone to buy at the top, and sell at the bottom, and/or forget their time horizon.

Considering that right now the market is registering extreme levels of fear, we thought it would be good to provide more context as to how previous markets have performed following this level of negative emotion.

Pictured above: The AAII Sentiment Survey which shows the spread between bulls and bears. Recently, the spread was more bearish than at the Covid low of March 2020. Source: Ycharts

S&P 500 below its 50/200 Simple Moving Average

One of the arguments I frequently see is that the S&P 500 has closed for multiple days below the 50-day moving average (MA) and the 200-day MA. However, it’s important to look back at what happened every time SPX closed three days below these moving averages.

Since 1980, the S&P 500 has closed 3 days below its 50-day and 200-day MA a total of 25 times. Only four of these times resulted in a secular bear market.

Regarding the other 21 times, from the moment the index broke the 50/200 day MA, we saw new highs within 3.5 months, on average.
The four times that resulted in a secular bear market, we saw ATHs, on average, within 3.6 years from the moment that we broke the 50/200 day MA.

Daily RSI 22

The relative strength index (RSI) is a popular way to measure momentum in an advancing trend. If the RSI is making lower highs while price is making higher highs, it can signal that the trend is getting weaker.

The RSI is also used to measure oversold and overbought conditions, considering it is an oscillator that moves between 100 and 0.

Since 2002, the daily RSI on the S&P 500 has only gone below a reading of 23 a total of seven times. Six months after this reading of <23, the market was positive every time, ranging between +3% after the October 2008 reading, and as high as 25% after the 2011 low.

Interestingly, six out of the seven times this reading happened, we saw another low in the market before a bottom was struck. On Jan. 27 we saw a reading of 23 on the S&P 500 daily RSI, followed by a new low.

Apple in 2000

We continuously hear the current bull market being compared to 2000. This argument has been made too-often and especially since 2015. Yet, from the start of 2015, the NASDAQ100 is up +220%, including the current drawdown in 2022. Investors had to weather an average annual drawdown of 17.8% in order to capture this return. It is no surprise that volatility goes hand-in-hand with tech investing, as most accept this reality. But, what about during a secular bear market.

The big fear is walking into a secular bear market that is led by tech, just like in 2000. We hear examples of QCOM and CSCO going down over 80%, and how it took QCOM 20 years to reclaim its highs and CSCO has never reclaimed its high. These are catastrophic losses that can destroy a portfolio without an exit strategy and position sizing strategy.

Yet, few talk about Apple reclaiming its 2000 high in just over 4.5 years, or how Apple reclaimed it 2007 high in under 2 years. The same can be said about Google, Amazon and Salesforce. Google reclaimed its 2007 high in just under 5 years, AMZN made new highs just over 2 years from its high, while Salesforce made new highs in less than 2 years. Keep in mind, these were devastating secular bear markets. The 2008 bear market was so harsh that it has been dubbed the Great Recession.

It's unlikely most would hold these high beta stocks in a clear secular bear market. However, if one did have a +5 year time horizon, a buy and hold on the right tech stocks would have been quite rewarding.

Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 403% – Click hereSign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 403% – Click hereClick here

So, what’s the difference between Apple, Google, Amazon, Salesforce and Cisco and Qualcomm? In one word – microtrends. Apple was right in the middle of the personal computer microtrend in the early 2000s, and beginning to disrupt the music industry with its iPod, while releasing the first iPhone in 2007. Google and Amazon were setting themselves up to capture the internet/mobile microtrend and Amazon was trailblazing a path for the e-commerce microtrend while quietly building cloud IaaS in the background. Salesforce was also growing rapidly as one of the first software-as-a-service companies on the market that helped enterprises organize their sales and marketing departments.

We are invested in companies that are in the middle of powerful tech microtrends. These are companies that have superior products, and are growing revenues by mid to high double digits and raising guidance, mostly. If the company has a miss, we closely track the macro headwinds and make strategic bets on when those headwinds will clear (supply chains, for example).

These are companies that we thoroughly vet on product, fundamentals and technical. Our time horizon is TRULY +5 years, and behind our various and robust risk management protocols, there are specific stocks that we do not plan to sell based on our research and the magnitude of microtrends just starting.

This doesn’t mean we are inflexible. When Zoom Video guided for one of the lowest growth rates across cloud – and subsequently missed this guide, we closed the position. We will gladly revisit Zoom as the product grows and the management team decides which market and TAM it wants to tackle next. Meanwhile, in contrast to closing Zoom, we believe ad-tech is seeing temporary headwinds and have been building positions here.

The Path we are Following

The only way that I know how to truly measure sentiment in a robust and mechanical way is through technical analysis. We see the exact same technical patterns and Fibonacci ratios in play in the mid-late 19th century in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, long before anyone knew to map price patterns. Human sentiment is quantifiable, and measurable, which is why I use technical analysis.

It is true, this time is different, just like every other event that caused a fear driven drawdown. What has not changed is human emotion, and how the measurement of this force manifests when funneled into a market.

I’ve showed our Premium Members a variation of this chart since late 2020. As of now, the current correction falls directly into the minor 4th wave targets outlined in blue, with room to go, if a bottom hasn’t been struck. As long as we can hold the 4300 break out, the odds will start to build towards a low being in.

I believe that with sentiment as low as it is, the level of bearish bets as well as the economy not being as abysmal as most think, we are setting up for a multi-month uptrend that should take us +5000 SPX.

In conclusion, the same Teflon market that shrugged off countless bear market events over the last 12 years, appears to be alive and well today.

Can it let go and crash? Of course; no one knows for certain. However, if we let history, market patterns and sentiment guide us, giving this bull market the benefit of the doubt has paid off for 12 years. We remain flexible at all times, yet we side with the bulls that this market could give us at least one more all-time high.

The I/O Fund is a team of analysts who share their research publicly as they build a portfolio of 20 stocks. Our team has record results for a retail Fund and we also have four-digit gains on some of our free newsletter coverage. You can learn more about our premium service by clicking here or sign up for our free newsletter here.by clicking here or sign up for our free newsletter here.

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Please consult with your financial advisor in regards to any stocks you buy.

Levels to Watch for SPX: The Market Got Too Bearish Too Soon

Posted on March 18, 2022June 30, 2026 by io-fund

We are in a market where the macro environment is front and center.

The S&P500 is comfortably below its 50-day and 200-day moving average (MA), growth has reversed much of the gains from 2020 and energy is the only sector positive for the year. Inflation is at 40-year highs, oil went from $90- $129 in less than a month, as the FOMC arguably waited too long into this cycle to begin raising rates.

The FOMC is now boxed and must either abandon inflation concerns or growth concerns. Consumer sentiment is trending into recessionary levels, which means if the FED doesn’t address inflation, the consumer will do this for them. As if that’s not enough, the current war is potentially leading to a global sanction war that would all but guarantee a global recession.

Regardless, I still think the odds are higher that we see +5000 SPX before we see 3500 SPX, and the reason for this is due to the single most powerful force in equity markets – sentiment.

I know many will claim this time really is different, but many forget that similar excessive bearishness was present during Brexit, Grexit, the near collapse of the Euro zone, downgrading US debt, China collapses 1 and 2, double dip recession fears in 2012, as well as the 2016 global slowdown and political shift that brought about cries of a 50% drawdown. In fact, it really was different in 2009 as well as 2020, yet the market marched higher and never looked back, regardless of the data and extreme bearishness.

For the first time since 2020, we have sentiment depressed enough to propel us higher, and it is only from such states of despair that deep corrections find bottoms and begin to march higher. If you have ever said to yourself, “this market makes zero sense,” then you indirectly understand that fundamentals do not always drive market moves. I believe the time will come soon, that many will be saying the same phrase as we begin to march higher in light of the ongoing negative news cycle.

Bear Market or Correction?

The debate is whether this is a correction or the start of a secular bear market. If this is the start of a secular bear market, it will be the first one in history that the equity market sees before the bond market. Yes, the yield curve is flattening, but it has not indicated that the FED has made a catastrophic mistake that would all but insure a recession. The equity market has historically and consistently been the final market to wake up to the macro picture, with the bond market usually being the first.

As of today, the 30-year yield is making a new high. Unlike the short end of the curve, the longer out you go, the more rates are controlled by growth/inflation. The 30-year has been in a prolonged downtrend, until recently, suggesting that inflation AND growth do not warrant a coming recession, yet.

The spread between the 10/2 year is the flattest we’ve seen since October of 2018. This is not ideal, and this trend is moving towards an inversion. However, we have not inverted, yet.

What history has shown us is that once the yield curve inverts, the economy falls into recession, on average, between 9-24 months from the first inversion. Also, surprisingly, some of the best gains within a bull market happen in that final +1 year period after inversion.

Also, this would be the first bear market that triggers while the economy is still expanding, and earnings are surprising to the upside. In fact, over 75% of the stocks in the S&P 500 provided upward surprises, as many talked about raising their prices and increasing production to meet the demand in the global economy.

Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 403% – Click hereSign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 403% – Click hereClick here

Though the Rate of Change is starting to slow in the high frequency economic data, we are still expanding. We appeared to have reached peak growth in mid 2021, as the Rate of Change (RoC) continues to move towards a contraction.

However, the above chart is measuring Rate of Change, and though we are seeing the RoC decelerate, we are still expanding. In fact, the last two rounds of global PMI data showed numerous surprises to the upside in both manufacturing and services, and not just in the US. Historically, this is not the environment that we see large, prolonged drawdowns.

If we look at the US PMI data, anything above 50 is signifying an expansion, while below 50 signals a contraction. It’s not until we get that sub-50 reading that we see the equity markets at their most volatile. Note in the below chart how the PMI moving sub-50 tends to coincide with either the largest leg of a drawdown, or close to the start of a large drawdown. As of today, the PMI reading is at 58.

Furthermore, we are seeing Business Development Companies (BDCs) reporting strong demand, as many have raised their dividends and increased guidance for 2022. It’s important to monitor the sources of borrowing for small to medium sized businesses, which BDC’s service. This is further backed by the upward trending loan growth in commercial banks in the US.

I am not arguing that the current economy is ripe for growth. In fact, it’s important to understand where we are in the business cycle as well as earnings cycle. What I am saying is that sentiment in the markets have gotten too bearish, too quickly. This, more times than not, leads to an unwind which I believe could take SPX +5000 before we see 3500.

Next week, I will discuss statistics around bear markets and what has historically preceded a bear market and what has historically led to new highs. You might be surprised.

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Please consult with your financial advisor in regards to any stocks you buy.

Algorithms led to the fastest bear market in stock market history

Posted on April 1, 2020June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Last week, I wrote about how algorithms led to the fastest bear market in history. I explained that what’s driving the speed and severity of the bear market is the escalation of algorithmic trading, which is more prevalent than it was during the Great Recession in 2008.

March 2020 holds the record for how quickly stock prices dropped into a bear market — only 16 days after the S&P 500 Index hit its last closing high Feb. 19. The second-fastest bear market was the notorious 1929 crash that set off the Great Depression, followed by the elevator drop of 1987’s Black Monday.

Americans invested in stocks through 401(k)s and other retirement accounts may be unaware that they are part of a small minority of investors who are in it for the long run. Guy De Blonay, a fund manager at Jupiter Asset Management, said 80% of the stock market was controlled by machines during the selloff in 2018’s fourth quarter. In 2017, analysts at J.P. Morgan said “fundamental discretionary traders” accounted for only 10% of stock trading volume.

The “flash crash” on May 6, 2010, caused the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, -4.44% to drop 998.5 points (about 9%) within minutes, only to recover a large part of the decline later in the day.

According to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), high-frequency trading “did not cause the Flash Crash, but contributed to it by demanding immediacy ahead of other market participants.”

Flash moves of nearly 1,000 points in either direction are now the new normal, with 14 occurring in the past 30 days. Four of those intraday moves were more than 9%. Trading curbs, known as circuit breakers, were hit four times this month.

Furthermore, according to Wells Fargo, robots will replace 200,000 banking jobs over the next 10 years. And Citigroup C, has formed a lab to cross-train traders and developers for machine learning and artificial intelligence.

Perhaps we will get a coronavirus vaccine or antiviral tomorrow, and business will go on as usual. Or, the opposite could happen, and things will get worse. One thing is certain: Until there is regulation, the machines will profit either way.

Read the full article on MarketWatch here.