Skip to content
Logo-main-white.860316a8

I/O Fund

  • Home
  • Free Stock Analysis
  • AI Stocks
  • BEST OF 2025
  • Analysts
  • Nvidia Hub
  • About
    • Case Studies
    • About Us
    • Premium Services
    • Pricing
    • Notable Wins
    • I/O Fund Reviews
    • Media
  • Contact Us

Category: Data Center

Cloud Earnings Review: Digging Deeper on Best-of-Breed

Posted on March 31, 2023June 30, 2026 by io-fund

This is a continuation of our article Slowdown in Cloud on Thin Ice Following Q1 Guides. Here’s a quick recap”

“Following the most recent earnings reports, our prediction is playing out that the slowdown we had predicted in Cloud would worsen. For example, best-of-breed cloud reported a 71% slowdown in QoQ/YoY growth for Q4 guides and is now guiding for an 83% slowdown in QoQ/YoY growth for Q1 guides.  

This is important because the cloud category has treated investors quite well with recurring revenue, resiliency during Covid, and some of the strongest examples of product-market fit available on the public markets. However, not even this can overcome the effects of lower budgets and cloud spend, which is the top driver in terms of year-over-year comparisons.”

Digging Deeper on Best-of-Breed

Our analysis on cloud best-of-breed should not be confused for excessive bearishness. We like this category quite a bit and will continue to watch it closely to build position(s) in the future. Rather, we prefer to not stand in front of the train (which for growth stocks, can be defined as rapid deceleration on the top line) and to simply wait for a signal that growth will resume. Others will choose to remain invested for the long-term story, and that may fit another investment profile.

We took a sample of the top-ranking cloud stocks on revenue growth, free cash flow, adjusted operating margin and/or valuations. Among the best-of-breed cloud stocks, only ServiceNow’s guide shows sequential growth. The company’s QoQ growth was 7% last year and is expected to be 8% this year. In this article we want to expand the data below to see which companies are outperforming and underperforming based on the various metrics.

Source: YCharts 

Source: YCharts

We did a similar analysis in December. Since then, Gitlab stands out for its revenue growth profile that increased from a 10% decel to a 16% decel expected for Q1 from the previous year. If this continues, Gitlab will see an approximate 50% decel from FY2022. HashiCorp is also turning negative in terms of QoQ/YoY, as is Bill.com and MongoDB. Two of these stocks lag cloud on YTD returns with Bill down (30.25%) and Gitlab down (27.13%).

Source: YCharts

Earnings Beats

Below we look at companies that beat revenue and adjusted EPS. HashiCorp was the leading cloud stock to have the highest revenue beat. The company’s revenue grew by 41% YoY to $135.79 million and beat estimates by 9.3%. BILL revenue grew by 66% YoY to $260 million and beat estimates by 7%. MongoDB revenue grew by 36% YoY to $361.31 million and beat estimates by 6.9%.

Source: YCharts

MongoDB’s adjusted EPS was $0.57 compared to $0.10 for the same quarter last year. It beat analyst estimates by 656.6%.

BILL adjusted EPS came at $0.42 compared to break even for the same quarter last year. It beat analyst estimates by 210.7%.

Source: YCharts

Both MongoDB and BILL, despite the top-line and bottom-line beat, dropped after the earnings due to decelerating revenue. Per Barclays analyst Raimo Lenschow, who has an overweight rating on MongoDB, the guidance only implies 16% growth and a meaningful slowdown in the company's Atlas and Enterprise Advanced segments.

We do not place much weight on earnings beats in the current macro environment. This helps to perfectly illustrate why beats can actually be a dangerous way to evaluate a stock. In all cases – HCP, MDB and BILL, the companies were beating on decelerating revenue and/or bottom lines. We had pointed this out in our January Q1 Webinar when we stated: “We won’t be buying beats on decelerating top line or beats on deceleration bottom line.”

Bottom Line and Free Cash Flow

Below we look at the best-of-breed cloud stock’s GAAP operating margin and free cash flow margin. Note that some cloud companies are reporting better free cash margins.

Snowflake reported a higher free cash flow margin of 35% when compared to 15% in the same period last year. ServiceNow has an impressive 52% free cash flow margin when compared to 46% in the year-ago period.

GAAP profitability is another important metric to closely monitor, especially with macroeconomic uncertainty. Adobe ranks the highest in the best-of-breed cloud companies with an operating margin of 34% and ServiceNow ranks second with an operating margin of 8%.

Source: YCharts

Cloud investors should remain cautious as cutting back on expenses may weigh on growth long-term. We do not have all of the information yet on how these companies will perform a year out when they’ve decreased head count, gone remote, cut back on sales and marketing and/or cut back on R&D. During the bull market, cloud was spending for growth and this had a direct relation to helping the top line. The effects of pulling back on this spending will not be immediately seen. We are very new to cloud deceleration, which I estimate began to occur in Q3 2022. We’ve stated various reasons for this being the quarter where earnings were a bit unusual, including the Q2 beats weren’t being carried through to a full year raise on guidance.

As stated on Real Vision, this was a flag to us and we began to decrease our exposure to cloud around this time. I think we will need at least a year to 18 months to see the full effects of reduced spending in relation to the top line. Our December cloud report had said – do not be surprised if we see best-of-breed dip below 20% — and we are already quicker than I thought was possible with MDB reporting 16% growth. Perhaps I should update this and say – do not be surprised if best-of-breed reports below 10% growth. With the information we have today, we are headed in this direction.

More on Margins:

The below chart shows the GAAP operating margins of the best-of-breed cloud companies. Apart from ServiceNow and Adobe, other cloud names have negative GAAP operating margins.

Datadog was GAAP profitable but recently lost their positive margin from +3% to (7%). CrowdStrike is low negative single digits at (5%). Datadog’s management had stated in the earnings call that the previous year’s operating margin benefitted from less in-person office costs and travel costs due to Covid policies.

Source: YCharts

Stock-Based Compensation

Most of the names listed below that are unprofitable on a GAAP basis are paying high stock-based compensation. BILL has the highest percentage of stock-based compensation at 45.9%, followed by Snowflake at 42.6%, and 36.6% for SentinelOne.

The high stock-based compensation is something to be on watch for, because when companies report, they will overemphasize non-GAAP earnings. For example, BILL has a GAAP operating margin of (43%) and an adjusted operating margin of 12%, with the primary difference being stock-based compensation.

Stock-based compensation is a non-cash expense added back to adjusted earnings. However, in practice this is an expense as per GAAP rules. Warren Buffet said the following, which relates to the importance of GAAP earnings over adjusted earnings when stock-based compensation is involved. “If options aren’t a form of compensation, what are they? If compensation isn’t an expense, what is it? And if expenses should not go into the calculation of earnings, where in the world should they go?”

Source: YCharts

Valuations

In the below chart, we ranked companies based on the forward P/S ratio. Snowflake and Cloudflare have the highest forward P/S ratio. These have come down considerably over the past few months. Eventually, cloud will hit a bottom on valuations and be cheap enough for risk-adverse investors to consider.

Source: YCharts

Ranking based on revenue estimates change for current quarter.

Zscaler’s revenue estimates have been revised up 2.4% and CrowdStrike’s revenue estimates have been revised up 1.6% in the past 30 days. On the other hand, GitLab’s revenue estimates have been revised down (6.6%), Datadog’s revenue estimates have been revised down (2.6%), and MongoDB’s revenue has been revised down (1.7%). This is another reason that earnings beats are not the best way to determine the outcome of an earnings report. Because the market is forward-looking, you’ll see a company beat current estimates while being revised down on forward estimates. This is a trap that retail should try to avoid at all costs.

Source: YCharts

Ranking based on adjusted EPS estimates change for the current quarter.

MongoDB’s adjusted EPS has been revised up 47.4% in the past 30 days. We also noted earlier in our analysis that the company had a very strong adjusted EPS beat in the recent quarter. Similarly, Zscaler’s estimates have been revised up 27%, and CrowdStrike’s by 16.8%. On the other hand, Snowflake’s estimates have been revised down (26.4%) and Gitlab’s by (10.1%).

Source: YCharts

A Few Best-of-Breed highlights and lowlights in Q4.

According to the data above, Adobe and ServiceNow are best positioned to weather the new macro. This is due to favorable bottom lines, which includes the elusive GAAP profitability for this category. Their stock-based compensation ranks margin lowest on our list and their respective GAAP operating margins reflects this.

ServiceNow and Adobe also have two of the strongest free cash flow margins in the category and are essentially flat QoQ/YoY on the top line while many cloud stocks are deeply decelerating.

Crowdstrike is guiding for QoQ growth from Q4 to Q1 on both the top line and bottom line.

CrowdStrike revenue grew by 48% YoY to $637.4 million (beat estimates by 1.7%) and adjusted EPS was $0.47 (beat estimates by 10.4%). The free cash flow was also strong as it grew by 65% YoY to $209.5 million with a free cash flow margin of 33%.

Crowdstrike guided for $676M, at the midpoint and EPS of $0.50 to $0.51.

Wedbush analyst Taz Koujalgi said, "We calculate that the [annual recurring revenue] guide appears conservative, and if macro conditions do not deteriorate, net new [annual recurring revenue] growth if high single digits are doable."

The management also highlighted that the company had been ranked No.1 for the third consecutive year in IDC’s annual Worldwide Modern Endpoint Security Market. The company was able to increase its market share by 3.8% to 17.7%.

Cloudflare Grows Free Cash Flow Margin

Cloudflare revenue grew by 42% YoY to $274.7 million (beat estimates by 0.23%) and adjusted EPS was $0.06 (beat estimates by 31.6%).

The company had a free cash flow of $33.66 million with a free cash flow margin of 12% compared to a free cash flow of $8.64 million with a free cash flow margin of 4% in the year-ago quarter.

The management highlighted some of the key deals in the quarter, particularly a leading generative AI company signing a one year $1 million deal. The AI company has been a user of free tier since 2017. Cloudflare was also awarded a five-year deal of $7.2 million to operate the .gov registry. The company also got the moderate status of the FedRAMP authorization in December.

Zscaler Grows Free Cash Flow but Billings Slow

Zscaler revenue grew by 52% YoY to $387.6 million (beat estimates by 6.3%) and adjusted EPS was $0.37 (beat estimates by 26.1%). The free cash flow grew by 113% YoY to $62.8 million with a free cash flow margin of 16%. However, the weak point in the company’s report was the calculated billings that grew by 34% in the quarter from 37% growth reported in Q3 and 59% growth reported in the year-ago quarter.

The management mentioned in the earnings call, “Billings were impacted by new customers being more deliberate about their large purchasing decisions at the start of the calendar year. These deals have not gone away, and we have closed a few already in February.” The billings guide for the next quarter was also low. “For Q3 (Q1), we are assuming billings to decline by approximately 9% sequentially, compared to the mid-single digit percentage declines we have seen in the last few years.”

Conclusion

The cloud sector has many moving parts as it mixes strong product stories with weak bottom lines. In addition to this, eventually the valuations will become attractive especially for those that can weather the new macro by cutting costs and maintaining category-leading growth. Across the board, cloud investors should be prepared for a sustained slowdown on the top line. This could worsen over the next year, as typically there’s a direct relationship between spending/investing in growth and top line results 12-18 months later. The opposite will also be true, cutting back on spending/investing in growth will lead to a lower top line.

Our preference is to remain on the side lines for now while identifying the strongest one or two cloud stocks fundamentally for when the technicals show give us a clear signal that it’s time to hold exposure here again. This could happen quickly so we prefer to be prepared in advance with what companies’ charts should take priority.

Deep dives plus trade alerts and weekly webinars are offered on our premium service, you can find out more information here.

Posted in Cloud Platforms, Data CenterLeave a Comment on Cloud Earnings Review: Digging Deeper on Best-of-Breed

Cloud Earnings Review: Digging Deeper on Best-of-Breed

Posted on March 31, 2023June 30, 2026 by io-fund

This is a continuation of our article Slowdown in Cloud on Thin Ice Following Q1 Guides. Here’s a quick recap”

“Following the most recent earnings reports, our prediction is playing out that the slowdown we had predicted in Cloud would worsen. For example, best-of-breed cloud reported a 71% slowdown in QoQ/YoY growth for Q4 guides and is now guiding for an 83% slowdown in QoQ/YoY growth for Q1 guides.  

This is important because the cloud category has treated investors quite well with recurring revenue, resiliency during Covid, and some of the strongest examples of product-market fit available on the public markets. However, not even this can overcome the effects of lower budgets and cloud spend, which is the top driver in terms of year-over-year comparisons.”

Digging Deeper on Best-of-Breed

Our analysis on cloud best-of-breed should not be confused for excessive bearishness. We like this category quite a bit and will continue to watch it closely to build position(s) in the future. Rather, we prefer to not stand in front of the train (which for growth stocks, can be defined as rapid deceleration on the top line) and to simply wait for a signal that growth will resume. Others will choose to remain invested for the long-term story, and that may fit another investment profile.

We took a sample of the top-ranking cloud stocks on revenue growth, free cash flow, adjusted operating margin and/or valuations. Among the best-of-breed cloud stocks, only ServiceNow’s guide shows sequential growth. The company’s QoQ growth was 7% last year and is expected to be 8% this year. In this article we want to expand the data below to see which companies are outperforming and underperforming based on the various metrics.

Source: YCharts 

Source: YCharts

We did a similar analysis in December. Since then, Gitlab stands out for its revenue growth profile that increased from a 10% decel to a 16% decel expected for Q1 from the previous year. If this continues, Gitlab will see an approximate 50% decel from FY2022. HashiCorp is also turning negative in terms of QoQ/YoY, as is Bill.com and MongoDB. Two of these stocks lag cloud on YTD returns with Bill down (30.25%) and Gitlab down (27.13%).

Source: YCharts

Earnings Beats

Below we look at companies that beat revenue and adjusted EPS. HashiCorp was the leading cloud stock to have the highest revenue beat. The company’s revenue grew by 41% YoY to $135.79 million and beat estimates by 9.3%. BILL revenue grew by 66% YoY to $260 million and beat estimates by 7%. MongoDB revenue grew by 36% YoY to $361.31 million and beat estimates by 6.9%.

Source: YCharts

MongoDB’s adjusted EPS was $0.57 compared to $0.10 for the same quarter last year. It beat analyst estimates by 656.6%.

BILL adjusted EPS came at $0.42 compared to break even for the same quarter last year. It beat analyst estimates by 210.7%.

Source: YCharts

Both MongoDB and BILL, despite the top-line and bottom-line beat, dropped after the earnings due to decelerating revenue. Per Barclays analyst Raimo Lenschow, who has an overweight rating on MongoDB, the guidance only implies 16% growth and a meaningful slowdown in the company's Atlas and Enterprise Advanced segments.

We do not place much weight on earnings beats in the current macro environment. This helps to perfectly illustrate why beats can actually be a dangerous way to evaluate a stock. In all cases – HCP, MDB and BILL, the companies were beating on decelerating revenue and/or bottom lines. We had pointed this out in our January Q1 Webinar when we stated: “We won’t be buying beats on decelerating top line or beats on deceleration bottom line.”

Bottom Line and Free Cash Flow

Below we look at the best-of-breed cloud stock’s GAAP operating margin and free cash flow margin. Note that some cloud companies are reporting better free cash margins.

Snowflake reported a higher free cash flow margin of 35% when compared to 15% in the same period last year. ServiceNow has an impressive 52% free cash flow margin when compared to 46% in the year-ago period.

GAAP profitability is another important metric to closely monitor, especially with macroeconomic uncertainty. Adobe ranks the highest in the best-of-breed cloud companies with an operating margin of 34% and ServiceNow ranks second with an operating margin of 8%.

Source: YCharts

Cloud investors should remain cautious as cutting back on expenses may weigh on growth long-term. We do not have all of the information yet on how these companies will perform a year out when they’ve decreased head count, gone remote, cut back on sales and marketing and/or cut back on R&D. During the bull market, cloud was spending for growth and this had a direct relation to helping the top line. The effects of pulling back on this spending will not be immediately seen. We are very new to cloud deceleration, which I estimate began to occur in Q3 2022. We’ve stated various reasons for this being the quarter where earnings were a bit unusual, including the Q2 beats weren’t being carried through to a full year raise on guidance.

As stated on Real Vision, this was a flag to us and we began to decrease our exposure to cloud around this time. I think we will need at least a year to 18 months to see the full effects of reduced spending in relation to the top line. Our December cloud report had said – do not be surprised if we see best-of-breed dip below 20% — and we are already quicker than I thought was possible with MDB reporting 16% growth. Perhaps I should update this and say – do not be surprised if best-of-breed reports below 10% growth. With the information we have today, we are headed in this direction.

More on Margins:

The below chart shows the GAAP operating margins of the best-of-breed cloud companies. Apart from ServiceNow and Adobe, other cloud names have negative GAAP operating margins.

Datadog was GAAP profitable but recently lost their positive margin from +3% to (7%). CrowdStrike is low negative single digits at (5%). Datadog’s management had stated in the earnings call that the previous year’s operating margin benefitted from less in-person office costs and travel costs due to Covid policies.

Source: YCharts

Stock-Based Compensation

Most of the names listed below that are unprofitable on a GAAP basis are paying high stock-based compensation. BILL has the highest percentage of stock-based compensation at 45.9%, followed by Snowflake at 42.6%, and 36.6% for SentinelOne.

The high stock-based compensation is something to be on watch for, because when companies report, they will overemphasize non-GAAP earnings. For example, BILL has a GAAP operating margin of (43%) and an adjusted operating margin of 12%, with the primary difference being stock-based compensation.

Stock-based compensation is a non-cash expense added back to adjusted earnings. However, in practice this is an expense as per GAAP rules. Warren Buffet said the following, which relates to the importance of GAAP earnings over adjusted earnings when stock-based compensation is involved. “If options aren’t a form of compensation, what are they? If compensation isn’t an expense, what is it? And if expenses should not go into the calculation of earnings, where in the world should they go?”

Source: YCharts

Valuations

In the below chart, we ranked companies based on the forward P/S ratio. Snowflake and Cloudflare have the highest forward P/S ratio. These have come down considerably over the past few months. Eventually, cloud will hit a bottom on valuations and be cheap enough for risk-adverse investors to consider.

Source: YCharts

Ranking based on revenue estimates change for current quarter.

Zscaler’s revenue estimates have been revised up 2.4% and CrowdStrike’s revenue estimates have been revised up 1.6% in the past 30 days. On the other hand, GitLab’s revenue estimates have been revised down (6.6%), Datadog’s revenue estimates have been revised down (2.6%), and MongoDB’s revenue has been revised down (1.7%). This is another reason that earnings beats are not the best way to determine the outcome of an earnings report. Because the market is forward-looking, you’ll see a company beat current estimates while being revised down on forward estimates. This is a trap that retail should try to avoid at all costs.

Source: YCharts

Ranking based on adjusted EPS estimates change for the current quarter.

MongoDB’s adjusted EPS has been revised up 47.4% in the past 30 days. We also noted earlier in our analysis that the company had a very strong adjusted EPS beat in the recent quarter. Similarly, Zscaler’s estimates have been revised up 27%, and CrowdStrike’s by 16.8%. On the other hand, Snowflake’s estimates have been revised down (26.4%) and Gitlab’s by (10.1%).

Source: YCharts

A Few Best-of-Breed highlights and lowlights in Q4.

According to the data above, Adobe and ServiceNow are best positioned to weather the new macro. This is due to favorable bottom lines, which includes the elusive GAAP profitability for this category. Their stock-based compensation ranks margin lowest on our list and their respective GAAP operating margins reflects this.

ServiceNow and Adobe also have two of the strongest free cash flow margins in the category and are essentially flat QoQ/YoY on the top line while many cloud stocks are deeply decelerating.

Crowdstrike is guiding for QoQ growth from Q4 to Q1 on both the top line and bottom line.

CrowdStrike revenue grew by 48% YoY to $637.4 million (beat estimates by 1.7%) and adjusted EPS was $0.47 (beat estimates by 10.4%). The free cash flow was also strong as it grew by 65% YoY to $209.5 million with a free cash flow margin of 33%.

Crowdstrike guided for $676M, at the midpoint and EPS of $0.50 to $0.51.

Wedbush analyst Taz Koujalgi said, "We calculate that the [annual recurring revenue] guide appears conservative, and if macro conditions do not deteriorate, net new [annual recurring revenue] growth if high single digits are doable."

The management also highlighted that the company had been ranked No.1 for the third consecutive year in IDC’s annual Worldwide Modern Endpoint Security Market. The company was able to increase its market share by 3.8% to 17.7%.

Cloudflare Grows Free Cash Flow Margin

Cloudflare revenue grew by 42% YoY to $274.7 million (beat estimates by 0.23%) and adjusted EPS was $0.06 (beat estimates by 31.6%).

The company had a free cash flow of $33.66 million with a free cash flow margin of 12% compared to a free cash flow of $8.64 million with a free cash flow margin of 4% in the year-ago quarter.

The management highlighted some of the key deals in the quarter, particularly a leading generative AI company signing a one year $1 million deal. The AI company has been a user of free tier since 2017. Cloudflare was also awarded a five-year deal of $7.2 million to operate the .gov registry. The company also got the moderate status of the FedRAMP authorization in December.

Zscaler Grows Free Cash Flow but Billings Slow

Zscaler revenue grew by 52% YoY to $387.6 million (beat estimates by 6.3%) and adjusted EPS was $0.37 (beat estimates by 26.1%). The free cash flow grew by 113% YoY to $62.8 million with a free cash flow margin of 16%. However, the weak point in the company’s report was the calculated billings that grew by 34% in the quarter from 37% growth reported in Q3 and 59% growth reported in the year-ago quarter.

The management mentioned in the earnings call, “Billings were impacted by new customers being more deliberate about their large purchasing decisions at the start of the calendar year. These deals have not gone away, and we have closed a few already in February.” The billings guide for the next quarter was also low. “For Q3 (Q1), we are assuming billings to decline by approximately 9% sequentially, compared to the mid-single digit percentage declines we have seen in the last few years.”

Conclusion

The cloud sector has many moving parts as it mixes strong product stories with weak bottom lines. In addition to this, eventually the valuations will become attractive especially for those that can weather the new macro by cutting costs and maintaining category-leading growth. Across the board, cloud investors should be prepared for a sustained slowdown on the top line. This could worsen over the next year, as typically there’s a direct relationship between spending/investing in growth and top line results 12-18 months later. The opposite will also be true, cutting back on spending/investing in growth will lead to a lower top line.

Our preference is to remain on the side lines for now while identifying the strongest one or two cloud stocks fundamentally for when the technicals show give us a clear signal that it’s time to hold exposure here again. This could happen quickly so we prefer to be prepared in advance with what companies’ charts should take priority.

Of these names, we plan to do a deep dive in April for our premium members on the front runner(s). Stay tuned.

Posted in Cloud Platforms, Data CenterLeave a Comment on Cloud Earnings Review: Digging Deeper on Best-of-Breed

Barron’s Podcast: What the Heck is Going on with Cloud Valuations

Posted on October 7, 2022June 30, 2026 by io-fund
Barron’s Podcast: What the Heck is Going on with Cloud Valuations

Earlier this week, I/O Fund CEO and Lead Tech Analyst Beth Kindig joined Jeremy Owens, Tech Editor, and San Francisco Bureau Chief of MarketWatch, on Barron’s Live. They discussed cloud valuations including those that are trading at 2X above Covid lows, what metrics matter when evaluating cloud companies, and what to watch for in upcoming earnings season — including a few comments on ad-tech. Barron’s Live. They discussed cloud valuations including those that are trading at 2X above Covid lows, what metrics matter when evaluating cloud companies, and what to watch for in upcoming earnings season — including a few comments on ad-tech.

Metrics and Valuations

As discussed in the podcast, the FOMC decisions have forced tech investors to look for cloud stocks that are expanding their margins and also have positive free cash flow. If you look at the best-of-breed companies that command the top 10 in valuations, the majority of them are free cash flow positive.

We had discussed with our premium research members back in May in a special report Compartmentalizing Cloud Stocks that “It’s true that cloud is deflationary but it’s also true that cloud can have profitability issues […] cloud is quite resilient in terms of growth, due to being deflationary, but those weak bottom lines may be questioned over time. Cash came easy over the past decade, and as cloud investors, we need to reframe our thinking on what constitutes an attractive cloud stock.”

Free cash flow is emerging as an important metric because cash gets rerated in a rising rate environment. As stated, not only were many cloud companies were not public during the previous rising rate environment of 2017 to late 2018 – but in addition to this, the previous rising rate environment was quite tame and we are currently in a more aggressive rising rate environment.

Along with free cash flow, GAAP operating margins are being closely examined. This has resulted in companies with high stock-based compensations being penalized during earnings.

The takeaway is that a best-of-breed company with a 15X or higher valuation must remain FCF positive or it will immediately lose its category high valuation. Revenue growth alone is not determining the top spots in this category any longer. This may seem obvious at first thought but we have found it’s better to close a stock at a higher valuation if it has contracting margins.

Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 403% to get analysis like this delivered straight to your inbox every week. Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 403% to get analysis like this delivered straight to your inbox every week. Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 403% to get analysis like this delivered straight to your inbox every week.

The difference between Subscription and Consumption Models

Consumptions models occur in the Big Data and Analytics trend where data storage, processing, and analytic solutions are based on usage rather than on a recurring subscription fee. This trend is becoming popular because with consumption-based pricing model, revenue is uncapped. The consumption billing model does not have a ceiling on revenue, so if customer consumption rises, so does sales. There is what is meant by uncapped revenue potential.

We covered Snowflake’s Consumption Model in January of 2022 when we said in our free newsletter: “While Snowflake uses a “land -and-expand” sales strategy, it also uses a consumption billing model. For instance, Snowflake bills customers based on the amount of data they store and transfer and what resources they use. Accruing revenue based on consumption rather than a ratable subscription model decreases the predictability of quarterly revenue, but it leaves revenue uncapped. This provides revenue upside, because if consumption soars, then so will revenue.”

Some of the drawbacks, however, include the revenue growth being less predictable than subscription revenue. There also isn’t a floor on revenue because if consumption declines, then so will sales. Contracts help protect against this but are often only 1/3 of next 2.5 years of revenue.

The drawbacks were also discussed in the Snowflake’s Consumption Model article in January of 2022, “Another risk is the company’s consumption billing model, which is inherently unpredictable. This can make growth lumpy and some quarters may disappoint the Street. Investors should expect increased volatility in growth from Snowflake in the near term as new customers ramp consumption. However, management does expect revenue growth to smooth and become more predictable in the aggregate as customer consumption scales and matures on the platform.”

The lack of predictability is seen in Snowflake’s earnings history with Q1 earnings reporting revenue growth of 85% YoY to $422.4 million (beat estimates by 2.3%). However, the GAAP EPS missed by $0.02. The management had a hard time convincing the analysts in the earnings call that the company’s revenue was not discretionary and the consumption was lower due to shifting economic circumstances that impacted certain customers, particularly consumer facing cloud companies.

The company’s CFO, Mike Scarpelli, said in the earnings call, “Consumption patterns may fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter. This variability does not detract from our long-term opportunity. Customer’s overall demand for Snowflake remains unchanged. This is supported by the contractual commitments they are making with us and their longer-term plans for adopting the data cloud across their organization.”

In the podcast, we also discussed how net retention rates are often higher for consumption models as spending ramps over time and is uncapped. It’s easier to re-accelerate here for that reason and it’s not the best apples-to-apples comparison for subscription NRR. The net retention rates for subscription-based companies are in the range of 130-140 range while Snowflake has remained in the 170 range.

Another metric is the remaining performance obligation (RPO). When customers sign onto the platform, they purchase consumption at specified prices, which gets recorded as remaining performance obligations (RPO). These contracts are for about 2.5 years. Although these key metrics are important, as mentioned earlier, what the market will reward or penalize most in a rising rate environment are operating margins and free cash flow.

Over the last two weeks, we've entered two bargain priced stocks on our premium site where the market may have gone too far, too fast — particularly those with an improving bottom line. Become a premium member to unlock real-time trade notifications on every entry and exit. Over the last two weeks, we've entered two bargain priced stocks on our premium site where the market may have gone too far, too fast — particularly those with an improving bottom line. Become a premium member to unlock real-time trade notifications on every entry and exit. premium site where the market may have gone too far, too fast — particularly those with an improving bottom line. Become a premium member to unlock real-time trade notifications on every entry and exit.

Ad-tech opportunity

In the interview, Jeremy Owens reminds me that I was the first person to warn him about how the Apple’s IDFA changes that would negatively impact Facebook’s revenue many years ago. It was a bold call at the time because I called the top for Facebook when it was a stock market darling in 2018. Despite the odds, it turned out to be accurate.

We discuss how ad-tech stocks are trading at historically low valuations with many 50% lower than where they have traded during times of economic uncertainty. The share prices of these ad-tech companies can grow over 100%. When the market senses a bottom is in — which I believe was either Q2 or will be Q3 — buyers will step back in to support higher valuations.

We discuss why CTV ads is the most investable trend in media right now.

What to look in the upcoming earnings season

Microsoft’s results are to be closely watched since the company is a bellwether for Cloud. Its suite of Cloud products drives down costs and it’s the most insulated cloud company. It benefits from cloud migrations and also the need for organizations to reduce costs.

Analysts in the earnings call are concerned that the enterprise sector is the next shoe to drop following consumers. The consumer cycle is very short, whereas for Enterprises, it depends on the renewal cycle and there is a period of negotiation. In addition to constrained enterprise budgets, many startups are not able to raise funding and are going out of business, which can weigh on cloud, as collectively startups are a sizable customer for cloud companies.  

The cybersecurity sector has reported exceptional fundamentals given the economic headwinds. Many companies have been reporting high growth rates and are cash flow positive. This sector also has no exposure to discretionary spending, which will help the category sustain long-term.

Bargain Cloud Stocks

We spoke about Best-of-Breed on this podcast yet we are currently building positions in companies that are undervalued and more of a “basement bargain” or “fire sale” valuation as we believe the market has not been entirely efficient with key stocks that have been penalized with low valuations. These stocks are 50% lower than their Covid low and have the potential to bounce back. In fact, one could argue there is more room for gains in these stocks than the best-of-breed companies which are within 30% of historic valuations for cloud stocks.

Sign up for premium to learn more.

Listen on Apple Podcasts | Listen on SpotifySign up for premium to learn more.

Listen on Apple Podcasts | Listen on Spotify

Timestamps:

00:00 Intro
00:44 Valuations
04:40 Consumption-based pricing
11:24 Snowflake vs MongoDB
13:15 Ad-tech
20:15 Upcoming earnings season
22:08 Cybersecurity
24:22 Best practices for retail investors

Please note: The I/O Fund conducts research and draws conclusions for the Fund’s positions. We then share that information with our readers. This is not a guarantee of a stock’s performance. Please consult your personal financial advisor before buying any stock in the companies mentioned in this analysis.

Posted in Cloud Infrastructure, Cloud Platforms, Cloud Software, Cybersecurity, Data Center, Data Warehousing, Tech StocksLeave a Comment on Barron’s Podcast: What the Heck is Going on with Cloud Valuations

Datadog Deep Dive: Rare Pure Play with Cloud IaaS Tailwinds

Posted on November 22, 2021June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Datadog is a company that quietly appears every three months with earnings results that say: “Remember me?” We are looking to increase allocation to this LTBH position as this is a rare leader in the migration to the cloud and the observability that is required across increasingly complex architectures. If you want a simple thesis that you can share with your friends and family, it’s this: Datadog lets us directly participate in the growth of AWS, Azure and Google Cloud through a pureplay that cross-sells better than almost any other cloud company.

Product Overview:

Datadog’s management team was very early to address the issue of silos in a cloud-native environment. As systems moved from on-premise to the public cloud to include virtualized machines and containers, the number of applications to monitor grew. Virtualized machines create more data from many more applications. The next iteration of the cloud, which was containers, exponentially grew the number of applications. Now that there are serverless architectures where every function needs to be tracked individually – which means the complexity has grown yet again.

Here's a picture of what I mean:

 

Datadog is a company that solves the complexity associated with the cloud as the products are able to observe and monitor any environment no matter how large the tech stack scales.

The second thing to understand about Datadog is that it’s not only cloud native but it also works well in a multi-cloud environment. This means Datadog is downstream from Azure, AWS and Google Cloud – no matter who a customer goes with and at what percentages for the deployment. The fact that companies prefer to work with more than one cloud vendor is actually a driving force for Datadog as it’s observability and security products can scale across any deployment a customer chooses and is flexible if the customer makes changes down the line.

The trend of multi-cloud and hybrid cloud is only going to accelerate from here which we covered in detail in our Big Data and Analytics analysis. It’s worth a read if you haven’t read it yet.

The company uses the word “standardization” to describe how the multi-cloud trend is a main driver for Datadog. We covered this in our last analysis but it bears repeating here as to why multi-cloud and hybrid cloud are important drivers for Datadog and how standardization plays a key role.

Standardizing means interoperability between various cloud environments and integrated interfaces. This is especially important with multi-cloud or hybrid cloud where companies have more than one environment. This is becoming the new normal to prevent vendor lock-in. The word standardization/ standardize was mentioned 20 times on the Q2 Earnings Call, highlighting its importance to Datadog’s story going forward. If corporations continue to standardize on Datadog’s platform, then the company will continue to capture market share.

Here’s a quote from our previous analysis:

Since dealing with multiple cloud vendors quickly becomes cumbersome, there is a natural tendency to standardize in tech, especially with software. Moreover, cloud applications need to communicate, so having everything on one platform can make detecting and resolving issues less complex and costly. We believe that we are on the cusp of this standardization trend with cloud software vendors, with Datadog leading the way. We believe that Datadog is best positioned to benefit from both the rise in cloud usage and the standardization of cloud software.”Moreover, cloud applications need to communicate, so having everything on one platform can make detecting and resolving issues less complex and costly. We believe that we are on the cusp of this standardization trend with cloud software vendors, with Datadog leading the way. We believe that Datadog is best positioned to benefit from both the rise in cloud usage and the standardization of cloud software.”

Datadog eliminates the need to work with many different vendors and pulls the entire DevOpsSec stack into one platform. This not only breaks down silos in terms of the observability framework yet also breaks down silos within the company.

Infrastructure Monitoring

At the point that companies migrate to the cloud from on-premise servers, how they monitor their infrastructure fundamentally changes. On-premise servers have fixed IP addresses and there are static servers and virtualized machines. Once you move to the cloud, this changes as servers are spun-up in the cloud and are not on-site and components are hosted across many regions.

At the start, Datadog helped monitor the hardware in cloud-native environments, the operating systems, and the application servers. Infrastructure monitoring is essential if there is a problem with the functionality of a cloud-native company on the back-end. It offers tools, such as CPU utilization, to determine if there’s sufficient processing capacity, memory utilization to determine if there’s memory capacity, and storage use which indicates the amount of disk that the host is using to store files and other content.

The goal of infrastructure monitoring is to prevent or troubleshoot performance issues and to lower costs. We’ve covered in the Big Data and ML analysis here the costs associated with cloud environments and why this is coming under pressure with more companies choosing hybrid architectures, including a mix of cloud and on-premise servers.

Datadog set out to disrupt on-premise solutions that monitored servers and virtualized machines. This is called “host-centric.” The primary issues with former infrastructure monitoring tools are that they do not scale for the cloud and it creates silos between departments. In the cloud, infrastructure monitoring uses an API for cloud-based metrics. Datadog’s products also remove the need for Secure Shell, or SSH, to log onto remote servers. As architectures evolved to serverless, legacy monitoring tools were even more outdated as there isn’t a server to run the code and install a monitoring agent.

One key thing about Datadog is the company allows for metadata to be tagged on backend components for better monitoring. These tags inform alerts and visualization tools. The company tags both the zones and the applications. Unified tagging limits the need for reconfiguration as a company scales. This is one of Datadog’s core competencies and their unique method approach to tagging is what they launched with in 2010. This aggregates and contextualizes the data no matter where the data comes from.

Another main selling point to many of Datadog’s features is a unified platform rather than many disparate tools or vendors. This is how Datadog has disrupted its competitors and crept into larger addressable markets. The unified platform works across all environments – on-premise, hybrid and cloud – and spans infrastructure monitoring, application monitoring, log management, observability and now security. By being so strong in the area of observability, Datadog can knock down its competitors by cross-selling 13 products from the key critical piece in the stack, which is monitoring and observability. With 450 integrations, Datadog leaves little reason to leave the platform and the dashboard for other tools.

The unified platform for complex architectures is also partly why Datadog is able to lead its competitors in standardization. The dashboard also offers AI to help customers move through the dashboard by recommending the next monitoring step. Here’s a direct quote from an analyst on the call that sums up Datadog’s positioning:

“Congrats on the solid quarter as well for me. But Oli, you’re already bigger than all your near-term or nearest competitors growing faster than all of them by a couple of magnitude. You talked about enterprise standardization trend that led to your largest deal in the company’s history.”

Application Performance Monitoring

As discussed, the number of applications that need monitoring began to exponentially grow with virtualized machines and containers. Infrastructure monitoring is incomplete in these architectures without application performance monitoring to assure applications and websites run as expected with optimal speeds across mobile platforms, cloud-native infrastructures, virtualized and containerized servers. Distributed application environments can cause numerous bottlenecks and it can be challenging to figure where the bottleneck is coming from. Meanwhile, slow speeds can cause customer drop-off.  

APM also assures that the application is performing as it should and backend processes are executing as they should, including transaction processing, and detects bug or errors in the application code.

APM performs the following functions: 

  • Digital user experience monitoring: determines if there are errors or downtime that could lead to a loss of revenue 
  • Transaction profiling: analyzes the transaction flow to isolate the cause 
  • Code-level diagnostics: According to DZone, 43% of application performance issues come from code. Diagnostics help to identify the line of code or query causing the issue. 
  • Deep-dive analysis: Looks beyond code at the server and application infrastructure for problems such as insufficient memory or long wait times 
  • Infrastructure monitoring: similar to deep drive analysis, ideally infrastructure monitoring is part of the APM package to monitor slow network connections or virtualization bottlenecks.

Datadog’s APM also comes with network performance monitoring to verify if the network is slowing down traffic or if there is a low connectivity issue. The 360-degree view of infrastructure, applications and networks helps diagnose issues more quickly and with more accuracy.

According to Gartner, the number of applications monitored with APM tools has increased from 5% in 2018 to 20% in 2021. Machine learning is also used to forecast usage patterns and to detect anomalies outside of manual alerts.

Observability

Where observability differs from APM is that it monitors external data across metrics, events, logging and tracing (MELT). It’s called observability because it provides visibility as the issue is occurring and ideally before there is a performance issue.

Observability tools work with telemetry data, which is this combination of logs, metrics and traces. Metrics are numerical measurements, such a transactions per second. Events are individual actions. Logs are application-specific structured and unstructured data. Tracing tracks how many requests flow through a system. This is achieved through APIs, such as the Tracer API or the Metric API.

An observability framework allows you to work with telemetry data with fast retrieval and good visualization. In this specific area, Datadog competes yet is also compatible with the open-source framework called OpenTelemetry. You could also argue the project erodes some of Datadog’s moat as it reduces vendor lock-in but it’s the end-to-end tools that draws customers to Datadog rather than only the telemetry data. We covered this here in Q2.

Because Datadog is an end-to-end tool, it can be compatible with OpenTelemetry by allowing the open-sourced SDK to connect to the platform for telemetry data. The company also supports other open-source projects under the OpenTelemetry umbrella, such as OpenTracing, OpenCensus and OpenMetrics. This has created a standard set of APIs and libraries for observability and allows for the telemetry data to be easily migrated between vendors. Datadog has contributed to the project with its auto-instrumentation libraries.

Kubernetes and the rise of microservice-based architectures increase application reliability and efficiency; however, developers need the ability to monitor these architectures. Microservices benefit from Observability as it helps understand how microservices communicate. This keeps track of metadata for performance purposes and also distributed traces or requests. Observability allows for a more holistic picture so developers can connect data to monitoring tools and solve issues quickly.

Datadog has a new product that offers observability before code goes to production called CI Visibility. The launch of the CI Visibility product follows the acquisition of Undefined Labs. Datadog talks about “shifting left” which means moving more into the development phase prior to production.

Continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) provide a shared repository of code for an automated build process with regular intervals. This helps speed up development by deploying smaller batches of code. In data science machine learning models, projects are based on code and also the data used to train the model. The CI/CD data pipelines help to deliver machine learning models and this is another opportunity for Datadog’s observability tools to serve a growing demand.

Security Platform

Datadog’s core product is observability and security is an additional catalyst (or an accelerant). Datadog’s positioning with observability puts the products into the right place in the tech stack for threat detection. Cloud environments have an increased attack surface across infrastructure, containers and applications. As teams seek simplified operations, there are more third-party managed services being deployed which reduces visibility. Datadog offers a few security products to allow teams to detect real-time threats to applications and infrastructure, track compliance posture, and also workload security across infrastructure or workloads, such as Kubernetes clusters. With security monitoring, engineering teams have end-to-end analytics coverage from a unified dashboard. This increases time to resolution and also means you can find threats buried deep in the architecture.

As we covered in our previous write-up, the Sqreen acquisition helps Datadog take advantage of the trend towards microservices and Kubernetes rather than monolithic architectures. Generally speaking, Kubernetes can introduce vulnerable clusters due to default configurations. In the past, demonstrations at BlackHat, the annual security conference held in Las Vegas, have exploited features in Kubernetes default attack surface rather than bugs. Sqreen specializes in protecting code-level risks across distributed applications by protecting application logic. Sqreen’s main goal is to deliver security solutions to developers and the operations teams, as well, i.e., to “democratize” and emphasize security testing and implementation during the development process, often called DevSecOps. These are the two main points on this acquisition – more market share across security for microservices and more stakeholders at a company who can buy and deploy Datadog products outside of the security team.

The breakdown between developers, operations and security called DevSecOps is a transition that Datadog plans to capture similar to how the company captured DevOps. Applications and infrastructure security is new to Datadog yet management has hinted towards it becoming as big as the observability market, which is at $38 billion in 2021.

Datadog’s Financials

Datadog accelerated revenue growth during a year of tough covid comps. This shows remarkable product strength. The company’s revenue is up 75% year-over-year to $270 million, an acceleration from 66.81% last quarter, and 61.35% revenue growth in the year-ago quarter. The revenue comfortably beat estimates by 10% and was up 16% QoQ.

The company has an adjusted operating margin of 16% and adjusted EPS of $0.13. The company also had free cash flow of $57.1 million which is an increase from last quarter’s $52 million. This proves the company can grow the top line and invest heavily in R&D but not at the expense of the bottom line. The company has $1.5 billion in cash and cash equivalents.

The company issued guidance of $291 million in revenue, or 52.3% growth in the fourth quarter and EPS of $0.11. For the full year, the company is guiding for $994 million, at the midpoint, and adjusted EPS of $0.39-$0.40. According to the company, usage is down for them seasonally in Q4 as employees and businesses take holiday breaks.

It’s the underlying key metrics on customer growth that help forecast strength for Datadog as we move into 2022. The company has 17,500 total customers of which 1,800 have a ARR of $100K or more, up 66%. These accounts make up 80% of ARR, so growth in the <$100K segment is key. The other key driver of growth for Datadog is the cross-selling of products. The company is unusually strong here with 77% of customers using two or more products, up from 71% a year ago. The number of customers who use four or more products is at 31%, up from 20% a year-ago. The company also stated that net dollar retention rate is above 130 for the 17th consecutive quarter.

Annual recurring revenue helps gauge what level of revenue a company is expecting. According to management, “We also had a record quarter of ARR adds, including record ARR adds in all of our major products. And we saw strong growth across geographical regions, with all regions accelerated on a year-over-year basis compared to Q2.”

Although billings contract terms have fluctuated due to Covid with shorter terms in 2020 that are slowly returning to a more normal length. This helped drive Billings growth of 98% year-over-year. Increased contract duration to annual and multi-year partly contributed to remaining performance obligations (RPO) growth of 127%. On a more normalized basis, the company mentioned current RPO growth was closer to 100%. Revenue still remains the primary way to value Datadog, however, this under-the-hood growth certainly helps understand the strength of the company and how customers view the products as we move into 2022.

The company is investing “significantly in R&D” and plans to spend on travel and conferences in the coming year. The R&D expenses were up 80% in Q3 which management explained by saying, “It’s important to go fast when scaling those teams because there’s quite a bit of a lead time between the time when you hire engineers and the time when you get new products on the other hand. I’ve mentioned in other calls like maybe hiring now is a good predictor of output two years from now on the engineering side. So we should get started. That’s why we’re doing it.”

Notably, we like companies that invest in their engineering teams. Datadog points towards pricing power and cross-selling as to why they’re able to invest heavily in R&D and still remain profitable.

Conclusion:

As someone had said on the forum following the stellar earnings report: “Who let the Dog out?!”

To be literal, it’s AWS, Azure and Google Cloud that let the dog out. Our simplified thesis as we rounded the corner into tough Q2 covid comps was specifically, “If the tech giants are communicating that cloud infrastructure-as-a-service is one of the most critical markets in the future, then who are we to argue with this by not investing in the leader across cloud monitoring products?”

Observability is not exactly the most conversational topic, but hopefully it’s understood that architectures are becoming more complex in terms of monitoring and observability. I’m also hoping it’s clear from this analysis that Datadog has additional tailwinds from the trend towards hybrid and multi-cloud. Lastly, the management has not only executed before, during, and after Covid, yet has also grown its product suite to leverage its key positioning at the observability layer. Many companies will begin here and remain with Datadog for other products.

Valuation is high at 43X forward P/S. We rarely buy above 50 forward P/S and much prefer under 40. However, you’ll get buy alerts as we go along to help communicate when the risk/reward looks favorable as we continue to build this position.

Posted in Cloud Infrastructure, Cloud Platforms, Cloud Software, Cybersecurity, Data Analytics, Data Center, Data WarehousingLeave a Comment on Datadog Deep Dive: Rare Pure Play with Cloud IaaS Tailwinds

Recent Posts

  • The IPO Glut of 2020: Why Valuations Have Gone Too Far
  • Zoom Discusses Two Important Catalysts In Q1 Earnings
  • Three Risk Management Tools the I/O Fund Offers
  • Micron Is Up 900%. Here’s Why the AI Memory Trade May Still Have Room to Run
  • Credo: Reliability Leader Aggressively Moves into Optics

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018

Categories

  • 5G
  • About
  • Accounting Tips
  • AdTech
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • AI Stocks
  • AI Stocks
  • Analysts
  • Application Monitoring
  • Application Monitoring
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • AR
  • Audit Reports
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Avod
  • Avod
  • Battery Charging
  • Bear Market
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Broad Market Today
  • Bull Market
  • Bull Market
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • China Stocks
  • Cloud
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Platforms
  • Cloud Platforms
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Technology
  • Company
  • Company
  • Console Gaming
  • Console Gaming
  • Console Gaming
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer Tech
  • Corrections
  • Crypto Investment
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center and Processing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Dating
  • Defi
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • E-Commerce
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • ECommerce
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Energy Stocks
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Ethereum
  • Events1
  • Events1
  • Exchange
  • Faq
  • Finance
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Markets
  • FinTech
  • Fundamental Analysis
  • Gambling
  • Gaming
  • Genomics
  • Glossary
  • Green Energy
  • Growth Stocks
  • Growth Stocks
  • Growth Stocks
  • Headsets
  • Headsets
  • Health Tech
  • Hydrogen
  • Identity
  • Identity
  • Identity
  • Inflation
  • Inflation
  • Inflation
  • Internet of Things
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Investing
  • Investing
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Macro Trends
  • Macro Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Media
  • Membership
  • Mining
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Multimedia
  • Music Streaming
  • NVDA | NVIDIA Corporation
  • Performance Updates
  • Pin Content
  • Podcasts
  • Podcasts
  • Podcasts
  • Portfolio
  • Premium Research
  • Press Releases
  • Press Releases
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Reports and Whitepapers
  • Research Services Preview
  • Resources
  • Resources
  • Semiconductor Stocks
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Solar
  • Solar
  • Stock Analysis PDFs
  • Stock Updates
  • Stock Updates (Blogs)
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Tech Podcast
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Technical Analysis
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Testing Equipment
  • Testing Equipment
  • Top Tech Stock News
  • Travel
  • Trends Report
  • Tutorials
  • Uncategorized
  • Updates
  • Updates
  • Updates
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video Footage
  • VR
  • Webinar Alerts
  • Webinar Alerts
  • Webinars
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: iofund by iofund.co.uk.