Skip to content
Logo-main-white.860316a8

I/O Fund

  • Home
  • Free Stock Analysis
  • AI Stocks
  • BEST OF 2025
  • Analysts
  • Nvidia Hub
  • About
    • Case Studies
    • About Us
    • Premium Services
    • Pricing
    • Notable Wins
    • I/O Fund Reviews
    • Media
  • Contact Us

Category: AI Stocks

Nvidia Earnings Preview: 239% is the Revenue Growth Peak (for now)

Posted on February 21, 2024June 30, 2026 by io-fund

When looking at Nvidia’s forward estimates, what stands out is that revenue growth will peak this quarter at 239%. This can be a tricky place for a tech investor when what’s ahead is slowing growth.

Nvidia could raise and beat, as it’s had a penchant for doing lately, but the slowing growth will eventually catch up to the stock and analysts are pegging H2 for this to happen. To contrast, Nvidia will top over the next two quarters according to revenue growth rates whereas AMD is bottoming.

It’s unclear how much of Nvidia’s expected $100 billion for the data center in FY2025 is priced in. This has been discussed since at least the last quarter’s earnings report, yet the valuation is still very reasonable. We look at this and more below to prepare you for the most anticipated earnings report of the quarter. 

Revenue and Earnings:

Nvidia is expected to report revenue growth of 239.4% for revenue of $20.54 billion for fiscal Q4 ending in January. These estimates have been steadily rising since the H100-related historic quarter last May. Last spring, the January quarter was expected to report 40% growth, and by November, the January quarter estimates were at 195%. I want to paint a picture for why Nvidia’s price action has been so strong – these revised estimates create ample room in the valuation.

For next quarter, estimates are for 204.94% growth for revenue of $21.93 billion.

  • Fiscal year 2024 ending in January is expected to report revenue of $59.3 billion for growth of 119.7%.
  • For fiscal year 2025, the company is expected to report revenue of $94.1 billion for growth of 58.9% with the growth overweight in the first half of calendar year 2024.

Even if we see a beat and raise, the slowing growth in the second half will be hard to overcome due to high comps. As mentioned in the introduction, Nvidia will begin to lap some stellar quarters come the October CY2024 quarter as the growth in October of CY2023 was 205.5% YoY.

Note: See below for bullish scenarios from analysts where these estimates may be too low.

Earnings growth is similar to revenue growth where the current quarter and also next quarter are expected to be stellar.

  • Q4 FY2024 January quarter is expected to report growth of 426.4% for EPS of $4.63
  • Q1 FY2025 April quarter is expected to report growth of 354.8% for EPS of $4.96
  • From there, the July quarter is also strong at 95.4% growth yet tapers off as the company laps the high comps in the October quarter at 41.4%.

EPS growth of 40%+ is nothing to scoff at, yet the exuberance that pushed Nvidia to achieve a market cap of $1.8 trillion to where it is now the world’s second most valuable company blowing past Meta, Tesla and edging out Amazon, Alphabet is what must sustain. Fundamentals that decelerate are when the exuberance tends to wear off, and that is right around Fall of 2024 as of now.

For EPS the growth decelerates in line with revenue growth:

  • FY2024 ending in January is expected to report full year EPS of $12.40 for growth of 271.1%
  • FY2025 has estimates of $21.36 EPS for growth of 72.32% — as stated, right now, this is front half weighted
  • FY2026 has estimates of $26.54 EPS for growth of 24.24%

We broke our portfolio management rules of having a position above 10% allocation, and therefore, we have to take it seriously that both the top line and bottom line will decelerate from >200% to 40% over the span of six months. Most analysts are in agreement that a beat/raise is likely after hours tomorrow and perhaps for next quarter. What we are keeping an eye on is further out when Nvidia laps the strong quarters in October of this year. That is a long way off, but the market is forward-looking by about 9 months.

According to current estimates, there is no acceleration on the horizon through 2026. We think those estimates will ultimately be wrong especially once AI software ramps, but for now, this is the estimates investors are working with for pricing the stock.

Margins:

  • Gross margin of 74.5% expected this quarter compares to GAAP GM of 63.3% in the year ago quarter. This equals $14.9 billion in gross profit. The adjusted gross margin is expected to be 75.5% this quarter.
  • Operating margin of 58.7% is expected this quarter for operating profit of $11.7 billion. The adjusted operating margin is expected to be 64.5%.
  • Last quarter, net margin was 51% for net profit of $9.25 billion and adjusted net margin was 55.3% for adjusted profit of $10.02 billion.

Cash Flow:

When we compare the world’s most valuable companies, Apple stands out for its cash. This is where Nvidia will have to improve to ultimately surpass Apple. During the hype cycle of AI software is where that is most likely to occur. 

Nvidia’s cash flow is still strong, yet it doesn’t hurt to compare it to other Mag 7 stocks:

Nvidia is the third strongest cash flow generator in the Mag 7, with an operating cash flow margin above 40%, but its smaller scale puts it in sixth place in terms of cash flow generation on a dollar basis. Nvidia’s $17.5 billion in TTM free cash flow pales in comparison to Microsoft’s and Alphabet’s nearly $70 billion – and while it’s not necessarily fair to compare companies in different tech verticals, Nvidia’s rapid ascent to a valuation above Alphabet and Amazon at some point will need to be reflected in the scope of its cash flows, especially when growth begins to decelerate.

Revenue Segments:

  • Data center revenue last quarter was $14.5 billion, up 279% YoY. This compares to 31% growth in the year ago quarter. For this upcoming quarter, Nvidia is expected to report data center revenue of $16.9 billion for growth of 367%, which we outlined here along with a few different scenarios including how Nvidia can get to data center revenue of $101 billion in fiscal year 2025. Note that some of the data center revenue is also driven by networking for AI system with InfiniBand up 500% last quarter to $10 billion annualized run rate. We will update you more on networking after Nvidia’s report tomorrow and also when Marvell reports early March.
  • Gaming revenue of $2.86 billion is up 81% YoY. This compares to a decline of (-23%) YoY in the year ago quarter.
  • Pro Visualization was up 108% YoY for revenue of $416 million compared to a decline of (-65%) YoY in the year ago quarter.
  • Automotive revenue of $261 million was up 4% YoY compared to 86% growth in the year ago quarter.

 

Additional Notes:

Analysts are Bullish

Bullish is the common theme heading into the report, given that Nvidia has raced from 13% growth in Q1 to 235% expected growth in Q4, and nothing describes the exuberance that accompanies this historic acceleration better than a handful of analyst estimates.

It’s within the data center that this bullishness is visible, as some analysts are expecting a nearly 20% beat on the Street’s $16.8 billion estimate, up to 60% higher than the Street by end of fiscal 2025.

Loop Capital is Nvidia’s largest bull heading into earnings, attaching a Street-high $1,200 price target on shares as the firm believes data center and overall revenue growth through FY 2026 will be meaningfully above the Street’s estimates. Loop is modeling a 17% beat in data center revenue to $19.6 billion, the highest on the Street, driving a 14% beat in total revenue to $23.1 billion. 

Loop is projecting the data center to reach a $100 billion annual run rate by fiscal Q2 2025, closing the year out with data center revenue of $117.5 billion, 41% higher than the Street’s consensus of $83 billion. Overall, Loop is modeling more than $132.3 billion in total revenue for Nvidia next year, 38% higher than consensus at $95.8 billion and representing 123% YoY growth, 65 percentage points above the Street.

It is entirely plausible that Nvidia’s growth continues to fly past expectations and mirror a scenario similar to what Loop is modeling, given the elevated levels of demand for its H100 combining with the launch of its faster H200 and B100 GPUs later this year.

KeyBanc sees that Nvidia’s AI capacity is well above the Street and can support data center revenues above $100 billion in calendar 2024, nearly 30% higher than what the Street is modeling. In that sense, there still may be room for another surprise in 2024.

UBS follows closely behind Loop with expectations for a similarly large data center beat in Q4 and impressive Q1 guide on strong demand for AI compute. Analysts are expecting Nvidia to beat on data center revenue by ~$2.5 billion to $3 billion, with their estimate at $19.5 billion for the segment and $23 billion for total revenue. UBS also believes that with “supply chain work,” Nvidia could guide to $25 billion to $26 billion in revenue for fiscal Q1, more than 16% above consensus estimates for $21.9 billion. 

BofA is more tame than Loop and UBS, calling for a modest 3-5% beat, or between $500 million to $1 billion above consensus for Q4’s report and Q1’s guide. This view for a beat and raise stems from supply gains offsetting impacts from China restrictions. However, BofA cautions that a beat of this size “’would pale vs. the 10%/22% beat/raise of prior quarters and perhaps disappoint some bulls,’ the more measured pace will also be seen as creating more fertile ground for continued growth.”

Meanwhile, going back to Q3’s report in November, analysts at Barclays said that the Nvidia's large Q3 beat “may not have cleared a very high hurdle,” and "didn't quite meet sky-high expectations" at "only" $2B ahead of consensus with margins at 75% and increasing into January. That commentary serves as a clear, yet somewhat brutal, reminder that even a $2 billion beat and raise had a muted response. 

Market Shifts in Anticipation of Growth Rate Changes

An interesting pattern has been playing out with Nvidia’s stock price over the past few years as its quarterly revenue growth rate has shifted.

Nvidia’s shares topped in November and December 2021, around 7 months before growth decelerated from the 50% range to just 3% growth in the July quarter. Shares bottomed in October 2022, 7 months in advance of revenues inflecting off a (21%) decline in the January quarter to a (13%) decline in the April quarter.

Current estimates are calling for a significant deceleration to just 38% growth in the October quarter, and if this pattern continues, then we are at the brink of setting a top above the $700 range as the market anticipates this deceleration. 

H200 and B100 to Launch in Q2 and Q4

Nvidia has an ambitious AI GPU roadmap, and is expected to release the next-gen H200 and B100 GPUs later this year, just over one year after releasing the H100.

The GPUs are expected to offer another leap in performance for AI training and inference, and the H200 is already in demand by the leading CSPs – AWS will be the first to deploy the new GPU, but Microsoft, Google and Oracle will also be deploying the chips. 

It’s easy to see why the cloud giants are eager to upgrade quickly — Nvidia says the H200 will boast reduced energy usage and thus a lower TCO, while the introduction of HBM3e memory will essentially supercharge the GPU’s performance. For GPT-3 175B, the H200 is expected to offer 1.4x to 1.9x faster LLM inference on the leading GPT and Llama models compared to the H100, and an 18x performance upgrade compared to the A100.

While it will be too soon to gauge what level of demand there is for the two new GPUs from a Q1 guide, a fiscal year guide could provide insight into whether demand for the H200 and B100 can match the H100, or if Nvidia will face initial supply constraints while ramping production of the two at the same time. Additionally, Nvidia will face competition this year from AMD’s MI300s.

A Note on China:

We detailed in our Q3 report the risks surrounding China given its importance to Nvidia as well as the export restrictions impacting Nvidia’s ability to sell the A100 and H100. Nvidia’s CFO said last quarter that “export controls will have a negative effect on our China business, and we do not have good visibility into the magnitude of that impact even over the long term.”

Any China commentary will be critical, given the $80 billion to $100 billion data center segment that may be impacted. Keybanc has the $101 billion estimate for the data center segment this year yet believes that $20 billion is dependent on China. Per our write-up: “Keybanc sees a $5 impact to Nvidia’s $25.62 EPS estimate, and up to a $20B impact to its data center segment with current estimates at $101B for the data center in FY2025.”

Valuation:

Fundamentally, Nvidia’s valuation is still quite cheap compared to historical benchmarks, given the sheer leverage and earnings power that the H100 is driving.

Shares are trading at a 91x PE and 32x forward PE ratio, and though it may look elevated, it’s not a range that Nvidia is unaccustomed to – shares traded between a 75x to 100x PE ratio for a majority of the time from the second half of 2020 to early 2022. However, Nvidia’s forward PE of 32x is where the valuation has room to run. Shares bottomed in October 2022 at a 34x forward PE with declining revenue and EPS, compared to today, where EPS is expected to grow at least 73% YoY to $21.36.

On a PS basis, Nvidia still looks reasonably valued, with more potential upside if it can surprise again in 2024. Shares are trading at a forward PS of just over 18x, around the same level it held through the second half of 2023 and a steep discount to the 32x forward PS it peaked at in late 2021. Prior to 2023, Nvidia last traded at around an 18x forward PS in July and August 2022, despite the challenging macro headwinds and declining revenue growth.

Conclusion:

Our process is such that we have no issues placing Nvidia at a lower allocation if needed, or increasing that allocation back to the #1 position if needed. We want to remain flexible while acknowledging two things – the first, is the company will eventually lap high comps and the sky-high growth will not sustain forever. Secondly, that this company is the defacto leader in the multi-generational investment opportunity of AI and is trading at a reasonable valuation.

It’s entirely plausible we get a beat/raise tomorrow and a beat/raise for the next quarter. What needs to be watched is the H2 estimates as they lap high comps of 200%+. The first graph above best illustrates this.

With that said, we are in the first, early powerful move for AIfirst, early powerful move for AI. We have two more powerful moves to go — AI software and AI at the edge, and then automotive will be the grand finale. Nvidia is a leader in both, and I’ve been quite clear that our stance is that AI software for Nvidia specifically will drive more revenue than AI accelerators. We are seeing early indication that Nvidia can and will compete with Big Tech on AI software and AI at the edge with the Chat with RTX application.

Stay tuned for our post-ER writeup to hit your inboxes tomorrow night.

Premium Members, you can look forward to a deep dive on a stock that is new to the IOF portfolio that we plan to accumulate this year – we called Meta the one that got away in our year end webinar. This stock is the runner-up and we think it has more room to go (fingers crossed). Look for this in your inboxes next week.

 Recommended Reading:

  • Crypto and AI Opportunity: Real Vision Video Interview
  • Cloudflare Q4: Key Metrics Accelerate
  • Special Webinar Replay – February 1, 2024
  • AMD Q4 2023 Earnings: 75% GPU Raise, Separating the Wheat from the Chaff
Posted in AI Stocks, SemiconductorsLeave a Comment on Nvidia Earnings Preview: 239% is the Revenue Growth Peak (for now)

Micron: AI Offers a Multifaceted Secular Growth Tailwind

Posted on December 14, 2023June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Memory plays a critical role in the world of AI, as faster and more powerful AI chips and servers will require increasing amounts of memory. The recent surge in generative AI and AI GPUs, spurred by the success of OpenAI’s ChatGPT and development of hundreds of other large language models, are forecast to bring about a new DRAM market, underpinned by high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and DDR5. Micron is uniquely positioned to benefit from this secular AI growth tailwind, leading the industry with the fastest, highest-capacity HBM, alongside other industry-leading products for AI applications.

This analysis will touch on how the memory market is recovering off one of the worst cyclical downturns it has faced recently, how NAND and DRAM are evolving, the massive shift ahead for HBM3, and how this translates to a multifaceted growth opportunity for Micron to tap into to push towards record revenues.

Please note, our plan is to patiently wait for the right entry. This is detailed below at the Conclusion.

Memory Market Recovery Begins in 2024, Accelerates in 2025

The memory market is coming off its worst cyclical downturn in 15 years, with late 2022 seeing memory revenues fall off a cliff, with challenges persisting through much of 2023. Heading into Q4, the market is showing multiple signs of bottoming – South Korean NAND flash exports returned to growth in September, NAND and DRAM pricing is expected to return to growth this quarter, and supply bit shipments are forecast to return to double-digit growth in 2024.

The downcycle starting in Q2/Q3 of 2022 exceeded the previous cycle in late 2018 in terms of its scale and duration – memory revenues declined approximately (-26%) from ~$44 billion in Q2 to nearly $33 billion in Q3. NAND revenues declined (-24.3%) to $13.7 billion, while DRAM fared slightly worse, with revenues declining (-28.9%) to $18.2 billion.

Q4 of last year saw another ~ (-27%) sequential decline to just over $24 billion in revenues. NAND revenues slipped around (-19.7%) sequentially to ~$11 billion, while DRAM revenues fell (-34.2%) sequentially to $12.3 billion. Essentially, DRAM revenues saw nearly a (-50%) decline in just two quarters, while the broader memory market declined just over (-45%).

Driving this rapid slowdown was a rapid deterioration in NAND and DRAM pricing – this was exacerbated by excess inventory at major manufacturers Samsung and SK Hynix leading to a fire sale at extremely low prices. NAND and DRAM both saw pricing decline more than (-20%) QoQ in Q3, and nearly (-30%) QoQ in Q4 2022. The previous year, from Q3 2021 through Q1 2023, NAND prices fell (-55%), and DRAM declined (-57%).

Source: Yole Intelligence

Pricing is expected to bottom out in Q3, with Q4 projected to see the first QoQ increase in both NAND and DRAM pricing since Q3 2021. That trend is set to continue through 2024, with Yole Intelligence forecasting NAND and DRAM prices to continue rising.

Source: Bloomberg

South Korean export data further supports the recovery story for NAND and DRAM.

NAND flash exports for September rose for the first time in a year, while DRAM exports registered the smallest decline. NAND flash exports increased +5.6% for the month, compared to an (-8.9%) decline in August, while DRAM exports fell (-24.6%). In October, chip exports from the country declined just (-3.1%) YoY to $8.9 billion in October, the smallest decline since August 2022, and another data point in support of memory’s recovery from the deep trough of late 2022 and early 2023.

A Broader Look at Memory’s Rebound

Pricing and export data both are signaling a return to growth for the memory market starting in Q4 and persisting through 2024 and 2025. Production cuts beginning in early 2023 are expected to lead to an undersupply of chips over the next four to eight quarters, and combined with steadily increasing NAND and DRAM prices, the memory market is projected to jump to record levels by 2025. cuts beginning in early 2023 are expected to lead to an undersupply of chips over the next four to eight quarters, and combined with steadily increasing NAND and DRAM prices, the memory market is projected to jump to record levels by 2025.

Overall, the memory market is projected to register a (-41%) YoY decline to approximately $84 billion in revenues in 2023, down from ~$144 billion in 2022. DRAM revenues are projected to fall (-47%) YoY from $79.7 billion in 2022 to ~$42 billion in 2023; NAND revenues are expected to fall (-37%) YoY from $58.7 billion to $37 billion this year.

2024 is forecast to see a sharp rebound in the market, with revenues rising approximately +55% YoY to more than $130 billion, according to Yole Intelligence. The increase in prices are driving the revenue jump with DRAM growing by “as much as 87 percent” in 2024 while NAND flash memory is projected to “bounce back to grow by about 60 percent,” according to Gartner.

2025 is projected to see the market reach record revenues of above $200 billion, or over +55% YoY for a second year straight, boosted by increased prices, undersupply – especially in DDR5 and other DRAM sub-segments — and AI mega-trends.

According to Lam Research, AI servers use 8X DRAM and 3X NAND compared to an enterprise class server.  For DRAM, that AI server and data center demand is expected to push the markets to new highs, from that ~$42B size in 2023 to ~$96B in 2028, according to Yole Intelligence.

Overview: HBM and DDR5’s Role in AI

High-bandwidth memory (HBM) – more specifically the next-gen HBM3/HBM3e – and DDR5 play a mission-critical role in AI, and such a role will lead the market to stunning growth: market leader SK Hynix projects the HBM market will grow at an 82% CAGR through 2027.

High bandwidth memory (HBM) offers higher bandwidth, capacity, performance, and lower power by vertically stacking up to twelve DRAM memory chips to shorten how far data has to travel, while also allowing for smaller form factors. Stacked memory chips are connected through something called “through silicon vias” or TSVs. HBM is increasingly being used to power machine learning, high performance data centers, and more recently, generative AI models. For a different perspective into HBM from an equipment leader, read our analysis on Lam Research here.here.

DDR5 DRAM, or double data rate 5, aimed to double bandwidth and data transfer speeds at a lower latency and power consumption than its predecessor, DDR4. DDR5 memory chips can be mounted on circuit boards to create memory modules, for use in servers or PCs. DDR5’s increased bandwidth allows for faster processing for memory-intensive applications, such as generative AI and training LLMs.

Demand for high-capacity memory is being driven by the sudden rise in generative AI and LLMs, which both require significant amounts of computing power and substantial amounts of DRAM to meet elevated performance requirements. SK Hynix’s head of DRAM marketing Park Myung-soo explained that “an AI server requires 500-gigabyte (GB) or larger High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) chips and at least 2-terabyte (TB) DDR5 chips.” As such, HBM3 and DDR5 are projected to see a rapid shift to become the dominant architectures over the next few years.

In 2022, HBM2e was the dominant HBM architecture, accounting for ~70% share of HBM shipments, with the emerging HBM3 taking just 8%. However, HBM3 will see a surge in demand in 2023 and 2024, rising to 39% share this year and approaching 60% share in 2024 to become the dominant architecture. This will be driven by the massive demand for Nvidia’s H100 GPU and AMD’s upcoming MI300, which are underpinned by HBM3.

As a result, HBM3 revenues are forecast to rise as much as +127% YoY to $8.9 billion, according to TrendForce, while SK Hynix estimated that this AI chip boom will lead to the HBM3 market expanding at an +82% CAGR through 2027.

Similar to HBM3, DDR5 is expected to quickly become the mainstream DDR architecture, driven by demand for faster compute for AI. DDR5 was expected to take more than 25% share of bit shipments in 2022, before rising to take more than 55% share in 2023. By 2026, DDR5 is projected to hold almost 95% share of bit shipments as the memory market completes its transition over to DDR5 from DDR4.

Source: Tom’s Hardware

Micron is well positioned to benefit from this massive shift to HBM3 and DDR5, as it is first-to-market with its 128GB capacity DDR5 RDIMMs (registered memory modules) and its eight-high 24GB HBM3e cube.

Background on Micron’s Positioning in HBM3 and DDR5

Throughout 2024, Micron is seeing “accelerating AI-driven opportunities for memory and storage across multiple market segments from the data center to the edge,” and it is rolling out industry-leading HBM and DDR5 products. Micron’s 8-high 24GB HBM3e cube began sampling in late July 2023, and it plans to sample its 12-high 36GB HBM3e cube in the first quarter of 2024 – among the first in the industry to reach the market.

Micron is investing heavily to capitalize on this HBM3/3e shift, with management noting last quarter that “assembly and test capex is projected to double year over year in fiscal 2024, predominantly driven by investments to support HBM3e production.”

Micron currently has deployed the industry’s fastest and highest capacity HBM3e on the market, supporting the most advanced AI training and inference. Micron’s HBM3e can deliver faster training times and more responsive queries for LLMs — it “increases performance per watt resulting in lower time to train LLMs such as GPT-4 and beyond.”

Micron’s HBM3e provides higher memory bandwidth that exceeds 1.2TB/s and 50% more memory capacity per 8-high 24GB cube, improving the accuracy and precision while training LLMs. Micron explains that this allows for up to 50% or more queries per day while reducing training times by 30%, thus lowering total cost of ownership (TCO).

TCO is an important factor for hyperscalers when evaluating equipment, especially GPUs, as it factors in not only the acquisition cost but also the costs associated with owning and operating the equipment over the hardware life cycle. Micron’s 24GB cube touts 2.5 times performance per watt improvement over previous generations; this increased power efficiency generates “tangible cost savings” for AI data centers. Micron explains that for “an installation of 10 million GPUs, every five watts of power savings per HBM cube is estimated to save operational expenses of up to $550 million over five years.”

In terms of DDR5, Micron says it currently sits as the market leader, with the most market share in the early innings of this DDR5 shift, underpinned by the memory industry’s most developed DDR5 ecosystem. Micron has launched its high-capacity 96GB DIMMs, and at the beginning of November, Micron launched the first-to-market 128GB DIMM based on its 1β technology, which it says “delivers the fastest speed and lowest latency” of any DDR5 DIMM available.

Micron explains that the 128GB DIMM offers more than 24% improved energy efficiency, as well as 16% improved latency, which is crucial for “memory-bound workloads such as generative AI, in-memory

databases, and real-time data analytics, where high-capacity is needed, and prompt response times are critical for real-time inference.” Micron adds that the 128GB DIMM “delivers up to 28% faster performance for AI training” on models such as Meta’s Llama 2-70B.

Customers are seeming optimistic about the benefits that the 128GB DIMM offers – AMD SVP Dan McNamara said that “as AMD advances compute with our next-gen EPYC processors, Micron’s 128GB RDIMMs will likely become one of the main memory options to deliver high-capacity and bandwidth per core capabilities to address the demands of memory-intensive applications.” Intel VP Dr. Dimitrios Ziakas echoed that sentiment, saying, “Intel is evaluating this 32Gb memory offering for key DDR5 server platforms based on the resulting total cost of ownership benefits to cloud, AI and enterprise customers.”

Competition Remains Stiff for Micron

While Micron claims it is first-to-market with HBM3e and holds the most market share in DDR5, competition remains stiff, as Micron is competing against two heavyweights who control more than 85% of the market – Samsung and SK Hynix. The two South Korean firms are rapidly advancing HBM3 development, with SK Hynix already firmly established in the market as it was the preferred HBM3 supplier for Nvidia’s highly popular H100 GPU.

SK Hynix unveiled its 1TB bandwidth HBM3e memory in late Q2 this year, with mass production set to start in early 2024. SK Hynix is also reportedly eyeing development of its next-gen HBM4 cube with a plan to introduce that product to market in 2026.

Samsung is currently mass producing its 12-high 24GB HBM3 cube, ‘Icebolt’, and is sampling its HBM3e cube ‘Shinebolt’ to prospective customers. While coming to market later than Micron and SK Hynix, Shinebolt is rumored to compete with Micron on performance, with both offering 1.2 TB/s bandwidth. Samsung is also expected to unveil its fifth-gen HBM3e cube, named ‘Snowbolt’, by the end of the year, followed by a sixth-gen HBM cube next year.

Nvidia, AMD Battling on Memory

HBM3 and HBM3e are becoming the next battleground for memory chip manufacturers as well as AI chip developers, especially Nvidia and AMD, who are pushing the boundaries with the amount of memory bandwidth in each GPU.

AMD’s competing GPUs, the MI300 series, substantially boosted memory and bandwidth relative to the H100, utilizing Samsung’s HBM3. The MI300A is shipping with 128GB HBM3 memory while the MI300x ships with 192GB memory and 5.2 TB/s of bandwidth – that’s 1.6x more bandwidth and 2.4x more HBM3 density than Nvidia’s H100.

Nvidia is rapidly moving forward with its GPU roadmap, as it aims to launch its next-gen H200 and B100 GPUs next year followed by the X100 GPU in 2025 – each GPU will accelerate AI inference times along an exponential curve, thus creating a need for more memory and more bandwidth.

Source: Nvidia

Nvidia’s A100 shipped in two different versions with either  40GB or 80GB HBM2e memory, with the 40GB offering 1.55TB/s of bandwidth and the 80GB offering 2TB/s bandwidth, the industry’s fastest at the time in 2021.

Nvidia then upgraded from HBM2e to HBM3 DRAM, tapping SK Hynix as the supplier for its H100 GPU for 1.6X the bandwidth. Nvidia’s upcoming H200 GPU, set to launch in early 2024 as the industry’s first HBM3e-powered GPU, is expected to ship with another 1.5x bandwidth boost relative to the H100 with nearly 1.8x the memory.

It is rumored by some sources that the H200 is shipping with Micron’s HBM3e, instead of SK Hynix. rumored by some sources that the H200 is shipping with Micron’s HBM3e, instead of SK Hynix. Micron reportedly sampled its 24GB HBM3e memory with Nvidia at the end of July, with SK Hynix following in mid-August and Samsung in early October. According to sources in South Korea, Nvidia remains engaged with SK Hynix for the H200.

This raises an important point about competition in this AI chip and memory race: if Nvidia is switching this quickly from one supplier to the next based on time to market, this raises the risk that Samsung or SK Hynix could be first to market with a superior HBM4 product and take share away from Micron, especially if they undercut Micron on price.

AI Will Increase Secular Growth Opportunity for Micron

The recent surge in AI and data center growth fueled by Nvidia is expected to translate into an interesting shift in revenue mix for Micron: it foresees exposure to the more cyclical and seasonal PC and mobile end market declining from 55% share of revenue in FY21 to 38% share in FY25.

Data center and graphics are forecast to rise from 30% share of revenue in FY21 to 42% share by FY25, with AI and machine learning driving such growth; the projected surge in the HBM3/HBM3e market supports this shift. In data center, Micron is expecting NAND GB shipped per server to increase 3x and DRAM 2x by 2025, as AI servers require significantly more memory than traditional servers.

Automotive and industrial are projected to rise from 15% share to 20% share, as both end markets exhibit much faster growth rates than PC and mobile due to the rise of electric vehicles, industrial robotics, and other emerging trends which require a higher semiconductor content per unit.

This revenue mix shift is underpinned by long-term agreements, at ~75% of revenue in CY22. This offers multiple benefits: more visibility into forward revenues, less exposure to cyclical pricing trends in NAND/DRAM with pricing locked in for the contract duration, reduced impacts from supply and demand imbalances, and ultimately more stable margins.

Financials Sharply Improving

The swift decline in the broader memory market over the past eight quarters has had a significant effect on Micron’s financials. Revenues plummeted, falling (-49.5%) YoY in FY23 from $30.76 billion to $15.54 billion. Operating margin also shifted deep into the red, with Micron posting a (-37.0%) operating margin, compared to a 31.5% operating margin in FY22. Micron reported a net loss of (-$5.83 billion), or ($5.53) per share, compared to net income of $8.69 billion, or $7.75 per share, in FY22. This was the sharpest decline for revenues, operating income, and net income in Micron’s history.

Fiscal Q4 (ending Aug 31) showed initial signs of a recovery:

  • NAND revenues increased 19% sequentially to $1.2 billion, bit shipments rose >40%
  • DRAM revenues increased 3% sequentially to $2.8 billion
  • Total revenue increased 7% sequentially to $4.01 billion
  • GAAP net loss improved 25% sequentially to ($1.43 billion)
  • Operating cash flow improved 938% sequentially to $249 million, but is much lower compared to $3.78 billion in the year ago quarter

Fiscal Q1’s guide was boosted at the end of November:

  • Revenue is projected to be $4.7 billion, compared to a prior view for $4.4 billion +/- $200 million. This would represent YoY growth of 14.9%.
  • Gross margin is expected to be (0.5%) to 0%, compared to the prior view of (4.0%) +/- 2.0%

The surge in the HBM3 market, positive outlooks for a NAND and DRAM pricing recovery through 2024 and into 2025, and a surge in AI and data center demand are expected to fuel a rapid recovery for Micron’s top and bottom line.

Moving forward through FY24 (Sept. 2023-24, this reacceleration in NAND and DRAM, buoyed by increasing pricing, is expected to send Micron’s revenue on an eight-quarter streak with more than +20% growth – even as high as +65% as it laps easy comps. On a dollar basis, revenues are forecast to rise from $4.01 billion in Q4 of fiscal 2023 to $8.71 billion in Q1 FY26.

Essentially, Micron is on track to potentially reach record revenues just over eight quarters after that massive slump. However, EPS is forecast to be below levels seen in FY18 and FY22 – estimates peak at $2.05 in Q4 FY25, compared to $3.53 in Q4 FY18 and $2.59 in Q3 FY22. What this means is that revenues are being propelled higher by this shift to HBM3/3e (as it exhibits much higher ASPs relative to typical DRAM memory), but margins are having a tougher time recovering as rapidly due to the deep trough that NAND and DRAM prices must rebound from.

Operating cash flow is also expected to rebound quickly after plunging alongside revenues and EPS in FY23. OCF margin is estimated to rebound from 10% to more than 40% by FY25, with Micron projected to generate upwards of $13.2 billion in operating cash flow, compared to $1.56 billion in FY23.

Micron has applied for CHIPS Act funding for its New York and Idaho fabs, saying that federal funding and tax incentives were needed to develop both facilities. Micron is investing up to $115 billion over the next 20 years to build out its US production base, in an effort to boost the US’ share of production from 2% to 15% and diversify away from East Asia – Micron’s current high-end chip production is more concentrated in Japan and Taiwan. Given that construction isn’t set to begin until late next year with production commencing as early as 2026, any margin benefits from the CHIPS Act are unlikely to be recognized over the short and medium term.

Risks

China presents a real risk to Micron as it does to much of the semiconductor industry. Micron is generating nearly one-quarter of its revenues from China, and CEO Sanjay Mehrotra recently told CNBC that “about half that revenue is at risk.” Micron was the first American chip company targeted by China with a partial ban earlier this year, and the company is working to improve relations with the nation, though there is no guarantee that such a ban will be lifted.

However, there are risks to this recovery, in that it may not unfold as smoothly as projections picture. Quarterly revenues have been variable over the past few fiscal years, with multiple sequential declines present along the growth trend, so there is a risk that current projections calling for sequential growth through Q1 FY26 do not account for some of that lumpiness.

In addition, there is also a tail-end risk in that NAND and DRAM pricing does not exhibit consecutive sequential growth through 2024. This could be exaggerated if NAND pricing slips back to sequential declines in Q2, as it is forecast to see just +3-4% sequential growth in that quarter. Pricing has shown to be volatile in the past, and there is no guarantee that pricing will rebound smoothly and steadily. Should some sequential declines appear in NAND and DRAM pricing in 2024, this would likely weigh on both margins and EPS.

Valuation

Micron’s fundamental backdrop is projected to see rapid top-line growth and a sharp bottom-line improvement on the backs of surging HBM3/3e demand; however, semis have rallied this year due to Nvidia leading the historic Nasdaq rally in the first six months of 2023. This has resulted in a rising of all boats, as many semis are trading far above historical multiples. The product of strong gains in the broader semiconductor industry has pulled Micron’s shares higher: the iShares Semiconductor ETF has gained +48.7% YTD, significantly outperforming the S&P 500’s +18.7% return.

Micron currently trades at a 5.43x PS ratio, its highest level in more than 20 years, in part due to FY23’s (49.5%) YoY decline in revenues while shares have gained +54.5% YTD. Even with +34.5% estimated revenue growth in FY24 to $20.9 billion, Micron still trades at a 4.05x 1-year forward PS ratio, far above its 5-year median PS ratio of 2.75x.

Micron’s forward EV/EBITDA multiple of ~13.0x also is elevated, at nearly double its 5-year median multiple. This accounts for the expected top and bottom line recovery for next year, but it will take more than a few quarters for this top-line growth to translate to a strong recovery in EBITDA and regression to the mean.

Conclusion

As Beth stated in Nvidia’s Q3 earnings preview, HBM3e is rapidly making its presence known, with Nvidia’s upcoming H200 GPU to be the first with HBM3e memory, rumored to come from Micron (still needs confirmation, but is an exciting possibility should it come to fruition).

Nvidia’s rapid GPU upgrade roadmap in response to AMD’s MI300X is a testament to the fast-moving nature of not just the AI GPU market, but also memory – HBM3e is coming to market in 2024, but may quickly be replaced by HBM4 in 2025 and future iterations of HBM memory beyond 2025 to 2026. 

It is a highly concentrated market, dominated by Samsung and SK Hynix, though Micron remains an important player as it moves ahead with industry-leading first-to-market HBM3e and DDR5 solutions. Micron looks well positioned to capitalize on this AI mega-trend, with revenues from both solutions contributing in 2024. On a broader scale, AI and data center are set to transform Micron’s revenue mix to stronger and more secular end markets from its historically cyclical and seasonal concentration in PCs and smartphones — Micron estimates data center and AI to rise from 30% of revenue in FY21 to 42% in FY25, while smartphone and PC’s 55% share is estimated to decrease to just 38%.

However, Micron is valued at elevated multiples, when memory stocks typically would be on a deep discount given the steep downcycle, yet SOXX returns are > QQQ returns. This has lifted the tide of all boats, and memory stocks such as Micron are not trading where they’d normally trade, which makes a near-term buy less likely for the I/O Fund until we see a pullback. This is where the I/O Fund is unique, not only do we strive to be early in our research, such as to the importance of memory for the next generation of AI accelerators, but we are also careful with our timing.

Technical Analysis

The long-term pattern best fits as a large degree diagonal pattern. This is a 5 wave uptrend that is characterized with large corrective swings. If accurate, we are in the middle of the 4th wave correction, which would target the $48 – $35 region before completing.

If we zoom into the 2021 top to now, we can get a better look at the risk parameters that would either confirm or invalidate this setup. For one, the price action from the 2021 high best fits this pattern. Note how we only have a clear 3 wave drop into the October, 2022, low. This is followed by a messy and overlapping uptrend into the recent high. More times than not, when the following bounce after a 3 wave drop is a messy and overlapping move, it signals a bounce in a larger corrective pattern.

If we see a break down below the $62-$58 support region, then this pattern will be confirmed, as we establish lower targets to buy this stock. On the other hand, in order to invalidate the risk present in the current price structure, we need to see price break above the $84-$91 resistance zone. The higher we go into this region, the more likely that we will see a continuation of the larger uptrend.

I/O Fund Equity Analyst, Damien Robbins, contributed to this analysis. I/O Fund Portfolio Manager, Knox Ridley, contributed to this analysis.

Recommended Reading:

  • Memory and PC Stocks Review
  • Marvell Q3 Earnings: The Market Wants More on AI
  • Marvell Q3: AI-Driven Rebound on the Books, Bottom Line in Focus
  • Nvidia Fiscal Q3 Earnings: The China Impact
  • 2024 Trend: Memory and PC Rebound
Posted in AI Stocks, SemiconductorsLeave a Comment on Micron: AI Offers a Multifaceted Secular Growth Tailwind

Nvidia’s Fiscal Q3 Earnings Preview: The Pressure Is On

Posted on November 27, 2023June 30, 2026 by io-fund
Nvidia’s Fiscal Q3 Earnings Preview: The Pressure Is On

This article was originally published on Forbes on Nov 21, 2023,11:18am ESTForbes Forbes on Nov 21, 2023,11:18am EST

Nvidia has surged this year with 241% gains YTD, which has more than doubled the returns of the FAANGs. This is no small feat considering it’s widely understood Big Tech is holding up the broader market. Valuations are stretched and leadership is only narrowing; to say there’s pressure going into Nvidia’s report this evening is an understatement.

The outsized demand for the H100 has led to historic moments as Nvidia is expected to exit this fiscal year with quarterly data center revenue of $14 to $15 billion compared to $3.6 billion per quarter at FY2023 exit. Should these estimates be correct (we will get the official guide this evening), Nvidia will end the year with a bang with approximately 300% growth in the final fiscal quarter.

Wow, what a year. Investors may not truly appreciate what Nvidia accomplished given a global pandemic and shelter-in-place orders fueled triple digit growth in tech stocks three years ago. Yet, what Nvidia accomplished was entirely due to product-market fit and design prowess with no end of the world scenario needed. It’s rare what Nvidia did, which was to ignite demand of enormous magnitude.

It’s well known my firm was early to this move in Nvidia with a bold analysis that claimed Nvidia will surpass Apple in valuation by 2026. You can look forward to my firm updating the long-term thesis in the coming weeks with details on how Nvidia will close-in on the next trillion in market cap. But in the near-term, Nvidia investors face what makes or breaks a portfolio, which is the inevitable moment of when Nvidia will top and sell off, how to handle these enormous gains, and if Nvidia can surprise the market again now that it was the defacto leader in the Nasdaq’s historic rally this year.

My firm strongly believes that simply picking a stock is akin to playing a fantasy sport, whereas discussing how to manage the stock is what separates fantasy from the live game. On Nvidia, we’ve been quite clear that we were net buyers in 2022 and we have been trimming the position to take gains in 2023. Meanwhile, Nvidia has remained our largest position until very recently when we put a different stock as first place and Nvidia as second place. Although we typically reserve our trades for our research members, we’ve been open about our strategy of active portfolio management with this spectacular, winning position. Judging by filings by famous hedge fund managers, we are in good company with this strategy.

Going into this highly anticipated report, I’d like to provide my readers with more information on how we are managing our Nvidia position and what to expect from the earnings report. This is a near-term analysis whereas our long-term thesis that Nvidia will surpass Apple in valuation is still firmly intact.

Neck-Breaking Release Cycle: H200 is Hopping Ahead

Nvidia has a near-monopoly in data center GPUs, and one of its strategies to protect its moat is to upgrade GPUs quickly to where it’s hard for AMD, Intel or custom silicon to catch up. The release cycle from the H100 to H200 is neck-breaking, as a typical cycle is two years whereas the H200 will ship in volume one year following the H100. The B100 based on the Blackwell architecture is expected to hit the market at the end of calendar year 2024 with the X100 following soon after.

Hyperscale and Enterprise Data

Source: NVIDIA INVESTOR’S PRESENTATION

If 2023 was the year AI accelerators made their importance known to Wall Street, then 2024 will be the year that memory and HBM3/HBM3E makes its importance known as the competition is going head-to-head at memory capacity and bandwidth per GPU rather than compute performance. This further translates to mean the AI race is more focused on inference for the next generation of GPUs as the neural network can be run entirely in memory without the need to move data back-and-forth with the external memory. The H200 is the first GPU with HBM3e for 141 GB of memory and 4.8 TB/s bandwidth. This will result in 1.6X to 1.9X better inferencing performance than the H100.

To drive the point further as to how important memory will be in the next generation of GPUs, the compute performance from the H100 to the H200 is not changing much. According to what the industry has seen so far from Nvidia’s GPU HGX 200 systems, there will be “32 PLOPS FP8” performance, which would be achieved through eight H100s with 3,958 teraflops of FP8 each. The translation is that Nvidia’s H200 upgrade is strategically focused on memory, which also translates to Nvidia feeling pressure from AMD as the MI300X will be the first GPU to hit the market with the memory capacity and bandwidth offering full utilization to increase LLM inferencing performance.

By adding HBM3 and HBM3e memory, the compute engines get a performance boost, albeit at a higher cost as HBM3 costs 5-6 times more than typical DRAM. Fewer GPUs will be needed so the cost does not translate to an equal increase in total cost of ownership. GPUs with HBM3 and HBM3E will run compute-intensive large language models with fewer GPUs than is required with the H100s due to offering roughly double the memory. The need for fewer GPUs is accomplished by running LLMs in the memory. The H200 with 141GB of memory compared to the H100’s 80GB will reduce the number of GPUs required for running popular large language models.

If you read between the lines on the H200, then Nvidia is a bit nervous about AMD’s MI300X with the H200 serving as an attempt to bridge the H100 and the B100. AMD’s design more than doubles the memory of the H100 with 192GB HBM3 memory and 5 TB/s of bandwidth, and most importantly, will be out a few months prior to the H200. The MI300X was the first to run a 40B parameter large language model on a single GPU.

AMD should feel satisfied that it forced the near-monopoly leader to hurry toward releasing the H200 with HBM3e as an answer to the MI300X. We covered this in a deep dive for our premium members in July and reiterated it again in August when we covered our favorite memory stock.

Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 221% – Click hereClick hereClick here

What to Expect in the Upcoming Earnings Report:

The very quarter that Nvidia began reporting double digit negative revenue growth of (-16.5%) was the best buying moment. Near the bottom a year ago, our firm wrote for Forbes that Nvidia Was Ready to Rumble with the RTX 40 Series and the H100 GPUs. Notably, Nvidia is up 200% YTD yet is up over 300% since the October low, which is why timing matters.

One year later, and Nvidia is unrecognizable from where the company was exactly one year ago. For the October quarter, Nvidia is expected to report YoY growth of 169.6% to 171% for $16 to 16.1 billion and growth of 190.6% YoY growth for the December quarter. According to current estimates, the December quarter is peak growth.

Revenue YoY

Source: I/O FUND

Pictured Above: The very quarter that Nvidia bottomed in fiscal Q1 was the quarter that the stock was had its highest short interest since the Covid low as the product thesis was little understood at the time.highest short interest since the Covid low as the product thesis was little understood at the time.

A beat is very important for Nvidia given the spotlight on this company. Demand is certainly there, and what instead is in question (into the foreseeable future) is supply.

Here is what the CFO stated on the last earnings call:

“We expect supply to increase each quarter through next year” and also “Demand for our Data Center platform where AI is tremendous and broad-based across industries on customers. Our demand visibility extends into next year. Our supply over the next several quarters will continue to ramp as we lower cycle times and work with our supply partners to add capacity.”

Where the market was a tad disappointed last quarter was when the CFO declined to elaborate on what percentage increase in supply she was expecting to see. The translation is that these are hard comps to compete with, and without a substantial increase in supply, the growth rate may have an inherent constraint given supply has already increased triple digits YoY.

The soaring demand for GPUs is evident in Nvidia’s growth rate. Per the Financial Times, Nvidia is planning to ship 1.5M to 2M GPUs next year compared to a target of 500,000 this year. Given this outsized demand, the hiccup is more likely to happen on the supply side. For this reason, we detail Taiwan Semiconductor’s chart below.

When you strip out data center revenue, what you have is an even higher growth rate for the data center segment of 239% to $13 billion expected this quarter. So, the question remains —- can supply continue to grow at these elevated percentages?

Data Center YoY

Source: NVIDIA IR

The data center segment is clearly the thesis but it doesn’t hurt that gaming has rebounded, as well, with 22% growth last quarter.

Gaming YoY

Source: NVIDIA IR

Last quarter, the gross margin improved significantly to 70.1% compared to 64.6% in Q1 and 43.5% in the same period last year. This was the best gross margin in Nvidia’s history due to higher average sales prices and some contribution from the increased mix of software.

Per the CFO: “software is a part of almost all of our products, whether they're our Data Center products, GPU systems or any of our products within gaming and our future automotive products.” Separately, the standalone software business is worth “hundreds of millions of dollars annually.” As seen with our note on the H100 release from last year, its important investors are early to a tipping point. This is why we’ve been adamant that Nvidia’s true AI moment was in 2020 with the A100. If you bought the stock for the H100, you likely missed this year’s power move. The same will be true for Nvidia’s software revenue.

Regarding this quarter’s gross margin, management expects it to expand to 71.5% in the upcoming quarter. The operating income grew by an incredible 1,263% YoY to $6.8 billion, which shows the cyclical nature of semiconductors. The operating margin was 50.3% compared to 7.4% in the same period last year. The management guidance for the next quarter is 53.1%. Typically, Nvidia’s operating margin is in the 30% range.

Operating Margin

Source: NVIDIA IR

This has flowed through to the bottom line with Nvidia’s adjusted EPS up 429% YoY for $2.70 compared to 481.3% growth expected this quarter for EPS of $3.37.

Adjusted EPS YoY

Source: SEEKING ALPHA

Nvidia has the strongest cash flow margins among mega cap stocks. The operating cash flow margin is 47% with a free cash flow margin of 44.8%. In addition to higher revenue helping the cash flow, there was also $1.25 billion in customer payments received ahead of the invoice date.

Q2 Free Cask Flow Margin

Source: YCHARTS

The company has cash and marketable securities of $16.02 billion with debt of $9.7 billion. Last quarter, there was $3.28 billion shares repurchased. The Board of Directors approved an additional $25 billion in stock purchases with $4 billion authorized remaining at the end of Q2.

Data Center Assumptions

I/O Fund Analyst Notes on Nvidia’s Data Center Segment

The magnitude of Q4 guidance will be very important given heighted expectations. Assuming Nvidia meets its Q3 guidance of $16B +/- 2%, we’ve put together a simple scenario analysis to parameterize the different outcomes anticipated based on Nvidia’s potential Q4 guidance.+/- indicates anticipated stock positive or negative price performance on the next trading day based on that scenario.

Nvidia Q/Q Growth

Source: I/O FUND

At $40,000 per H100, that equals $28B in H100 sales alone, and when you add the A100 and other data center sales at a current run rate of $14B, the Data Center segment could report total revenue of $42B in FY24 (CY23). When you equal this out across the upcoming quarters, it looks something like this based on our estimates and Piper Sandler estimates.

Data Center Revenue

Nvidia's Data Center segment could report total revenue of $42B in FY24 (CY23)

Source: ESTIMATES FOR DATA CENTER REVENUE FOR Q3 AND Q4 FROM PIPER SANDLER

We believe the market will reactive negatively if Nvidia provides F4Q24 (Jan-Q) guidance that is in-line or lower than consensus growth of 11% Q/Q for the Jan-Q.

On the flip side, Nvidia will likely need to provide guidance of at least greater than 20% Q/Q growth for a significant positive reaction. This is because consensus will need to make upward revisions to their earnings for the remainder of FY24 (CY23) and FY25 (CY24). This is critical to support the current valuation with NVDA trading at ~45x NTM Non-GAAP P/E in-line with its 5 year average of ~45x NTM Non-GAAP P/E as of Monday November 21, 2023.

Our base case assumption is that Nvidia’s F4Q24 (Jan-Q) guidance will estimate Q/Q growth of at least +20%. Recall, H100 was only introduced to the market toward end of CY22. The Apr-Q was the very first quarter when Nvidia was beginning to see the impact of AI and demand for the H100. Piper Sandler believes Nvidia will close out the year with data center revenue of $42B and 2H23 Data Center revenue ~88% greater than 1H23 revenue.

Furthermore, we believe if Nvidia maintains its ~35% beat that it had for the Jul-Q for the rest of FY24 (CY23), Nvidia can potentially do $52B in Data Center revenue for FY24 (CY23).

Looking ahead to FY25, we believe Nvidia can do ~$92B in Data Center revenue based on our estimates for % beats for Actual Data Center revenue vs. Estimates for Data Center Revenue (Piper Sandler).

Actual Data Center Revenue vs Estimates for Data Center Revenue

Source: I/O FUND

Every Thursday at 4:30 pm Eastern, the I/O Fund team holds a webinar for premium members to discuss how to navigate the broad market, as well as various stock entries and exits. We offer trade alerts plus an automated hedging signal. The I/O Fund team is one of the only audited portfolios available to individual investors. Learn more here.Learn more hereLearn more here.

Exploring Scenarios for the Upcoming Earnings Report:

The neutral-case scenario is that Nvidia reports in line, but can’t give the Street what it wants, which is a raise on already impressive growth to help sustain the market leader’s gains this year.

If investors are being realistic, a raise is best left to next quarter when the company typically offers a fiscal year outlook. The question is not whether Nvidia is a top AI stock, and has a promising future (of course it does). The question at hand is whether Nvidia can produce a report that pushes buyers off the sidelines. These are two different matters, and are often in opposition after a large run-up in price.

The best-case scenario is that Nvidia’s been downplaying its supply (just a touch) and there will be a beat for the fiscal Q4 guide. Nvidia’s story is quite clear, which is that the data center segment is producing historic growth and the bottom line is so beautiful, you have to squint to make sure it’s real. If this happens, we could see the price go into the mid-$500s before technicals are predicting that buyers will be exhausted. As a reminder, that’s only a 7% move from where the stock is trading now.

Piper Sandler has a data center estimate for fiscal year 2024 of $42 billion, which translates to $14.9 billion in data center revenue if we assume $13 billion this quarter. We detail below the price targets we are eyeing to take more gains should Nvidia report a beat on Q4FY24.

The topping-out scenario is that Nvidia’s buying is exhausted, and there isn’t one fundamental analyst on earth that can help investors figure out when this will happen. That is best left to somewhat-esoteric technical analysis. As you’ll note, I am not calling this the bear-case as there is not a bear case for Nvidia. Even if the company loses China entirely due to restrictions, it’s likely that demand gets absorbed. However, there is a bear case for the semiconductor sector, of which Nvidia is exposed to, and I detail this for you below.

Regarding the topping-out scenario, it’s unlikely Nvidia has a major negative surprise to the downside as semiconductors have strong visibility compared to, say, an ad-tech company. The management team should be going to great lengths to be consistent and accurate with Wall Street given the long golden roadway in front of them. Therefore, the topping-out scenario is aptly named as a 200% gain means you’ve got to impress the Street to keep those gains, and Nvidia may need to refuel for a quarter or so until we can get to a new fiscal year guide next quarter.

The Red Scare

What’s not to be forgotten in the excitement of the product road map is China, which has been the predominant risk for semiconductor stocks dating back to 2018. Last year, the government restricted Nvidia from selling its two most powerful chips to China, the A100 and H100. To circumvent these restrictions, Nvidia designed slightly less powerful chips called the A800 and H800. As reported by Reuters, the H800 has as much computing power as the H100 in certain settings. For the United States, these chips are important to block as they strengthen China’s military.

Last month, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced updated rules focuses on computing performance by removing the bandwidth parameter and focusing exclusively on how powerful a chip is, as well as performance density, which will prevent companies from working loopholes. According to an official who spoke to Reuters, “the U.S. will require companies to notify the government about semiconductors whose performance is just below the guidelines before they are shipped to China.”

Although this is a medium-term issue for Nvidia, analysts believe the demand is high enough today that the company shouldn’t have any issues absorbing the 20% to 25% loss in its data center segment from tighter export restrictions to China. Looking further out for FY2025, Keybanc sees a $5 impact to Nvidia’s $25.62 EPS estimate, and up to a $20B impact to its data center segment with current estimates at $101B for the data center in FY2025.

Eventually, demand may settle – especially as more competitors step up – and investors should pencil-in losing China revenue as a risk that is materializing now, with the revenue impact likely to be felt in FY2025.

The Topping Out Scenario

Nvidia (NVDA)

Nvidia continues to push to all-time highs, which is a scenario that was outlined in our prior free report on NVDA in September of this year. In the last analysis, the I/O Fund Portfolio Manager stated: “as long as we hold $340, Nvidia has the potential for one more swing higher into year-end/early next year.”

The primary scenario presented had the $545-$574 region as the target for the next swing higher. As of today, we are about 7% away from this target in what appears to be the final 5th wave in an uptrend off the October 2022 low.

I have laid out two scenarios that I continue to see playing out in the coming weeks-months:

  • The topping-out scenario has NVDA in a complex topping pattern. We would see a sharp reversal from current levels that would ultimately break below $435-$419 support region. This would signal that the top is in, and we would then setup our downward targets to start accumulating again.
  • The bull scenario has us already in the final swing higher. Our targets are between $545 – $575 for this move. If we end up seeing a gap and continuation higher from the earnings report, then we would get a direct path to these targets. We would use this strength to continue to trim. The other scenario is that we see a slight pullback that holds the $435-$419 region, which would set us up for a push into higher targets in the coming months.
Nvidia Price Chart

Source: I/O FUND

Semiconductor Industry May Be the Achilles Heel

Nvidia could certainly miss, yet it’s less likely given the company has outsized demand and visibility on supply. Within this context, it is easier to see the level of risk with interrelated stocks. One chart that is quite concerning, which has ramifications for all of tech, is Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM)

TSM Price Chart

Source: I/O FUND

The bounce from the October, 2022 low is clearly an overlapping and messy move higher. This is common of B waves. What’s concerning is that the drop from the July high is a 5 wave pattern that broke through the major trendline. This would be wave 1 of the larger (C) wave.

What followed is a 3 wave retrace, so far, which would be wave 2. If the next drop is a 5 wave pattern that takes us below $89, it will be a strong warning. On the other hand, if we can see a vertical move over $104, then it will shift the odds away from the red count above, and suggest that we could see a larger swing higher into early 2024, which would be the green count.

We do not own TSM as we closed this position, yet one reason we are watching this chart is to help manage our semiconductor positions as a break below $89 is concerning enough to have a read-through to our other positions. In this case, we will likely hedge the semiconductor stocks that we have identified as those we want to own in a downturn.

A break below $89 could also be concerning given TSM is in the crosshairs with China, and the United States recently tightened export restrictions to effectively cutoff AI chips. China has made it known they are pursuing domestic silicon, and if so, TSM may become stuck in a tug-o-war on which country gets 3nm, 4nm and 5nm supply.

The Broader Semiconductor Sector (PHLX)

The PHLX Semiconductor Index is a popular index of the broader semiconductor sector. It currently has the same downside setup that we are seeing in TSM. However, it is moving up into major resistance and into a cycle that suggests a reversal is likely to follow.

PHLX Semiconductor Index Chart

Source: I/O FUND

The fan placed at the October, 2022 low represents a series of important angles that the PHLX has been using in its push higher. The red 1×1 line is a true 45 degrees off the low, and is the most important angle in defining an uptrend. Note how price broke below it and is now testing this angle as resistance.

Furthermore, those symbols above price represent cycles that we see within the PHLX. Note how price tends to reverse the trend that is moving into them. So, regarding these cycles, how we trend into them is the most important thing. We are currently trending up, into the current cycle, while testing the major angle in red.

It is likely that the broader semi sector sees a reversal soon, and until the PHLX can retake the red 1×1 angle, the pressure and risk remain to the downside.

Conclusion:

Nvidia’s earnings outcome is not easy to read in the tea leaves. This is because the fundamentals are the best in the S&P 500 and the CFO has been clear that she has strong visibility for this quarter and into next year. It’s possible the company misses, but not probable (outside of something China related). Rather, Nvidia’s issues are sector-wide as semiconductor indexes and the bellwether TSM are looking weak on technicals. This would signal even if Nvidia beats/raises and the stock goes up, that its peer group may weigh on the company’s price action in the near-term. There’s also immense pressure that Nvidia raises, which may not be realistic given constraints on supply.

We’ve been crystal clear in both August and September that Nvidia has a move to $545 to $570 and this could mark the top. We continue to believe this is the price target where our firm will again take gains. If we don’t get there this evening, and price breaks down, then we will also take gains. In our opinion, this is the only way to procure a win-win scenario with a stock that holds a leading allocation in a portfolio that has extended 200% in one year.

Meanwhile, you can look forward to an update on how, exactly, Nvidia will surpass Apple’s valuation by 2026 in the coming weeks.

Our premium members will receive our post-earnings analysis this evening after hours. If you own Nvidia stock, or are looking to own NVDA, we encourage you to attend our weekly premium webinars, held every Thursday at 4:30 pm EST. Next week, we will discuss our plan following NVDA’s earnings, as well as a handful of other AI plays for 2024 – what our targets are, where we plan to buy as well as take gains.

Please note: The I/O Fund conducts research and draws conclusions for the company’s portfolio. We then share that information with our readers and offer real-time trade notifications. This is not a guarantee of a stock’s performance and it is not financial advice. Please consult your personal financial advisor before buying any stock in the companies mentioned in this analysis. Beth Kindig and the I/O Fund own shares in NVDA at the time of writing and may own stocks pictured in the charts.

Recommended Reading:

  • Apple’s Services Growth Flywheel Continues To Strengthen
  • Big Tech Stocks: Q3 Earnings Preview
  • Solar Stocks Still Searching For A Bottom
  • Tesla Sells 33% Of Vehicles Below Average Cost, BYD Pulls Ahead
Posted in AI Stocks, Semiconductor StocksLeave a Comment on Nvidia’s Fiscal Q3 Earnings Preview: The Pressure Is On

Nvidia Fiscal Q3 Earnings: The China Impact

Posted on November 22, 2023June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Nvidia’s Fiscal Q3 earnings report was spectacular on all accounts. The data center growth for this quarter was bonkers againbonkers again with growth of 279% year-over-year. The FQ4 guide implies data center growth that will accelerate to roughly 370% next quarter.

Overall revenue beat by $2 billion this quarter for $18.12B in revenue, up 206%. For next quarter, the guide beat by another $2 billion for guidance of $20B compared to $17.9B expected.

EPS of $4.02 compares to $3.39 expected. Gross margin grew to 74% compared to 71.5% expected.

Yet, the stock is down 1.5% after hours. In our pre-earnings write-up that was published this morning in our free newsletter, I had stated: “The topping-out scenario is that Nvidia’s buying is exhausted, and there isn’t one fundamental analyst on earth that can help investors figure out when this will happen.” I explained this is best left to technical analysts as there are many forces which weigh on a stock. It was unlikely Nvidia missed due to the CFO’s visibility on supply, yet the win-win scenario is that we don’t need the market to continue to reward Nvidia. It already has rewarded Nvidia, and if the market is getting tired of Nvidia’s exceptional results, then we will simply take gains and buy again lower.

Essentially, what we are seeing after hours has nothing to do with the company’s financials. When buyers become exhausted, it means a story is well-known. It’s not logical, it’s merely what makes a market.

The flaw in Nvidia’s report is the loss of China revenue. It can be deceiving because demand is so high, that Nvidia will absorb those losses in the upcoming quarter. However, there are implications in the medium-term, which we had also written about in our pre-earnings report.

The long-term thesis is very much intact, which is that Nvidia is on its way to become the world’s most valuable company someday. Data center GPUs are only part of the story. Automotive has the potential to exceed data center GPUs, and there’s also software.

In the near-term, Nvidia investors should keep an eye on the broader semiconductor sector, which looks weak, and there’s a chance the China impact drags on FY2025/FY2026 estimates until we get a new fiscal year guide next quarter. I also touch base on a few positives that are important to keep an eye on.

Revenue and EPS:

Nvidia reported revenue of $18.1B, up 206% Y/Y and well above consensus of $16.1B and above guidance of $16B. However, the magnitude of the revenue beat of 12% was smaller than the 22% beat in the July quarter. Non-GAAP EPS was $4.02, well above consensus of $3.39.

Revenue Segments:

  • Data Center revenue of $14.5B, up 279% YoY and up 41% QoQ
  • Gaming revenue of $2.9B, up 81% YoY and up 15% QoQ
  • Pro Visualization revenue of $416M, up 108% YoY and up 10% QoQ
  • Automotive revenue of $261M, up 4% YoY and up 3% QoQ
  • OEM & Other Revenue of $73M, flattish YoY and up 11% Q/Q

Nvidia provided revenue guidance of $20B +/- + 2% above consensus of $17.9B with adjusted GM guidance of 75.5% and Non-GAAP Operating Margin guidance of 64.5%.

More on Data Center Segment:

Our pre-earnings report highlighted the release of the H200. Major cloud players such as AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, and Oracle cloud will be among the first CSPs to offer H200 inferences starting in Q2 of 2024. The H200 is likely to come with a higher ASP than the H100 due to HBM3e memory. The H100 has an ASP in the $30,000 to $40,000 range. The higher ASP may not contribute to margins necessarily, as HBM3e is costly.

At $40,000 per H100, that equals $29B in H100 sales alone, and when you add the A100 and other data center sales at a current run rate of $15B, the Data Center segment could report total revenue of $44B in FY24 (CY23). When you equal this out across the upcoming quarters, it looks something like this based on our estimates and Piper Sandler estimates.

Nvidia is expected to report approximately $16.5B in revenue for the January quarter. Keybanc has data center revenue at $101 billion for next year. If we assume China is $20 billion of this (and worst case, doesn’t get absorbed) then it will look something like this:

Scenario 1:

Q1 FY25: $18B

Q2 FY25: $19.5B

Q3 FY25: $21B

Q4 FY25: $23B

However, it’s likely the China revenue does get absorbed even if analysts are forced to revise estimates for now. This means that estimates may go down this quarter, and then be revised up again when management discusses the fiscal year guide. If so, it would look more like this:

Scenario 2:

Q1 FY25: $20B

Q2 FY25: $24B

Q3 FY25: $27B

Q4 FY25: $30B

That’s based on Keybanc’s fairly optimistic estimate of over $100B next year in data center revenue. Here are data center revenue numbers that are more conservative from Piper Sandler. Due to the QoQ growth in this model, next quarter’s fiscal year guide is paramount for us Nvidia bulls.

Scenario 3:

My opinion is that Scenario 1 is a safe assumption as it combines continued growth in the data center with some China impact.

Margins:

Gross margin of 74% beat guidance of 71.5%. As stated in our pre-ER write-up, these are historic margins for Nvidia.

The company reported an operating margin of 57.5% for income of $10.4 billion. The adjusted operating margin of 63.8% compares to a margin of 26.4% last quarter.

Net income of $9.2 billion represents a margin of 51% compared to 11.5% net margin in the year ago quarter. This is a combination of data center strength and being at the cyclical trough last year for gaming.

Cash:

Cash flow margins are the best in the Mag 7 at 40.5% operating cash flow this quarter and 38.9% in free cash flow margin. Meta has the second best FCF margin at 34.7% followed by Apple at 29.7%.

Nvidia had $18.3B in cash and marketable securities, up from $16.0B last quarter and debt of $9.7B in-line with the July quarter of $9.7B.

The company utilized cash of $3.91 billion towards shareholder returns, including $3.81 billion in share repurchases and $99 million in cash dividends. Last quarter, an additional $25 billion was authorized for share repurchases.

Earnings Call:

The China Impact:

We had written the following in our pre-earnings report:

“The Red Scare:

What’s not to be forgotten in the excitement of the product road map is China, which has been the predominant risk for semiconductor stocks dating back to 2018. Last year, the government restricted Nvidia from selling its two most powerful chips to China, the A100 and H100. To circumvent these restrictions, Nvidia designed slightly less powerful chips called the A800 and H800. As reported by Reuters, the H800 has as much computing power as the H100 in certain settings. For the United States, these chips are important to block as they strengthen China’s military.

Last month, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced updated rules focuses on computing performance by removing the bandwidth parameter and focusing exclusively on how powerful a chip is, as well as performance density, which will prevent companies from working loopholes. According to an official who spoke to Reuters, “the U.S. will require companies to notify the government about semiconductors whose performance is just below the guidelines before they are shipped to China.” 

Although this is a medium-term issue for Nvidia, analysts believe the demand is high enough today that the company shouldn’t have any issues absorbing the 20% to 25% loss in its data center segment from tighter export restrictions to China. Looking further out for FY2025, Keybanc sees a $5 impact to Nvidia’s $25.62 EPS estimate, and up to a $20B impact to its data center segment with current estimates at $101B for the data center in FY2025.

Eventually, demand may settle – especially as more competitors step up – and investors should pencil-in losing China revenue as a risk that is materializing now, with the revenue impact likely to be felt in FY2025.”

It’s tempting to shrug off the loss of revenue given Nvidia beat/raised next quarter, which is the quarter when 20% to 25% of revenue from China and other restricted countries will be cut off.  However, the Street is likely to be cautious tomorrow because FQ4 will be seen as an outlier where demand can absorb the 20% to 25%. Basically, the outsized demand will be transitory whereas the U.S. Department of Commerce is cutting off 20% to 25% permanently. There was some talk about Nvidia serving these countries with a less powerful chip, but the restrictions are blacklisting Nvidia’s AI chips (specifically) so this workaround won’t be an easy feat.

By the time Nvidia comes up with a workaround, even if it’s acceptable, those countries will have designed their own domestic silicon. Even if this eventually does get absorbed, analysts will likely revised down their estimates for a few quarters out in FY2025 or next fiscal year FY2026. This may, in turn, impact Nvidia’s valuation. Per the CFO: “The export controls will have a negative effect on our China business, and we do not have good visibility into the magnitude of that impact even over the long term.” 

This does not derail Nvidia’s thesis by any means and the timing could not have been better with the restrictions happening during a period of outsized demand. As pointed out on the call, Nvidia will be tapped by many countries that are not blacklisted into the foreseeable future: “National investment in compute capacity is a new economic imperative, and serving the sovereign AI infrastructure market represents a multibillion-dollar opportunity over the next few years.”

InfiniBand up 500% YoY:

We covered InfiniBand a few years back for our premium members. Mellanox was an important acquisition as it helped Nvidia align its architecture with speed by supporting Virtual Protocol Interconnect (VPI), which allows the ubiquitous Ethernet to provide bandwidth as cheap as possible, and InfiniBand to deliver higher throughput and fewer bottlenecks during high loads. Today, this acquisition is paying off.

Per the opening remarks: “Networking now exceeds a $10 billion annualized revenue run-rate. Strong growth was driven by exceptional demand for InfiniBand, which grew fivefold year-on-year […] Azure uses over 29,000 miles of InfiniBand tabling, enough to circle the globe.”

InfiniBand growing five-fold exceeds overall data center revenue given the $15B in total data center revenue last fiscal year is expected to grow 200% to $45 billion at the exit of this fiscal year. Networking revenue tripled and data center compute grew four-fold.

The discussion on the call is that companies are standardizing with InfiniBand as the “computing fabric” increases the effectiveness of AI infrastructure by 20% to 30%. InfiniBand is nearly ubiquitous in supercomputing and is becoming popular with AI/Big Data applications on a large scale for high performance clusters. The benefits of the software defined fabric is that it’s low latency, high bandwidth and low management cost.

Recurring Software Revenue at $1 Billion:

Going off what we know, recuring software revenue may have doubled over the past few quarters CFO had stated: “hundreds of millions of dollars annually” and it’s now being stated the standalone software business will be worth $1 billion next quarter: “We are on track to exit the year at an annualized revenue run-rate of $1 billion for our recurring software support and services offerings.”

Keep an eye on this as it’s likely to be the leading story over the next few years – especially as automotive ramps.

AI Factories:

This was probably the most important question in terms of Nvidia’s growth potential. There’s nothing revelatory being said, per se, but it’s nice to hear some of the bigger picture repeated.

Question: “Because when I just look at the trajectory of your Data Center, it will be close to nearly 30% of all the spending in Data Center next year. So what metrics are you keeping an eye on to inform you that you can continue to grow? Just where are we in the adoption curve of your products into the generative AI market?” -Vivek Arya, Bank of America

Answer: “Generative AI is the largest TAM expansion of software and hardware that we've seen in several decades. At the core of it, what's really exciting is that what was largely a retrieval-based computing approach – almost everything that you do is retrieved off of storage somewhere – has been augmented now, added with a generative method. And its changed almost everything. […]

And one of the areas that is really impactful is the software industry, which is about $1 trillion or so, has been building tools that are manually used over the last couple decades. And now, there's a whole new segment of software called co-pilots and assistants. Instead of manually used, these tools will have co- pilots to help you use it, and so instead of licensing software – we will continue to do that of course, but we will also hire co-pilots and assistants to help us use the software. […]

But there's a new class of data centers, and this new class of data centers, unlike the data centers of the past, where you have a lot of applications running used by a great many people that are different tenants that are using the same infrastructure, and that data center stores a lot of files. These new data centers are very few applications, if not one application, used by basically one tenant, and it processes data. It trains models, and it generates tokens. It generates AI. And we call these new data centers AI factories.”

Translation: If you separate AI from traditional data centers (and where data centers are headed), then Nvidia represents far more than 30%.

Conclusion:

We are tracking TSM, semiconductor indexes, and Nvidia’s chart for signs of exhaustion as outlined here. We are seeking a win-win scenario where we can lock-in gains, and then use that cash to buy Nvidia again at lower levels. As stated, Nvidia’s thesis is firmly intact. Rather, the issue is the market is seeing very narrow leadership and Nvidia is the defacto leader within that narrow leadership. The saying in Wall Street is that pigs get slaughtered. That’s a rough way of saying 200% gains YTD should be approached carefully as the goal is to make real money, not paper money. Of course, 200% will be nothing by the time we are done with this position. But for this year, it’s good enough.

Advanced Signals Members receive real-time trade alerts for our entries and in-depth technical analysis from the Portfolio Manager, Knox Ridley. Learn more here.here.

 Recommended Reading:

  • Big Tech companies continue to invest in AI
  • November Positions Report
  • Q4 2023 Webinar Highlights
  • Microsoft Fiscal Q1 Earnings: Operating Leverage from AI
  • Netflix: Cash is King and Pivot is on Track
  • AMD Q2 Earnings: ETA for AI Ramp is Q4 & 2024
  • Nvidia Q2 FY24 Earnings: 226% Q3 Data Center Growth is Bonkers
Posted in AI Stocks, SemiconductorsLeave a Comment on Nvidia Fiscal Q3 Earnings: The China Impact

Nvidia Fiscal Q3 Earnings: The China Impact

Posted on November 22, 2023June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Nvidia’s Fiscal Q3 earnings report was spectacular on all accounts. The data center growth for this quarter was bonkers againbonkers again with growth of 279% year-over-year. The FQ4 guide implies data center growth that will accelerate to roughly 370% next quarter.

Overall revenue beat by $2 billion this quarter for $18.12B in revenue, up 206%. For next quarter, the guide beat by another $2 billion for guidance of $20B compared to $17.9B expected. 

EPS of $4.02 compares to $3.39 expected. Gross margin grew to 74% compared to 71.5% expected.

Yet, the stock is down 1.5% after hours. In our pre-earnings write-up that was published this morning in our free newsletter, I had stated: “The topping-out scenario is that Nvidia’s buying is exhausted, and there isn’t one fundamental analyst on earth that can help investors figure out when this will happen.” I explained this is best left to technical analysts as there are many forces which weigh on a stock. It was unlikely Nvidia missed due to the CFO’s visibility on supply, yet the win-win scenario is that we don’t need the market to continue to reward Nvidia. It already has rewarded Nvidia, and if the market is getting tired of Nvidia’s exceptional results, then we will simply take gains and buy again lower.

Essentially, what we are seeing after hours has nothing to do with the company’s financials. When buyers become exhausted, it means a story is well-known. It’s not logical, it’s merely what makes a market.

The flaw in Nvidia’s report is the loss of China revenue. It can be deceiving because demand is so high, that Nvidia will absorb those losses in the upcoming quarter. However, there are implications in the medium-term, which we had also written about in our pre-earnings report.

The long-term thesis is very much intact, which is that Nvidia is on its way to become the world’s most valuable company someday. Data center GPUs are only part of the story. Automotive has the potential to exceed data center GPUs, and there’s also software which we covered here.

In the near-term, Nvidia investors should keep an eye on the broader semiconductor sector, which looks weak, and there’s a chance the China impact drags on FY2025/FY2026 estimates until we get a new fiscal year guide next quarter. I also touch base on a few positives that are important to keep an eye on.

Revenue and EPS:

Nvidia reported revenue of $18.1B, up 206% Y/Y and well above consensus of $16.1B and above guidance of $16B. However, the magnitude of the revenue beat of 12% was smaller than the 22% beat in the July quarter. Non-GAAP EPS was $4.02, well above consensus of $3.39.

Revenue Segments:

  • Data Center revenue of $14.5B, up 279% YoY and up 41% QoQ
  • Gaming revenue of $2.9B, up 81% YoY and up 15% QoQ
  • Pro Visualization revenue of $416M, up 108% YoY and up 10% QoQ
  • Automotive revenue of $261M, up 4% YoY and up 3% QoQ
  • OEM & Other Revenue of $73M, flattish YoY and up 11% Q/Q

Nvidia provided revenue guidance of $20B +/- + 2% above consensus of $17.9B with adjusted GM guidance of 75.5% and Non-GAAP Operating Margin guidance of 64.5%.

More on Data Center Segment:

Our pre-earnings report highlighted the release of the H200. Major cloud players such as AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, and Oracle cloud will be among the first CSPs to offer H200 inferences starting in Q2 of 2024. The H200 is likely to come with a higher ASP than the H100 due to HBM3e memory. The H100 has an ASP in the $30,000 to $40,000 range. The higher ASP may not contribute to margins necessarily, as HBM3e is costly.

At $40,000 per H100, that equals $29B in H100 sales alone, and when you add the A100 and other data center sales at a current run rate of $15B, the Data Center segment could report total revenue of $44B in FY24 (CY23). When you equal this out across the upcoming quarters, it looks something like this based on our estimates and Piper Sandler estimates.

Nvidia is expected to report approximately $16.5B in revenue for the January quarter. Keybanc has data center revenue at $101 billion for next year. If we assume China is $20 billion of this (and worst case, doesn’t get absorbed) then it will look something like this:

Scenario 1:

Q1 FY25: $18B

Q2 FY25: $19.5B

Q3 FY25: $21B

Q4 FY25: $23B

However, it’s likely the China revenue does get absorbed even if analysts are forced to revise estimates for now. This means that estimates may go down this quarter, and then be revised up again when management discusses the fiscal year guide. If so, it would look more like this:

Scenario 2:

Q1 FY25: $20B

Q2 FY25: $24B

Q3 FY25: $27B

Q4 FY25: $30B

That’s based on Keybanc’s fairly optimistic estimate of over $100B next year in data center revenue. Here are data center revenue numbers that are more conservative from Piper Sandler. Due to the QoQ growth in this model, next quarter’s fiscal year guide is paramount for us Nvidia bulls.

Scenario 3:

My opinion is that Scenario 1 is a safe assumption as it combines continued growth in the data center with some China impact.

Margins:

Gross margin of 74% beat guidance of 71.5%. As stated in our pre-ER write-up, these are historic margins for Nvidia.

The company reported an operating margin of 57.5% for income of $10.4 billion. The adjusted operating margin of 63.8% compares to a margin of 26.4% last quarter.

Net income of $9.2 billion represents a margin of 51% compared to 11.5% net margin in the year ago quarter. This is a combination of data center strength and being at the cyclical trough last year for gaming.

Cash:

Cash flow margins are the best in the Mag 7 at 40.5% operating cash flow this quarter and 38.9% in free cash flow margin. Meta has the second best FCF margin at 34.7% followed by Apple at 29.7%.

Nvidia had $18.3B in cash and marketable securities, up from $16.0B last quarter and debt of $9.7B in-line with the July quarter of $9.7B.

The company utilized cash of $3.91 billion towards shareholder returns, including $3.81 billion in share repurchases and $99 million in cash dividends. Last quarter, an additional $25 billion was authorized for share repurchases.

Earnings Call:

The China Impact:

We had written the following in our pre-earnings report:

“The Red Scare:

What’s not to be forgotten in the excitement of the product road map is China, which has been the predominant risk for semiconductor stocks dating back to 2018. Last year, the government restricted Nvidia from selling its two most powerful chips to China, the A100 and H100. To circumvent these restrictions, Nvidia designed slightly less powerful chips called the A800 and H800. As reported by Reuters, the H800 has as much computing power as the H100 in certain settings. For the United States, these chips are important to block as they strengthen China’s military.

Last month, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced updated rules focuses on computing performance by removing the bandwidth parameter and focusing exclusively on how powerful a chip is, as well as performance density, which will prevent companies from working loopholes. According to an official who spoke to Reuters, “the U.S. will require companies to notify the government about semiconductors whose performance is just below the guidelines before they are shipped to China.”

Although this is a medium-term issue for Nvidia, analysts believe the demand is high enough today that the company shouldn’t have any issues absorbing the 20% to 25% loss in its data center segment from tighter export restrictions to China. Looking further out for FY2025, Keybanc sees a $5 impact to Nvidia’s $25.62 EPS estimate, and up to a $20B impact to its data center segment with current estimates at $101B for the data center in FY2025.

Eventually, demand may settle – especially as more competitors step up – and investors should pencil-in losing China revenue as a risk that is materializing now, with the revenue impact likely to be felt in FY2025.”

It’s tempting to shrug off the loss of revenue given Nvidia beat/raised next quarter, which is the quarter when 20% to 25% of revenue from China and other restricted countries will be cut off.  However, the Street is likely to be cautious tomorrow because FQ4 will be seen as an outlier where demand can absorb the 20% to 25%. Basically, the outsized demand will be transitory whereas the U.S. Department of Commerce is cutting off 20% to 25% permanently. There was some talk about Nvidia serving these countries with a less powerful chip, but the restrictions are blacklisting Nvidia’s AI chips (specifically) so this workaround won’t be an easy feat.

By the time Nvidia comes up with a workaround, even if it’s acceptable, those countries will have designed their own domestic silicon. Even if this eventually does get absorbed, analysts will likely revised down their estimates for a few quarters out in FY2025 or next fiscal year FY2026. This may, in turn, impact Nvidia’s valuation. Per the CFO: “The export controls will have a negative effect on our China business, and we do not have good visibility into the magnitude of that impact even over the long term.”

This does not derail Nvidia’s thesis by any means and the timing could not have been better with the restrictions happening during a period of outsized demand. As pointed out on the call, Nvidia will be tapped by many countries that are not blacklisted into the foreseeable future: “National investment in compute capacity is a new economic imperative, and serving the sovereign AI infrastructure market represents a multibillion-dollar opportunity over the next few years.”

InfiniBand up 500% YoY:

We covered InfiniBand a few years back when our site covered the Mellanox acquisition. Mellanox was an important acquisition as it helped Nvidia align its architecture with speed by supporting Virtual Protocol Interconnect (VPI), which allows the ubiquitous Ethernet to provide bandwidth as cheap as possible, and InfiniBand to deliver higher throughput and fewer bottlenecks during high loads. Today, this acquisition is paying off.

Per the opening remarks: “Networking now exceeds a $10 billion annualized revenue run-rate. Strong growth was driven by exceptional demand for InfiniBand, which grew fivefold year-on-year […] Azure uses over 29,000 miles of InfiniBand tabling, enough to circle the globe.”

InfiniBand growing five-fold exceeds overall data center revenue given the $15B in total data center revenue last fiscal year is expected to grow 200% to $45 billion at the exit of this fiscal year. Networking revenue tripled and data center compute grew four-fold.

The discussion on the call is that companies are standardizing with InfiniBand as the “computing fabric” increases the effectiveness of AI infrastructure by 20% to 30%. InfiniBand is nearly ubiquitous in supercomputing and is becoming popular with AI/Big Data applications on a large scale for high performance clusters. The benefits of the software defined fabric is that it’s low latency, high bandwidth and low management cost.

Recurring Software Revenue at $1 Billion:

Going off what we know, recuring software revenue may have doubled over the past few quarters CFO had stated: “hundreds of millions of dollars annually” and it’s now being stated the standalone software business will be worth $1 billion next quarter: “We are on track to exit the year at an annualized revenue run-rate of $1 billion for our recurring software support and services offerings.”

Keep an eye on this as it’s likely to be the leading story over the next few years – especially as automotive ramps.

AI Factories:

This was probably the most important question in terms of Nvidia’s growth potential. There’s nothing revelatory being said, per se, but it’s nice to hear some of the bigger picture repeated.

Question: “Because when I just look at the trajectory of your Data Center, it will be close to nearly 30% of all the spending in Data Center next year. So what metrics are you keeping an eye on to inform you that you can continue to grow? Just where are we in the adoption curve of your products into the generative AI market?” -Vivek Arya, Bank of America

Answer: “Generative AI is the largest TAM expansion of software and hardware that we've seen in several decades. At the core of it, what's really exciting is that what was largely a retrieval-based computing approach – almost everything that you do is retrieved off of storage somewhere – has been augmented now, added with a generative method. And its changed almost everything. […]

And one of the areas that is really impactful is the software industry, which is about $1 trillion or so, has been building tools that are manually used over the last couple decades. And now, there's a whole new segment of software called co-pilots and assistants. Instead of manually used, these tools will have co- pilots to help you use it, and so instead of licensing software – we will continue to do that of course, but we will also hire co-pilots and assistants to help us use the software. […]

But there's a new class of data centers, and this new class of data centers, unlike the data centers of the past, where you have a lot of applications running used by a great many people that are different tenants that are using the same infrastructure, and that data center stores a lot of files. These new data centers are very few applications, if not one application, used by basically one tenant, and it processes data. It trains models, and it generates tokens. It generates AI. And we call these new data centers AI factories.”

Translation: If you separate AI from traditional data centers (and where data centers are headed), then Nvidia represents far more than 30%.

Conclusion:

We are tracking TSM, semiconductor indexes, and Nvidia’s chart for signs of exhaustion as outlined here. We are seeking a win-win scenario where we can lock-in gains, and then use that cash to buy Nvidia again at lower levels. As stated, Nvidia’s thesis is firmly intact. Rather, the issue is the market is seeing very narrow leadership and Nvidia is the defacto leader within that narrow leadership. The saying in Wall Street is that pigs get slaughtered. That’s a rough way of saying 200% gains YTD should be approached carefully as the goal is to make real money, not paper money. Of course, 200% will be nothing by the time we are done with this position. But for this year, it’s good enough. 

 Recommended Reading:

  • 2024 Trend: Memory and PC Rebound
  • Big Tech companies continue to invest in AI
  • Apple Q4: iPhone Revenue Accelerates while Services Shine
  • Supermicro Fiscal Q1: “Conservative” Guide
  • AMD Q3 Earnings: $2B in GPU Revenue for 2024
Posted in AI Stocks, SemiconductorsLeave a Comment on Nvidia Fiscal Q3 Earnings: The China Impact

Big Tech companies continue to invest in AI

Posted on November 15, 2023June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Big Tech capex is a leading indicator for AI semiconductor companies and has been a secular tailwind for our holdings, such as Nvidia and AMD. The combined capex of Big Tech companies has increased from $41.4 billion in 2017 to $150.6 billion in 2022, growing at a CAGR of 29.5%. In the recent earnings calls, management teams from big tech companies are indicating they will continue to invest in AI.

On a side note, increased capex related to AI does not mean AI stocks will move in a linear fashion, rather we track data like this to help us determine what to buy during selloffs, and at the bottom of selloffs.

Semiconductor Market Update

According to the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA), global semiconductor sales were up 1.9% MoM and down (-4.5%) YoY in September to $44.9 billion. Q3 global semiconductor sales were up 6.3% QoQ and down (-4.5%) YoY to $134.7 billion.

John Neuffer, SIA President and CEO said, “Global semiconductor sales increased on a month-to-month basis for the seventh consecutive time in September, reinforcing the positive momentum the chip market has experienced during the middle part of this year,”increased on a month-to-month basis for the seventh consecutive time in September, reinforcing the positive momentum the chip market has experienced during the middle part of this year,” he further said, “The long-term outlook for semiconductor demand remains strong, with chips enabling countless products the world depends on and giving rise to new, transformative technologies of the future.”

Meanwhile, South Korean exports rose in October as semiconductor exports reported the smallest drop since August 2022 of (-3.1%) YoY in October. Chip sales helped the rise in the country’s exports for the first time in about a year.

Management Commentary on Big Tech Capex

Meta

Meta spent $32.04 billion in capex in 2022, up 66.5% YoY. 2023 has been a ‘Year of Efficiency’ and reducing capex was a priority for the company. Reduced spending in 2023 was possible due to cost savings, particularly in non-AI servers and the capex shift to 2024.

Susan Li, CFO of Meta, said in the recent earnings call. “Capital expenditures were below the prior year levels primarily due to lower server and data center construction spend as we prepared to shift to our new data center design, as well as payment timing.”to lower server and data center construction spend as we prepared to shift to our new data center design, as well as payment timing.”

The management during Q3 results lowered the upper range of the 2023 capex. It is expected to be $27 billion to $29 billion from the earlier reduced estimate of $27 billion to $30 billion, representing a YoY decline of (12.6%) at the mid-point. However, they expect higher capex for next year in the range of $30 billion to $35 billion, representing a YoY growth of 16.1% at the mid-point. The CFO said in the earnings call, “With growth driven by investments in servers, including both non-AI and AI hardware, and in data centers as we ramp up construction on sites with the new data center architecture we announced late last year.”With growth driven by investments in servers, including both non-AI and AI hardware, and in data centers as we ramp up construction on sites with the new data center architecture we announced late last year.”

Microsoft

Microsoft spent $28.40 billion in capex in 2022, up 3.3% YoY. YTD September 2023, the company has already spent $29.7 billion and therefore will see a significant jump in capex for the year 2023, helped by investments in cloud and AI.

Amy Hood, CFO of Microsoft, said in the recent earnings call. “Capital expenditures, including finance leases were $11.2 billion to support cloud demand, including investments to scale our AI infrastructure. Cash paid for PP&E was $9.9 billion.” including investments to scale our AI infrastructure. Cash paid for PP&E was $9.9 billion.” She further added, “We expect capital expenditures to increase sequentially on a dollar basis, driven by investments in our cloud and AI infrastructure. As a reminder, there can be normal quarterly spend variability in the timing of our cloud infrastructure buildout.”driven by investments in our cloud and AI infrastructure. As a reminder, there can be normal quarterly spend variability in the timing of our cloud infrastructure buildout.”

Nvidia had announced last year that they have a multi-year collaboration with Microsoft to build a giant AI supercomputer using thousands of Nvidia GPUs, Nvidia Quantum-2 InfiniBand, and full stack of Nvidia AI software to cater to the growing demand for AI.

Alphabet

The company spent $31.49 billion in capex in 2022, up 27.8% YoY. In the recent quarter, the company’s capex grew by 10.7% YoY to $8.06 billion. YTD September 2023, the capex was $21.3 billion down (-11.1%) YoY. However, the company will see an increase in Q4 and continue to grow in 2024.

Ruth Porat, CFO of Alphabet, said in the recent earnings call. “Finally, our reported CapEx in Q3 was $8 billion, driven overwhelmingly by investment in our technical infrastructure with the largest component for servers, followed by data centers, reflecting a meaningful increase in our investments in AI compute.reflecting a meaningful increase in our investments in AI compute.

The growth in reported cash CapEx in Q3 is somewhat muted due to the timing of supplier payments, which can cause variability from quarter-to-quarter. We continue to invest meaningfully in the technical infrastructure needed to support the opportunities we see in AI across Alphabet and expect elevated levels of investment, increasing in the fourth quarter of 2023 and continuing to grow in 2024.” We continue to invest meaningfully in the technical infrastructure needed to support the opportunities we see in AI across Alphabet and expect elevated levels of investment, increasing in the fourth quarter of 2023 and continuing to grow in 2024.”

She further clarified to an analyst that “2024 aggregate CapEx will be above the full year 2023.” “2024 aggregate CapEx will be above the full year 2023.”

The main takeaway is that the investment in technical infrastructure is growing and will continue to grow in 2024. There is an increasing shift in investment in technical infrastructure (i.e., AI and cloud) compared to other capex like office facilities, which is of prime importance for our portfolio. Ruth had clarified the change in shift in the Q4 2022 earnings call, “We're increasing our investments in technical infrastructure. And that's not just for AI. That's to support investments across Alphabet, in particular in Cloud as well. And at the same time, we're meaningfully decreasing our CapEx for office facilities.”we're meaningfully decreasing our CapEx for office facilities.”

Amazon

The company spent $58.62 billion in capex in 2022, down (-2%) YoY. The key takeaway is the company’s technological infrastructure spend is increasing. To understand the breakup of Amazon’s capex, we looked at some of the other previous earnings calls and understand technology infrastructure spend to be over 50% of the total capex. Brian Olsavsky, CFO of the company said in the Q2 2022 earnings call, “In 2021, we incurred approximately $60 billion in capital investments. About 40% of that is comprised of technology infrastructure, primarily supporting AWS as well as our worldwide stores business. Another 30% of the $60 billion was fulfillment capacity and a little less than 25% was for transportation, remaining 5% was comprised of things like corporate space and physical storesAbout 40% of that is comprised of technology infrastructure, primarily supporting AWS as well as our worldwide stores business. Another 30% of the $60 billion was fulfillment capacity and a little less than 25% was for transportation, remaining 5% was comprised of things like corporate space and physical stores.” He further said, “We expect infrastructure to represent a bit more than half of our total capital investments in 2022.”“We expect infrastructure to represent a bit more than half of our total capital investments in 2022.”

The guidance for 2023 capex is $50 billion, down (14.7%) YoY. However, technology infrastructure continues to grow. Brian said in the recent earnings call. “Now, let's turn to our capital investments. We define our capital investments as a combination of CapEx plus equipment finance leases. These investments were $50 billion for the trailing 12-month period ended September 30, down from $60 billion in the comparable prior year period. For the full year 2023, we expect capital investments to be approximately $50 billion compared to $59 billion in 2022. We expect fulfillment and transportation CapEx to be down year-over-year, partially offset by increased infrastructure CapEx to support growth of our AWS business, including additional investments related to generative AI and large language model efforts.”We expect fulfillment and transportation CapEx to be down year-over-year, partially offset by increased infrastructure CapEx to support growth of our AWS business, including additional investments related to generative AI and large language model efforts.”

We will be listening closely for 2024 capex discussions next quarter.

Conclusion

We continue to monitor Big Tech capex commentary and are encouraged by Meta’s recent guide for FY2024. Meta is the only company that has provided this level of visibility. In addition to a potential increase in capex from Big Tech, we are hearing across the board that a higher allocation of capex is going toward AI infrastructure.

With that said, it’s normal for cloud IaaS to go through periods of optimization. Given Meta’s guide, we are hopeful a period of optimization will not happen in 2024. Meanwhile, we will continue to closely monitor Big Tech capex comments closely as an important proxy for AI accelerators.

Advanced Signals Members receive real-time trade alerts for our entries and in-depth technical analysis from the Portfolio Manager, Knox Ridley.  Learn more here.here.

Royston Roche, Equity Analyst at the I/O Fund, contributed to this analysis.

 Recommended Reading:

  • November Positions Report
  • Q4 2023 Webinar Highlights
  • Microsoft Fiscal Q1 Earnings: Operating Leverage from AI
  • Netflix: Cash is King and Pivot is on Track
  • Nvidia Q2 FY24 Earnings: 226% Q3 Data Center Growth is Bonkers
Posted in AI Stocks, SemiconductorsLeave a Comment on Big Tech companies continue to invest in AI

AMD Q3 Earnings: $2B in GPU Revenue for 2024

Posted on November 1, 2023June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Initially, AMD sold off (-5%) based on the missed Q4 revenue guide. After hours, the stock recouped and ended up flat once management clarified the miss is not from the data center segment. Rather, it was confirmed the Q4 data center will grow 50% QoQ, and perhaps most importantly, management guided for $2B in GPU sales in 2024 from AI rather than supercomputing. This was the moment the price action reversed, and is a positive as it translates to broader hyperscaler customers driving the $2B rather than the Department of Energy’s supercomputer El Capitan.

We had stated in our pre-earnings write-up: “[The 50% revenue growth in Q4] is exciting, yet the market will want to see more balanced, commercial demand beyond the government-owned supercomputer.” AMD’s management went out of their way to provide additional color on hyperscalers driving the 2024 revenue, and I’ve included that part of the transcript below.

Roughly speaking, the data center is a $6 billion segment for AMD after 10 years of Lisa Su being the CEO (she became CEO in 2014). This means within one or two quarters of the GPUs shipping; sales will be the equivalent to 30% of today’s data center revenue right out the gate. Lisa Su stated the MI300 will be the fastest product they’ve had reach $1 billion in sales – which is saying a lot because the EPYC CPUs are popular.

Per the opening comments: “Based on the rapid progress we are making with our AI road map execution and purchase commitments from cloud customers, we now expect Data Center GPU revenue to be approximately $400 million in the fourth quarter and exceed $2 billion in 2024 as revenue ramps throughout the year. This growth would make MI300 the fastest product to ramp to $1 billion in sales in AMD history.”

Notably, it’s out of character for this management team to discuss forward revenue beyond one quarter. I find this break in style interesting, and I also take this to mean the $2 billion is a baseline. We will see, but that’s how I interpret a very early guide that would normally come in February. 

What is a bit unfortunate is that the gaming segment and embedded is weak, and these two segments overshadow AMD continuing to take market share on the CPU data center, and the company’s highly anticipated answer to Nvidia’s H100s. Per the CFO’s opening remarks: “In the fourth quarter, we expect to benefit from strong Data Center and Client momentum, driven by MI300 AI accelerated ramp and the strength of our high-performance leadership Zen 4 family of products despite lower sales in the Gaming segment and additional softening of demand in the embedded market.”

What is quite fortunate, however, is that some of AMD’s AI story is undercover, which is the PC and mobile market. There’s a bonus waiting for AMD investors as the AI story plays out, and while data center GPUs take up all of the attention, there is another powerful AI trend that is silently building strength in the background. I mentioned this in a previous write-up: “When discussing AMD’s AI opportunity, it is vitally important that we not lose sight of the opportunity AMD will have to expand its AI portfolio to the Client Segment.” This has already begun with the Ryzen AI on-chip accelerator contributing to the rebound in the client segment this quarter.

Revenue and EPS:

Revenue and EPS for Q3 came in a tad higher than expected at 4% growth for revenue of $5.8 billion. The company reported EPS of $0.70 versus $0.68 expected.

The guide for next quarter was problematic as it was a miss with management guiding for $6.1B in revenue versus $6.39B expected. However, the miss is not coming from the data center, and the market is digesting whether AMD is a “buy” given two of its segments are quite weak (gaming and embedded).

Margins:

Overall, the company came in as expected on margins. Gross margin came in at 47% which is a positive. On the call, it was mentioned that as the GPUs ramp, the revenue will be accretive to gross margin.

  • Adjusted gross margin of 51% was in line with management guidance for adjusted gross profits of $2.963B
  • Operating margin of 4% for operating profit of $224M is an improvement over the past few quarters of single digit negative GAAP operating margin. Per the CFO during those quarters, GAAP OM would improve with the Client segment recovery.
  • Adjusted OM came in as expected at 22% for Adj operating profits of $1.27B
  • GAAP net income was $299M with a margin of 5%

The CFO said the following about continued margin expansion:

“And in Q3, we saw very significant improvement with our client segment gross margin. I think going forward, the pace of Client segment improvement will moderate, but it will continue to drive incremental gross margin improvement in Client segment […] I think going forward, it's really mix, primarily mix, is driving our gross margin, but we feel pretty good about second half next year when we can expand the Data Center significantly and especially Embedded segment start to recover, we should be able to drive more meaningful gross margin improvement in second half.”

Cash Flow:

Operating cash flow has improved from last quarter although is still quite a bit lower than AMD’s peak in 2022. Operating cash flow of $421M is up from $379M last quarter, but is down from $965M in the year ago quarter. This should continue to improve with the Client segment bottoming.

Free cash flow of $297M is similar – an improvement from last quarter at $254M yet down from $842M in the year ago quarter.

The company has $5.8 billion in cash and short-term investments with $2.467B in debt. The company repurchased $511 million in shares.

Revenue Segments:

Data Center:

Data center came in as expected for Q3 at $1.6 billion in revenue, driven by the 4th Gen EPYC CPUs which offset a decline in adaptive SoC products. Per the opening remarks: “EPYC CPU revenue grew by a strong double-digit percentage sequentially” and also “we gained server CPU revenue share in the quarter as fourth-gen EPYC CPU revenue grew more than 50% sequentially, crossing over to represent a majority of our server processor revenue and unit shipments.”

Management has confirmed Q4 will be 50% sequential growth, or $2.4 billion in revenue. Of this, $400 million is from GPUs.

Client Segment:

The Client segment looks to have bottomed in a big way. Revenue of $1.5B was up 42% year-over-year and was up 46% QoQ. A full recovery would be in the $2.5B range. AMD released the Ryzen 7000 Series, which has helped CPU sales. Management also indicated that their partnership with Microsoft is a catalyst on the horizon as the Ryzen 7000 Series will power the biggest advancement in Windows in over 20 years.

Per management’s opening remarks: “Looking forward, we are executing on a multiyear Ryzen AI road map to deliver leadership compute capabilities built on top of Microsoft's Windows software ecosystem to enable the new generation of AI PCs that will fundamentally redefine the computing experience over the coming years.”

The Client Segment is expected to be strong next quarter, as well.

Gaming:

Gaming revenue of $1.5B was down (-8%) YoY due to a decline in semi-custom revenue but was offset by AMD Radeon GPUs. This segment is expected to decline next quarter due to a steep console cycle.

Embedded:

This segment is weighing on AMD as it’s lapping very high comps. As stated in our Pre-ER writeup, embedded is lapping a quarter with 1868% growth. Per the opening remarks: “Looking ahead, based on our current visibility, we expect Embedded segment revenue to decline sequentially as customers continue working through elevated inventory levels through the first half of 2024.”

The weakness in the gaming and embedded segments is expected to last (and perhaps worsen) through at least Q1. Per the CEO:

“And then from an Embedded and Gaming standpoint, we would say Embedded, think about it down similar levels sort of in the teens compared to sort of Q3 was down in the teens and Q4 will be down in the teens. And then Gaming, from a console standpoint, we do expect that to be down a bit more than that. And then as we go into Q1, again without being — there are lots of things that need to happen. We would expect that both gaming and embedded would be down into Q1 as well and sort of the other comments would be more around seasonality.”

Earnings Call:

It was key that management provide color on this call regarding the MI300 demand. The first question was centered the hyperscalers and how the MI300 is being used:

Toshiya Hari:

[…] My first one is on the Data Center GPU business. You talked about '24 revenue potentially exceeding $2 billion. I was hoping you could provide a little bit more color. What percentage of this is AI versus supercomputing or other applications?

Lisa Su:

Your question as to how the revenue evolves, so the way to think about it is, in the fourth quarter, we said revenue would be approximately $400 million, and that's mostly HPC with some — the start of our AI ramp. And then as we go into the first quarter, we actually expect revenue to be approximately similar in that $400 million range. And that will be mostly AI so with a very small piece being HPC. And as we go through 2024, we would expect revenue to continue to ramp quarterly, and again, it will be mostly AI.

The second question is when the stock price recovered after hours because this is when management made it clear the Q4 miss was not data center related. AMD had previously guided for 50% sequential data center growth (we covered this in great detail here) and this was reiterated:

Aaron Rakers:

[…] And how has that $400 million evolved underneath that? Has that — was it $300 million now going to $400 million? Just how has that changed over the course of the last quarter just to level set that Data Center expectation?

Jean Hu:

Yeah. So, I think for the second half, we said we expect Data Center business to grow approximately 50% versus first half. But right now, based on what we are seeing, we continue to see in that similar range of that 50%. So, we are very happy and pleased about the strong momentum of our Data Center business. On the GPU side, Lisa mentioned about $400 million, around $400 million […]”

The CEO let a comment slip that it would be “greater than $2 billion” for next year, and given how careful this management team is, I do think it’s important to note here:

Lisa Su:

Sure, Aaron. So, we've been planning the supply chain for the last year and we're always planning for success. So, certainly, for the current forecast of greater than $2 billion, we have adequate supply. But we have also planned for a supply chain forecast that could be significantly higher than that, and we would continue to work with customers to build that out.

For our purposes, as far as where this can go, the management team goes back to quoting 50% CAGR in this segment over the next few years: “So, I think we are big believers in the strength of the market. We previously said we believe that the compound annual growth rate could be 50% over the next three or four years.”

The March quarter is expected to be lumpy due to seasonality with the Client segment, Gaming, Embedded and then moving from El Capitan’s $400M in GPU revenue to $400M in Q1 from AI-driven GPU revenue (hyperscalers).

In regards to AMD’s AI-driven Client segment, here is a comment that helps solidify some of what our earlier analysis this year has discussed. From the CEO today: “What I'm most excited about in PCs is actually the AI PC. I think the AI PC opportunity is an opportunity to redefine what PCs are in terms of productivity tool and really sort of operating on sort of user data. And so, I think we're at the beginning of a wave there. We're investing heavily in Ryzen AI and the opportunity to really broaden sort of the AI capabilities of PCs going forward.”

Conclusion:

Gaming and Embedded will overshadow 4th Gen EPYC and also GPU sales in the near-term. However, we will be looking exclusively at the acceleration in the data center (EPYC and Instinct) and client segment (Ryzen AI) as the thesis. The market wanted to sell this report, yet AMD’s management team stood firm on their data center guide. For our purposes, some important hurdles were cleared – Q4 will come in as expected on the MI300s, Q1 will be the start of hyperscaler GPU sales, the margins will get better over time, and the Client segment is rebounding while also having its own AI story. Most importantly, we wanted to see AMD gain traction with hyperscalers, and that was confirmed this quarter for Q1.

Technically speaking, this report was stronger than Nvidia’s was this time last year despite the GPUs shipping at the same time seasonally – NVDA had 1% QoQ growth for data center revenue in the October quarter and then declined (-6%) QoQ in the Q4 January quarter. To jog your memory, it was the guide provided in May (for the July quarter) when Nvidia had its blowout quarter.

I don’t think AMD will take the exact path as Nvidia’s near-monopoly, rather, as was stated in the pre-earnings writeup, our goal is to see how this unfolds.

 Recommended Readings:

  • Super Micro Fiscal Q1 Pre-Earnings: AI Marches Onward
  • AMD Q3 Pre-Earnings: With Bated Breath for Q4 Commentary
  • Meta Q3 Earnings Update
  • Alphabet: Search Accelerates While Cloud Decelerates
  • TSM Results: Recovery in sight but technicals look weak
Posted in AI Stocks, SemiconductorsLeave a Comment on AMD Q3 Earnings: $2B in GPU Revenue for 2024

Super Micro Fiscal Q1 Pre-Earnings: AI Marches Onward

Posted on November 1, 2023June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Second only to Nvidia, Super Micro is a stock that is reporting real AI revenue. As a percentage of revenue, SMCI is reporting 52% in AI revenue compared to Nvidia’s 76% as a percentage of total revenue (data center segment).

Super Micro is sandwiched in the AI trend between hyperscalers and major chip design companies. The company is a server maker that started off by making motherboards and other components before it began making complete systems. The company is unique in that it sits between being an equipment manufacturer (Dell, HP) and being a design manufacturer (Foxconn). Part of the company’s success is due to liquid cooling, which is a popular alternative to air cooling to sustain maximum performance with the added benefit of driving down costs for supercomputers. Liquid cooling is expected to grow from 10% of supercomputers to the “vast majority” due to improving data center power usage effectiveness (PUE) and total cost of ownership (TCO) “by over 40% on power costs.” Please reference our Super Micro overview here.

The AI and GPU rack-scale revenue accounted for 52% of the recent Q4 FY2023 revenue. It was up from 29% in Q3 FY2023 – so nearly doubling in the span of a quarter (!)

For Super Micro, AI-related revenue is expected to march onward with Barclays analyst George Wang expecting it to rise to 70% of revenue in FY2024 and further rise to 80% in FY2025. The management FY2024 revenue guidance of $10 billion at the mid-point was significantly higher than the estimates of $8.61 billion and represents a YoY growth of 40.45%, up from 37.1% in FY2023.

What could cause Super Micro to miss is supply constraints for components. This was outlined in the last earnings write-up when we stated “Supply is the primary headwind; not demand.” With that said, management seems to be confident in the current guide, with supply more of a factor as to whether they raise revenue guidance in the future. Anything can happen, but that was our interpretation in the last earnings write-up.

Here's a quote from management: “However, given the record high backlog, we see fiscal year 2024 revenue between $9.5 billion to $10.5 billion with room to deliver more depending on availability of supply.”

Revenue and EPS

The company’s Q4 FY2023 revenue grew by 33.6% YoY to $2.18 billion. The management Q1 guidance is in the range of $1.9 billion to $2.2 billion, representing YoY growth of 10.8% at the mid-point. The consensus analysts’ estimate is $2.06 billion, representing a YoY growth of 11.4%. The guidance was lower due to the key component supply shortages, and strong growth is expected for the remaining quarters of the fiscal year.

The management Q1 GAAP EPS guidance is $2.02 to $2.80 and adjusted EPS guidance is $2.75 to $3.50. The consensus adjusted EPS estimate is $3.22, representing a YoY decline of (-5.8%). The EPS also follows a similar trend of solid growth like revenue for the remaining quarters of the fiscal year.

Margins

The adjusted gross margin was 17.1% compared to 17.7% in Q3 and 17.6% in the same period last year. The gross margin was lower as the company focused on market share gains. The management expects the September quarter adjusted gross margin to be similar to Q4.

The operating margin improved 30 basis points YoY to 10.4%. The adjusted operating margin improved 30 basis points YoY and 230 basis points QoQ to 11%. The strong QoQ improvement in margins was due to higher revenues that outpaced increases in operating expenses.

The operating margin guide for the next quarter is 8% and adjusted operating margin is 10.4%. The lower operating margin is due to higher operating expenses from a continued increase in R&D expenses and higher personnel costs.

The net margin improved 30 basis points YoY to 8.9%.

Overall, these margins are slim and this is always a focus in the earnings calls. The 10%+ OM is strong enough to be acceptable on a GAAP basis, yet is also thin enough to have to monitor quarterly.

Cash Flow and Balance Sheet

Operating cash outflow in Q4 FY23 was (-$9 million) compared to cash flow of $198 million in Q3 and cash outflow of (-$25 million) in the same quarter last year. The drop in cash flow was mainly due to higher accounts receivable. We will look for improved cash flow in the upcoming quarter.

The free cash flow outflow was (-$17 million) compared to free cash flow of $190 million in Q3 and free cash outflow of (-$36 million) in the same quarter last year. Lumpy is okay as long as fiscal year is positive. For FY2022, the company reported negative cash flow of (-$485 million). For FY2023 ending in June, the company reported positive cash flow of $626.8 million. 

The company has cash of $440 million and debt of $290 million. It has a net cash position of $150 million, down from a net cash position of $176 million in the previous quarter. Per management: “we utilized our bank lines of credit to support higher revenues and accounts receivable as we ramped up production of new AI/GPU design wins.”

Key Metrics:

The AI and GPU rack-scale revenue accounted for 52% of the recent Q4 FY2023 revenue. It was up from 29% in Q3 FY2023. Barclays initiated coverage on the company with an overweight rating citing company’s exposure to AI. "Against the backdrop of AI investment trends, we believe SMCI is well positioned to capture the rising AI server opportunity with more share gains ahead driven by its superior design capability and strong AI partnerships." with more share gains ahead driven by its superior design capability and strong AI partnerships." The analyst also believes that AI-related revenue will increase to 70% in FY2024 and further to 80% in FY2025.

The OEM appliance and large data center revenue of $1.17 billion grew 59% year-over-year and 94% QoQ. The boom in AI-related data center sales helped to push this segment to over 100% growth in FY2023.

The Enterprise and channel vertical, which also includes AI/ML revenue, was up 19% year-over-year and 51% QoQ to $976 million.

What to look for in the earnings report:

1) Visibility on Supply:

Charles Liang, Founder and CEO of the company, said in the last earnings call, “Due to the current key components supply shortages, we forecast revenue in the range of $1.9 billion to $2.2 billion for the September quarter. However, given the record high backlog, we see fiscal year 2024 revenue between $9.5 billion to $10.5 billion with room to deliver more depending on availability of supply.” “Due to the current key components supply shortages, we forecast revenue in the range of $1.9 billion to $2.2 billion for the September quarter. However, given the record high backlog, we see fiscal year 2024 revenue between $9.5 billion to $10.5 billion with room to deliver more depending on availability of supply.”

Regarding the possibility high revenue (all dependent on supply), this was what was discussed on the call – with the CEO making it abundantly clear the revenue will follow the supply outlook.

Ananda Baruah:

“[…] And so I guess the first question is, is what's the opportunity do you see to maybe even do teach stronger than the fiscal '24 guidance. I guess, what would be the puts and takes there? And, if you were to be able to exceed the 2024 guidance, what would be some of the things you think would need to occur?”

Charles Liang

“[..] And for sure, they need 10 times 20 time more system. And we just cannot ship at this moment, because of supply chain […] So I mean, we are on the right track, yes expecting supply chain can improve so that we can grow our revenue.

2) Nvidia Relationship:

You can expect Supermicro to continue to play up its relationship with Nvidia in the upcoming earnings call.

The company recently announced the shipment of Nvidia GH200 Grace Hopper Superchip-based servers. So, there could be more updates in the earnings call regarding the company’s capabilities in AI. In the last earnings call, Charles Liang said, “Couple of months ago, I was honored to have my close friend, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, join me on stage at Computex to highlight our optimized new generation GPU solutions for this AI era. We are deploying not just systems, but complete rack-scale total solutions to large generative AI innovators.”

3) Cash flow and Margins need to be decent.

Cash flow was negative in the recent quarter due to high accounts receivable. However, we will keep an eye on cash flow in the upcoming quarter. There was a question in the earnings call about working capital needs and whether they can generate positive cash flow going forward. Per management: “Yes, John. We see the business generating good cash flows, as it has historically. And we think that the — especially in this constrained supply market, where we could deliver more if we had more supply. But we're so really, the constrained supply ends up moderating the working capital. And so we grew our business last quarter quite a bit and grew our ARR. So that utilized a lot of working capital, but we have no concerns about working capital.”

As stated, operating margins are always a point of focus for SMCI on the earnings calls.

Conclusion:

Investing is a sum of calculated bets. AI will continue to be a powerful trend into the foreseeable future and our plan is to position for this. Supermicro is the #2 company for AI-related revenue (as a percentage of revenue), and this is not an easy achievement given the other companies that are gunning for AI-related revenue are juggernauts with billions in cash. However, we are no stranger to the ups/downs of sentiment in the tech sector. Strong companies with perfect earnings reports will selloff, sometimes drastically, and then often power higher. You can expect us to use all the technical analysis tools at our disposal to manage this position: setting stops, hedging at times, layering in more, trimming at the top. We think SMCI is well worth the effort.

Notably with SMCI and all of our positions, what would get us to change our mind is a material change to the margins and cash flow. We respect the FED, we don’t fight the FED. You can look for our post-ER write-up Wed night!

Read our deep-dive analysis on the company here and our past coverage here and here.

Royston Roche Equity Analyst at the I/O Fund contributed to this analysis

Recommended Reading:

  • Q4 Earnings Kickoff Webinar Replay
  • AMD Q3 Pre-Earnings: With Bated Breath for Q4 Commentary
  • Meta Q3 Earnings Update
  • Alphabet: Search Accelerates While Cloud Decelerates
  • TSM Results: Recovery in sight but technicals look weak
  • AEHR Fiscal Q1: More Orders Likely this Fiscal Year
  • Marvell Q2 Earnings: 7% to 14.4% Incoming AI Revenue
  • Nvidia Q2 FY24 Earnings: 226% Q3 Data Center Growth is Bonkers
Posted in AI Stocks, SemiconductorsLeave a Comment on Super Micro Fiscal Q1 Pre-Earnings: AI Marches Onward

AI Could Be Apple’s Next Chapter

Posted on October 18, 2023June 30, 2026 by io-fund
AI Could Be Apple’s Next Chapter

This article was originally published on Forbes on Oct 13, 2023,05:15am EDTForbes Forbes on Oct 13, 2023,05:15am EDT

After Nvidia added $750 billion in value this year on the backs of surging AI chip demand, investors are quickly searching for the next trillion-dollar AI winner. AI is the best investment opportunity of our lifetimes, and although Apple (AAPL) has been relatively overlooked as an AI play, the tech giant could quickly become a force to be reckoned with in the AI space. The reason for this is simple. Apple can bring AI to the consumer’s pocket by the billions, and is rumored to be sitting on one of the best AI models on the market today, with comparable performance to OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Two Billion Devices to Lever AI

Apple’s installed active device base surpassed 2 billion last February and “reached an all-time high in every geographic segment” at the end of the June quarter, according to CFO Luca Maestri. The iPhone’s installed base also “grew to a new all-time high,” and is estimated to have nearly 1.5 billion active devices worldwide, after adding around 500 million active devices since 2019—an 11.4% compound annual growth rate since then.

Active iPhone Users Worldwide Chart

Source: I/O FUND

While installed active devices reached a new record, so did Apple’s subscriber base. CEO Tim Cook noted during Apple’s FQ3 report in August that the company hit an “all-time revenue record in Services” with “over 1 billion paid subscriptions,” which are growing at a double-digit rate. Apple has added more than65 million subscribers in the first half of this fiscal year and more than 300 million subscribers over the past two fiscal years heading into its fiscal Q4.

Apple Paid Subscription Chart

Source: I/O FUND

The opportunity for Apple to capitalize on AI arises from the combination of growth within Apple’s installed device base, along with increased engagement and adoption of paid subscriptions over time. Consumer interest in AI surged earlier in 2023 with ChatGPT garnering over100 million active users and more than 1 billion visits monthly. Apple’s installed base offers the chance to more than 10 times the number of individuals with readily available access to AI.

Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 221% -Click hereClick hereClick here

Services Is Where AI Can Shine

Apple is witnessing a higher contribution from its services segment to both revenues and margins—the segment is approaching a $100 billion annual run rate, accounting for nearly 26% of revenue with a 70.5% gross margin.

In other words, services is contributing 41.1 cents to each dollar of gross profit, up from 34.6 cents just eight quarters ago. The segment has seen its contribution to gross profit increase steadily, rising 46% from 23.7 cents per dollar in FY18 to 34.6 cents per dollar to date in FY23. It is not out of the picture for services to soon contribute 50 cents of each dollar of gross profit as the segment surpasses $100 billion in annual revenue.

Services Segment Contribution to Gross Profit Chart

Source: I/O FUND

The importance of services to Apple’s bottom line cannot be overstated—that 70% gross margin level combined with its nearly $100 billion revenue scale has pulled Apple’s margins higher over the past few years and will likely continue to do so in the future as transacting accounts and paid accounts continue to grow to new all-time highs.

This is exactly where AI will have the most profound impact on Apple, and why the tech giant could emerge as a strong AI contender.

Google and Microsoft demonstrate the revenue potential of AI subscriptions at scale—for Microsoft’s Copilot, a 2.5% take rate of the ~382 million commercial Office 365 users would equate to nearly $3.5 billion in annual revenue, while a 10% take rate would see annual revenue reaching $14 billion, according to Macquarie.

In Apple’s case, it has nearly three times the paid subscription base as Microsoft that it could target with an AI product, via a stand-alone service or in one of its three pre-existing service bundles. Regardless of the route that Apple chooses, there remains billions in revenue potential. Offering a stand-alone AI subscription for $2.99 per month could rake in ~$10.8 billion in annual revenue at a 15% attach rate based on Apple’s more than 2 billion active devices, while boosting the prices of its subscription bundles could by $0.50 per month could add more than $5 billion annually.

Every Thursday at 4:30 pm Eastern, the I/O Fund team holds a webinar for premium members to discuss how to navigate the broad market, as well as various stock entries and exits. We offer trade alerts plus an automated hedging signal. The I/O Fund team is one of the only audited portfolios available to individual investors. Learn more here.Learn more hereLearn more here.

Apple Can Bridge the Gap with Mass-Market Consumer AI

Apple is spending millions of dollars per day in a quest to develop a conversational AI model, potentially for Siri, that would allow iPhone and iPad owners to use voice commands for automating multi-step tasks with the voice assistant. As such, Apple is uniquely positioned to both monetize and implement advanced AI in a mass-market consumer application.

Consumers, especially Millennials, are very willing to adopt and pay for such voice assistants that are as smart and as reliable as a human. According to a PYMNTS survey from April, more than 42% are willing to pay $10 or more per month for an assistant.

Although Apple is tight-lipped about the progress of its AI projects, the so-called Apple GPT chatbot is rumored to be more powerful than Open AI’s GPT 3.5 model, according to The Verge. Apple is spending millions of dollars a day training the large language model Ajax on more than 200 billion parameters.

The project could find life integrated within Siri, given the applications within automating multiple tasks and range of capabilities stemming from image and video recognition.

Apple GPT Projection

Apple's Apple GPT model is rumored to be more powerful than OpenAl's GPT 3.5, as well as Google's LaMDA, Meta's LLaMA and LLaMA 2, and Anthropic's Claude 2 model. – Source: I/O FUND

Apple noted back in 2020 that Siri had more than 25 billion requests made per month, a figure that could easily be increased with a ChatGPT-like chatbot installed across billions of devices. That is how Apple can be the first big stock in consumer driven AI uptake.

On Real Vision, I previously pointed out that “if you take a consumer-facing company like Google,” that they are in a good position because Google doesn’t “have to go out and try to get lots of consumers to adopt something new, consumers will continue to use Search, it’ll just be improved Search; advertisers will continue to use Google, it’ll just be improved ROI.”

For Apple, it’s the same case – it does not have to try to convert millions of users into a paid subscriber in the way that OpenAI does; rather, it could easily integrate an advanced conversational AI model within Siri for example, and quickly convert already-paying subscribers over to those AI services.

Damien Robbins, Equity Analyst at the I/O Fund, contributed to this article

The I/O Fund was early to AI with a 45% allocation in 2023. For more in-depth research from Beth, including 15-page+ deep dives on the 10 stock positions the I/O Fund owns, subscribe here.

Recommended Reading:

  • Apple’s Stock In Focus: More Profitable Than Banks
  • Apple Vs. The FAANGs (Technical Analysis)
  • 5 Soon-to-Be Trends in Artificial Intelligence And Deep Learning
  • Apple Bets On The Emerging Markets Growth Story
Posted in Ai Platforms, AI Stocks, Consumer Tech, MobileLeave a Comment on AI Could Be Apple’s Next Chapter

AI is the Best Investment Opportunity of our Lifetime: Video Interview

Posted on October 6, 2023June 30, 2026 by io-fund
AI is the Best Investment Opportunity of our Lifetime: Video Interview

The I/O Fund was early to publishing stock analysis that stated AI would be an explosive opportunity. Beth went on record to say that Nvidia will surpass the valuation of Apple, and it has been her stance since November 2018 that AI will bring us a new set of FAANGs, one of which will be Nvidia. Since her callout, Nvidia shares have risen nearly 1,000%, with surging AI demand sending data center revenues to a projected $31 billion in FY24, an impressive 58.8% CAGR from 2018’s $1.93 billion.

In January, Beth was on Real Vision’s 3 Ideas and stated it would take World War 3 to get her to sell her Nvidia position. This was a strong statement at the time, yet Nvidia later led a historic 6-month performance for the Nasdaq with over 200% gains in 2023. Real Vision invited Beth Kindig back for a candid interview with Raoul Pal for a one-hour discussion on how to position for AI. Listen here for the full discussion on why AI is the best investment opportunity of our lifetime.here for the full discussion on why AI is the best investment opportunity of our lifetime.

Beth Kindig's interview on RealVision

Watch the full-length 1 hour video on RealVision here.here.

AI’s Potential Impact on The Economy Will Be Unrivaled

The reason that AI will be the best investment opportunity of our lifetime is because of the impact it will have on GDP. As discussed in the 1-hour interview, the potential of AI to revolutionize nearly every sector, boost productivity, reduce costs, and significantly influence GDP is unparalleled. To be exact, AI is estimated to add up to $15.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030, and drive a market 5x the size of tech’s current global spend.

Later, McKinsey highlighted in June that AI’s total economic impact could be as high as $25 trillion combined, when spanning ML, advanced analytics, generative AI and AI-related worker productivity gains.

Beth points out that the contribution to GDP around the world will be “unlike any technology in modern times” and “infinitely higher than something like mobile.” AI is expected to more than double the GDP of developed countries in Europe, Asia, and the United States, and drive worker productivity as much as 35% higher across those regions.

It’s a trend that will be “4-5x larger than the FAANGs,” and one that will result in massive winners.

To watch the full 1-hour video, click here.click here.

Beth explained to Raoul that “given the numbers we have today, because people like to think of AI as a hype, what I would encourage people to realize is that in 2010, mobile was not a hype, and we’re probably more like 2008 or 2009 right now, in terms of where we are with the vintage of AI and where it’s going to. So just keep all that in mind — if you believe that mobile would've been the right way to position, then AI certainly will be because it is so much more massive in terms of its contribution.”

AI GDP contribution chart

Big Tech is Cornering AI, Edging out Startups

In the past, nearly all innovation came from the private markets and smaller teams. There is certainly a lot of innovation in AI still occurring in the private markets, yet AI will not be as democratized as mobile or the internet boom. This is due to the cost of training models, and Big Tech’s 10+ year head start on AI.

Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Microsoft have invested billions into AI development for years and can quickly and effortlessly integrate AI into their established business models. For example, Beth explored in June how AI could drive $100B in revenue for Microsoft by 2027, from OpenAI’s APIs running on Azure, to AI integrations and partnerships via Bing, and the rollout of Copilot, among other drivers.

Beth points out that AI “will be very enterprise driven,” with some consumer overlay, as opposed to mobile’s consumer-driven nature. In that context, “what is really ideal for a stock is if you take a consumer-facing company like Google, and they can inject their AI technology into the ads machine, or Google Search. So they don’t have to go out and try to get lots of consumers to adopt something new, consumers will continue to use Search, it’ll just be improved Search; advertisers will continue to use Google, it’ll just be improved ROI.”

Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 221% – Click hereSign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 221% – Click hereClick here

To watch the full 1-hour video, click here.click here.

Powering nearly every aspect of Big Tech’s AI ambitions is the semiconductor universe, and at the moment, that’s spearheaded by Nvidia’s AI GPUs. Beth has taken the stance for multiple years that “AI will bring us a new set of FAANGs, one of which will be Nvidia,” pointing out five years ago that “when artificial intelligence matures, you can expect data center revenue to be Nvidia’s top revenue segment.” Demand for Nvidia’s GPUs has soared through the roof, with data center revenues projected to triple from FY22’s levels to around $31B in FY24, as Nvidia is reportedly looking to triple shipments of its H100 GPUs from ~550,000 this year to 1.5 million to 2.0 million next year.

Nvidia’s H100 “has now opened up such an ecosystem of software development, that it’s a very special moment in time. People do call it the ‘iPhone moment’” for Nvidia, because of the significant increase in performance offered combined with the transformer engine on the chip. However, with the ‘iPhone moment’ comes an Android – watch the video below to find out who Beth thinks will take second place on AI acceleration. For more in-depth research from Beth, including 15-page deep dives on the 10 stock positions the I/O Fund owns, subscribe heresubscribe here.

To watch the full 1-hour video, click here.click here.

Profiting From AI Takes a Thematic Approach

Beth does not believe in going “all-in” on a thematic approach. Rather, the I/O Fund is quite strict on what companies they add to the portfolio. Simply put, a great company should be disruptive and innovative, but should also be cash efficient and profitable. Criteria for the portfolio is discussed in detail every quarter on the I/O Fund team’s portfolio reviews.

To watch the full 1-hour video, click here.click here.

Some of the key components for I/O Fund portfolio companies include ensuring companies remain on track with their product roadmap, ensuring that they are not overpromising and under-delivering, and not giving any leniency to the company’s financials in terms of weaknesses that may be present in margins or growth.

An example of a company that does not fitdoes not fit the I/O Fund’s portfolio criteria despite being branded as an AI stock is C3.ai (NASDAQ: AI) – shares rallied nearly 34% after topping estimates with its fiscal Q3 results in March, before rising another 34% to $44 at the end of May on product roadmap updates with its Generative AI product release on AWS’ Marketplace.

However, in just the span of 4 months, shares have fallen nearly 50% to $24, as fiscal Q1 results in September highlighted exactly why investors should offer zero leniency for weak financials. From FQ4 to FQ1, revenues remained flat, GAAP gross margins shrunk 10 percentage points to 56%, while GAAP RPO declined by $47M.

This is why thematic investing alone can result in losses – companies must do more than just state they are an AI company to have a place in the portfolio. Their financials must prove they are doing something disruptive, and that they have found true product-market fit.

AI Is Not A Trend To Miss

Per Beth’s interview with Raoul: “we all know that [with] the FAANGs, if you could have invested 10, 15 years ago in the FAANGs, you would have,” because of that multi-trillion-dollar potential of the mobile economy. In 2022, the mobile economy contributed around $5.2 trillion to global GDP, per GSMA, while AI is currently forecast to contribute three to five times that amount over the course of the next decade and beyond. 

While many are quick to say that AI is merely just a ‘buzzword’, those who are in the know were able to get in front of 2023’s big move. AI is not a trend to miss, and as a leading portfolio in AI, the I/O Fund is preparing to capitalize on this once-in-a-lifetime trend.

If you own AI stocks, or are looking to own AI stocks, we encourage you to attend our weekly premium webinars, held every Thursday at 4:30 pm EST. Next week, we will discuss a new AI stock to our site that we think will be hot in 2024 – what our targets are, where we plan to buy, as well as where we plan to take gains. Learn more here.

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Please consult with your financial advisor in regards to any stocks you buy.

Recommended Reading:

  • The Next Market AI Will Disrupt Is Cybersecurity
  • This Next AI Trend Could Be Worth Trillions
  • Beth Kindig Discusses AI Stocks with Tier 1 Media
  • Microsoft – AI Will Help Drive $100 Billion In Revenue By 2027
  • Nvidia Will “Still” Surpass Apple’s Valuation
Posted in Ai Platforms, AI StocksLeave a Comment on AI is the Best Investment Opportunity of our Lifetime: Video Interview

Posts navigation

Older posts
Newer posts

Recent Posts

  • The IPO Glut of 2020: Why Valuations Have Gone Too Far
  • Zoom Discusses Two Important Catalysts In Q1 Earnings
  • Three Risk Management Tools the I/O Fund Offers
  • Micron Is Up 900%. Here’s Why the AI Memory Trade May Still Have Room to Run
  • Credo: Reliability Leader Aggressively Moves into Optics

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018

Categories

  • 5G
  • About
  • Accounting Tips
  • AdTech
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • AI Stocks
  • AI Stocks
  • Analysts
  • Application Monitoring
  • Application Monitoring
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • AR
  • Audit Reports
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Avod
  • Avod
  • Battery Charging
  • Bear Market
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Broad Market Today
  • Bull Market
  • Bull Market
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • China Stocks
  • Cloud
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Platforms
  • Cloud Platforms
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Technology
  • Company
  • Company
  • Console Gaming
  • Console Gaming
  • Console Gaming
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer Tech
  • Corrections
  • Crypto Investment
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center and Processing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Dating
  • Defi
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • E-Commerce
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • ECommerce
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Energy Stocks
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Ethereum
  • Events1
  • Events1
  • Exchange
  • Faq
  • Finance
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Markets
  • FinTech
  • Fundamental Analysis
  • Gambling
  • Gaming
  • Genomics
  • Glossary
  • Green Energy
  • Growth Stocks
  • Growth Stocks
  • Growth Stocks
  • Headsets
  • Headsets
  • Health Tech
  • Hydrogen
  • Identity
  • Identity
  • Identity
  • Inflation
  • Inflation
  • Inflation
  • Internet of Things
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Investing
  • Investing
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Macro Trends
  • Macro Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Media
  • Membership
  • Mining
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Multimedia
  • Music Streaming
  • NVDA | NVIDIA Corporation
  • Performance Updates
  • Pin Content
  • Podcasts
  • Podcasts
  • Podcasts
  • Portfolio
  • Premium Research
  • Press Releases
  • Press Releases
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Reports and Whitepapers
  • Research Services Preview
  • Resources
  • Resources
  • Semiconductor Stocks
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Solar
  • Solar
  • Stock Analysis PDFs
  • Stock Updates
  • Stock Updates (Blogs)
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Tech Podcast
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Technical Analysis
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Testing Equipment
  • Testing Equipment
  • Top Tech Stock News
  • Travel
  • Trends Report
  • Tutorials
  • Uncategorized
  • Updates
  • Updates
  • Updates
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video Footage
  • VR
  • Webinar Alerts
  • Webinar Alerts
  • Webinars
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: iofund by iofund.co.uk.