Regarding the charts below, the vertical tan shades represent time factors. These are inflection points where we have high odds of something significant happening. More times than not, (3/4 of the time), they mark a turning point in the trend. So, what matters is the direction we are trending into these periods. Regarding the vertical lines, black lines represent strong support/resistance, while dark red lines mark very strong support/resistance.
Elliott Wave count are meant to provide context. There is a pattern unfolding in real-time, one of which will play out. By monitoring price levels that are held/broken, it will help us figure out which one is in play
Broad Market
Last week we saw the market in extreme oversold conditions. As a result, we were expecting a short covering rally to target 4040 SPX, which is what we saw. However, what we were not expecting was a 125 point rally in two days that exceeded our target. Furthermore, the structure of the rally is a rather clean 5 wave move, which has added an interesting layer of complication into where this market can go.
As a result, I’m adding an alternative scenario to the larger picture, which we will start game planning for in this report. Before I dive into these scenarios, I want to be clear. Short of the FED starting a new liquidity cycle, which I see very unlikely considering the inflation data, coupled with the bullish posture in various food/energy commodities, I simply do not see the necessary support needed for a new multi-year bull market playing out. Long-term risk (6 months+), we are still quite defensive and will remain this way until new data changes this view. However, intermediate term risk (1-3 months) is quite different. There is now a potential +300 point move that could play out over the coming weeks-months, which we will likely position for, if confirmed.
– Primary (Blue) – we have either topped or are within 200 points away from topping. This will lead to a fresh leg in the bear market with a downward target towards SPX 3000.
– Alternative (Red) – We have just completed the 2nd leg within a larger B wave (bear market rally). This will lead to the final 3rd leg of the bear market rally, which is targeting +4400 SPX.

If we zoom into the structure of the bounce off the October 13th low, you can see on multiple time frames 3 wave moves in all directions. We assumed that the January rally was the C wave, which appeared to collapse into a weak diagonal pattern. However, the 5 wave rally off of last week’s low has opened the door to this alternative scenario potentially playing out. Over the next 2 weeks, I expect one of the 3 scenarios below to be confirmed. This wil define the intermediate-term risk. What will matter most of all will be HOW the market retraces in the coming days – 3 waves down or 5 waves?

If we retrace in 5 waves down, and take out last week’s low, then either blue or green is playing out.
– Blue – we have topped, and will continue to trend down until the selling pressure gives way to a strong trend.
– Green – we bottom before breaking below 3765, then turn back up in a 5 wave pattern. This will imply that we are going to the 4200 region before a bigger top triggers.
If we retrace in 3 waves down, then red will start moving into position.
– Red – The overlapping mess of a market we have experienced since the December top has been part of a very complex B wave pattern. B waves (and 4th waves) are treacherous, as they tend to whipsaw emotions, grind down investment plans and wear down investors. We typically do not see B waves take such a complicated form, but considering that sentiment is in the basement, as well as the resilient credit cycle in the economy (more below), this scenario should be taken seriously.
Let’s zoom in a little more to a 15 minute chart. This will help us set up parameters and expectations for the week.

Note how the 5 wave move off the low started from a slightly lower low than the previous drop. This could easily be an expanded flat correction, which would support the blue/green above. However, because it started from a fresh low, we have to consider red, and the potential for a large push higher before we see a bigger top.
We topped today right into our minor time factor (6-7). We were trending up into it, and so far, the drop is only 3 waves. This can easily morph into a 4th and 5th down, which should be settled tomorrow/Wednesday. If this 3 wave pullback holds, and we push to make another high, the red count will then become my primary, as we set up a buying plan for the following 2ndwave pullback.
Our Updated Game Plan
We currently have about 30% cash and are 100% hedged. If we see this 3 wave drop hold, we will look to remove some of our hedge for a gain. Also, if the odds start favoring the red count, we will look to deploy some of our cash. As of now, ~ 2.5% in NFLX, ~ 2.5% in TSLA, 1.5% in ENPH, and ~10% in QLD once we close our hedge, and the rest in cash. For long-term investors who do not want to be this nimble, nothing has changed. Whether we see a top already in, or one that happens within the next +300 points, we believe that this bear market is not over. This will remain our outlook until we see evidence to the contrary.
Macro
The Liquidity Cycle
The phrase, “wall of worry,” continues to get thrown around in 2023. The new bull market, like all bull markets, is climbing a wall of worry. This phrase was golden in the last 12 year bull cycle, as stocks shrugged off countless events that pundits were certain would end it all – Downgrading US debt, Brexit, Grexit, Global Slowdown, China Collapse (1 and 2), Taper Tantrum, The 2016 Presidential Election, COVID, etc. Nothing serious manifested, as all drops were quickly brought back to new highs, leaving bears in the dust.
However, the one common thread within all of these events that allowed for equities to shrug off the news and continue higher was that we were either in the expansive part of a liquidity cycle (2011, 2015-2016), or the FED started a fresh liquidity cycle (2019, 2020), which saved equities.
How important is the liquidity cycle for stocks? After the COVID collapse, we saw some of the most abysmal economic data on record. Literally, high frequency data was off the chart, and appeared to only be getting worse as we entered a recession. In response, the FOMC started one of the most aggressive liquidity cycles on record. In 2020, stocks went on to have a record year, while economic data continued to shock investors. Without a new liquidity cycle, I simply do not see a new bull market starting up, which is why this is so important to track.
The below chart compares liquidity to the S&P 500 over the last 15 years. When liquidity is being pumped into the economy, stocks are able to shrug off terrible events, even contractions within the economy. On the other hand, when liquidity is being drained, we tend to go through periods of volatility – 2018-2020, 2022-present – until a new liquidity cycle starts back up.

The Credit Cycle
Recessions happen when banks shut the credit window. As the FED increases rates to slow inflation, the cost to buy homes, cars, business expansions, remodels, etc. all go up as well. This is why manufacturing sees a relatively quick reaction to rate increases. Like dominoes, layoffs lead to less spending, which leads to more layoffs. Banks increase their standards for loans, making it more difficult for struggling businesses and consumers to stay afloat. This eventually gives way to a recession, which destroys inflation, allowing the FED to lower rates. We then start a new credit cycle.
The question we have to address today is – how close are we to a recession? Manufacturing is clearly in a deep contraction and has been for several months. However, 85% of our GDP comes from Non-Manufacturing (Services). Unlike Manufacturing, this segment of the economy is continuing to expand.
If we dive down into Non-Manufacturing reading from last week, it did tick down to 55.1, beating the consensus expectation of 54.5 (any reading above 50 marks expansion, while below 50 marks contraction). New orders, which measures future demand, increased to 62.6 from 60.4 a month prior. Within the report, inflation concerns continued to be the predominate theme. This can be seen clearly in the prices index, which ticked down to 65.6. This is clearly off the peak, but still very elevated.
A basic metric that I use is measuring the trend in ISM numbers to their 12 month exponential average (in blue below). The below chart blends the ISM number along with the new orders number. Note how Services is back above this moving average for the first time since later 2021. This is great news for those worried about an imminent recession, as the credit cycle appears to be more resilient than most expect.

This is not only a US story, as recent global PMIs show the exact same scenarios playing out. All major countries are showing a contraction in manufacturing; however, the only major country that is showing a contraction in services is in Brazil. In other words, the likelihood of a H12023 global recession is unlikely. Why this matters for equities is because equities tend to bottom while in the middle of a recession. This further supports the red or green counts from above.
Why This Time is Different
The credit cycle is ready to extend, while the liquidity cycle continues to contract. Without the liquidity cycle, it is only a matter of time before credit, equities and the economy continue to contract into a recession. Why we think it is a pipe dream to assume the FED will pivot and start a new liquidity cycle to support equities? In one word – inflation.
We’ve been conditioned to expect the FED to save equities when they go down too much. Many, including myself, were shocked to see the most dovish FOMC in history pivot into becoming one of the more hawkish in recent history. This is because of how harmful inflation is to an economy. There is a reason that inflation pressures are more important to fix over decreasing asset prices.
Most investors have never experienced inflationary environments, while very few have experienced inflation of this caliber. We have entered a new macro regime where systemic global inflation is at odds with one of the most indebted global economies on record – global debt-to-GDP ratio of 338%.
As inflation builds, the fixed yield on bonds becomes less attractive. So, yields go up until buyers are satisfied with the new fixed yield relative to inflation. This will increase the cost to service debts, which is bad news for countries with a debt-to GDP ratio over 100%. If this cost goes too high, the bond market fails to believe that the debt will ever get paid back, which can cause a fiscal spiral. This is what we saw in England in late 2022, and this is what we want to avoid in Japan in 2023.
Furthermore, while a bear market in equities affects some members of a society, inflation affects all members of a society, especially the middle and lower classes. And, if the 1970s taught us (and the FED) any lesson about inflation, it is that once the genie is out of the bottle, it is very hard to get it back in. So, addressing inflation is the primary concern of this FED. They have stated this time and time again, and we do not believe the story with inflation is over, yet.
The below chart shows the 5 year breakeven rate. This is the difference in yield between the inflation projections 5 years out and the 5 year nominal yield. In other words, it’s a market-based gauge of where inflation will be in 5 years. Since January of this year, the 5 year breakeven is up 60 bps.

This is further backed up by the breakout in the 10 year yield. The bond market is diverging from equities, which will require a resolution.

This makes sense considering that the Services segment of the economy continues to expand in light of an aggressive FED. It also makes sense considering the “Super Core” segment of the economy, which we discussed last week, has been barely affected by the current rate cycle. What concerns me is that the 5 year breakeven is up this much while energy and food prices remain subdued. This, in my opinion, is not being priced into the markets, except maybe the bond market, which is very bearish right now.
The below charts are the price action in crude and gasoline. They are weekly charts, and appear to be consolidating just before a bigger breakout.
Gas

Crude

Furthermore, food prices appear to be setting up a fresh push higher. Cattle prices have been in a sharp uptrend and not far away from making new highs. Anecdotally, most carnivores have probably noticed the increased price of steaks, hamburgers, etc., as a result. This has been offset by wheat prices going down. Wheat appears to be putting in a bottom, as we trend down on decreased momentum, and into a major cycle cluster this week.

So, my concern is where will the breakeven go if energy and food make a new leg higher? What will the odds be that the FED starts a new liquidity cycle if the above futures do breakout? Can the rally ignore a higher terminal rate and continued draining of liquidity from the markets? How likely will the consumer be to increase discretionary spending if we do see another leg higher with inflation, and another leg lower in equities?
We are seeing a resilient credit cycle at odds with a decreasing liquidity cycle. It is my belief that the liquidity cycle is the most important element to justifying a new bull market. Without it, the current uptrend is on shaky ground. The FED has more than enough data without energy and food prices to continue draining liquidity from the system. It has to get inflation from 6.5% down to 2%, and the Services sector is making this goal very difficult with the current rate in place. This is without food and energy prices breaking out.
Hedge
The hedge is trending close to a flipping to a buy. We will likely close some of the hedge for a gain after we see weakness into this week. There has been a stark difference between the signal’s performance in 2023 and my manual performance. We continue to believe the signal, though will drag on returns in choppy markets, will help any that follow it avoid deep draw downs like we saw in 2022. This signal will help us to invest for a shorter time period and still find the necessary protection from another drop – whenever that happens. We plan to close some of our hedge in the coming weeks for a gain, and the remainder when the signal flips.

I/O Fund Portfolio
We are still holding about 30% cash, which we will likely deploy half if the coming pullback is 3 waves. These will be temporary allocations, until the market can prove to us that a new bull cycle is starting.

NVDA
The divergences are quite strong on the larger time frames. However, when you look at the daily chart, note how the Composite Index found support above the moving averages, that are starting to point up. This supports another push higher, but a limited one. No matter what, we still only have 3 waves up off the low, so any breakout should be bought with a stop that increases with price. This is not where a LTBH portfolio goes in.

NFLX
This chart is the most supportive of the OMH red count. A move to $300 will trigger a buy from our end. A push to new highs will also more than confirm NFLX has put in a major low back in May of 2022.

AMD
AMD is not as strong as NFLX. If we do see another leg in the bear market, we will likely see a fresh low here, but not in NVDA. The upper targets are listed as we complete 3 waves up off the October low.

ENPH
This one continues to trade like an energy commodity. If energy breaks out, I expect ENPH to have another stellar year. We will likely add to this position, as its posture is much more bullish than many of the other names we track.

MSFT
This stock is key for me. Some FAANGs have topped – GOOGL, AMZN. MSFT is the 2nd largest weighting in the S&P 500, and the jury is still out on whether it has topped. As of now, it is about 7.5% away from making new highs. Also, this rally is giving a strong sell signal. If we break below last week’s low, then we can see this market get ugly.

Now, if we compare this chart to APPL, you can see more divergences. AAPL is currently 2.5% away from a new high. So, if in the coming (potential) rally, we see AAPL make a new high without MSFT, this is a big warning. But, if MSFT can breakout to new highs with AAPL, this supports the larger red count where we can push towards 4400+ SPX.
AEHR
For AEHR to get another high, it cannot break this channel to the downside. That’s a lot of room to drop, and could set up a great buying opportunity.

TSM
TSM is 12% away from new highs. The same divergences with the FAANGs should show up in semis if/when we do top out in a larger B wave.

TSLA
TSLA could be in a 4th wave that’s targeting $180. This will be one of the places we park cash if we get more confirmation.

MGNI

Crypto
Can we get one more high? The setup is there as long as we hold $20K

In conclusion, I remain in the long-term bear camp based on my technical and macro analysis. I simply do not see a FED chair who is so obviously concerned about his legacy starting up a fresh liquidity cycle in light of the recent inflationary data just released. If energy and food do breakout, this will likely be the catalyst to push the 10 year yield to new highs, and finally align the equity market with the bond market.
However, this does not mean the equity market is seeing something 9 months in advance that I am not. Maybe the recession will be shallow, maybe energy does not breakout and continues lower? Or, maybe sentiment needs to be fully reset before we drop to new lows. This is why I always say, “price is king.” It is the only metric that makes you money, and if it is running counter to a great macro thesis, I will abandon that thesis to follow price.
The set-up is there in the stocks presented for another push, some to new highs and some not. If the red count is confirmed, or looks like it is getting confirmed, we will close some of our hedge (wait for the signal on the rest), and deploy some of our cash for this move. If not, we are hedged and will continue looking down for better buying opportunities.






































































