Skip to content
Logo-main-white.860316a8

I/O Fund

  • Home
  • Free Stock Analysis
  • AI Stocks
  • BEST OF 2025
  • Analysts
  • Nvidia Hub
  • About
    • Case Studies
    • About Us
    • Premium Services
    • Pricing
    • Notable Wins
    • I/O Fund Reviews
    • Media
  • Contact Us

Category: AI Stocks

Fabrinet: EML Constraints Easing, Capacity Expansion Adding >$2.6 Billion Revenue Potential

Posted on April 9, 2026June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Fabrinet is a key player in the optical supply chain, providing advanced and high-precision optical manufacturing services as a contract manufacturer to OEMs, hyperscalers and Nvidia. The company has multiple growth outlets ahead, including its HPC platform ramp with Amazon, the ‘big growth’ with Nvidia on 1.6T and 800G transceivers, along with new product ramps with Ciena and Cisco, its second largest customer behind Nvidia. 

There are a handful of puts and takes to Fabrinet’s story, primarily that its positioning as a contract manufacturer lends to thin margins with limited ability to expand in that regard. Growth in key outlets such as transceivers remains supply constrained and showing minimal sequential growth, though with the expectation that those soon ease. Q3 was also guided to see low single-digit QoQ growth, likely weighed down once again by transceiver constraints on the EML side. 

Looking further ahead, strong demand in 800G and 1.6T transceivers as well as within DCI provide a solid backdrop for continued growth, and the expansion of its HPC program with Amazon or with hyperscalers could represent substantial new revenue streams. Fabrinet also leads in CPO with early revenue now appearing, with the company expected to serve as the primary CPO module manufacturer for Nvidia, while other optical solutions like optical circuit switching could soon layer in. 

Capacity will also not be a problem in future growth, with Fabrinet’s new Building 10 and Pinehurst expansion in Thailand unlocking more than $2.6 billion in revenue potential, or nearly 50% higher than next year’s estimated revenue.  

Brief Product Overview 

Fabrinet provides advanced optical packaging, high-precision optical and electro-optical manufacturing services to OEMs; as management put it: “We're a pure contract manufacturer. We don't have any of our own products. And that's actually a positive for many of our customers. They don't want us to have our own products.” This neutral model with no proprietary products means Fabrinet does not compete with its customers, regardless of where they are positioned in the optical stack. 

Fabrinet also serves as a key optical partner for Nvidia (who generated 27.6% of its FY25 revenue, or ~$944 million), with some of its main contributions said to be for short-reach active optical cables and 800G transceivers for Nvidia’s InfiniBand platforms, as well as optical engine packaging. Fabrinet was also stated as key partner for Nvidia’s upcoming silicon photonics CPO switch platforms during GTC 2025.   

Fabrinet’s manufacturing primarily spans three main component lines: optical communications devices, industrial lasers, and sensors.  

Fabrinet’s optical communication (OC) services include selective switching products such as reconfigurable optical add-drop multiplexers (ROADMs), optical amplifies and modulators for fiber optics. OC also includes transceivers and tunable lasers, active optical cables for high-speed data center interconnect (DCI), and InfiniBand, Ethernet, fiber channel and optical backplane connectivity.  

OC is the core focus of this analysis as we delve deeper into the optics supply chain, as the shift to Nvidia’s Rubin generation and push to bring optics closer to the networking switch are expected to see silicon photonics silicon photonics capture incremental value, even though copper remains relevant and intact at the shortest distances.   

OC is also the core revenue driver for Fabrinet, generating nearly three-quarters of revenue; sensors for automotive is the second-largest product line at roughly 10% of revenue, while industrial lasers are a much smaller contributor at ~4%. 

HPC Segment Ramping for AWS 

Fabrinet’s new ‘HPC’ segment relates to its manufacturing of high-complexity electronic assemblies for hyperscale AI accelerator platforms, and though it is only in its second quarter post-introduction, there are clues showing that HPC could be quite lucrative for long-term growth. Though HPC is currently limited to one customer, AWS, the program is expected to scale to more than $600 million annually, or north of 10% of annual revenue, implying future HPC program wins or expansion can easily and quickly add substantial growth to the top-line.  

Fiscal Q2 marked the second quarter of Fabrinet ramping its HPC program for AWS, which is understood to be for high-complexity printed circuit board assembly (PCBA) likely for Trainium3, with management hinting at a goal of expanding into optical interconnects and other products in the future. Fabrinet also issued warrants allowing Amazon to purchase up to 381,922 shares at $208.48 vesting on certain purchase requirements, though it did not state the duration or scope of the agreement with Amazon.  

Although the program is only in its second quarter of ramping, growth was very strong in Q2, up 455.8% QoQ to $85.6 million. Fabrinet remains confident that the program will continue to experience rapid growth and will be fully ramped over the next two quarters. Management clarified that the program is a “little bit more than halfway” ramped and has a second production line qualified, and we're in the process of qualifying additional lines.” Once these lines ramp, Fabrinet stated that it will be on its way to achieve its full run rate of above $150 million per quarter, to be achieved over the next couple of quarters. 

While management guided for strong sequential growth in the near term as the second and third lines get qualified, they also cautioned not to take Q2’s sequential growth and extrapolate forward linearly: 

“HPC growth, it's not in a straight line because we are dealing with some new products that don't always grow. The growth is a little bit lumpy, I would say. So HPC won't necessarily grow in a straight line. It looks like a nice straight line. But really, we only have 2 data points, 2 quarters of revenue.  

So HPC, we had a nice bump of about $70 million sequentially last quarter. So that's not going to grow in that space. But we do anticipate double-digit growth in that area.” 

Assuming Fabrinet still reaches the full run rate within two quarters but sees a softer Q3, say to the $100 million revenue region (or high-teens QoQ), this would imply a sharper ~50% QoQ increase in Q4. At the full run rate, the program will be a key growth driver, with the roughly $600 million annual run rate representing ~13% of FY26’s estimated revenue and ~11% of FY27’s estimated revenue.  

This is especially important when taking into account all of the facts around the Amazon deal – Fabrinet is not the sole supplier or even the primary, but rather the secondary supplier, with future growth opportunities hinging on its ability to execute and deliver excellent quality and delivery at ‘competitive costs’ (ie, not guaranteed). 

If this first deal is any indication of what initial engagements with new customers could look like, HPC could shape up to be a much larger contributor down the road. However, the main downside is that Fabrinet has said engagement timelines for HPC are long, meaning it may be multiple quarters before new growth arises. 

Transceivers Remain Supply Constrained, but EMLs Easing 

Optical component supply constraints have been impacting Fabrinet’s datacom revenue, which has been essentially flat for the last three quarters, after having peaked at nearly $330 million in Q1 FY25. Revenue in FQ2 was up just 2% QoQ but down (7%) YoY to $278.1 million, primarily due to these shortages, as management noted that demand is very robust and that they are shipping everything they can, including significant volumes to its main customer, understood to be Nvidia.  

Easing shortages should open the doorway for Datacom revenue to begin accelerating through 2026, considering the signals that we are seeing across the optics supply chain pointing to strong demand for 800G and 1.6T transceivers. Fabrinet also sees that as the case, explaining that the “the big growth with NVIDIA is really in front of us on 1.6T and 800G,” meaning quickly resolving EML constraints are a key factor in its ability to reaccelerate Datacom revenue growth. 

Fabrinet had revealed last quarter that they believed they would face another quarter to two of tight supply before constraints start to ease, and commentary this quarter suggests they might soon be seeing the end of the tunnel. Notably, Fabrinet explicitly called out EMLs as the main cause of supply constraints and implied that Nvidia qualified a second supplier during the quarter, meaning its main constraint will likely ease over the coming quarters.  

There was another interesting tidbit from the call that is worth some attention – management explained that they are indifferent to product mix, whether it favors 800G over 1.6T or vice versa. This is important because as a contract manufacturer, Fabrinet benefits from volume, not ASPs, meaning that it will benefit from increasing volume as either 800G or 1.6T are selected. Fabrinet’s growth will remain largely insulated from nuances within the upgrade cycle, such as if some customers take a slower ramp on 1.6T, whereas transceiver suppliers are hammering on 1.6T for revenue and margin uplifts, where a slower ramp will more acutely impact growth.  

Fabrinet also mentioned some future transceiver opportunities, such as building transceivers for merchant vendors and producing directly for hyperscalers, noting that these opportunities would be “quarters away rather than years away” in terms of becoming a meaningful revenue stream. 

DCI to See Faster Growth in Q3  

DCI revenue (now provided as a separate breakout within Telecom) has been steadily increasing over the prior two years, having scaled from a ~$70 million quarterly run rate to $100 million in mid to late fiscal 2025, and now moving higher to the $140 million range.  

Growth was moderate in Q2 at 42% YoY and 2% QoQ with DCI module revenue up 59% YoY, slowing from the 92% YoY and 29% QoQ growth in Q1 as this quarter faced a tougher comp. Although Q3 guidance was somewhat vague, management stated that they expect DCI to “grow faster than we have seen in the past quarters.” Regardless of whether this faster growth comment is applied to YoY or QoQ, or a return to either >90% YoY or >30% QoQ, it could imply DCI revenue approaching around $190 million next quarter. This is likely to be driven by EML capacity coming online, or strong demand for 400ZR products as the 800ZR ramp approaches.   

Looking ahead, management expects demand to be durable as the ramp of 800ZR products approaches, similar to how Ciena noted that 800ZR is ramping later this year; however, management cautioned that growth will not always be in a straight line as challenges may arise from time to time with leading-edge products.  

For a quick note on Ciena, Fabrinet clarified that they started to ramp Ciena’s new system program in Q2, and this was a key driver of Telecom’s strong growth of nearly $81 million of 17% QoQ: “Telecom revenue growth was particularly strong as we started to ramp Ciena's new system program, as well as other new program wins that we're particularly excited about.”  

While Fabrinet did not clarify if Ciena was included in the DCI breakout, Rosenblatt’s Michael Genovese commented that “if you counted that Ciena business where that stuff was going in DCI, you'd find the vast majority of your telecom growth was driven by DCI and then you had a huge sequential DCI quarter. But that's just like kind of a segmenting thing. Any thoughts on that?” 

Seamus Grady, CEO 

“Yes, I think that's pretty accurate. DCI has been very, very strong for us. The growth is not just DCI, but it's predominantly DCI. It's been very good, and it continues to grow and the demand looks to be very, very durable, and it's not just Ciena, it's across multiple customers.” 

Fabrinet Already Seeing CPO Revenue, Multiple Customers Engaged 

Fabrinet was quite bullish on the upcoming opportunities around CPO, with management essentially revealing that they are the leader in CPO, far ahead of competitors and already shipping small amounts. Additionally, Fabrinet is working on separate CPO programs with three different customers, not only Nvidia, though analysts from Rosenblatt believe Fabrinet is well positioned to benefit as “Nvidia's primary transceiver and co-packaged optics module manufacturer.” 

Fabrinet CEO Seamus Grady explained that Fabrinet is “already seeing some CPO revenue, although the amounts are relatively small right now. We're working on co-packaged optics programs with 3 different customers. It's not just 1 customer, Samik, it's actually 3 different customers. And the specific timings on when the revenue would become more material, depends on our customers' road maps and schedules, but we're very excited about CPO. Again, we don't really want to speak on our customers' behalf, but rest assured, we're quite excited and we have several products that we're working on our projects with our customers.”  

For brief clarification on the revenue timing part, Fabrinet will see revenue impacts in line with, or slightly ahead of customer production timelines, meaning that Nvidia’s move for initial production of its Spectrum-X Ethernet switches supporting CPO in late 2026 may be appearing now through the next two quarters, while strong growth is likely to appear in 2027 as CPO volume ramps. Other industry commentary around CPO, such as from Lumentum, points to CPO seeing stronger contributions in 2027 with scale-out shipments beginning, implying CPO could see a strong ramp for Fabrinet into year end and next year from its positioning a few quarters.    

For OCS, details were a bit limited, though Grady noted that Fabrinet is engaged on multiple fronts and reemphasized that growth would depend on customer ramp schedules. Again, Lumentum recently pointed to larger contributions for them from OCS this year, raising revenue forecasts from $100 million to $400 million, implying this could also quickly turn into a key revenue stream for Fabrinet later this year.   

Capacity Expansion Underway, “Building 10” Fully Ready by 2027 and Adding $2.5B in Revenue Potential 

Fabrinet is accelerating its capacity expansion plans, pulling ahead the first portion of its Building 10 in Chonburi, Thailand by six to eight months, while expanding at its Pinehurst facility in Pathum Thani, Thailand to help meet strong demand. Combined, the two facilities add substantial revenue generation capacity of >$2.65 billion annually. Fabrinet also sees very minimal margin headwinds even in the event of a slower ramp stemming from its capex-lean construction abilities.  

Management provided some color on the completion timelines for the new building, with the first 250K square foot portion expected to be ready by June, six to eight months ahead of schedule, and the full factory ready by early 2027.  

Fabrinet revealed at Barclays’ Global Tech Conference in December that Building 10 can add $2.5 billion in revenue at full scale, with estimated capex of around $130 million for the building — simply put, Building 10 has the ability to generate nearly 20X of capex as revenue at full scale. Additionally, Fabrinet sees minimal headwinds from the factory if the ramp is slower than expected, at just 0.15 points to gross margin if it sits completely idle.  

With management also adding in Q2’s call that Pinehurst can support $150 million revenue, dependent on mix, both buildings add $2.65 billion in annual revenue potential. Compared to Fabrinet’s current footprint having room to support up to $4.8 billion in revenue (slightly above its current $4.5 billion run rate), the two buildings offer >50% upside in revenue capacity, implying that Fabrinet could support approximately $7.3 billion once is finished, or multiple years of runway. Additionally, the extensive capacity in Thailand serves as a key-value add to customers, as Fabrinet benefits from lower labor costs, thus giving them an ability pass margins on to key customers such as Nvidia and AWS. 

Financials  

FQ2 Revenue Grew by 36%  

Fabrinet’s Q2 FY2026 revenue ending December grew by 35.9% YoY and 15.8% QoQ  to a record $1.13 billion, beating estimates by 5.2%. Revenue growth accelerated by 14.3 percentage points from 21.6% YoY and 7.5% QoQ growth in the previous quarter. It was the fastest YoY growth since the company’s public listing in 2010 and was primarily driven by the strong growth in the Telecom and High-Performance Computing (HPC) revenue.   

Management has guided FQ3 revenue in the range of $1.15 billion to $1.20 billion, implying a YoY growth of 34.8% and 3.7% QoQ. For some detail on where growth is coming from, management explained that “within telecom, we anticipate that DCI is going to grow faster than we have seen in the past quarters. So that strength continues into our third quarter, and we also anticipate datacom to growth. So that's the color that we can provide at this stage. And automotive will probably be down in a similar way as it has been in the prior quarter.” 

Analysts expect strong growth to continue and FQ4 revenue is expected to grow by 36.9% YoY to $1.24 billion. 

The company’s FY2026 revenue ending June is expected to grow by 32.7% YoY to $4.54 billion and will then moderate to 18% YoY growth to $5.35 billion for FY2027 and 14.5% YoY to $6.13 billion for FY2028.  

Revenue by Product Category  

Optical Communications Revenue Grew by 29%  

Fabrinet’s FQ2 Optical Communications revenue grew by 29% YoY and 11% QoQ to $832.6 million. Revenue growth accelerated by 10 percentage points from 19% YoY and 8% QoQ growth in the previous quarter. 

Within optical communications, telecom FQ2 revenue grew by 59% YoY and 17% QoQ to a record $554.4 million. The telecom revenue was up 59% YoY and 15% QoQ in the previous quarter. The strong telecom revenue growth was primarily due to early ramp of Ciena’s systems program and other new program wins. Management expects telecom revenue to grow sequentially in the next quarter.  

Within telecom, Data Center Interconnect (DCI) revenue grew by 42% YoY and 3% QoQ to $142.2 million. Revenue growth decelerated from 92% YoY and 29% QoQ growth in the previous quarter.  

Datacom FQ2 revenue was down (7%) YoY and up 2% QoQ to $278.1 million compared to a decline of (17%) YoY and (1%) QoQ in the previous quarter. Management expects sequential revenue growth in the next quarter, while Q2 growth was impacted due to component shortages.  

Non-Optical Communications Revenue Grew by 61%  

Fabrinet’s FQ2 Non-Optical Communications revenue grew by 61% YoY and 30% QoQ to $300.3 million. Revenue growth accelerated by 31 percentage points from 30% YoY and 5% QoQ growth in the previous quarter. 

The strong growth was primarily driven by high-performance computing (HPC) products. HPC revenue in FQ2 came at $85.6 million and was up 456% QoQ from $15.4 million in the previous quarter. FQ1 was the first quarter in which the company broke out this category. 

FQ2 automotive revenue grew by 12% YoY and down (4%) QoQ to $117 million. Management expects another modest sequential decline in automotive revenue in the next quarter.  

Industrial Laser FQ2 revenue grew by 10% YoY and 4% QoQ to $41.4 million compared to 12% YoY and flat QoQ in the previous quarter.  

The other revenue grew by 26% YoY to $56.4 million compared to 36% YoY in the previous quarter.  

Margins  

The company’s gross margins and operating margins improved in FQ2 despite the foreign exchange headwinds.  

  • FQ2 gross profits grew by 36.5% YoY to $137.68 million. Gross profit margin showed an improvement of 10 basis points YoY and 30 basis points QoQ to 12.2% despite the foreign exchange headwinds. Adjusted gross profit margin was flat YoY and up 10 basis points QoQ to 12.4%.  
  • FQ2 operating income grew by 43.7% YoY to $114.4 million. Operating margin improved 60 basis points YoY and 50 basis points QoQ to 10.1% primarily driven by operating leverage. Adjusted operating margin improved by 30 basis points YoY and QoQ to 10.9%.  
  • FQ2 net income was $112.6 million or 9.9% of revenue compared to $86.6 million or 10.4% of revenue in the same period last year. The company reported a foreign exchange loss of $3.2 million compared to a gain of $4.0 million in the same period last year. Adjusted net income was $121.6 million or 10.7% of revenue compared to $95.1 million or 11.4% of revenue in the same period last year. 

FQ2 Adjusted EPS Grew by 29%  

The company’s FQ2 GAAP EPS grew by 30.7% YoY to $3.11, beating estimates by 3.7%. The adjusted EPS grew by 28.7% YoY to $3.36, beating estimates by 3.4%.  

Analysts expect strong growth to continue and expect adjusted EPS to grow by 40.7% YoY to $3.55 for FQ3 and 41.8% YoY to $3.76 for FQ4. The company’s FY2026 ending June adjusted EPS is expected to grow 33.5% YoY to $13.58 and FY2027 adjusted EPS is expected to grow 20% YoY to $16.29. 

Cash Flow and Balance Sheet  

The company’s cash flows have been weak in FQ2 due to higher working capital and increase in capex.  

  • FQ2 operating cash flow was $46.26 million or 4.1% of revenue compared to $115.9 million or 13.9% of revenue in the same period last year. It was lower due to higher working capital.  
  • FQ2 free cash outflow was ($5.3 million) or (0.5%) of revenue compared to $94 million or 11.3% of revenue in the same period last year. It was down due to lower operating cash flows and the increase in capex. The capex increased by 135.7% YoY to $51.6 million due to the expansion of capacity to support the future growth.   
  • Cash and short-term investments were $960.8 million and no debt at the end of the December quarter compared to $968.8 million and no debt at the end of the previous quarter.   
  • Inventories grew by 63.3% YoY and 10.6% QoQ to $798.9 million to support the future growth.   

Conclusion 

Fabrinet sees multiple different outlets to growth from 800G and 1.6T transceivers with Nvidia, the continued ramp at Amazon, the upcoming ramp of 800ZR modules for data center interconnect and new platforms with Ciena and Cisco. Fabrinet is also leading in CPO and shipping small amounts now, with analysts expecting the company to be a key beneficiary as Nvidia’s main CPO module manufacturer, with two other customers engaged as well.  

Revenue growth is expected to remain around 35% to 37% in fiscal Q3 and Q4, before decelerating to the low 30% range in early 2027. The company’s new Building 10 will unlock significant revenue generation potential and open the door for growth to remain strong, as long as demand does. However, as a pure-play contract manufacturer with no original products, Fabrinet fundamentally sees thinner margins and soft cash flows, with little power to materially increase either of those two fundamental aspects. Despite this, the bottom line remains rather defensible with earnings expected to grow nearly 34% to $13.58 this year.

Damien Robbins, Equity Analyst at I/O Fund contributed to this analysis.

Every Thursday at 4:30 pm Eastern, the I/O Fund team holds a webinar for premium members to discuss how to navigate the broad market, as well as various stock and crypto entries and exits. Beth Kindig offers weekly deep dives including lesser-known cryptocurrencies and AI stocks, plus the team offers trade alerts. The I/O Fund team is one of the only audited portfolios available to individual investors. If you’d like to subscribe to the Advanced Market Signals plan, email us at premium@io-fund.com. broad market, as well as various stock and crypto entries and exits. Beth Kindig offers weekly deep dives including lesser-known cryptocurrencies and AI stocks, plus the team offers trade alerts. The I/O Fund team is one of the only audited portfolios available to individual investors. If you’d like to subscribe to the Advanced Market Signals plan, email us at premium@io-fund.compremium@io-fund.com.

Please note: The I/O Fund conducts research and draws conclusions for the Fund’s positions. We then share that information with our readers. This is not a guarantee of a stock’s performance. Please consult your personal financial advisor before buying any stock in the companies mentioned in this analysis.

Recommended Reading:

  • Western Digital: Visibility Extends Through 2028, Catching up to Seagate on Density
  • Ciena: Benefitting from Data Center Scale Across Demand
  • Seagate: Slow QoQ Data Center Growth, 2027 Capacity Under Discussions
  • Monolithic Power: Strong AI Tailwinds to Drive 50% Enterprise Data Segment Growth in FY26
Posted in AI Stocks, SupplychainLeave a Comment on Fabrinet: EML Constraints Easing, Capacity Expansion Adding >$2.6 Billion Revenue Potential

Western Digital: Visibility Extends Through 2028, Catching up to Seagate on Density 

Posted on March 27, 2026June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Data is the fuel for training and inference as it enables stronger models and better inference results. As more data is generated and the value of data increases, the demand for storing data is also increasing quickly.  

There are a few ways that Western Digital can awaken an age-old industry to meet the demands of hyperscalers. The first is to increase areal density from 32TB to eventually 100TB as we end the decade. By packing more capacity into the same footprint, Western Digital delivers improved economics to alleviate surging capex. The company’s UltraSMR-enabled JBOD platforms offer TB per drive, lower cost per TB and lower power (and space) per TB, delivering not only increased capacity but also lower total cost of ownership.  

The company seeks to work with a larger customer base beyond hyperscalers by not just saying “go figure out SMR” on your own to enterprises. SMR stands for shingled magnetic recording (more on this below). There are barriers to adoption for SMR as it’s complex to integrate and can have unpredictable performance at times. Western Digital is planning for when AI broadens beyond hyperscalers by offering a validated JBOD platform that tests and tunes UltraSMR, offers predictability through controlled reference architecture, and that is also quick to deploy.  

When translating UltraSMR’s benefits in investor terms, management states it offers a 20% capacity lift over CMR (conventional magnetic recording) and a 10% capacity uplift over industry standard SMR. The UltraSMR solution is software-based, thus it’s “very accretive” from a margin standpoint. Last quarter, there was a 50% mix on UltraSMR with expectations this will increase as the company’s top three customers are onboard with UltraSMR drives today and another two to three are moving toward adopting UltraSMR. 

Looking beyond the recording format, HAMR is an important catalyst for Western Digital as it’s a new write technology that uses a tiny laser to briefly heat the disk surface to write onto higher-stability media at much higher densities. This means WDC can pack more data onto the same drive size to deliver higher capacity. The step-function upgrade to increase capacity is a key element to Western Digital’s future product road map. Overall, HAMR is a primary capacity lever that will lead to 100TB hard drives along with combining higher bits-per-platter and higher platter count.  

The analysis below is dense at times, yet a necessary step to discussing a stock that has seen returns of 591% over the past year.  

Brief Product Overview  

Multimodal datasets are among the largest drivers of incremental storage demand. As inference and physical AI scale, the low-cost and high-density of HDD economics are hard to beat. Video is a data hog that and even modest growth here from multimodal AI can create what’s called “data exhaust.”  

As you'll see below, HDD is the lowest cost per TB for bulk storage. As inference requires more exabytes to be stored, HDDs offer an advantage in that storage tier. In fact, Western Digital’s management team foresees a CAGR of 25%+ over the next 5 years with HDD representing “80% of the storage media that deployed within a hyperscale environment.” 

UltraSMR and ePMR   

To answer this incoming demand, Western Digital’s ePMR tech (energy-assisted Perpendicular MR) tech adds electrical currents to the write head to improve density and write smaller bits. This increase in areal density allows more data to be stored in smaller spaces, helping drive down costs per TB and improve TCO for customers. ePMR is a tried-and-true tech, with WDC noting that it has been the ‘workhorse of the industry’ for the last decade.  

WDC is currently shipping its ePMR-based drives in 26TB CMR (conventional magnetic recording) and 32TB UltraSMR (ultra shingled magnetic recording) configurations. It is also scaling to the world’s first 40TB UltraSMR later this year, a new product addition to its portfolio and a capacity that was previously thought to be impossible to reach with ePMR.  

UltraSMR also features technological and read channel optimizations that boost HDD capacity by up to 18% versus traditional CMR drives. A key enabler is Western Digital’s OptiNAND architecture, which integrates embedded NAND devices, enabling multiple active write zones and increasing track density per disk. WDC says its UltraSMR drives offer among the highest capacities per drive for data-intensive workloads, and consume as little as 5.5 watts of power when ideal, driving TCO lower. The UltraSMR drivers are also available in WDC’s JBOD hybrid storage platforms, integrating 60 to 102 drivers to offer up to 3.26PB of storage capacity. 

HAMR 

WDC is also moving into heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) to scale to higher capacity drives, as ePMR tech is reaching its physical limits in areal density. This refers to how many bits can be packed onto each square inch of disk platter (where data is stored).  

Thus, future capacity gains must come from shrinking bit sizes further, which can be achieved via HAMR. HAMR uses a laser diode to heat a microscopic spot on the disk, enabling polarity of a single bit to be flipped to allow data to be written. This allows for substantial areal density gains, moving from <3 TB per platter under the current UltraSMR drives to up to  ~10TB per platter by the end of the decade.  

WDC acknowledges that its ePMR roadmap can extend up to 60TB, but after that, the shift to HAMR is all but inevitable in order to progress towards 100TB capacities and beyond.

Source: WDC 

WDC is harnessing its patented laser technology to not only reach 100TB drives over the next few years, but scale even further by adding more platters to drives:  

“So for the last 6 years, we've been working on our own patented laser technology. It solves for those 3 problems. By emitting more light, harnessing more of that light into the recording technology, we will increase the aerial density of the HAMR platters from 4 terabytes all the way to 10 terabytes by 2028 per platter. We have 11 platters. It's one of the reasons I'm confident about 100 terabyte HAMR drives by 2029. This technology is not theoretical. It's actually already in the labs. 

We've watched it do in the recording. The other part of it, as you can see from the micrograph, they're shorter. So it allows us to add yet more capacity per drive by packing up to 14 platters into the same 3.5-inch form factor. 10 terabytes, 14 platters, that sounds like 140 terabytes.” 

Accelerating ePMR and HAMR Roadmap 

WDC is accelerating its ePMR and HAMR roadmaps, noting that ePMR shipments are growing double-digits sequentially next quarter. HAMR qualification timelines are also accelerating by six months. 

Management explained in fiscal Q2’s call that ePMR shipments reached more than 3.5 million units, while starting qualification of both its upcoming HAMR and next-gen ePMR drives at two different hyperscaler customers. ePMR shipments were guided to reach closer to 4 million in fiscal Q3, or growth of more than 14% QoQ.  

On HAMR, WDC stated that they pulled forward qualification and started in February with one hyperscaler, with another expected to be initiated relatively soon. Management emphasized at its Investor Day in February that they are “so confident in our road map for HAMR. From last year, we said back in the '27 for the ramp, we pulled it in by 6 months. So it's ramping in the first half of 2027.”  

Inference as an HDD Driver 

We recently covered discussions over the role of SSDs in ‘warm’ storage and Nvidia’s upcoming Inference Context Memory Storage platform in our SanDisk analysis in detail. Simply put, Nvidia is essentially proposing SSDs to take a more central role in the ‘warm’ tier where HDDs sits – what Western Digital and competitor Seagate consider ‘nearline’, where data does not have to be accessed instantaneously but must remain readily available.  

We covered Seagate’s response to this proposal in our analysis, with executives believing there ultimately will not be much change to storage architectures with HDDs remaining critical from a TCO perspective to handle the massive volume of data generated by AI applications. Western Digital mirrored this view, explaining that Nvidia’s new initiative will likely at its core accelerate the growth of volume generated, which means HDDs will remain critical for AI storage requirements – management expects HDDs to still account for 80% of storage solutions deployed by hyperscalers over the next five years. 

However, management also pushed back on the economics of utilizing quad-level cell (QLC) SSDs for AI storage workloads, emphasizing that QLCs offer 10% of performance of HDDs for 10X the cost: 

“This performance has led some customers to think about using QLC flash to provide that performance in addition to hard drives. It's very attractive because — but QLC has a problem when the data is constantly moving as it does in the AI workloads and in the cloud workloads. QLC wears out. And that means you have to make a lot of changes in your software, so it doesn't wear out.  

Otherwise, you end up with silent data corruption. And that is just as scary as it sounds. Hard drives, on the other hand, just don't. They don't wear out. They'll operate for years without wear out and customers like that and it simplifies their code. The other reason to consider QLC flash is that the headline performance of a QLC drive is 6 gigabytes per second. That's way more than the 200 to 250 megabytes per second of a hard drive. But that's a headline number. It's only true when that drive, that QLC drive is attached directly to the GPU with a great big bus. In the real world, in object stores deployed in massive scale, that's not how it's done. Hard drives and QLC drives are connected to the network via a thing called the SAE interface.  

It's a thin pipe that takes data from the drive to the network. It can only support 530 megabytes per second. So customers would get less than 10% of the performance of QLC for 10x the cost of a hard drive. Do you think that's a good deal? I don't now or as a customer.” 

WDC also commented on more specific inference-based HDD demand drivers, such as multi-modal models requiring significantly large data sets to store queries and prompts, video generation, as well as autonomous vehicles and robotics needing extensive data sets to function in real-world situations. All summed up, WDC believes that inference and these upcoming AI applications will drive storage exabyte demand at a >25% CAGR over the next five years, providing a solid foundation for long-term revenue growth as HAMR unlocks a path to higher capacity drives.  

There is one risk with this, in that there will still likely be use cases and applications where customers use a higher mix of SSDs. HDDs offer the lowest-cost per terabyte, ideal for “big data” storage, backups and large AI datasets. However, solid state drives (SSDs), which store data on flash memory chips, are far faster and lower-latency but at a higher cost per terabyte. This means leveraging a mix of HDDs and SSDs is a popular choice, and some AI workloads prioritizing latency may take a higher mix of SSDs.  

High Bandwidth HDD Design and Power-Optimized HDDs 

At its recent Innovation Day, Western Digital shared more information on its product roadmap and technological innovations driving its path to 100TB capacity. WDC is not seeking just capacity gains but also performance gains with high-bandwidth HDD design. This is especially important as throughput (data transfer speeds) must continue to scale alongside capacity to prevent performance bottlenecks. 

This has not been the case over the last several years. WDC explains that since 2017, CMR HDD capacities have increased by 116%, from its 12TB Ultrastar to 26TB, yet maximum sequential throughput only increased 18%, from 255MB/s to 302MB/s. This is critical as a lack of throughput gains will make HDDs less suitable for bandwidth-intensive AI workloads despite strong capacity gains.  

WDC is aiming to boost performance and throughput via two innovations, High Bandwidth Drive (HBDT) and Dual Pivot design technologies. Put simply, WDC is working towards delivering NAND flash-similar performance and throughput but with HDD cost and TCO economics.  

WDC says that its HBDT will enable simultaneous read and write from multiple heads on multiple tracks, which up until now has been done on a single track at a time. Currently, HBDT is able to access two tracks simultaneously, though WDC believes it can ultimately scale to four and eight tracks simultaneously. Under two tracks, WDC says sequential throughput will double and will scale further as HBDT innovation progresses towards eight tracks at once. Importantly, HBDT is already in validation with customers. 

Dual Pivot tech (DPT) unlocks further performance gains by adding a second independent actuator on a separate pivot. Similar to how read and write were previously done on a single track at a time, HDDs have been limited by having one single actuator containing the read-write heads. With DPT, a second actuator is added on the opposite end of the drive, allowing for independent seeking between the two heads.  

This is the main difference between DPT and previous dual actuator drives. Previous drives had to remove on disk to make space for the second actuator to boost performance, sacrificing capacity, whereas with DPT and the placement of the second actuator, WDC can reduce spacing between disks, and boost capacity and performance at the same time. DPT remains in the lab for testing and is expected to be available in 2028. 

Combining both technologies is expected to drive significant performance and throughput gains while on the path to >100TB capacity. WDC states that “two-track HBDT plus dual pivot is projected to increase throughput from today’s 300MB/s to approximately 1.2GB/s, a 4x increase.” This would mean that a 100TB drive would have similar throughput and performance as the currently-available 26TB drives, preserving HDD performance and cost economics. WDC adds that eight-track HBDT and DPT could theoretically increase throughput to 4.8GB/s, another 4x increase from two-track and 16x versus today.   

Here’s how management explained this increase in performance, and this quote provides some perspective as to why demand may be high for drives integrating these technologies, as it can seamlessly integrate into existing infrastructure: 

The thing [customers] really love about this is that we can go to 4, 6 and 8x the performance. It is scalable. By the time we get to 100 terabytes, we could be 8x the performance of today's drives. We already have the technology to do it, and we're developing it, so we're ready for when customers are ready for it. We'll introduce this capability at the 50-terabyte mark to meet the customers' demand so that they are ready for us to consume and take advantage of all this performance. … 

This design will fit in an existing customer chassis with that change. It can be made on the same manufacturing lines. And they just see more performance. So customers are really excited by this. double the transactions smoothly for customers. … Dual-pivot technology helps customers focus their software effort on improving more performance for AI versus having to deal with how the hard drives are working. And we'll introduce this at the 60-terabyte mark. … 

My biggest problem is finding them enough material so they can start testing. Dual pivot technology will be in their hands in late '27 and '28. So all the performance that the customer's hardware can support their existing boxes, their existing software, their existing networks without having — can be delivered from these drives with the capacity that we are building without having to use QLC. We deliver performance 10x cheaper than QLC can.” 

Management also shed more light on software optimizations and how this will also accelerate deployment timelines for upcoming tech. WDC explained that the “shortcut is a simple, open API that allows customers to integrate that API to their existing file system, their existing object store,” that will be available on flash and extending to all HDDs scaling to 100TB. This will provide faster qualification and faster time to production, with this becoming available in 2027. 

WDC is also working on power-optimized HDDs, aiming to lower power consumption by up to 20% and boost capacity with minimal trade-offs on performance. The lower power consumption not only will offer a lower TCO, but also make these HDDs more attractive from a hyperscaler perspective by saving more power that can be allocated towards more GPUs.  

WDC says that by spinning the drive slower, “we can reduce the power by 20%, but we only trade 5% to 10% of the sequential I/O [input output operations], not something that the customers have seen before or even thought was possible.” This also will add ~10% more capacity, or 10TB for a 100TB drive, or increasing capacity inside the same 3.5 inch form factor without changing the drive’s power profile. WDC adds that this lower power consumption is optimal for cold data, or data that needs to be accessed within seconds for AI inference, helping enable AI data storage at scale. 

Multiple Margin Levers to Pull 

WDC outlined multiple different margin levers at its disposal, from strong yields with its ePMR products to increasing mix of UltraSMR drivers and soon the HAMR ramp. WDC has seen strong margin expansion, with Q2 gross margins up nearly 8 points YoY and operating margin following suit with a nearly 7 point YoY expansion. Perhaps most importantly, WDC expects to drive further gross margin expansion over the next couple of quarters and beyond, due to these levers.  

Management explained that yields for ePMR products are in the low-90% range, noting that “as we get yields up, cost continues to decline. As the UltraSMR mix goes up within those new products as well, that's also going to be a driver of cost down as well.” For context, UltraSMR drives now account for 50% mix in its nearline portfolio, with WDC’s top three customers onboarded with two to three other major customers likely moving to adopt the drives soon. This is expected to drive an increase in UltraSMR mix over the coming quarters and provide solid gross margin tailwinds. HAMR will be another margin lever in play once these drives begin to ramp, as WDC expects its HAMR products to be neutral or accretive to gross margins. 

Touching on the cost front, WDC explained that costs per terabyte were down around (10%) YoY in the quarter, which, combined with a 2-3% increase in ASP, provides room for solid margin expansion. This also pertains to higher capacity drives, which management explained have a cost benefit as well, which likely see lower unit costs, similar to Seagate.  

Analysts questioned about incremental gross margins considering the combined levers WDC has, with management explaining that they are currently running at a 75% incremental margin: 

“On the gross margin line, the guidance that you're giving for 47% to 48%, I guess the back of the envelope math would suggest that you're maintaining what looks to be like a 70%, maybe 75% incremental margin flow-through. So, I guess, my question is, how do you think about the durability of that incremental margin? 

EVP and CFO, Kris SennesaelEVP and CFO, Kris Sennesael 

We delivered 46.1% gross margin, up 220 basis points quarter-over-quarter, up 770 basis points year-over-year. And we are guiding to 47%, 48%, so 47.5% at the midpoint, which is up 740 basis points on a year-over-year basis. And, Aaron, I think your math is working. The incremental gross margin is on or about 75%, depending on how you look at it on a year-over-year basis or a quarter-over-quarter basis. So I've stated before, I'm very comfortable with an incremental gross margin higher than 50% and definitely 75% is higher than 50%. 

I mean in gross margins, there's two sides to the equation. On one hand, you have pricing environment. On the other hand, you have the cost environment. In pricing, I've talked about that before. We see a stable pricing environment with prices on a price per terabyte, kind of, flattish to slightly up. Actually, last quarter, it was up 2%, 3% on an ASP per terabyte basis. So that clearly demonstrate the value that we continue to deliver to our customers. 

And on the cost front, the teams continue to execute really well. We continue to upshift our customers to higher capacity drives, which gives us a cost benefit. And then there is great execution as well on driving down the cost in our manufacturing assets as well as throughout the supply chain. And when you look at it last quarter, the cost per terabyte was coming down on or about 10% on a year-over-year basis. And so when you put this all together, we continue to drive further gross margin expansion. And we believe in the next couple of quarters and beyond, we will continue to be able to do that.” 

What the incremental margin means is that for every dollar of revenue that WDC adds compared to the prior quarter, 75% of that flows through to gross margin – WDC delivered a $199 million QoQ increase in revenue this quarter, with $153 million of that flowing to gross profit. Looking ahead, if WDC can maintain this and deliver >$200 million QoQ growth throughout CY26 (as current estimates suggest), it could exit the year with margins above 50%. 

Visibility through 2027-2028 at Top Customers, Pricing is Stable 

WDC has already signed firm orders through calendar 2026 with its top seven customers, though it has visibility into demand extending out into 2028. Management explained that they have ‘robust’ agreements with three of its top five customers, with two of these covering calendar 2028 and one extending through calendar 2028, with these LTAs including both volume and price conditions.  

Analysts asked questions about WDC’s long-term agreements and what the economics of these new orders would look like. WDC revealed that they do contain conditions for volume and pricing, but added quite an important caveat at its Investor Day – hyperscalers want ‘predictable’ pricing, in sharp contrast to rapidly rising (and fluctuating) SSD prices. This means that upcoming contracts will likely have set price escalators so hyperscalers do not get exposed to rapidly changing memory cost structures: 

Irving, just given the tightness of the HDD market and kind of the significant inflation that NAND is going through right now, can you maybe just talk about maybe your patience in being able to sign purchase orders further into calendar '27 to extract better economics just relative to maybe how you were approaching signing POs last year? Is that making any difference in the economics you're able to extract?  

CEO Irving Tan 

As we highlighted, we're pretty much sold out for calendar year '26. We have firm [purchase orders] with our top 7 customers. And we've also established LTAs with two of them for calendar year '27 and one of them for calendar year '28. Obviously, these LTAs have a combination of volume of exabytes and price. And in relation to pricing, I think first, it's important to recognize [that] there's actually a structural shift in the value that we deliver to them, especially in the impact that we have to their total cost of ownership as the business moves more and more towards inference where monetization is happening.  

So, in this case, the pricing that we've provided there reflects the value that we're delivering to them. And so as Kris mentioned, we continue to see going forward a stable pricing environment that gives us an opportunity to continue to extract more value as we deliver both better TCO value to our customers and to better support their supply-demand needs as well through higher capacity drives. 

This ties in to comments from Investor Day, where management confirmed that they want to ensure there is a fair value exchange between capacity/performance and pricing, noting that the goal is to deliver “predictable pricing” as hyperscalers are concerned about “high volatility of some tiers of the storage space,” referring to the strong QoQ growth in enterprise SSD prices. 

Management also offered some more insights onto pricing trends through 2026, noting that FQ2 had seen stable prices with ASP per terabyte up 2-3%, while projecting mid-to-high single digit YoY ASP growth through the year and remaining stable into 2027: 

“If I look at calendar year 2026, 4 quarters of calendar year '26, I do expect ASP per terabyte to go up mid- to high single digits year-over-year for all 4 quarters, mid- to high single digits year-over-year for '26. And then beyond '26, I expect us to continue to operate in what I call a stable pricing environment, of course, from the higher level that we established in '26.” 

Battling Head to Head with Seagate on HAMR, but Expects to Lead 

It’s safe to say that WDC faces fierce competition with Seagate in the HDD space on both exabyte shipments and on the tech front. WDC exhibits a fair lead in exabytes, shipping 192 nearline exabytes in the quarter versus Seagate’s 165 exabytes. However, Seagate current is ahead when it comes to ramping HAMR drives. 

For an apple-to-apple comparison to Seagate, WDC’s first HAMR products are expected to launch with capacities from 40-44TB, which aligns with Seagate’s Mozaic4+ platform also offering up to 44TB, as both feature 4TB capacity per platter. The key difference is that Seagate’s Mozaic4+ is now shipping to two hyperscalers and ramping through the rest of the year, representing a three quarter head start over WDC in the first half of 2027. 

However, Western Digital expects to quickly take the lead in HAMR-drive capacity, with management confident in achieving 100TB+ products as early as 2029. This goes back to our discussion on the HAMr under the product overview, with WDC aiming to reach 10 TB per platter by 2028 to enable shipping 100TB HAMR drives by 2029.  

One reason that WDC is able to move so fast at scaling capacity is that it begins qualification processes at hyperscalers when introducing new hardware into the labs, cutting ramp timelines by months: “Together with our customers, we started to introduce the hardware into our labs and the qualification of the hyperscaler software so that we can start the qualification process while we're still developing the drive.  

That cuts out months from a qualification process. So by the time we're ready for volume manufacturing, the drive is ready to ramp. As Irving said earlier, we've ramped up our latest generation of drives very quickly. That's one of the reasons. The other part with rapid generation of more capacity points, customers will have a lot of qualifications. So instead of qualifying every single capacity point, they qualify one set of capacity point, let's say, 36 to 41 terabytes, and we will just ship them more capacity as we make it available. One qualification, many capacity points.  

And the next one is going to be at 42 to 56 and so on. So that innovation, not just in the drive design, but also in the processes we do gets us faster time to capacity in customers' hands in their fleets where they need it the most. So putting it all together, our HAMR capacity goes from 40 terabytes to 100 terabytes by 2029.” 

On the flip side, Seagate has that capacity penciled in for the early part of next decade, noting in Q2’s call that its Mozaic3+ and Mozaic4+ “developments align with our long-term areal density road map that extends to 10 terabytes per disk, which we expect to deliver early in the next decade.” This shift will be key to watch, as it suggest that Seagate could soon lag WDC’s capacity roadmap by several years.  

In plain terms, WDC could have a significant capacity and TCO advantage by 2029 if it can realize these density targets, making it a more attractive solution for AI data storage needs 

Financials 

Revenue Growth Accelerating to 40%, Potentially Peak Growth 

WDC delivered fiscal Q2 revenue of $3.02 billion, up 25% YoY and 7% QoQ, although this marked a deceleration from 27% YoY and 8% QoQ in Q1. Management said this was driven by strong demand for its higher capacity nearline drives.  

Exabyte shipments rose 22% YoY and 5% QoQ to 215 EB, including 103 EB from its ePMR product line on 3.5 million shipments. Revenues are closely correlated with EB shipments with pricing contributing only a 2-3 points of upside.  

Looking ahead to FQ3, WDC guided for revenue of $3.2 billion at midpoint, representing an acceleration to 40% YoY growth, up 15 points, while QoQ growth would tick slightly higher to 6.1%. Current estimates suggest WDC will close out the fiscal year with $3.44 billion in revenue in Q4, up 32% YoY and another 7.5% QoQ. At present, this would suggest that fiscal Q3’s YoY acceleration to 40% would be the company’s peak growth quarter moving through calendar 2026. 

For FY26 ending in June, revenue is expected to increase 31% to $12.47 billion, while an initial look at FY27 points to 25.6% growth to $15.66 billion in revenue. This is above WDC’s long-term revenue growth model for >20% growth CAGR over the next three to five years.  

Key Segments 

Similar to Seagate, WDC sees the large majority of its revenue go to Cloud customers, with minimal exposure to Client and Consumer end markets. 

Cloud revenue was $2.67 billion in Q2, up 27.5% YoY and 6.5% QoQ, decelerating from 31.5% YoY and 7.8% QoQ in Q1. Management noted that they are seeing strong demand from hyperscaler customers. Cloud accounted for 89% of revenue in the quarter.  

Assuming similar Cloud mix at 89% in fiscal Q3, though there is potential for slight mix gains on seasonality in its other two end markets, Cloud revenue would be implied at roughly ~$2.85 billion, up 6.5% QoQ and 41.9% YoY. 

WDC’s Client segment represented 6% of revenue at $176 million, up 26% YoY, while Consumer accounted for 5% of revenue at $168 million, declining (3%) YoY. 

Strong Margin Expansion 

As discussed above, WDC is seeing strong gross margin expansion with multiple levers available, and this margin expansion is flowing down the line.  

GAAP gross margin was 45.7% in Q2, up 8 points YoY and 2.2 points QOQ, while adjusted gross margin was 46.1%, up 7.7 points YoY and 2.2 points QoQ. For Q3, adjusted gross margin is expected to be 47.5% at midpoint, up 7.4 points YoY and 1.4 points QoQ.  

GAAP operating margin was 30.1%, up 6.9 points YoY and 2 points QoQ, while adjusted operating margin was 33.8%, up 9.3 points YoY and 3.4 points QoQ. Adjusted operating margin is implied to be 35.5% in Q3, up 9.5 points YoY and 1.7 points QoQ, showing a slight degree of operating leverage.  

GAAP net margin was 59.7% as WDC benefited from a more than $1 billion gain on its 7.5 million share stake in SanDisk, which it has now sold for nearly $3.2 billion to help reduce debt. Adjusted net margin was 26.7%, up 9.3 points YoY and 3.5 points QoQ. 

For a quick view on how current margins stack up to WDC’s long-term model, it expects adjusted gross and operating margins to surpass 50%/40% over the next three to five years, or roughly three to five points of expansion.  

EPS Growth Robust but Decelerating 

Driven by the margin expansion, WDC is seeing strong EPS growth, though growth is expected to largely decelerate moving through the year. 

GAAP EPS was $4.73, up 54% QoQ and 272% YoY, again driven by the gain on its SanDisk stake. Adjusted EPS was $2.13, up 78% YoY and 20% QoQ, beating estimates for $1.98. 

For Q3, adjusted EPS was guided to be $2.30, +/- $0.15, up 69% YoY and 8% QoQ at midpoint. Adjusted EPS growth is expected to decelerate further to 61% YoY in FQ4, and slow to 50% by the end of FY27. 

For FY26, WDC is expected to report adjusted EPS growth of nearly 80% YoY to $8.85, with another 52% to $13.46; despite the deceleration on the quarterly view, it should be noted that this EPS growth rate is still quite strong compared to the base it is growing from. Under the long-term model, management expects EPS to surpass $20. 

Cash and Balance Sheet 

Cash flow margins also showed strong expansion, and while debt does look inflated, WDC’s sale of its SanDisk stake is meaningfully improving its debt profile. Management explained at Innovation Day that “if you look at the revenue growth that we've delivered over the last 12 months, the margin appreciation, ultimately, what is done is to translate into very strong free cash flow. And in the last 2 quarters, we returned 100% of the free cash flow that we've generated. And we also were able to bring our net leverage well below the 1 to 1.5x that we laid out last year.” 

Operating cash flow was $745 million in Q2 for a 24.7% margin, up from 16.9% a year ago and 23.8% in Q1. Free cash flow was $653 million for a 21.6% margin, up from 13.9% a year ago and 21.3% in Q3. 

As of Q2, WDC reported cash of $1.98 billion and debt of $4.65 billion, though it already has redeemed $1 billion in its 2029 and 2032 senior notes following the stake sale. 

Inventories were $1.35 billion, down marginally from $1.39 billion in Q1. 

Conclusion 

Western Digital has emerged as one of the top AI winners over the past year with a 591% return, with the company getting added to the NASDAQ-100 index in December of 2025.  

Looking ahead to 2026, Western Digital is already sold out of capacity with set price and volume commitments, with visibility from key hyperscaler customers extending into 2027 and 2028. WDC also has been excelling at driving strong margin expansion with a handful of key levers at its disposal.  

Over the next few years, WDC is leveraging its technological expertise and several new innovations such as HBDT and DPT to drive significant performance gains on the path to 100TB capacity. WDC is also expecting to quickly take the lead in higher-capacity HAMR drives versus key competitor Seagate, potentially giving it a key advantage by the turn of the decade in meeting AI-driven data storage demand.

Damien Robbins, Equity Analyst at I/O Fund contributed to this analysis.

Please note: The I/O Fund conducts research and draws conclusions for the Fund’s positions. We then share that information with our readers. This is not a guarantee of a stock’s performance. Please consult your personal financial advisor before buying any stock in the companies mentioned in this analysis.

Recommended Reading:

  • Ciena: Benefitting from Data Center Scale Across Demand
  • Seagate: Slow QoQ Data Center Growth, 2027 Capacity Under Discussions
  • Monolithic Power: Strong AI Tailwinds to Drive 50% Enterprise Data Segment Growth in FY26
  • Teradyne Q4: Revenue Accelerates to 41% QoQ, Possibly Peak Growth Quarter
Posted in AI Stocks, Data CenterLeave a Comment on Western Digital: Visibility Extends Through 2028, Catching up to Seagate on Density 

Ciena: Benefitting from Data Center Scale Across Demand 

Posted on March 19, 2026June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Ciena’s role is different than the many “inside-the-data-center" networking stocks the I/O Fund covers as instead of offering networking fabrics at the system level, Ciena offers optical transport across data centers and metro regions. While AI training is already pushing hyperscalers to connect clusters across data center sites, inference offers another leg up for metro/long-haul networking as workloads will be distributed across many data centers to scale significant application usage, especially as agents necessitate responsiveness and reducing latency. 

This quarter, Ciena proved it's a leader in data center interconnects with $1.43 billion in revenue and $1.35 in adjusted EPS – more than doubling year-over-year. Optical revenue grew 41% YoY and 10% QoQ with Waveserver and RLS up 80% YoY and backlog that grew by $2 billion to reach about $7 billion total. 

With 800G pluggables ramping, new platforms like RLS Hyper-Rail and Nubius products (Vesta Optical Engine and Nitro redriver) will help to expand Ciena’s footprint. Notably, Ciena benefits from two major customer pools: hyperscalers building and linking more AI data centers which drives demand for DCI/metro/long-haul optical networking, but also telecom carriers and service providers who are upgrading their networks in anticipation of increased AI traffic across the network.  

Below, we cover Ciena’s product positioning, its most recent earnings report and a few key catalysts to keep an eye on as we approach an inflection driven by the inference market. 

Product Overview: 

Ciena’s foundational business is to address connectivity needs in the wide area network (WAN), spanning long-haul, metro and data center interconnect (DCI). Ciena offers the optical backbone that connects AI data centers and regions and is poised to benefit as AI-driven traffic will lead to higher-capacity metro and long-haul upgrades. 

Below, we break down the main products that Ciena offers currently, such as RLS and Waveserver, and products that Ciena plans to expand into, such as Vesta higher-density optical engine and Nitro linear redriver to extend reach in active copper cabling. 

Optical Networking & DCI 

Ciena offers a range of optical networking solutions targeting scale across, campus and metro DCI (10-20km and 20-100km) to backbone and submarine (10,000+ km reach) optical systems.  

Ciena’s WaveLogic sends information over fiber using fewer lanes, which lowers power use and cost. Ciena uses WaveLogic inside its systems and offers compact pluggable modules that make it easier to add capacity without rebuilding a networking. Ciena’s Waveserver is the platform that connects data centers at scale by offering a packaged solution that can be deployed to expand bandwidth between sites quickly. The newer versions of Wavelogic detailed below allow Ciena to push higher speeds over the same fiber, which can reduce the number of components needed for a quicker and more simplified upgrade.  

  • Ciena’s WaveLogic 5 Extreme supports 200G to 800G line rates to enable 400GbE transport across any distance, including ultra-long haul and subsea, while its WaveLogic 5 Nano 100G to 400G ZR/ZR+ pluggable coherent optics are optimized for DCI applications with low power consumption of 15W with reach up to 140km. WaveLogic pluggables also seamlessly integrate into its Waveserver stackable interconnect platforms, scaling up to 12.8Tb/s per 2RU unit for cost-effective DCI solutions. 
  • Ciena’s WaveLogic 6 Extreme boosts speeds to an industry-leading 1.6Tb/s per wavelength, extending 800GbE transmission across the longest distances. Ciena says that WL6e delivers twice the capacity per wavelength in its existing 6500 and Waveserver platforms, helping reducing transceiver counts and lowering cost and complexity of systems. It also delivers double the capacity under the same power and space envelope versus WL5e. 
  • WaveLogic 6 Nano offers fit-for-purpose 400-800G ZR/LR/ZR+ pluggables and 1.6T coherent-lite pluggable transceivers to meet high-bandwidth AI data center applications. Ciena says that WL6n combines it vertically integrated DSP, electro-optics, and high-speed packaging to support high-performance data center fabric, or 2km, and data center campus, up to 20km, applications. 800ZR pluggables were implied to be ramping later in the year, while Ciena is also developing future 1600ZR/1600ZR+ solutions built on 2nm silicon. 

Reconfigurable Line Systems (RLS) 

RLS offers the infrastructure that routes wavelengths over fiber for metro and long-haul networks. COLORZ pluggables are part of the optical stack and are the endpoints that generate and receive the optical signal for DCI/metro links. 

RLS plays an important role in ‘scale-across’ applications, the third pillar of scaling AI infrastructure. We have detailed the first two pillars, scale up and scale out, in detail, yet the challenge is that both cannot extend infinitely, which is where scale across fits in.   

While scale across is much less discussed, it refers to linking together multiple geographically distributed AI data centers to act as one cohesive compute facility, theoretically facilitating a path to >1GW-scale clusters as it bypasses site/land and power constraints.  This can either be in close proximity such as OpenAI’s Stargate cluster in Abilene spanning multiple buildings, Amazon’s Project Rainier or Microsoft’s Fairwater data centers linking together via ‘AI WAN’ (wide area network). Coherent ZR/ZR+ modules excel in scale across as they maintain the signal integrity and reliability across long distances at the highest data rates.  

According to the management team, Ciena’s upcoming RLS hyper-rail solution is expected to be in high demand: “We are addressing this demand for scale across solutions with our RLS platform, the de facto industry line system standard for cloud providers as well as our 800ZR pluggable optics. To underscore this, we realized a second consecutive record quarter for RLS shipments and revenue. We expect to expand our role in scale across applications with the introduction of our new RLS hyper-rail solution. Hyper-rail delivers an order of magnitude increase in fiber density within existing rack footprints, helping customers scale traffic while reducing and, in some cases, avoiding costs and complexity associated with adding substantial numbers of amplifier huts.” 

  • Ciena offers reconfigurable line systems (RLS) in its 6500 RLS family, which addresses the highest-capacity bandwidth requirements in metro, long-haul and DCI applications. RLS can support 60Tb/s capacity on a single fiber pair, offering flexible configuration options while doubling fiber capacity without impacting existing C-band traffic. Ciena also says that its 6500 RLS can reduce physical footprint by as much as 70% versus traditional chassis-based systems from its modular form factor. 
  • Ciena is expanding its RLS portfolio with hyper-rail photonics, which feature new amplifier configurations to deliver 32x density of current solutions, scaling to 128 fiber pairs in a single rack. This is achieved by scaling from one rail per module to four, reducing power consumption by up to 75% and space requirements by up to 85% while integrating into existing rack footprints. Ciena explained that the RLS Hyper-Rail was co-developed with its hyperscaler customers specifically for multi-region, large scale AI connectivity, and will begin standardization at the end of 2026 and ramp in 2027. Ciena expects to be first to market in hyper-rail, allowing them to extend current RLS momentum into 2027 driven by share gains. 

RLS is an important cornerstone for Ciena’s Optical Networking portfolio, with management explaining that FQ1 marked a “second consecutive record quarter for RLS shipments and revenue”, with growth of over 80% YoY. Ciena is seeing robust momentum for scale across stemming from its RLS solutions and ZR/ZR+ modules this year, with management explaining that they “are already experiencing extraordinary demand with 3 hyperscalers choosing to use our optical solutions for their training applications across distance.” All three hyperscalers were said to be “significantly ramping including additional orders for multiple additional clusters from the first hyperscaler we announced in Q3 2025.” 

Scale Up, Scale Out and CPO 

Ciena’s $270 million acquisition of Nubis in September 2025 expanded its presence inside the data center, as the aforementioned products primarily offer networking across the data center. With this new acquisition, Ciena is moving into scale-up and scale-out networking and co-packaged optics (CPO).  

As a brief recap, CPO places optical transceivers directly on the chip package, rather than using separate optical modules, resulting in faster data transmission, reduced latency and higher bandwidth. This may be the best of both worlds: the performance of optical yet with reduced power consumption for increasingly power-hungry AI racks. 

Ciena recently unveiled its Vesta 200 6.4T CPX, which it says is the industry's highest-density and lowest-power pluggable CPO solution. Ciena says that the retimer-free linear-drive operation saves up to 70% power versus other retimed options. According to management, samples of the Vesta 200 6.4T optical engine will be available in Q2 2026. 

For scale-up inside the rack, Ciena is advancing Nubis’ Nitro Linear Redriver tech, which extends the distance that signals can be transmitted over copper cables and also reduce power by up to 80% versus AECs. Ciena will also sample the redriver in calendar Q2. As stated on the call, this is especially important for XPUs (such as from Broadcom): “For scale-up opportunities inside the rack, where XPUs are getting faster and driving heat and power concerns, we are advancing the Nitro Linear Redriver technology also from our Nubis acquisition.” 

Data Center Out-of-Band Management  

Out-of-band management is critical yet underdiscussed, as it provides a separate, independent network to control and recover data center infrastructure – for example, it allows hyperscalers to have visibility over servers and other components, and provide a pathway remotely recover systems without physical intervention. However, traditional out-of-band management faces increasing challenges as AI clusters scale up and out. This is because the maximization of GPU density in racks leaves minimal space for OOB connectivity, such as for switches, routers and console servers. It also is copper-heavy (and power hungry) by relying on extensive Ethernet cabling.  

Ciena designed its DCOM solution with Meta to meet hyperscaler configuration requirements, noting that its DCOM solution, leveraging its routers, switches and its passive optical network (PON) ecosystem to reduce rack space by up to 99%, reduce power, and streamline remote access. Ciena says it is continuing to work with Meta on DCOM and had expanded last quarter, with two other hyperscalers in discussion. Management believes that DCOM will be a significant opportunity in the data center and a defensible space for them due to its speed, vertical integration and software.  

Managed-Over-Fiber Networks (MOFNs) 

Advanced networks called managed-over-fiber-network (MOFNs) are projects that connect multiple data centers in a metro area and upgrade capacity and resiliency on existing metro networks. This drives demand for Ciena’s optical transport and DCI solutions, especially across Waveserver, coherent optics and RLS amplifier and routing gear.  

MOFNs are starting to show up as a growth driver because AI is creating significant traffic that has to be distributed between data centers. The customer base includes hyperscalers, neoclouds and service providers with 10% to 15% coming from telecom. 

Ciena is seeing strong momentum in MOFN, noting that its orders in India were up 40% YoY, specifically for these solutions. According to management, there were three greater than 10% customers including two global cloud providers and one Tier 1 North America service provider with strong MOFN activity and “order intake has been incredibly strong over the past 90 days, leading to a new record by a significant margin.” 

There was an interesting quote from management about MOFN and the neoclouds, as Ciena hinted that this is a preferred method of connectivity from its speed to market and less capex requirements from a lack of maintenance on the neoclouds’ part:  

“We're seeing obviously an emerging ramp here around a bunch of the loosely called sort of neo-scalers, which encompasses a fair range of different players. It's, I would say, largely right now MOFN orientated, given the capital expenditures, time to market for them, et cetera. But what is clear from it all is that the network is now a real priority for them. And I think that plays through to the hyperscalers, too. There's been such a maniacal focus and continues to be, obviously, on things like power, GPU accessibility, et cetera, et cetera. 

Now it's really about the network. The traffic is beginning to come out of the network, both for inference and for training. And the neo-scalers are obviously seeing that, too. So they're leaning in on the network. Now we're also beginning to see some of them wish to have control of some of that network as well and do their own builds. We're cautious about that approachment given the financial structure of some of those neo-scalers, not all of them.” 

Backlog Rises 40% QoQ to $7 Billion, Orders Fulfilled in FY27 

Ciena revealed strong backlog growth in fiscal Q1 and robust order activity tied to strong demand from hyperscaler customers. The backlog growth sparked multiple important discussions around conversion and pricing power, suggesting Ciena has strong visibility into next year with pricing emerging later this year as a growth lever.  

Backlog rose 40% QoQ to $7 billion, with management noting that Q1 demand was ‘unprecedented’ with a very strong order intake. Roughly 80% of the backlog is for products and software, or ~$5.6 billion, up from $3.8 billion last quarter. Management would not put a concrete number on RPO, but said that it would be roughly 60% of the orders Ciena took in during Q1.  

Ciena expects its backlog to continue to grow throughout the year yet noted that “nearly all” of the new orders it is currently receiving will be fulfilled in fiscal 2027, suggesting that supply remains extremely tight relative to demand with this providing strong visibility for next year’s growth.  

CEO Gary Smith provided some color on the demand drivers and strength of demand, explaining that Ciena is “seeing growth in cloud, general cloud, you're seeing inference, you're seeing this new market of training now emerge. As I said in my comments, we've now got 3 hyperscalers deploying us for training, and we're at the very early stages of that. 

So you put all of that together, and that yields the incredible demand that we saw in Q1. And as Marc said, despite the fact that we're ramping our capacity for delivery as seen in our results, demand is going to continue, we believe, to outstrip our ability to supply. And that's going to continue for — we believe, this year. And so we're going to end up with a larger backlog than we have right now as we turn the year despite the fact that we're ramping our capacity strongly throughout the year and obviously through '27 and '28.”  

Smith also later clarified that it was purely demand that was driving this order growth and backlog increase, explaining that hyperscalers are ramping significantly in optical technologies both across clusters and within racks.  

Pluggables to Triple to >$500M 

Also intertwined with the scale across momentum is Ciena’s projections for hypergrowth to continue within its ZR/ZR+ pluggables business, where it is expecting its pluggable revenue to triple after doubling last year.  

For context, Ciena stated in Q4 that pluggables had reached more than $168 million in FY25, so management’s guidance implies a ramp to >$500 million this year. This would represent a ramp from ~5% of Optical Networking revenue to likely low-double digit share in FY26 for pluggables, making them a key contributor to the segment and overall topline growth.  

Management offered some commentary on pluggables and the drivers behind this growth, pointing to 800G ramping through FY27 and their expectation to lead the market with the new data rate:  

Amit Daryanani, Evercore 

“How do you see the pluggables market, especially with 800G ramping up through fiscal '26 and '27? And if you just maybe compare and contrast a bit about your position in 400 versus 800, that will be helpful as you go into the next cycle. 

Scott McFeely, Executive Advisor 

So we've seen pluggable revenue increase sort of period-over-period, and we've talked in the past about our interconnect business and when we went from 2024 to '25, that doubling. That's sort of in the rearview mirror. And then we talked about it as a major portion of our inside and around the data center with our aspirations to triple that this year, and we're well on track for that. 

So we do see significant growth from a competitive perspective, as we've talked about in the past, through choices that we made to focus early introduction of the technology in the last generation more on our systems business and our pluggable business because that was the bigger opportunity. We weren't necessarily first movers in that market. So that probably cost us some share and it probably cost us actually, frankly, some margin dollars. That's not the case in the 800G. We're first to market there and 800G is moving quite along.” 

800G is expected to ramp through the first part of 2026 and persist through 2027, and while the tripling of revenue is certainly welcomed, the upcoming cycle is expected to see strengthening margin tailwinds through the course of the year. Ciena explained last quarter that they are expecting to lower 800G unit costs over time, and as the ramp progresses through Q2 to Q4, they expect significantly lower costs versus the start of 2026. This suggests that 800G margin headwinds in the initial early ramp will quickly pass through and potentially shift to margin tailwinds by year-end on a much larger revenue base. 

The primary challenge with pluggables was touched upon by management, in that the market is competitive, any first-mover advantages may be fleeting and pricing power is not a given. For example, Marvell recently unveiled its 1.6T ZR/ZR+ module, the first to come to market, with the new product expected to be initially available in the second half of the year, meaning Ciena’s lead in 800G may be short lived.  

Not Aggressive on Pricing, but Tailwinds Emerging in 2H 

Given the demand environment and supply tightness, analysts were curious about pricing power, noting that other component suppliers are being much more aggressive in raising prices and repricing their backlogs higher, and if Ciena would do the same. 

Ciena has already been upfront about demand outstripping supply for at least the next several quarters and how supply constraints have impacted revenue growth, meaning a more aggressive stance on pricing could drive revenue growth at a much faster pace.  

However, management downplayed the need or desire to reprice the backlog and be aggressive with pricing, explaining that they are already seeing market share gains and tangible impacts to growth and margins. This is likely because Ciena has already raised prices and expecting these to begin landing in 2H: “As we disclosed in Q4, right, the pricing increases that we talked about were really on the new orders. And because we had such a big backlog at the time, most of that was going to be seen in the second half. So you should expect those price increases to show up in Q3 and Q4.” 

Management was also upfront about why they are opting to not be as aggressive as other suppliers when it comes to pricing, rather using it as a lever to get better contractual terms, better cash conversion and longer-term purchasing commitments to reduce the risk associated with converting its larger backlog.  

George Notter, Wolfe ResearchGeorge Notter, Wolfe Research 

“Obviously, you're raising pricing. I know it's going to come through later in the year as you eat down the backlog. But just stepping back and thinking about the space, you've got higher memory costs, you've got component suppliers that are being really aggressive on price. They're repricing their own backlogs. It just seems like it's an environment where you guys could be more aggressive on price and even perhaps reprice your own backlog. So I'm just curious like why not be more aggressive here given the supply-demand dynamics and what's going on in the supply chain? 

Gary Smith, Ciena CEOGary Smith, Ciena CEO 
We've talked a lot about the good things that we're doing to manage our margins and the rest of it, including the value rebalancing. But it is a balance to it all. And that's what we're trying to strike as we go through this. I mean you're seeing it translate into improved financial performance in all dimensions, market share gains, revenue, gross margin improvement and operating leverage. We're seeing that. And it's a confluence of things….  

Marc Graff, Ciena CFOMarc Graff, Ciena CFO 

No, I think Gary said it well. Pricing is a lever, George, but we're also looking at can we improve cash conversion? Can we get better terms and conditions? Can we get longer-term purchasing commits with maybe some more noncancelable, less risky terms as we satisfy this quite large backlog.” 

Ciena is already showing signs of healthier payment activity within its days sales outstanding (DSO), which declined to 72 days in Q1, down from 77 days in Q4 and 90 days in the prior year quarter. Additionally, inventory turns reached 3.2X in Q1, up from 3.1X in Q4 and 2.3X in the prior year quarter, suggesting that demand is strengthening and payment terms are improving. Aiming for longer-term contracts and less risky terms would provide a higher degree of visibility into revenue through 2027 and will prevent Ciena from falling back into an inventory overhang like it had faced in early 2024.  

Financials 

Revenue Accelerates to 33.1% YoY in Q1  

Ciena reported fiscal Q1 revenue of $1.43 billion, representing 33.1% YoY growth, while sequential growth came in at 5.6% QoQ. Revenue also beat consensus estimates by 2.1%, reflecting stronger-than-expected demand across optical networking and cloud connectivity deployments.  

The strong YoY growth marks a notable improvement compared to the muted growth environment seen through much of FY24 and early FY25 as telecom customers worked through inventory digestion and moderated capital spending. The current acceleration suggests spending patterns across service providers and cloud operators are normalizing, particularly as network upgrades tied to AI infrastructure and high-capacity data center interconnect (DCI) deployments expand. 

Looking ahead, Ciena guided for Q2 revenue of approximately $1.50 billion, which would represent 33.5% YoY growth and a modest 4.9% QoQ growth.  

For the full year, Ciena guided for fiscal 2026 revenue of $5.9 to $6.3 billion, raising its growth forecast from 24% YoY to 28% YoY at midpoint. While the raise is certainly welcomed and indicative of the strengthening demand Ciena is seeing in RLS and pluggables, it indicates a rather soft 2H, after 40% and 34% growth in 1H. This suggests that the order momentum and backlog building are not translating over to 2H growth as of yet, but more so for 2027.  

Margins Expanded, Ahead of Guidance 

Profitability improved across all levels during the quarter, with margins expanding sequentially and outperforming management’s guidance in several areas. 

GAAP gross margin came in at 43.8%, generating $625.5 million in gross profit. Gross margins benefited from improved product mix and stronger volumes across higher-capacity optical platforms.  

On an adjusted basis, margins were slightly stronger, with adjusted gross margin of 44.7% on adjusted gross profit of $638.2 million. This result exceeded management’s midpoint guidance of 43.5%, suggesting better pricing discipline and favorable mix within Ciena’s optical portfolio. The company’s WaveLogic coherent optical platforms typically command higher margins, particularly as customers transition toward higher-capacity wavelengths such as 800G and beyond. Looking ahead, Ciena expects that its upcoming products such as RLS hyper-rail and more focused cost optimizations will help deliver improvement in gross margins. On the call, management explained that ” moving forward, you'll see even more aggressive cost reductions. And then the price increases that we talked about at the end of last year, those really haven't started to fully kick in until the second half of the year. So I think that creates additional tailwinds for us. So all in all, again, I think we're making really good progress towards that 45% way point, and you should see that throughout the year.” 

Operating leverage became more visible in Q2 as operating margins improved meaningfully in the quarter, reflecting the benefits of stronger revenue growth flowing through the cost structure. GAAP operating margin was 13.3%, improving 5.8 points YoY and 12.5 points QoQ, and marking Ciena’s first return to above a double-digit margin since the end of 2021. 

Adjusted operating margin was 17.9%, coming in well ahead of management’s 16% guidance. Because Ciena operates with a large fixed-cost R&D base tied to its optical platform development, revenue expansions typically translate into disproportionately stronger operating profit growth once demand improves. Operating leverage will remain a key driver of earnings growth if revenue continues expanding at a high double-digit pace over the coming quarters. 

This improving operating profitability flowed through to net income as well, with GAAP net margin of 10.5%, up 6.3 points YoY and 9.1 points QoQ. Adjusted net margin was 13.8%, with the difference reflecting stock-based compensation and other non-cash adjustments.  

EPS 

Ciena reported a strong 15.6% beat to adjusted EPS estimates in Q1, earning $1.35 in the quarter, up 110.9% YoY. GAAP EPS was thinner at $1.03, up 232.3% YoY on a softer comp. 

Looking ahead, Ciena is expected to see EPS growth accelerate in Q2 on a softer YoY comp, with growth decelerating through the back half of the year but remaining strong. Adjusted EPS is projected to rise 247% to $1.46 in Q2 before decelerating to 134.6% YoY to $1.57 in Q3. Growth is expected to reach 94.1% by Q4 to $1.77. 

For the full year, Ciena is currently projected to report 132.4% growth to $6.14, before decelerating to 34% growth in FY27 to $8.22. 

Cash Flow Generation Remains Healthy 

Cash flow generation remained solid in the quarter and improved alongside stronger profitability. Ciena’s balance sheet remains solid with a manageable leverage profile and ample liquidity. 

Operating cash flow was $227.7 million for a 16.0% margin, improving from a 9.7% margin a year ago. Free cash flow was also positive at $153.8 million, representing a 10.8% margin, up from 7.2% a year ago.  

These cash flow margins remain healthy for a hardware-driven networking company, particularly one with significant R&D investments in optical technologies and silicon photonics. Over time, improving operating leverage and scale could push free cash flow margins higher, particularly if higher-capacity optical products continue gaining share within the product mix. 

Cash and short-term investments totaled $1.30 billion, while total debt was $1.54 billion. 

Notably, capex was $74 million in Q1, which is 2X to 3X more than the company’s average capex over the past three years. The trend toward higher capex is likely to continue given a mix of strong visibility from customers and the need to secure critical components ahead of demand. Here is what was stated on the earnings call: “Second, we are deeply engaged with component vendors, which is where more of the industry challenges exist to secure and expand supply, including through responsible long-term purchase commitments. As shown by our Q1 results, we are navigating the supply environment well and are investing to expand capacity. However, we expect demand will continue to outstrip supply at least for the next several quarters.” 

Conclusion 

Ciena’s quarter reinforced the company is a direct beneficiary of AI-driven connectivity spend – not just inside the data center, but across metro and long-haul networks that connect AI clusters and regions. Ciena was also recently included in the S&P 500 – and for good reason as the $50B+ market cap company is set to report over $6 billion this year in revenue with a bottom-line that is doubling. 

Record revenue and expanding profitability, plus a backlog that pushes into fiscal 2027 all point to demand that is both strong and increasingly visible. The company’s 800G pluggables are ramping, and new platforms like RLS hyper-rail and Nubis products are set to expand Ciena’s footprint ahead of more long-haul/metro demand from distributed inference and multi-site training. 

Although our portfolio is loaded with market-leading AI networking winners, with some up as much as 100% YTD, Ciena holds its own by offering a differentiated way of participating in the next phase of AI infrastructure, where the focus shifts to scaling the bandwidth that connects data centers and regions.

Damien Robbins, Equity Analyst at I/O Fund contributed to this analysis.

Every Thursday at 4:30 pm Eastern, the I/O Fund team holds a webinar for premium members to discuss how to navigate the broad market, as well as various stock and crypto entries and exits. Beth Kindig offers weekly deep dives including lesser-known cryptocurrencies and AI stocks, plus the team offers trade alerts. The I/O Fund team is one of the only audited portfolios available to individual investors. If you’d like to subscribe to the Advanced Market Signals plan, email us at premium@io-fund.compremium@io-fund.com.

Please note: The I/O Fund conducts research and draws conclusions for the Fund’s positions. We then share that information with our readers. This is not a guarantee of a stock’s performance. Please consult your personal financial advisor before buying any stock in the companies mentioned in this analysis.

Recommended Reading:

  • Seagate: Slow QoQ Data Center Growth, 2027 Capacity Under Discussions
  • Monolithic Power: Strong AI Tailwinds to Drive 50% Enterprise Data Segment Growth in FY26
  • Teradyne Q4: Revenue Accelerates to 41% QoQ, Possibly Peak Growth Quarter
  • Talen Q4: Reveals 2028 Timeline for Data Center Power Delivery
Posted in AI Stocks, Data CenterLeave a Comment on Ciena: Benefitting from Data Center Scale Across Demand 

Seagate: Slow QoQ Data Center Growth, 2027 Capacity Under Discussions 

Posted on March 6, 2026June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Seagate has been a rather under-the-radar AI beneficiary with shares up more than 262% over the past year, keeping pace with heavyweight Micron and other strong memory sector performers. The company is working with cloud service providers (CSPs) to supply hard disk drives, stating they are qualified with 6 out of 8 CSPs on their new HAMR-based Mozaic products. As it pertains to data centers and AI, it’s expected that HDDs will handle the high-volume data storage requirements for agentic AI, which relies on persistent access to large volumes of historic data for planning, reasoning and decision-making. 

With that said, Seagate’s data center revenue growth is quite slow at just 5% QoQ in Q4, as the company is not exposed to the same swift price surges rippling across DRAM and SSD markets due to locked-in pricing for 2026.  

Looking ahead to 2027, Seagate could potentially raise prices with management stating that pricing is not locked-in yet (but notably, management was a bit evasive on the details when asked many times in the Q&A session): “But I would say we have — the vast, vast majority of the volume is already allocated. Calendar '27, we will start working on that fairly soon. Of course, we have very good indication and agreement on volumes, but we have not — we have not fixed the price yet.” 

Regardless of exact timing on when pricing can be renegotiated, Seagate’s fundamentals show exceptional margin growth as HAMR products offer stronger profitability and improved cash flows, leading to net leverage of 1.1x. It spells good things to come as HAMR products are only beginning to ramp now yet are making an impact on margins. 

Brief Product Overview: HDDs and HAMR Technology 

Hard disk drives (HDDs) offer the lowest-cost per terabyte, which makes HDDs ideal for “big data” storage, backups and large AI datasets. Compare this to solid state drives (SSDs) which store data on flash memory chips and are far faster and lower-latency. SSDs cost more per terabyte, thus leveraging a mix of HDDs and SDDs is a popular choice.  

As it stands today, SDDs have illustrated significant pricing power compared to HDDs. Therefore, because HDDs are considered more commoditized in the current market dynamics compared to SDDs, I’m quoting the management team in full as to why HDDs are likely to increase in importance as the AI economy plays out – as this is the predominant question Seagate must answer (when comparing to other memory sector stocks): 

“So if the concept is that drives aren't working hard, they're in the background, just storing data, that's not the way — a good way to think about it. That's not the way hard drives are being used right now. They're working 24/7. A lot of times, they're optimized for performance themselves, largely streaming performance, not random small block workloads. That's more of a memory thing. And so if you had an application that's random small block, it's probably memory. If you have big data, it's probably a little bit of memory on the front end and a lot of hard drive on the back end. And we think that — there are applications across the entire spectrum, of course, but we think that in the future when we start to talk about the concepts in their enormity, about checkpoints and physical AI and video and things like that, it's large, large data. So the architectural tier that stores the data will probably remain constant for the next decade.” 

Heat-assisted Magnetic Recording (HAMR) 

Seagate has developed heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) tech for substantial areal density gains, which refers to how many bits can be packed onto each square inch of disk platter (where data is stored). HAMR uses a laser diode to heat a small spot on the disk, enabling polarity of a single bit to be flipped to allow data to be written.  

Other HDD tech such as energy-assisted magnetic recording (EAMR), like Western Digital’s ePMR (energy-assisted Perpendicular MR) tech, adds electrical currents to the write head to improve density and write smaller bits. While EAMR is simpler and builds on familiar PMR tech, offering faster time to market, it does not scale to the same capacity as HAMR. WDC acknowledges that EAMR is expanding to 30-40TB drive capacity with roadmaps to 60TB, while HAMR enables capacity to expand to >100TB by 2032. 

Seagate says HAMR allows data bits to become even smaller and more densely packed, while remaining thermally stable, and its HAMR-based drives can offer more exabytes of storage while taking up less space in the rack, offering substantial increases in TCO. To put this in number form, Seagate says a 1 exabyte deployment with HAMR would consume ~2 million kWh per year in 204 sq ft of space, versus 3.2 million kWh per year and 400 sq ft of space for a similar PMR deployment. 

Management believes that HDDs and higher-capacity storage systems will play a key role in meeting the storage needs for agentic AI, which need constant access to substantial volumes of data for reasoning and decision-making. Seagate projects AI workloads will drive “7.2 zettabytes of nearline storage demand over the next four years, exceeding the entire industry's consumption over the last decade.” 

Seagate’s Mozaic3+ HAMR, offering >3TB per disk, is qualified with all major US CSPs and the company says it remains on track to qualify with all global CSPs within the first half of CY26: “We ended the year shipping 3 terabyte per disk Mozaic-based HAMR products to our first CSP customer. And by year's end, quarterly HAMR shipments exceeded 1.5 million units and have continued to ramp. Mozaic 3 HAMR drives are now qualified with all of the major U.S. CSP customers and qualifications for our second-generation Mozaic 4 terabyte per disk products are tracking well to plan.” 

In terms of future catalysts, Mozaic4+ HAMR is currently qualifying, with the ramp expected to begin later this quarter and multiple CSPs expected to be qualified over the coming months. Mozaic is powering Seagate’s Exos family of products, which scale to multi-petabyte block storage systems, offering up to 2.5 PB (2,500 TB) in storage.  

In terms of volume, Seagate says that quarterly HAMR shipments have exceeded 1.5 million units and are continuing to ramp, or roughly 20% of its estimated ~7.2 million nearline unit shipments in Q2. To note, Seagate is ahead of Western Digital when it comes to HAMR, as WDC is not expecting to ramp its HAMR products until the start of CY27. 

HDD Role in ‘Warm-Storage’ 

We recently covered discussions over the role of SSDs in ‘warm’ storage and Nvidia’s upcoming Inference Context Memory Storage platform in our SanDisk analysis. We had stated: 

“Nvidia believes that “AI factories need a complementary, purposebuilt context layer that treats KV cache as its own AInative data class rather than forcing it into either scarce HBM or generalpurpose enterprise storage.” For example, the current inference context hierarchy begins with HBM (G1), providing near-instant access to latency-critical context in active generation, down to SSDs (G3) in the third tier to handle ‘warm’ data, or data that is used regularly but less frequently and still requiring efficient, cost-effective storage. Enterprise or shared storage sits at the bottom of the hierarchy (G4), handling ‘cold’ data, or data stored for long-term retention but much less frequently accessed.” 

The connection here to Seagate is that Nvidia is proposing SSDs to take a more central role in the ‘warm’ tier where HDDs sits – this is what Seagate and WDC consider ‘nearline’, where data does not have to be accessed instantaneously but must remain readily available.  

Analysts questioned about this possible shift to SSDs in warm storage: 

“Dave, while we have you, a little bit of a technical one, are you — what kind of activity are you seeing at sort of the so-called warm tier of storage? It's a question that comes up a bunch in our conversations. We've heard that it's obviously growing, it's growing both hard drive and flash storage is participating nicely, but would love to get your input on it. Because I think there's still — first of all, we love to know if what we're hearing is accurate. 

But secondarily, I think there's a lot of people that are assuming that that's really like it's becoming a NAND tier, largely a NAND tier in the GenAI world. And anyway, just love to get any context there that you have. 

CEO and Chairman William MosleyCEO and Chairman William Mosley 

“When you start talking about big data storage, if you will, in data centers, the tiering architecture is fairly well set and probably won't change based on economics and also architectures that are well known. People know how to play. So if the concept is that drives aren't working hard, they're in the background, just storing data, that's not a good way to think about it. That's not the way hard drives are being used right now. They're working 24/7.  

A lot of times, they're optimized for performance themselves, largely streaming performance, not random small block workloads. That's more of a memory thing. And so if you had an application that's random small block, it's probably memory. If you have big data, it's probably a little bit of memory on the front end and a lot of hard drive on the back end. … So the architectural tier that stores the data will probably remain constant for the next decade.” 

While there has been some chatter about this newfound role for SSDs to command a leading position in meeting inference-driven storage demand, Seagate does not believe that there will ultimately be much change to storage architectures, with HDDs remaining critical to handle the massive volumes of data generated by AI applications such as agents, video generation, world models and more.  

2026 Capacity Sold Out, Beginning to Contract for 2027 

One of the reasons for this shift to SSDs is that HDD capacity is already sold out through 2026, with Seagate already turning to signing long-term agreements (LTA) for calendar 2027. Seagate said its nearline capacity is already fully allocated through CY2026, and management expects to “begin accepting orders for the first half of calendar year 2027 in the coming months,” supported by strong demand visibility from some of its major cloud customers seeking supply assurance through 2027 and into 2028. 

Considering the supply tightness and elevated level of demand in the market for HDDs, analysts prodded about how pricing would look under new LTAs, and if new agreements would be closed at higher prices. Management noted that 2027 prices are still in discussion and have not been locked in, and implied that higher prices are possible due to demand: 

Q, Christopher Muse, Cantor FitzgeraldQ, Christopher Muse, Cantor Fitzgerald 

“And then, I guess, maybe bigger picture, as you think about overall average pricing per exabyte, we've gone from kind of down double digits to high single digits. And I think we just exited the quarter down 4% year-on-year. Do you see a world where pricing could flat or even move positive year-over-year?” 

CEO William MosleyCEO William Mosley 
“Pricing will be dictated by the demand. Right now, the demand is really strong. So I think as we roll through into '27 and '28, we look at how much capacity we're having. We're bringing online by virtue of the fact that we're making all these aggressive product transitions. We'll bring more exabytes to bear and then people go out there and renegotiate for those. I think flat to slightly up is certainly possible. And that's the way we're really managing it as we talk to our customers.” 

This ties into a later response where Seagate revealed that pricing has not been locked in for 2027, while 2026 volumes and prices are well defined – meaning any potential upside in 2026 would only come from excess capacity being sold in the open market.  

CFO Gianluca Romano explained that Seagate has “very good indication and agreement on volumes, but we have not fixed the price yet,” so if prices begin to move higher as higher-capacity next-gen HAMR devices ramp, considering how tight supply remains relative to demand, Seagate has tailwinds to both revenue growth and profitability.  

It should also be noted that in clear contrast to SSDs, HDD prices are not surging – analysts had implied HDD prices exited Q4 down (4%) YoY, while other reports placed prices up ~4% QoQ, a far cry from SSDs rising 40% to 100% QoQ – this is why Seagate’s QoQ Data Center revenue growth pales in comparison to competitors such as SanDisk. 

If Seagate can only realize a small low to mid-single digit price increase with 2027 contracts, this suggests growth will likely follow its projections for mid-20% exabyte growth with a few points' upside, rather than sharply accelerating on a YoY or QoQ basis. 

Financials:  

Revenue Growth

Seagate reported fiscal Q2 revenue of $2.83 billion, up 21.5% YoY and 7.5% QoQ, with sequential revenue growth across nearly all end markets. Growth was relatively steady on both a YoY and QoQ basis compared to fiscal Q1. 

Looking ahead, Seagate guided for FQ3 revenue to be $2.90 billion, +/- $100 million, pointing to YoY growth of 34.3%, accelerating nearly 13 points, though QoQ growth would be just 2.7% at midpoint. This softer QoQ read is due to typical March quarter seasonality from edge IoT markets, though management expects Data Center to more than offset that impact.  

Seagate also did not provide guidance for the full-year, but did state that its current outlook expects “sequential improvement to both the top and bottom line throughout calendar 2026,” meaning QoQ growth in each quarter through fiscal Q2 2027.  

Assuming low double-digit QoQ growth in FQ4 from the midpoint of Q3’s guide, FY26 revenue would roughly project to ~$11.64 billion, up 27.9% YoY, slightly above current estimates for $11.50 billion for 26.4% growth. 

Looking out to the first half of FY27, considering management’s commentary and similar QoQ growth rates as the past two years at ~7-8% QoQ, Seagate could exit calendar 2026 (FQ2 27) at ~$3.75 billion, or about 4% above current estimates for $3.61 billion. 

Key Segments – Data Center Growth Decelerates to 5% QoQ 

Seagate reports under two segments – Data Center and Edge IoT, with Data Center being the company’s primary revenue stream, accounting for 87% of its shipment volume in the quarter but only 79% of revenue. 

Data Center revenue increased 28% YoY and 5% QoQ to $2.22 billion in FQ2, decelerating from 34% YoY and 13% QoQ in Q1. Driving this was a deceleration in shipments – Data Center shipments were 165 exabytes in the quarter, up 4% QoQ and 31% YoY, slowing from 17% QoQ and 39% YoY in Q1.  

Seagate said it is seeing “sustained demand growth for our high capacity nearline drives across global cloud data centers as well as continued improvement from the enterprise edge,” expecting strong demand trends to continue for some time. In the enterprise OEM specifically, Seagate said it is “benefiting from slight improvement in traditional server units, along with increasing demand for storage servers, driven in large part by the adoption of AI applications and need to store data at the enterprise edge.” 

Outside of Data Center, Edge IoT revenue rose 2% YoY and 17% QoQ to $601 million, though it should be this sequential growth followed a soft FQ1 which saw an (11%) QoQ decline. Management said this was driven by anticipated seasonal improvement for consumer products.  

Looking ahead to FQ3, management expects Data Center to more than offset typical March quarter seasonality in edge IoT – assuming a similar (7%) QoQ decline in Edge IoT, this would project Data Center revenue to be up just over 5% QoQ, matching Q2’s pace.  

Gross and Operating Margin Reach Records 

Seagate is witnessing solid margin expansion, driven by pricing and operating leverage, with management pointing to high-capacity drives as a gross margin tailwind while opex continues to decline. Both gross and operating margin reached company records in Q2.  

Q2 GAAP gross margin was 41.6%, up 6.3 points YoY and 2.2 points QoQ, while adjusted gross margin was 42.2%, up 6.7 points YoY and 2.1 point QoQ. Management said this was driven by its pricing strategy and improving mix of high-capacity drives as HAMR shipments ramp. Seagate noted that the upcoming Mozaic4+ adds more content per unit, helping reduce costs and improve profitability. 

Q2 GAAP operating margin was 29.8%, up 8.8 points YoY and 3.4 points QoQ, while adjusted operating margin was 31.9%, up 8.8 points YoY and 2.9 points QoQ. Seagate continues to see a greater degree of operating leverage, as adjusted opex as a percent of revenue declined to 10.3%, from 12.4% in the year ago quarter and 11.1% in Q1. 

Q2 GAAP net margin was 21%, up 6.5 points YoY and just 0.1 points QoQ. Adjusted net margin was 24.8%, up 6.2 points YoY and 2.6 points QoQ. 

Looking ahead to FQ3, Seagate projected a notable uptick in both gross and operating margins. Adjusted operating margin was projected to be in the mid-30% range, up around 3 points QoQ assuming this would correspond to roughly 35%. Based on adjusted opex guidance to be ~10% of revenue, this would place adjusted gross margin at ~45% under this framework.  

Evercore’s Amit Daryanani questioned about the QoQ strength in margins, more specifically the gross margin – management would not offer much aside from pricing and mix, with a HAMR ramp at a recently qualified customer aiding this expansion: 

“Gianluca, I'm hoping you can talk a little bit about the March quarter guide because there seems to be a really sizable uptick in gross margins. I think it's up like 250 basis points or 100% plus incrementals. Could you just — is there anything you would call out in March quarter that's unique that's helping drive that kind of margin expansion? And is this really all coming from the core HDD business? Or is there a potential benefit from the old systems business helping you as well?” 

EVP and CFO Gianluca Romano 

“Amit, well, I would say, we expect to be a very good quarter. I don't think it's different than what we have done before. It's always based on the pricing strategy and the mix, as you know. We qualified another customer on HAMR, so we will ramp a little bit more volume on HAMR. This is helping us to get better margin. But fundamentally, is not really different in how we think we are going to execute the quarter and is good. I think the incremental margin looks very good.” 

Romano had also clarified that Seagate had previously presented a model with a 50% incremental margin above $2.6 billion of revenue, noting that this model covers the next two to three years, with the HAMR ramp helping drive further margin expansion.   

EPS 

Driven by the margin expansion, Seagate delivered strong sequential EPS growth, with adjusted EPS up 19% QoQ to $3.11, beating estimates by 9.6%. YoY growth for adjusted EPS was 53.2%, decelerating from 65.1% in Q1. GAAP EPS in Q2 was $2.60, up 67.7% YoY, decelerating from 72.3% in Q1.  

Looking ahead to Q3, Seagate guided for adjusted EPS to be $3.40, +/- $0.20, representing a more than 25 point acceleration to 78.9% YoY at midpoint. Growth is expected to decelerate back towards ~50% YoY in FQ4 to $3.87.    

For FY26, current adjusted EPS estimates sit at $13.02, up 60.8% YoY, while GAAP EPS is projected to be $11.71, up 73% YoY. 

Cash Flows and Balance Sheet 

Seagate noted that its free cash flow generation reached the highest level in the last eight years, while they also retired $500 million in debt to strengthen its balance sheet.  

Operating cash flow in Q2 was $723 million for a 25.6% margin, up 17.1 points YoY and 5.4 points QoQ.  

Free cash flow was $607 million for a 21.5% margin, up 15 points YoY and 5.3 points QoQ. Management guided for free cash flow to expand further in Q3, supported by strong demand trends and operational efficiency. 

Cash and equivalents totaled $1.05 billion with management noting that total liquidity was $2.3 billion including its undrawn revolving credit facility.  

Inventories remained flat QoQ at $1.5 billion.  

Debt was $4.5 billion exiting Q2, down from $5 billion at the end of Q1. Seagate said its net leverage ratio was 1.1x, improving 16% QoQ and 63% YoY, with the expectation that net leverage will continue to trend lower as profitability and cash flows increase.  

Valuation 

Seagate is trading close to peak multiples, a tougher pill to swallow considering the slow sequential growth the company is seeing in the Data Center. Seagate trades at 7.8x forward PS, well above its 5-year average of 3.0x, and just below its recent peak of 8.5x. Shares had traded as low as 1.5x in April. 

Looking at the bottom line, Seagate trades at 31.5x forward PE, below its 39.9x average, though it should be noted this is skewed higher due to margins falling negative in 2023. Over the past year, shares are trading nearly double its average of 17x. 

Conclusion 

Seagate’s data center growth is much slower than other memory peers at just 5% QoQ as the HDD space is witnessing soft pricing power relative to SSDs or DRAM. Data center growth is also unlikely to meaningfully inflect moving through CY26 as price and volume agreements have already been locked in. Seagate does see potential for some pricing upside in 2027 as contracts are open for discussions, yet for now, pricing tailwinds are muted compared to what is seen in enterprise SSDs and DRAM.

Damien Robbins, Equity Analyst at I/O Fund contributed to this analysis.

Every Thursday at 4:30 pm Eastern, the I/O Fund team holds a webinar for premium members to discuss how to navigate the broad market, as well as various stock and crypto entries and exits. Beth Kindig offers weekly deep dives including lesser-known cryptocurrencies and AI stocks, plus the team offers trade alerts. The I/O Fund team is one of the only audited portfolios available to individual investors. If you’d like to subscribe to the Advanced Market Signals plan, email us at premium@io-fund.compremium@io-fund.com.

Please note: The I/O Fund conducts research and draws conclusions for the Fund’s positions. We then share that information with our readers. This is not a guarantee of a stock’s performance. Please consult your personal financial advisor before buying any stock in the companies mentioned in this analysis.

Recommended Reading:

  • Monolithic Power: Strong AI Tailwinds to Drive 50% Enterprise Data Segment Growth in FY26
  • Teradyne Q4: Revenue Accelerates to 41% QoQ, Possibly Peak Growth Quarter
  • Talen Q4: Reveals 2028 Timeline for Data Center Power Delivery
  • Nova: Memory Revenue Accelerates Sharply, though 1H 2026 Expected to be Soft
Posted in AI Stocks, Data CenterLeave a Comment on Seagate: Slow QoQ Data Center Growth, 2027 Capacity Under Discussions 

Broadcom Fiscal Q1: $100 Billion+ in AI Chip Revenue in 2027

Posted on March 5, 2026June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Broadcom guided to $22 billion in FQ2 revenue up 47% YoY and adjusted EBITDA at 68% of revenue. Within that, management guided semiconductor revenue to $14.8 billion, up 76% YoY, and AI revenue to $10.7 billion, up 140% YoY, indicating an acceleration from Q1.  

The most explosive comment was that: “Today, in fact, we have line of sight to achieve AI revenue from chips, just chips in excess of $100 billion in 2027. We have also secured the supply chain required to achieve this.”  

Management characterized this demand as being driven by a small number of hyperscalers  and frontier model builders, with both training and inference contributing as those customers will soon productize their LLM platforms. Within discussing the impressive customer list, the CEO of Broadcom hinted toward 2027 being significantly higher than $100 billion – plus another analyst did math that would show a sharp inflection in 2028 due to OpenAI’s incoming GWs. 

The majority of the Q&A was about the $100 billion comment, including surfacing why this estimate may prove to be far too low.  

$100 Billion for Chips Alone … and Counting 

AI revenue was at $8.4 billion this quarter and is guided to $10.7 billion next quarter for a run rate of about $43 billion. On the surface, the guide doesn’t look like much and would imply a deceleration given AI is growing at a rate of 140% YoY and 27% QoQ – whereas this is effectively saying Broadcom will double in 7-8 quarters.  

However, the easy-to-miss details on the guide is that the $100 billion is only for silicon and does not include networking. The words “significantly in excess” were also added later to the guide in the following statement during the Q&A portion: 

“Now to clarify your first part, Blayne. When I say we forecast, we have a line of sight that our revenue in '27 will be significantly in excess of $100 billion, I'm focusing on the fact that these are pretty much all based on chips, whether they are XPUs, whether they are switch chips DSPs, these are silicon content we're talking about.” 

According to the earnings call, networking is about 33% to 40% of AI revenue today: “AI networking revenue grew 60% year-on-year and represented 1/3 of total AI revenue. In Q2, we project AI networking to accelerate a lot more and grow to 40% of total AI revenue.” 

If we assume this mix continues on the low end for about 30% mix in AI networking of total AI revenue, then it’s reasonable to assume Broadcom’s AI revenue will be $143 billion with networking of $43 billion (or 30% of $143B). This represents a QoQ growth of 30% for 7-8 quarters – which is an excellent baseline to set. 

When you add the words “significantly in excess” of this amount, it spells a solid runway for Broadcom. 

The analysts in the Q&A session were not satisfied with this blanket comment and began poking around with one analyst doing the math on the customers plus what each GW is worth, and coming out closer to $180 billion to $200 billion in AI revenue. Here was the exchange – the CEO did not confirm the math but it still helps to know what the sell-side is thinking: 

“Stacy Rasgon Bernstein: 

I don't know if this is for Hock or Kirsten, but I wanted to dig in a little more to this substantially more than $100 billion next year. I'm trying to just count up the gigawatts. I counted, I don't know, 8 or 9, you have 3 from Anthropic, one from open AI, so that's 4. You said Meta was multiple, so east, that gets you to 6. Google, I figure should be bigger than Meta.so like at least 3, that's 9 and then you got a few others.  

I just thought that your content per gigawatt was sort of, call it, a $20 billion per gigawatt range. I guess what I'm asking, is my math around the gigawatts you plan to ship in 27 correct? And how do I think about your content per gigawatt as that ships — maybe we'll be "substantially" more than $100 billion. 

Hock Tan CEO: 

Stacy, you have a very interesting perspective, and I've got to [ remind ] you for that. But you're right. You can look at it a gigawatts, which is the right way to look at it instead of dollars because that's how we sell our chips. So you have to realize we — depending on our LLM customer, our 6 customers, sorry, not 56. The dollars per gigawatt is varies, sometimes quite dramatically. — it does vary. But you're right. It's so far from the dollars you are talking about. And if you look at it by gigawatt in '27, we are seeing getting close to 10 gigawatts.” 

OpenAI to Drive Strong Fiscal 2028  

During the opening remarks, the CEO stated that OpenAI represents 1 GW stating: “We expect OpenAI deploying in volume, their first-generation XPU in 2027 and over 1 gigawatt of compute capacity.” Later, an analyst drilled into the math to where OpenAI will eventually represent 10GWs, which could make for a strong inflection come 2028. 

“Joshua Buchalter, TD Cowen: 

Congrats on the results. I appreciate all the details on the expectations for deployment at specific customers. I was hoping you could just maybe reflect on how visibility has changed over the last 1 to 2 quarters that gave you the confidence to give us more details? And then on a specific one, you mentioned greater than 1 gigawatt for OpenAI in 2027, with that deal being for 10 gigawatts through 2029, that implied a pretty sharp inflection, I guess, in 2028. Is that the right way to think about it? And was that sort of always the plan? 

Hock Tan, CEO: 

Yes. Well, yes, this — as you've all seen, and you all know in this generative AI race that we are in now, and I shouldn't use the word race, let's call it, progression among the few players we see here, I mean, it's a competition. Each is trying to create an LLM better than the other and more tailored for specific purpose, be it enterprise, be it consumer, be it search. Each one is trying to create it more and more. And all of that requires not just training, which is important to keep improving your LLM models. But inference for productization and monetization of your LLMs.  

And we are going — and probably call it the fact that we've been engaged with some of them now for more than a couple of years. We're getting better and better visibility as they have more and more confidence that the XPUs they are working on with us is achieving what they are getting it as they get the sense that the XPUs they are working on with the software, with the algorithms they needed, they are having more confidence that this XPU silicon is what they need.  

And it gets better and better. And It's get better, we get more visibility as Charlie puts up perfectly because at the end of the day, we only have 6 guys to work on. And these 6 guys are all, as I said, look at XPUs and AI in a very strategic manner. They don't think 1 generation at a time. They think multiple generation multiple years.” 

Speaking of large customers, in the exchange above, Broadcom refutes the idea that Meta is facing significant hurdles for its MITA chips, stating in the opening remarks that: “Now contrary, the recent analyst reports Meta's custom accelerator MTIA roadmap is alive and well. We're shipping now. And in fact, for the next generation XPUs, we will scale to multiple [ gigawatts ] in '27 and beyond.” 

Financials 

By Royston Roche 

Revenue grew by 29.5%

Broadcom’s FQ1 ending January 2026 revenue grew by 29.5% YoY and 7.2% QoQ to $19.3 billion, beating estimates by 0.9%. Revenue growth accelerated by 1.3 percentage points from 28.2% growth in the previous quarter.  

Management provided a strong FQ2 guide of $22 billion, implying a YoY growth of 46.6% and 13.9% QoQ, beating estimates by 7.8%. The expected strong growth is primarily driven by AI revenue, which is expected to grow 140% YoY and 27% QoQ to $10.7 billion. Analysts expect strong growth to continue, with revenue expected to grow 71.7% YoY to $27.39 billion in FQ3 and 74% YoY to $31.35 billion in FQ4.

Key Segments 

Semiconductor Solutions 

FQ1 Semiconductor solutions revenue grew by 52% YoY and 13% QoQ to $12.5 billion and was better than the management guidance of $12.3 billion. Revenue growth accelerated by 17 percentage points from 35% growth in the previous quarter. Management expects semiconductor revenue to further accelerate to 76% YoY and 18% QoQ to $14.8 billion in the next quarter, driven by the surge in AI revenue.

FQ1 AI revenue grew by 106% YoY and 29% QoQ to $8.4 billion. Revenue growth accelerated from 74% YoY and 25% QoQ in the previous quarter. Management expects strong growth to continue in the next quarter and AI revenue is expected to grow 140% YoY and 27% QoQ to $10.7 billion.  

The company’s CEO, Hock Tan, said in the earnings call, “Now our custom accelerator business grew 140% year-on-year in Q1. This momentum continues in Q2. The ramp of custom AI accelerators across all our 5 customers is progressing very well. For Google, we continue our trajectory of growth in '26 with strong demand for the seventh-generation Ironwood TPU. In 2027 and beyond, we expect to see even stronger demand from next generations of TPU. For Anthropic, we are off to a very good start in 2026 for 1 gigawatt of TPU compute. And for '27, this demand is expected to surge in excess of 3 gigawatts of compute. Our XPU franchise, I should add, extends beyond TPUs.” 

Non-AI semiconductor FQ1 revenue was flat YoY at $4.1 billion, in line with guidance. Enterprise networking, broadband, server storage revenues were up YoY, offset by a seasonal decline in wireless. In FQ2, management expects non-AI semiconductor revenue to be $4.1 billion, up 4% YoY.

Infrastructure Software 

FQ1 Infrastructure Software revenue came at $6.8 billion, up 1% YoY and down (2%) QoQ and was in line with the guidance. VMware revenue grew 13% YoY. Management expects infrastructure software revenue to grow 9% YoY and 6% QoQ to $7.2 billion in the next quarter. 

Margins 

The company’s adjusted EBITDA margins beat management guidance in FQ1, primarily driven by operating leverage.  

  • FQ1 gross profits grew by 29.7% YoY to $13.16 billion. Gross profit margin improved by 10 basis points YoY and QoQ to 68.1%. Adjusted gross margin came at 77%, down 210 basis points YoY and 90 basis points QoQ and marginally beat the guidance by 10 basis points. Management has guided adjusted gross margin to be flat sequentially to 77% and down 240 basis points YoY. 
  • FQ1 operating income grew by 36.8% YoY to $8.56 billion. Operating margin improved by 230 basis points YoY and 260 basis points QoQ to 44.3% primarily driven by operating leverage. The adjusted operating margin was 66.4%, compared to 65.9% in the same period last year and 66.2% in the previous quarter. 
  • FQ1 net income grew by 33.5% YoY to $7.35 billion with a net profit margin of 38.1% compared to 36.9% in the same period last year. Adjusted net income grew by 30.2% YoY to $10.19 billion with an adjusted net profit margin of 52.7% compared to 52.4% in the same period last year.

FQ1 adjusted EBITDA grew by 30.2% YoY to $13.1 billion with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 68% and was better than the management guidance of 67%. Management has guided FQ2 adjusted EBITDA guidance to be flat sequentially and up 100 basis points YoY to 68%.

Adjusted EPS grew by 28% 

FQ1 GAAP EPS grew by 31.6% YoY to $1.50. Adjusted EPS grew by 28.1% YoY to $2.05, beating estimates by 1.3%, primarily driven by operating leverage. Analysts expect strong growth in the coming quarters and adjusted EPS is expected to grow 36.9% YoY to $2.16 in FQ2 and 69.5% YoY to $2.86 in FQ3.

Cash Flow and Balance Sheet 

Broadcom’s cash flows are improving, driven by higher profits. 

  • FQ1 operating cash flows grew by 35.1% YoY to $8.26 billion with an operating cash flow margin of 42.8% compared to 41% in the same period last year. 
  • FQ1 free cash flows grew by 33.2% YoY to $8.01 billion with a free cash flow margin of 41.5% compared to 40.3% in the same period last year. 
  • Cash was $14.2 billion at the end of FQ1 with debt of $66.1 billion compared to cash of $16.2 billion and debt of $65.1 billion at the end of FQ4. The company repurchased shares worth $7.85 billion and paid dividends of $3.1 billion in the recent quarter. Management authorized an additional $10 billion share repurchase program effective through the end of calendar year 2026. 
  • Inventory increased by 30.4% QoQ to $2.96 billion to support the strong AI demand. 

Conclusion: 

Broadcom’s most consequential message this quarter was not the near-term guide, but the long-range visibility: management stated it has line of sight to AI-related revenue in FY2027 “significantly in excess of $100 billion.” 

If that framework proves accurate, the market will be forced to shift from debating whether AI spend can persist to modeling how Broadcom scales into that demand across XPUs and networking as customers expand from early deployments into multi-gigawatt clusters.  

Notably, management’s comments imply substantial silicon content per gigawatt—for example, Anthropic’s trajectory has been discussed in terms that can translate into roughly $20 billion per GW—and they also referenced a back-half weighted OpenAI ramp that appears more likely to contribute in 2028–2029.  

And that’s only what we can quantify today …

Please note: The I/O Fund conducts research and draws conclusions for the company’s portfolio. We then share that information with our readers and offer real-time trade notifications. This is not a guarantee of a stock’s performance and it is not financial advice. Please consult your personal financial advisor before buying any stock in the companies mentioned in this analysis. Beth Kindig and the I/O Fund own shares in AVGO at the time of writing and may own stocks pictured in the charts.

Recommended Reading:

  • Nvidia Q4: Stellar Report; Stock Remains Range Bound
  • Alphabet Q4: Cloud Sees 14 Point Acceleration to 48% Growth, FY26 Capex to Nearly Double
  • 2025 Full Year Audited Returns
  • AppLovin: Strong Fundamentals; Sentiment Remains a Hurdle
Posted in AI Stocks, SemiconductorsLeave a Comment on Broadcom Fiscal Q1: $100 Billion+ in AI Chip Revenue in 2027

AppLovin: Strong Fundamentals; Sentiment Remains a Hurdle

Posted on February 12, 2026June 30, 2026 by io-fund

AppLovin’s fundamentals remained strong in this earnings report, yet negative sentiment continues to build. There is no material evidence that market concerns are playing out, yet regardless, the market has a new set of concerns around AI-driven ad competitors, following previous concerns on short seller reports and SEC probes. 

Sticking to the facts, the company reported very strong growth of 66% YoY and 18% QoQ for revenue of $1.66 billion. On a sequential basis, AppLovin accelerated from 11.6% QoQ last quarter though YoY was down about 230 basis points. Looking into Q1, the company is guiding for growth of 6.2% QoQ on a higher revenue base of $1.66 billion compared to 16% QoQ growth in Q1 last year on a lower revenue base of $999.5 million. The Q1 revenue guide beat estimates by a solid 3.5%. 

Adjusted EBITDA margin of 84% was up 700 basis points from last year and up 200 basis points QoQ. This makes for a Rule of 40 of 150, which is higher than Palantir and Cloudflare.  

You will be hard pressed to find any issues with the earnings report, yet just as Applovin was beginning to overcome the negative spin from short sellers, a slew of AI-driven competitors launched recently. There were plenty of discussions around Applovin’s positioning, detailed for you below.

AppLovin is a Shark in Sharky Waters: 

By definition of being an ad platform, AppLovin is in sharky waters. There is far more competition among advertising platforms than what public investors may realize – the ecosystem is into the thousands 

However, AppLovin is top dog (or top shark) in many regards, especially when it comes to gaming for sure, and also when it comes to independent ad platforms. The weak price action as of late is because the waters have become more crowded.  

Here is what I had stated last quarter, noting the stock is not for the faint of heart: 

“AppLovin operates in shark-infested waters as one of the few companies over the past decade to challenge the walled gardens of Meta and Google. While the company’s fundamentals are exceptional, the presence of an SEC probe—discussed below—adds complexity, contributing to sharp swings in both directions.” 

There are three primary developments that complicate AppLovin’s moat, which the market is grappling with. I’ll go in order of least concerning. 

Google’s Project Genie 3 

Google recently announced Project Genie 3, which offers AI-driven automation for ads by relying on AI agents for campaign setup and optimizations. If we look more closely, Genie is more about workflow automation whereas Applovin emphasizes performance as it’s built on a very large data set of 1+ billion users. The end goal is fundamentally different as Project Genie offers automation of ad operations (so, reducing workforce is the most likely outcome) compared to Applovin’s Axon which is focused on marginal improvements in ad performance by continuously training models to optimize ROAS (return on ad spend) and LTV (lifetime value). 

Here is how it was described on the call: 

“But right now, we're seeing somewhere around day 30 LTV to cost of user acquisition. So if you think about lead gen models and if you know lead gen models and also if you understand the life of value that we create for advertisers, which is in the many years, to be able to break even on the media buy in 30 days is exceptional. We've got arguably one of the best business models the world has ever seen, and we're seeing the ability to market our platform and small testing at that level.” 

For reference, 30 days LTV to CAC (customer acquisition cost) is exceptional as many direct-to-consumer brands consider 3 months as ideal for fast growth and 6 months acceptable. 

CloudX: 

CloudX is a startup founded by an AI executive heavyweight who previously founded MoPub and MAX (which was later acquired by AppLovin). Rather than competing with Applovin on the demand/advertiser side, this newly launched startup is targeting the publisher/supply side.  

As it stands, Applovin works with the world’s largest gaming publishers and is adding e-commerce sites. Where CloudX hopes to attract those publishers is by offering AI agents to offload time-intensive busywork of integrating multiple software development kits (SDKs), mediation layers and custom bidding logic. This level of work represents entire teams on the engineering side, and also can quickly improve time-to-deployment for trying new ad products and demand partners.  

On the topic of demand partners, CloudX stated the following in their public announcement: “Four months ago, CloudX launched with three demand partners and a handful of publishers. Today, we're generally available with seven bidders: Meta, Unity, Liftoff, Magnite, InMobi, Mintegral, and Moloco. All competing in the same verified auction. At the same time, we’ve been hard at work adding the publisher features that our first batch of customers have been asking for. We put together a quick demo video to give you an idea of the power of our Monetization as Code and Agentic enabled approach.”Monetization as Code and Agentic enabled approach.” 

However, performance parity is not guaranteed as AppLovin has a formidable dataset – in fact, it’s likely the most attractive dataset outside of Big Tech with over 1 billion users. CloudX has a lot to prove, especially given AppLovin can provide a 30-day LTV to CAC.   

Here is what was stated about CloudX on the call: 

“So in a world where Cloud X becomes a start-up that comes into the space, you have to talk about like what are they walking into? How is the world different today versus what it was? The moat around our mediation is not because of the mediation. We're very good. We've got the most bid density. In any mediation A/B test, if you talk to publishers, you'll hear MAX does better. But we don't blow it out of the water. We're a few percentage points better than other mediations. If someone wanted to pay a bonus to cover that, they could potentially pay a bonus to cover that.  

Where it gets really expensive for the publisher and where we're really locked in is that we have the best advertising solutions on the market. In fact, for a lot of these publishers, we're over 50% of all their user acquisition spend. They can't go get that anywhere else. If they go off MAX, that decays. And so they're left in a world where they have the best buying tools. They have the best monetization tools. It becomes a really strong 360 solution and their growth depends on it.  

And then the MAX ecosystem is not growing slow, as we've talked about in prior calls, this is a double-digit, very strong growing category where these publishers are seeing their businesses improve because of the improvement in our technology. When you've got that in the foundation and you've got a really strong moat with technologies that no one else can replicate or have, then you end up with a sticky solution, and we're very confident our solution is just that.” 

Meta: 

The I/O Fund has been quite vocal about Meta’s strength among the Mag 7 given Advantage+ is reporting a $60 billion annual run rate. Conversely, the market is concerned that Meta’s capex-fueled push into AI-driven ad automation will breach Applovin’s moat.  There has not been a formal announcement that Meta is focused on gaming inventory or no-ID inventory, yet analysts are growing concerned this is inevitable given the company’s aggressive push to integrate more AI features into ad optimization and targeting.  

In November, Meta announced they had optimized campaigns for 29% higher return on ad spend (ROAS) compared to a 12% improvement earlier in the year. The press release stated, “the gaming sector shows particularly strong adoption” with many of the top global gaming studios commenting on the improvements.  

Meta received most of the analyst questions given they pose a more substantial threat in terms of data and budget for AI initiatives, plus more direct overlap given their Audience Network ad platform is aimed at attracting publishers. 

There were many questions about Meta, but this one was the most important, in my opinion: 

“Five years ago, when Meta was really big in the space, and I think this is what's throwing people off. People recall a time Meta was half the space. They think it's going to be half the space again. Meta has been on IDFA-based and Google ad ID-based traffic since that no IDFA change. Nothing has changed for them. What's changed in the marketplace is that the other ad platforms that are built for this category, Unity, Liftoff, Moloco, et cetera, have gotten better.  

Now we've got the best. AXON 2 was the biggest breakthrough in a model in this category period, and we were able to end up becoming the #1 by a lot. AXON 2 didn't exist five years ago. So there's no world where Meta is going to end up becoming that kind of a dominant player in the face of this competition. In fact, I don't see a world anyone else can because they're going up against that dominance. And these models, as they build more data, it's a closed-loop model that's continuously reinforcing itself and getting smarter. 

Our model is so far into getting smart for this niche. The niche isn't that small, and we've got such a strong position. It's highly unlikely that someone else is going to come in and materially disrupt it. So a long way of saying, again, no, we don't see what people are so afraid of. We think psychologically, people just index on numbers from five years ago and think, oh, Meta is going to ramp to that. But just ask the customers you talk to, what's the share of wallet between us to them and to everyone else on IDFA-based traffic, and that will give you an indicator of how good we are.” 

Financials 

By Royston Roche 

Q4 Revenue Growth of 66% 

AppLovin’s Q4 revenue grew by a stellar 65.9% YoY and 18% QoQ to $1.66 billion, beating estimates by 2.9%. The strong revenue growth was primarily driven by continued strength in the gaming advertising revenue, seasonal strength, and the contribution of e-commerce revenue. Management has guided Q1 revenue of $1.745 billion to $1.775 billion, implying a YoY growth of 51.9% YoY and 6.2% QoQ at the midpoint. The Q1 revenue guide beat estimates by a solid 3.5%. 

The company’s co-founder, Adam Foroughi, said in the earnings call, “Our performance, our business is executing extremely well. We continue to grow very quickly despite the numbers getting much bigger. We delivered strong growth in Q4. And despite typical seasonality where Q1 should be softer than Q4, we are guiding to meaningful sequential growth. That reflects both continued strength in gaming and the scaling of our e-commerce and our self-service customers.” 

Full year 2025 revenue grew by 70% YoY to $5.48 billion. Looking ahead, analysts expect revenue to grow 43.7% YoY to $7.87 billion in 2026 and 28.1% YoY to $10.08 billion in 2027. 

Q4 Operating Margin of 77% 

AppLovin’s margin expansion is truly outstanding, primarily driven by strong operating leverage. The company’s AI-powered advertising engine, AXON 2.0, launched in Q2 2023, serving as a game-changer that drove strong revenue and profits. 

  • Q4 gross profits grew by 74.3% YoY to $1.47 billion with a gross profit margin of 88.9%. The gross profit margin was up 420 basis points YoY and 130 basis points sequentially.  
  • Q4 operating income grew by 103% YoY to $1.275 billion, driven by solid operating leverage. The company’s operating margin improved by 1400 basis points YoY and 10 basis points sequentially to 76.9%.  
  • Q4 net income grew by 84.9% YoY to $1.10 billion. Net profit margin improved by 690 basis points YoY to 66.5%. 
  • Adjusted EBITDA grew by 81.7% YoY to $1.40 billion with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 84%, up by a solid 700 basis points YoY and 200 basis points sequentially. Management Q1 adjusted EBITDA guide is 84%, up 300 basis points YoY and flat QoQ. 
  • 2025 operating margin improved to 75.8%, from 59.3% in 2024. 
  • Net profit margin improved to 62.6%, from 49.3% in 2024. 
  • Adjusted EBITDA margin improved to 82%, from 75% in 2024. 

GAAP EPS grew by 88% YoY 

Q4 GAAP EPS grew by 88.4% YoY to $3.24 primarily driven by strong operating leverage. The EPS beat the analysts estimates by a solid 10.1%. Analysts expect strong growth to continue with Q1 EPS expected to grow by 97.9% YoY to $3.30 and Q2 EPS to grow by 49.2% YoY to $3.57. 

Looking ahead, analysts expect 2026 EPS to grow by 59.3% YoY to $15.53 and by 26.6% YoY to $19.65 in 2027. 

Q4 Free Cash Flow Grew by 88% 

The company has an exceptionally strong cash flow margin profile, primarily driven by strong profits.   

  • Q4 operating cash flows grew by 87.4% YoY to $1.314 billion with a margin of 79.2%, up 910 basis points YoY. 
  • Q4 free cash flows grew by 88.3% YoY to $1.31 billion with a margin of 79%, up 1370 basis points YoY. 
  • The company’s cash improved to $2.49 billion, up from $1.67 billion at the end of the previous quarter. While debt remained the same at $3.51 billion.   
  • The company repurchased and withheld 800,000 shares, valued at $482 million. For the full year, the company repurchased about 6.4 million shares for $2.58 billion, funded entirely by free cash flows. Over the last four quarters, the company reduced the outstanding shares from 346 million in Q4 2024 to 340 million. The remaining share repurchase authorization is $3.28 billion at the end of Q4 2025. 

Conclusion: 

In terms of number of competitors, Applovin operates in the sharkiest arena across the tech sector. Concerns around Meta, CloudX and IDFA dynamics are narratives that are not showing up in the fundamentals. What Applovin offers is performance at scale and a real data advantage that only Meta can rival. Even with Meta rivaling Applovin across many publishers, Applovin contends they have the gaming category cornered and are now expanding into e-commerce. The most likely end result is that most publishers will use both. 

In the Top 15 report, I led with the cautionary sentence that “AppLovin is a stock that needs a strong technical analysis overlay” as App’s fundamentals argue there is real staying power, but the stock will continue to demand patience and disciplined timing.

Royston Roche, Equity Analyst at I/O Fund contributed to this analysis.

Please note: The I/O Fund conducts research and draws conclusions for the company’s portfolio. We then share that information with our readers and offer real-time trade notifications. This is not a guarantee of a stock’s performance and it is not financial advice. Please consult your personal financial advisor before buying any stock in the companies mentioned in this analysis. Beth Kindig and the I/O Fund own shares in APP at the time of writing and may own stocks pictured in the charts.

Recommended Reading:

  • Cloudflare Q4: Important Inflection Across Key Metrics
  • Reddit Q4: Unwavering Fundamentals; Change in User Reporting Metrics
  • The I/O Fund’s Top 15 Stocks for Q1 2026
  • Astera Labs Q4: Solid Beat, but Q1 Margin Guide is Soft
Posted in AI Stocks, SoftwareLeave a Comment on AppLovin: Strong Fundamentals; Sentiment Remains a Hurdle

Astera Labs Q4: Solid Beat, but Q1 Margin Guide is Soft

Posted on February 11, 2026June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Astera Labs delivered a solid Q4 beat with revenue up another 17.4% QoQ, though the one point to nitpick from this report was Q1’s softer margin guidance, as it would imply a step down to below the 20% GAAP operating margin level sustained for the last three quarters. In addition, the hypergrowth company is not able to keep up with high comps given sequential growth is expected to be 7.7% QoQ following many quarters of double-digit QoQ growth with some quarters as high as 20%+ sequentially.  

There were clues in the call as to when Astera is most likely to see a second wind with Scorpio-X as the catalyst. Overall, Astera has a longer runway than the market is communicating given there is an element of vendor lock-in to their products. Additionally, Ethernet is optimized for reach, whereas Astera specializes in PCIe, which is optimized for something quite different – GPU-to-GPU communication and memory-level workloads inside the rack. 

Astera also announced that it entered into a warrant agreement with Amazon, allowing the tech giant to purchase up to 3.26 million shares at $142.82 through February 2033. The warrants will vest in tranches of payments made by Amazon for the purchase of up to $6.5 billion worth of Astera’s smart fabric switch, signal conditioning and optical engine products. The vote of confidence from one of Astera’s major customers is certainly welcomed. 

UALink Versus ESUN Debate  

The simplest way to settle the UALink versus ESUN debate is that AI systems using PCIe today are upgrading to PCIe6, and those relying on Ethernet will remain with that protocol. Rather than a winner-takes-all market, the most likely outcome is a hybrid system as PCIe is superior inside the rack and Ethernet is superior for scale-out between racks. 

As covered last quarter in the Q3 Earnings write-up, Ethernet Scale-Up Networking (ESUN) is kicking up dust in the market. The market is concerned because ESUN is proposing an Ethernet solution for scale-up with the October press release stating: “ESUN is a new workstream collaboration designed as an open technical forum to advance Ethernet in the rapidly growing scale-up domain for AI systems.” 

Last quarter, I pointed out that latency is a differentiator as UALink operates in the 100s of nanoseconds versus microseconds for Ethernet (as it stands today). Bridging this gap requires a leap in product design and successful deployment, and until that occurs, ESUN is structurally disadvantaged on intra-rack scale-up workloads. 

There is a time to market issue for UALink, yet in the meantime, PCIe remains a strong choice for fast, scale-up systems. PCIe is deployable right now for scale-up pods and CXL is also a strong choice for memory pool connectivity (Astera participates in all of this). 

The reality is that PCIe wins out for tighter, low-latency scale-up. What PCIe offers is device-level interconnects for highly synchronized GPU-to-GPU communication. The strength of PCIe will only become more evident (not less) as large training jobs require more GPUs to communicate. To contrast, Ethernet is a networking protocol designed for maximum reach – which are strengths that are quite distinct from intra-rack connectivity. 

Memory access between devices is another distinction where PCIe excels as Ethernet Scale-Up does not natively address memory-level integrations. This is an area the I/O Fund is watching closely for Astera, because as memory capacity scales and speeds increase, the attach rate increases for a vendor like Astera with more PCIe lanes, more signal conditioning and fabric complexity. Overall, the memory boom should increase Astera’s content across both PCIe and CXL deployments. 

Which leads us to Scorpio-X … 

Scorpio to Become Largest Product by Year End 

For a refresher on Astera’s products, please reference our previous analysis hereour previous analysis here 

Scorpio-P contributed 15% of revenue this quarter and it was stated previously that Scorpio-P and Scorpio-X will reach more than 50% of revenue by 2026. The X-Series is highly anticipated as it’s expected to be a much higher ASP product than the P-Series. Management in the past has called the X-Series an “anchor socket” which means it will secure vendor lock-in for Astera and they will be able to add more products, such as modules and silicon level products. Last quarter, management stated: “we expect our overall dollar content opportunity per AI accelerator to significantly increase, representing another step-up from a baseline revenue standpoint.” 

The update this quarter is that the X-Series will “incrementally grow revenue in the first half of 2026, followed by a transition to high-volume production in the second half. We continue to make excellent progress with additional engagements looking to leverage PCIe for scale-up networking. As previously communicated, we are engaged with 10-plus customers for Scorpio X family. And our current expectation is that we will ship initial quantities of Scorpio X series to support new customer platforms in the second half of 2026 with volume ramp set for 2027.” 

There was an inquiry on the call as to timing and magnitude: 

Ross Seymore, Deutsche Bank AG 

I guess, Mike, as my follow-up on — to the Scorpio family. I believe you said it crossed 15% of sales in 2025. So I just want to clarify if that was true. But perhaps more importantly, sort of bogeys as far as the growth rate this year. I believe in the past, you talked about it would cross over and become your biggest product line at some point this year. Is that still the case? Any updates on those sorts of timing and magnitude? 

Michael Tate, CFO 

Yes. So yes, so we originally set up for a 10% bogey, we did cross above 15% for 2025. And again, that's all just P-Series, X is for scale up is a much bigger, larger TAM for us and that we're starting to shift initial volumes in the first half, but the more material step up in the back half. So the commonization of those 2 will put us on a trajectory for it to be our biggest product line. But Aries and Taurus and Leo are all growing as well. So it's hard to know exactly when we cross over.  

But definitely at some point, it will. It will — it's going to drive very good revenue growth for us.” 

Astera Hints at New Customer Design Wins for NVLink 

As stated in our Top 15 report, PCIe remains relevant during the Vera Rubin transition due to from Nvidia’s “Extreme Co-Design.” As Rubin brings multiple compute, networking, and memory components together into a single, tightly integrated platform, the need for rapid, low-latency data movement within the server increases. 

This extends further with Nvidia’s move to PCIe Gen6 alongside expanded CXL support on its Vera CPU, up from PCIe Gen5 on Grace. CXL enables low-latency, high-bandwidth memory and cache sharing between CPUs, GPUs, and attached memory devices, reinforcing PCIe’s role at the heart of the system architecture. PCIe fabric switches are also expected to remain critical for backend GPU-to-GPU communication and for linking CPUs, NICs, and storage at scale. 

That’s a bit of context for why one of the most important parts of the call was not related to ESUN but rather it was confirmation that Nvidia is working with Astera on NVLink integrations. This is a lengthier quote so bear with me, but it ties together the full picture of why I believe Astera has a longer runway than the market is communicating. 

Blayne Curtis, Jefferies: 

Congrats on the results and congrats, Mike, on the new role. I just want to ask you, obviously, this $6.5 billion is a huge number. I might already know the answer, but I wanted to ask you about what seems like one of the biggest debates still is the acceptance of UA Link for these next-gen designs. You mentioned two lead customers mentioning it. I'm just kind of curious as people think about your UA Link switch opportunity, particularly at your largest customer versus the custom connectivity and then maybe them using NVLink? 

I'm kind of curious with this deal, is there any better visibility you can kind of think about, you know, that mix between hybrid boxes and native UA Link for these Azure lead customers? 

Jitendra Mohan, CEO: 

Thanks, Blayne. Maybe let me start and then Mike can chime in on the warrant itself. So, yes, clearly, AWS announced at re:Invent that the Trainium 4, which is slated to ramp in 2027, will support UA Link, which was a very positive endorsement of UA Link, as well as support for NVLink fusion. Subsequently, AMD has also announced that their MI 500 series will also support UA Link, again in 2027. So these are two very good public announcements in support of UA Link, and there are several other discussions that are ongoing. The UA Link ecosystem is coming. We've got great availability of IP, a lot of vendor announcements, and so on. 

And so we will be ready with our UA Link solution to intercept the ramp that happens in 2027. Now for NVLink fusion, this also represents a meaningful opportunity for us. And before we jump into what the opportunities are, I do want to call out the fact that both Amazon, the hyperscaler, as well as NVIDIA have chosen Astera Labs as a partner. And that's a very important statement in terms of the trust that they place in Astera Labs. So the opportunity itself is to take the native protocol that the XPU or the ASIC speaks and translate that into NVLink. 

This is a sophisticated function, and we have a solution that we will deploy to address this. And given the fact that the solution attaches to the XPU on a one-to-one basis, we anticipate the overall revenues to be in line with the switch opportunity where we might be selling a UA Link switch. So all in all, the exact mix of how much NVLink fusion would be deployed versus a native solution would be deployed remains to be seen. But for us, the opportunity is roughly the same for both. 

My Takeaway: 

My goal is to always simplify things for my Research Members as much as I possibly can, which is why I had described about 8 months ago that Astera Labs is the best of both worlds as the company participates in both GPU workloads and custom silicon workloads from Amazon. That was echoed again this evening, which is that Astera will do well regardless of whether hyperscalers choose UALink (open standard mainly for custom silicon) or NVLink (Nvidia’s native scale-up for GPUs) 

Financials 

Q1 Revenue Guided to Increase 7.7% QoQ, Slowest in Public History 

Astera reported Q4 revenue of $270.6 million, topping estimates for $249.6 million by 8.4%. Growth continued to decelerate on both a YoY and QoQ basis, with YoY growth decelerating more than 12 points to 91.8% and QoQ growth by 2.7 points to 17.4%.  

For Q1, Astera guided for revenue between $286 to $297 million, more than 12% ahead of estimates for $260.1 million. However, this guidance points to YoY and QoQ growth continuing to decelerate, to 82.9% YoY and 7.7% QoQ. This would represent Astera’s slowest QoQ growth in its public history. As we had covered in detail last quarter, Astera’s higher-ASP Scorpio X-Series product now entered initial production in late January, likely becoming a greater tailwind to growth as its ramp progresses throughout the year. 

For the full year, Astera reported revenue of $852.5 million, up 115.1% YoY, ahead of estimates for 108.9% growth. While there was no specific guidance for 2026, current estimates for $1.18 billion in revenue, up 42.4% YoY, are likely to be revised higher in the coming days considering Q1 beat by more than $30 million.  

Soft Q1 Guide for Margins 

The one piece to nitpick would be Astera’s softer gross and operating margin guidance, though this comes with good reason – management stated that they will be accelerating R&D investments, including investments in the Scorpio X-Series roadmap, and opening a new design center in Israel to focus on next-gen scale-up fabric and R&D to address memory bottlenecks.  

For the Scorpio X-Series, management said the decision to expand the product roadmap stemmed from discussions and initial deployments with hyperscalers revealing more opportunities in the scale-up switching market, estimated to be $20 billion by 2030. This expanded X-Series roadmap will focus on new capabilities “including support for increased radix, platform-specific protocols, in-network computing, Hypercast technology, and optical connectivity.”  

Breaking this down, increased radix will help the X-Series support varying cluster sizes, from small to large-scale configurations, with support for custom interconnect protocols and tech enhancements to improve utilization and reduce GPU-to-GPU communication overhead. Including photonic switch-to-accelerator links is expected to help enable multi-rack deployments and facilitate scaling to thousands of GPUs.  

Management stated: “You know, as we spoke on the call, the TAM is much bigger than we originally expected just, you know, when we measured it, just twelve, eighteen months ago. So we are increasing our investments to pursue these opportunities. Last quarter in Q4, we did close the XScale acquisition, so now we have a full quarter in Q1. And then just recently in this quarter, we closed another AQUI hire.” 

To put it briefly, the major takeaway here is that R&D expenditures moving through 2026 may create a more persistent operating margin headwind; for example, R&D expenses rose 18.9% QoQ in Q4 to $93.8 million, or 34.7% of revenue, and could continue to outpace revenue growth as these investments unfold.  

Turning to margins: 

GAAP gross margin was 75.6% in Q4, up 1.6 points YoY but down 0.7 points QoQ. Adjusted gross margin was 75.7%. For Q1, management guided for some gross margin contraction, forecasting GAAP and adjusted gross margin to be 74%, down 0.9 points YoY and 1.6-1.7 points QoQ.  

GAAP operating margin showed slight sequential improvement in Q4, coming in at 24.7%, up 24.6 points YoY and 0.7 points QoQ, beating guidance for 22.2%. Adjusted operating margin was 40.2%, up 5.9 points YoY but down 1.5 points QoQ. 

The main critique was Q1’s operating margin guidance, as it currently points to a more pronounced contraction, likely due to the R&D ramp — GAAP operating expenses were guided to increase nearly 15% QoQ, or almost double the guided revenue growth rate, while adjusted operating expenses were guided to increase nearly 20% QoQ.   

Thus, Q1 GAAP operating margin was guided to be 19.8% at midpoint, down 4.9 points QoQ (but still up 12.7 points YoY), while adjusted operating margin was guided at 34.5% at midpoint, down 5.7 points QoQ and up only 0.8 points YoY.  

Q4 GAAP net margin was 16.6%, down 0.9 points YoY and 22.9 points QoQ, due to a $33.9 million income tax provision, whereas the two comparable quarters above witnessed income tax benefits of $14 million and $24.2 million respectively. Adjusted net margin was 38.7%, down 8.4 points YoY but up 0.4 points QoQ.  

For the full-year, Astera reported substantial GAAP margin expansion down the line. GAAP gross margin contracted 0.7 points YoY to 75.7%, though operating margin improved 49.6 points, from (29.3%) in 2024 to 20.3% in 2025. GAAP net margin improved 46.8 points to 25.7%.  

Adjusted margins also expanded nicely, but not to the same degree – while adjusted gross margin contracted 0.8 points to 75.8%, adjusted operating margin increased 9 points to 39.2%. Adjusted net margin for 2025 was 38.8%, expanding just 2.6 points.  

EPS Beat of 13.7%, Smallest on Record 

Astera reported its smallest EPS beat since going public, with its $0.58 in adjusted EPS in Q4 beating the $0.51 estimate by just 13.7%; for comparison, its second-smallest beat was in Q2 2024 at 18.9%, while the prior two quarters saw beats of >25% each. Adjusted EPS growth was 56.8%, decelerating from 113% in Q3.  

GAAP EPS was $0.25 in Q4, missing estimates for $0.30, likely due to the sharp net margin contraction related to the income tax provision. GAAP EPS growth was 78.6%. 

For Q1, Astera guided for adjusted EPS to be $0.53 to $0.54 and GAAP EPS to be $0.36 to $0.38, both figures barely ahead of estimates for $0.52 and $0.34 respectively. This would point to adjusted EPS growth accelerating slightly to 62.1%, and GAAP EPS growth accelerating to 105.6%.    

For 2025, Astera reported GAAP EPS of $1.22, up from a ($0.64) loss in 2024, while adjusted EPS was $1.84, up 119% YoY. Astera did not provide a full year guide for 2026, though considering the possibility for increased R&D to weigh some on margins and the marginal Q1 beat versus estimates, revisions are likely to be minimal from the current $2.37 for 33.1% growth.  

Cash Flows and Balance Sheet 

Cash flow margins remained strong in Q4, while Astera’s balance sheet remained healthy with zero debt and cash increasing slightly. Accounts receivable showed strong growth while inventories also rose, indicating that growth may remain strong through the initial part of 2026.  

Operating cash flow was $95.3 million in Q4 for a 35.2% margin, up 7.1 points YoY and 1.3 points QoQ. For 2025, operating cash flow was $319.3 million for a 37.5% margin, expanding 3 points YoY.  

Free cash flow was $76.6 million for a 28.3% margin, up 11.1 points YoY but down 0.2 points QoQ. For the year, free cash flow was $281.8 million for a 33.1% margin, up 7.3 points YoY.  

Accounts receivable surged nearly 94% QoQ to $83.2 million, while inventories rose more than 14% QoQ to almost $59 million, both positive signals that revenue growth is likely to remain strong considering the state of demand and hyperscaler capex plans.  

Cash and equivalents totaled $1.19 billion while debt remained zero.  

Conclusion: 

The I/O Fund considers many factors when determining how to position correctly. Frankly, the charts are picking up on market doubts from ESUN, yet the product analysis points to the setup for a second wind. Where Astera continues to stand out is that its products are qualified for both custom silicon for UALink and Nvidia deployments via NVLink, providing rare relevance across dueling platforms.  

Perhaps most importantly, Ethernet Scale-Up doesn’t weaken this position, rather the debate leads to a reinforcement on why PCIe is very difficult to displace. In a fluid and competitive space like networking, Astera breadth of customers and platforms integrations offer rare defensibility.

Damien Robbins, Equity Analyst at I/O Fund contributed to this analysis.

Please note: The I/O Fund conducts research and draws conclusions for the company’s portfolio. We then share that information with our readers and offer real-time trade notifications. This is not a guarantee of a stock’s performance and it is not financial advice. Please consult your personal financial advisor before buying any stock in the companies mentioned in this analysis. Beth Kindig and the I/O Fund own shares in ALAB at the time of writing and may own stocks pictured in the charts.

Recommended Reading:

  • The I/O Fund’s Top 15 Stocks for Q1 2026
  • Reddit Q4: Unwavering Fundamentals; Change in User Reporting Metrics
  • Bloom Q4: $20B Backlog, Guides for 58% Revenue Growth
  • Coherent Fiscal Q2: Strong Visibility for Back-Half of 2026 and Beyond
  • AMD Q4 Earnings: 60%+ Data Center Growth for 3-5 Years
Posted in AI Stocks, SemiconductorsLeave a Comment on Astera Labs Q4: Solid Beat, but Q1 Margin Guide is Soft

Reddit Q4: Unwavering Fundamentals; Change in User Reporting Metrics

Posted on February 6, 2026June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Reddit reported revenue of $725.6M for 70% YoY growth and 24.1% QoQ growth, which reflects seasonality from the holiday quarter. When comparing to last year's Q4, the company reported 130 basis points higher growth on a QoQ basis – no small feat given the tough comps the company is lapping with six quarters of 60%+ growth.  

The bottom-line shines with this stock as adjusted EBITDA was 45.1%, up from 36.1% in the year ago quarter. The GAAP operating margin of 31.9% has expanded sizably from the 12.4% margin reported last year for operating income of $232M. The free cash flow margin is 36.3%, leading the company to announce $1 billion in share repurchases.  

Although many investors consider Reddit niche compared to larger sites like Facebook or Google, the key metrics steadily move up on this audience of roughly 500 million monthly users and 120 million daily users. Global average revenue per user (ARPU) grew 42% YoY, up from 23% YoY growth in Q4 of last year. Advertising revenue also accelerated to 75% growth compared to 60% last year. 

Despite the strong report, the stock price has been slightly volatile. Management guided for a deceleration to 52.9% YoY growth, which leaves the market wondering if there is a catalyst in Reddit’s future. On the call, management pointed out they’ve guided conservatively for a few quarters now and discussed a new initiative to onboard advertisers at the bottom of the funnel with their AI-powered MAX platform. Another reason is that the company will no longer report logged-in users separately from logged-out users. This has been a point of contention for the Street for some time, which we covered in our previous analysis. 

That said, stocks with unwavering fundamentals with 50%-60% growth on the top line and 100%+ growth on the bottom line have a way of being mispriced quickly during periods of uncertainty. Consider that Reddit offers a Rule of 40 (revenue growth plus adjusted EBITDA margin) of 115 compared to Palantir’s Rule of 40 (revenue growth plus adjusted operating margin) of 127. Reddit’s rule of 40 is up 7 percentage points sequentially and 8 percentage points YoY. As of now, Reddit’s sales valuation is at April lows whereas this quarter’s results challenge the market’s overly cautious stance. 

Change in User Reporting Metrics 

In our coverage of Reddit’s Q3 results, I stated: “Reddit’s report was not a Perfect 10 – it was more like a 9 out of 10. First, the logged-out user growth is outpacing the logged-in user growth, which will take some getting used to for Street analysts as they often imply in the Q&A that logged-out users don’t monetize as well.” 

This has been a point of contention as the Street models logged-out users monetize at a lower rate, and yet Reddit is growing their logged-out users faster than logged-in users. This past quarter, global logged-in users grew 10% YoY compared to global logged-out users growing 27% YoY. 

In the call this evening, Reddit announced plans to drop this key metric and will instead report users as one number starting in Q3: “As a result, we are updating our disclosures starting in the second half of 2026 to better reflect the metrics we use to run the business and evaluate our operating performance as we scale. Specifically, starting with Q3 2026 disclosures, we’ll continue to report the U.S. and international DAUQ and WAUQ numbers as we’ve done historically, but we will no longer report logged in and logged out metrics. Between now and Q3, we will continue to report logged in and logged out metrics for the first two quarters of 2026.” 

Given Reddit has been able to put up strong top line numbers regardless of logged-in/logged-out, the concern may be exaggerated. However, dropping a key metric typically results in volatility after hours. 

Potential Catalysts: Reddit Max and Google/Open AI Partnerships 

At CES, Reddit announced the public beta launch of Reddit Max campaigns, which is an AI-powered campaign platform to help advertisers leverage Reddit’s data. The result is better targeting with management stating MAX campaigns saw 17% lower cost per acquisition (CPA) and 27% lift in conversion volume. 

Reddit has always monetized through advertising, but Reddit Max marks a shift from primarily brand and contextual ads toward AI-driven, automated performance advertising that can increase the number of advertisers that Reddit onboards.  

Although early, this could put Reddit on the map for using its personalized data to compete for ad dollars in performance advertising. Should it prove successful, this would also be a strong motivating factor for Reddit to drop the logged-in/logged-out user metric given users will see the performance ads regardless of logged-in status. Most importantly, these ads monetize at a higher rate than brand ads. 

Here is what was stated on the call: “We plan to use Reddit Max as a foundation to streamline advertiser onboarding, particularly for smaller customers, and enable them to leverage the AI-powered tools and automation to simplify campaign creation from setup to creative, and augment performance from optimization to campaign insights. And through 2026, we plan to expand access and build automation that leverages Reddit’s 24 billion posts and comments, turning them into powerful signals to drive further improvements in ad performance.” 

The obligatory question on Google and Open AI was touched on during the Q&A with management stating the partnerships are intact: 

Steve Huffman, Co-founder and CEO, Reddit:  

So on the AI deals, really our partnerships with Google and OpenAI, I think we can see the growing importance of Reddit. Reddit, per Profound, is the number one, cited source in AI answers. Our relationships with both companies are very healthy. The conversation is shifting from, you know, a purely business deal to, you know, more of a product partnership. And so, you know, I think the exchange will be, we help you build the best version of your products, and you help us build the best version of our products […]” 

Financials 

By Royston Roche 

Strong Q4 Revenue Growth of 70% 

Reddit once again reported stellar revenue growth of 69.7% YoY and 24.1% QoQ to $725.6 million. Revenue growth has been more than 60% for the sixth consecutive quarter. The company’s revenue beat estimates by a solid 8.8% and was better than last quarter’s beat of 6.4%. The strong revenue growth was primarily driven by 75% YoY growth in the advertising revenue to $690 million. While its other revenue, which includes licensing deals with Google and OpenAI, rose by a modest 8% YoY to $36 million. Regionally, U.S. revenue grew 68% and international revenue grew 78% YoY. 

Management guided Q1 revenue of $595M to $605M, implying a YoY growth of 52.9% YoY and down (17.3%) QoQ. The company’s Q1 guide beat the analysts estimates by 4% and was also stronger than last quarter’s beat of 3.5%. Analysts expect Q2 revenue to grow 38.2% YoY and Q3 revenue to grow 36.3% YoY to $797.4 million.  

Full year 2025 revenue grew by 69.4% YoY to $2.20 billion. Looking ahead, analysts expect 2026 revenue to grow by 41.8% YoY to $3.12 billion and 2027 revenue to grow by 25.7% YoY to $3.93 billion. 

Q4 Advertising Revenue Growth of 75% 

Q4 advertising revenue grew by 75% YoY to $690 million, accelerating from 74% growth in the previous quarter. Management attributed to impression growth as the main driver of revenue growth as the company’s AI investments are driving efficiency for advertisers delivering more outcomes and lower cost per action. Since last year, enhancements to the shopping ad ML models delivered over 75% improvement in advertisers return on investment. 

In Q4, click volume in the mid-funnel grew over 60% and lower funnel conversion volume doubled YoY. The company’s shopping solution, Dynamic Product Ads or DPA, emerged as a lower funnel driver in Q4, fueled by strong performance during the Black Friday and Cyber Monday period.  

The company’s active advertisers grew by 75% YoY in Q4 and Reddit added new customers across its channels, including large, mid-market and SMBs. The company also witnessed broad strength across verticals. 11 out of the top 15 verticals grew revenue by 50% or more YoY, led by retail, pharma, financial services and tech. 

ARPU Grew by 42% 

The company’s average revenue per user (ARPU) grew by 42% YoY and 19% QoQ to $5.98. ARPU growth accelerated from 41% YoY and 11% sequential growth in the previous quarter.  

The US ARPU grew by 53% YoY to $10.79. Although it slightly decelerated from 54% YoY growth in Q3, on a sequential basis it accelerated to 19% growth from 15% QoQ in the previous quarter. 

International ARPU grew by 38% YoY to $2.31 in Q4 compared to 39% growth in the previous quarter. While sequential growth strongly accelerated to 26% growth from 6% QoQ in Q3.

The company’s Daily Active Uniques (DAUq) are witnessing strong international growth. The Daily Active Uniques (DAUq) global grew by 19% YoY and 5% QoQ to 121.4 million, a similar growth rate in the previous quarter. The US DAUq grew by 9% YoY to 52.5 million in Q4, accelerating from 7% growth in Q3. While the international DAUq grew by 28% YoY to 68.9 million, decelerating from 31% growth in the previous quarter. 

The company’s Weekly Active Uniques (WAUq) grew by 24% YoY and 6% QoQ to 471.6 million in Q4, accelerating 3 percentage points on a YoY basis growth from 21% and 7% QoQ growth in the previous quarter. International growth outpaced US growth as it grew by 34% YoY to 278.2 million, while the US grew by 12% YoY to 193.4 million.

Q4 Operating Margins Expand 19.5% YoY 

The company is experiencing strong profit growth, primarily driven by operating leverage.   

  • Q4 gross profits grew by 68.5% YoY to $666.9 million with a gross margin of 91.9%. The gross margin was down 70 basis points YoY and up 90 basis points YoY. The company reported its sixth consecutive quarter of above 90% gross margins. 
  • The company’s operating income significantly improved to $231.8 million compared to $52.9 million in the same period last year. Operating margin improved by 19.5 percentage points YoY and 8.2 percentage points sequentially to 31.9% primarily driven by strong operating leverage. 
  • Q4 net income grew by 254.4% YoY to $251.6 million. Net profit margin improved by 18.1 percentage points YoY and 6.9 percentage points sequentially to 34.7%. 

Full year 2025 gross margin improved to 91.2% from 90.5% in 2024. Operating margin improved to 20.1% from (43.1%) in 2024, driven by operating leverage and the company had higher IPO related expenses in 2024. 

Q4 GAAP EPS grew by 244% 

Q4 GAAP EPS grew by 244.4% YoY and 55% QoQ to $1.24, beating estimates by a solid 33.1%. Analysts expect EPS to grow by 286.6% YoY to $0.50 in Q1 and 86% YoY to $0.84 in Q2. Looking ahead, analysts expect 2026 EPS to grow by 54.9% YoY to $4.06 and 37.1% YoY to $5.56 in 2027.

Q4 adjusted EBITDA grew by 112% YoY to $327 million with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 45.1%, beating the management guidance of 42.4%. Adjusted EBITDA margin improved by 9 percentage points YoY and 4.8 percentage points sequentially.  

Management has guided Q1 adjusted EBITDA margin of 35.8%, down 9.3 percentage points sequentially and up 6.4 percentage points YoY.

Cash Flow and Balance Sheet 

Reddit reported strong cash flows primarily driven by record profits. The company’s balance sheet is robust, providing financial flexibility to invest in future growth and support share repurchases.  

  • Q4 operating cash flows grew by 196.5% YoY to $266.8 million with an operating cash flow margin of 36.8%, up 15.8 percentage points YoY. 
  • Q4 free cash flows grew by 195.7% YoY to $263.6 million with a free cash flow margin of 36.3%, up 15.5 percentage points YoY. 
  • The company has cash and marketable securities of $2.48 billion with no debt and cash increased by $250 million sequentially. 
  • The company also announced a $1 billion share repurchase program, further reflecting management’s confidence in sustained profit generation. Looking ahead, the company will continue to prioritize investing in the core business first; next, it will look for merger and acquisition opportunities; third, it will repurchase shares; and target keeping over $1 billion in cash on the balance sheet. 

Conclusion: 

Reddit’s Q4 illustrates a business that can put up strong growth that disproportionately flows down to the bottom line. Revenue growth of 70% year over year, accelerating advertising performance, and a sharp inflection in margins point to a platform that has moved well beyond the early stages of monetization. 

We are keeping an eye on AI-powered initiatives like Reddit Max and LLM-based search traffic as two ways Reddit can increase ad spent and user engagement. Lastly, the valuation is very attractive and that is a key part to the equation.

Please note: The I/O Fund conducts research and draws conclusions for the company’s portfolio. We then share that information with our readers and offer real-time trade notifications. This is not a guarantee of a stock’s performance and it is not financial advice. Please consult your personal financial advisor before buying any stock in the companies mentioned in this analysis. Beth Kindig and the I/O Fund own shares in RDDT at the time of writing and may own stocks pictured in the charts.

Recommended Reading:

  • Bloom Q4: $20B Backlog, Guides for 58% Revenue Growth
  • Coherent Fiscal Q2: Strong Visibility for Back-Half of 2026 and Beyond
  • AMD Q4 Earnings: 60%+ Data Center Growth for 3-5 Years
  • Meta Q4 Earnings: A New Era Driven by AI Agents
Posted in AI Stocks, SoftwareLeave a Comment on Reddit Q4: Unwavering Fundamentals; Change in User Reporting Metrics

Nova: Memory Revenue Accelerates Sharply, though 1H 2026 Expected to be Soft

Posted on February 5, 2026June 30, 2026 by io-fund

The evolution of the AI semiconductor industry is driving a higher need for metrology tools and equipment, such as those supplied by Nova. This is because the increasing size and complexity of AI accelerator architectures, along with the accelerated release cycle moving to annual upgrades, puts much greater emphasis on metrology and process control to ensure manufacturing yields remain high. For a deeper understanding of the drivers of metrology demand, refer to our prior analyses, Nova and Onto Innovation: Growth in Metrology and Semiconductor Process Control, or Nova Limited: Riding the AI/HPC Wave with Advanced Nodes and Packaging. Nova and Onto Innovation: Growth in Metrology and Semiconductor Process Control, or Nova Limited: Riding the AI/HPC Wave with Advanced Nodes and Packaging.  

In particular, Nova is expecting to benefit from the shift to gate-all-around with TSMC’s 2nm node with outlets for growth in advanced packaging, such as for HBM, and in memory, with Q3 in particular showing a sharp acceleration in memory revenue to record levels as the industry battles a severe supply shortage.  

Looking ahead to 2026, revenue growth is expected to be quite soft in the first half before accelerating in the second half, driven by GAA with memory tailwinds, though for the time being, we will likely hold off on Nova but keep it on our watchlist for a potential inflection earlier than expected. 

Memory Revenue Accelerates to Nearly 21% QoQ in Q3 

Nova does have AI-related outlets to growth across its product revenue lineup, as TSMC’s 2nm node is its first to adopt GAA, which is expected to support AMD’s EPYC CPUs in 2026, as well as Google’s TPU v8 and Amazon’s Trainium4 accelerators in late 2027.  

However, the current memory environment may provide a stronger growth outlet considering supply shortages are worsening, with Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan recently commenting that there may not be relief until 2028. Nova sees a higher exposure to DRAM and HBM, and will likely benefit from Micron boosting its 2026 capex from $18 billion to $20 billion, primarily to support HBM supply in 2026.  

Nova saw a sharp QoQ acceleration in its memory business in Q3, reaching about 30% of product revenue, up from 25% in both Q1 and Q2. This would roughly project memory revenue to be up ~20.7% QoQ to approximately $53.7 million, a record high with DRAM accounting for the majority of sales, and accelerating from 2.3% QoQ growth in Q2.  

Nova said that Q3’s record revenue was driven by advanced DRAM and HBM, and on the product side, record Veraflex sales to memory fabs and new PRISM platform orders supporting HBM manufacturing. Nova said its next-gen modular Nova WMC system has been adopted by three customers for HBM and power device manufacturers, with other customer evaluations underway. 

Nova also said it anticipates “receiving orders for multiple tools from a new memory customer following the successful adoption of the Nova AncoScene front-end platform, which replaces a competing tool,” which could continue to drive further acceleration in memory over the next quarter(s).  

Memory to take More Revenue Share in 2026 

Despite not guiding for 2026, Nova hinted that memory will continue to take revenue share moving through 2026 on its higher exposure to DRAM. This could see memory reach as high as 40% product revenue share, up from the high-20% range currently. 

CEO Gaby Waisman explained that Nova sees “DRAM is recovering nicely, and we have a good exposure in this market. We do expect this trend to continue next year and that memory will be one of the growth drivers for WFE in 2026. Saying that, our long-term model suggests a ratio of 40% memory and 60% logic due to the higher metrology intensity in logic. … we do see the fundamentals of the growth in the memory, and we do expect a continued growth next year in that sector.” 

Assuming product revenue remains ~80% revenue share in 2026, this would project revenue out to ~$786.4 million for the full year. At a 40% share, memory revenue would project to nearly $315 million, whereas 2025 could land close to $195 to $200 million on similar mix in Q4 as in Q3. This would roughly point to growth in the high-50s YoY.   

2026 Growth to be Weighted in 2H 

However, the main challenge for Nova heading into 2026 is that Q1 growth is expected to be very soft, before accelerating in the back half of the year into 2027. Management has been open about the year being back-half weighted, so any hint of extended softness could be a key risk to watch, considering growth is not much above the broader WFE outlook. 

Looking forward, management explained that they expect WFE growth to be mid-single digits in 2026 with the potentiality that AI drives upside to this, as demand “trickles down the value chain to increase utilization rates and wafer starts.” As it stands, Nova’s 2026 revenue growth is estimated to increase just 11.9% YoY, only a handful of points above its WFE outlook, so any changes in capex plans by key customers could easily affect growth to the upside or the downside.  

Analysts noted that this WFE outlook is the same that Nova provided in Q2, and questioned if the company will still grow faster than WFE, or if memory chipmaker fab capacity constraints would limit WFE upside. CEO Gaby Waisman said that there has been “some improvement since the September discussions. But in general, I think that for the Nova side, we do believe that we have the right growth engines and ability to outperform this growth. And we estimate that 2026 will continue the trend and that in general, we believe it will be more of a second half weighted year.”  

CFO Guy Kizner provided more details later, saying that “And in terms of the specifics, I believe that the advanced nodes, in particular, gate-all-around will accelerate further in the second half of next year, driving that weighted assumption. But of course, we are not giving any color beyond that other than saying that we believe that we have both memory and advanced logic driving the business in next year in general and accelerating towards the second half in particular.” 

It's important to note that since Nova provided this commentary, TSMC has substantially boosted its 2026 capex outlook, guiding for $52 to $56 billion in capex for the year. This points to 32% YoY growth at the midpoint, with 70–80% to be allocated to advanced processes, signaling the chipmaker’s confidence in sustained, long-term demand driven by AI. 

As it stands, GAA likely will be the number one growth outlet through 2026, as Nova has previously committed to $500 million of cumulative GAA revenue from 2024 to 2026. As we outlined in our prior analysis, Nova Limited: Riding the AI/HPC Wave with Advanced Nodes and Packaging, a three-year time frame would imply a 2X and then 4X ramp in GAA revenue in 2025 and 2026, respectively, to ~$90 million in 2025 and ~$365 million in 2026. 

On the memory side, it’s likely that growth will remain concentrated in DRAM and HBM, as management explained that NAND is a “bit muted still” with the hope that it would begin growing “probably towards the second half of next year.”  Additionally, despite the severe supply constraints across the industry, fab construction is not an overnight phenomenon, meaning that any new plans put in place through 2026 may not begin to appear in Nova’s memory revenue until 2027.  

High China Exposure 

A key risk to consider is Nova’s high China exposure, as the country contributes >30% of revenue, and any renewal in geopolitical tensions could impact revenue or margins. Management explained that its revenue to China would be nominally higher YoY in 2025, though its revenue share would decrease from ~39% to >30%, as growth in other regions would outpace China.  

Management added that China revenue “has already normalized in terms of the business levels in the second half of this year, and we expect this trend to continue in the first half of 2026.” Analysts questioned if this normalization continuing into 1H would mean China could be down YoY for 2026, though CEO Gaby Waisman said it does not allude to any changes, as Nova still has lower visibility for 2H with China remaining “very dynamic.” 

Financials 

Revenue Growth Decelerating, Expected to Reaccelerate in 2H  

Nova reported its sixth-consecutive quarter with record revenue in Q3, up 25.5% YoY and 2.1% QoQ to $224.6 million, although this decelerated from 40.3% YoY and 3.1% QoQ growth in Q2. Nova said Q3 saw record revenue in memory and advanced logic products, with the latter driven by strong demand from gate-all-around (GAA) manufacturers and sales of its METRION platform for GAA and advanced DRAM manufacturing.  

For a breakdown of revenue, product revenue was $178.9 million, up 24.5% YoY and 0.6% QoQ to $178.9 million, a sharp deceleration from 42.7% YoY growth in Q2. Approximately 70% of product revenue stemmed from logic and foundry and the other 30% from memory. Services revenue was $45.7 million, up 29.4% YoY and 8.5% QoQ.  

For Q4, Nova guided for revenue to be between $215 to $225 million, pointing to YoY growth decelerating further to 13% YoY while QoQ growth would move negative, at a (2.2%) QoQ decline. Nova did not provide details on key growth drivers for Q4, but did note in November that it expected orders from additional customers for its METRION platform in the coming months.  

Based on Q4’s guidance, management expects 2025 to be a record year for the company with revenue up ~30% YoY, or to roughly $888 million. Looking ahead to 2026, Nova projects further growth on advanced packaging, advanced logic and DRAM fueling momentum. As noted above, growth is expected to be weighted towards the second half of the year, specifically on GAA acceleration.  

Current consensus estimates point to YoY growth of just 11.9% YoY to $983 million, with quarterly revenue growth in the ~5% region for Q1 and Q2 before sharply accelerating to exit the year at an estimated 25.5% in Q4, aligning with these aforementioned comments for a back-half weighted year.  

Margins Feeling a Slight Pinch Sequentially 

Margins were mostly flat on a YoY basis, yet Nova felt a pinch on margins sequentially as operating expenses increased slightly faster QoQ than revenue.  

GAAP gross margin in Q3 was 57%, in line with Q3 2024 but down 1 point from Q2, while adjusted gross margin was 59%, up 1 point YoY but down 1 point QoQ. For Q4, Nova guided for GAAP gross margin to remain flat QoQ at 57%, with adjusted gross margin guided at 58% +/- 1%, down slightly QoQ.  

Considering the perceived softness, Citi’s Atif Malik questioned about margins and if there were any China impacts. Management said there were no impacts from China, that guidance remained well aligned with its target model for 57-60% and reflected pricing and cost discipline, and the main fluctuating factor would be product mix. 

GAAP operating margin was 28% and adjusted operating margin was 32%, both flat YoY but down 2 points QoQ. This was primarily due to the ~3.2% QoQ increase in opex, outpacing QoQ revenue growth by just over 1 point, highlighting how easily a small shift in the cost structure can impact margins. For Q4, Nova guided for GAAP operating margin of ~27.5% at midpoint and adjusted operating margin at just over 31%, both down slightly sequentially, again on opex slightly outpacing revenue on a QoQ basis. 

GAAP net margin was 27%, down 2 points YoY and 4 points QoQ. Adjusted net margin was 31%, flat YoY but down 1 point QoQ.  

For the full year, Nova is guiding for adjusted gross margin of ~59% and adjusted operating margin of ~33%, at the high end of its target model, though this is weighed down by the softer margins in Q3 and Q4. Nova has not provided guidance for 2026 yet.  

EPS 

Due to the sequential margin contraction, EPS declined sequentially. Q3 GAAP EPS was $1.90, up 18.8% YoY but down (11.2%) QoQ and missing the consensus estimate for $1.94. Adjusted EPS of $2.16 barely beat consensus for $2.15, and was up 24.1% YoY but down (1.8%) QoQ.  

EPS growth is expected to remain muted through Q4, with GAAP EPS guided to be $1.77 to $1.95, up 17.7% YoY at midpoint, while adjusted EPS was guided to be $2.02 to $2.20, up 8.8% YoY at midpoint, a more than 15 point deceleration.  

For 2025, adjusted EPS is expected to rise nearly 30% YoY to $8.68, before decelerating to almost match revenue growth at 12.1% YoY to $9.73 in 2026.  

Cash Flows Strong 

Unlike margins, Nova’s cash flow margins strengthened, though the company sold $750 million in convertible notes in the quarter, boosting its debt.  

Operating cash flow was $71.3 million in Q3 for a 31.7% margin, up 5.5 points YoY and 10.9 points QoQ, while FCF was $66.9 million for a 29.8% margin, up 5.7 points YoY and 10.3 points QoQ. 

Cash, equivalents and marketable securities totaled $1.6 billion, while debt was $821.5 million, including the $750 million convertible note raised in Q3.  

Valuation 

Nova is currently trading just off peak multiples on its recent pullback, with shares trading at 12.5x forward PS, well above its average 7.8x multiple.  

On the bottom line, shares trade at an extended 42.7x, pulling back from its peak at 51.1x but remaining well above its 27.7x average and above most of its WFE peers.  

Conclusion 

Nova witnessed a sharp acceleration in memory growth in Q3 to 20.7% QoQ, capitalizing on advanced DRAM and HBM demand with GAA set to accelerate more significantly in the second half of 2026. Despite the strength in memory, it remains a smaller portion of revenue, at ~30% of product revenue or roughly 24% of overall revenue, not enough to significantly move the growth needle.  

As it stands, Nova is expected to see a rather soft Q1 and Q2 with YoY growth expected to be in the 5% range before meaningfully accelerating towards 25% by Q4, so we will keep an eye on the company for this inflection but remain on the sidelines for now.

Damien Robbins, Equity Analyst at I/O Fund contributed to this analysis.

Every Thursday at 4:30 pm Eastern, the I/O Fund team holds a webinar for premium members to discuss how to navigate the broad market, as well as various stock and crypto entries and exits. Beth Kindig offers weekly deep dives including lesser-known cryptocurrencies and AI stocks, plus the team offers trade alerts. The I/O Fund team is one of the only audited portfolios available to individual investors. If you’d like to subscribe to the Advanced Market Signals plan, email us at premium@io-fund.com.Every Thursday at 4:30 pm Eastern, the I/O Fund team holds a webinar for premium members to discuss how to navigate the broad market, as well as various stock and crypto entries and exits. Beth Kindig offers weekly deep dives including lesser-known cryptocurrencies and AI stocks, plus the team offers trade alerts. The I/O Fund team is one of the only audited portfolios available to individual investors. If you’d like to subscribe to the Advanced Market Signals plan, email us at premium@io-fund.compremium@io-fund.com.

Please note: The I/O Fund conducts research and draws conclusions for the Fund’s positions. We then share that information with our readers. This is not a guarantee of a stock’s performance. Please consult your personal financial advisor before buying any stock in the companies mentioned in this analysis.

Recommended Reading:

  • The I/O Fund’s Top 10 New Ideas List for Q1 2026
  • Arm: Data Center Royalties Double YoY, Riding Grace Blackwell, Vera Rubin Growth
  • SanDisk: Shares Up 559% In 2025 On NAND Flash, Enterprise SSD Tailwinds
  • Celestica Eyes FY26 Acceleration on Strong Networking Switch Demand
Posted in AI Stocks, SemiconductorsLeave a Comment on Nova: Memory Revenue Accelerates Sharply, though 1H 2026 Expected to be Soft

Coherent Fiscal Q2: Strong Visibility for Back-Half of 2026 and Beyond

Posted on February 5, 2026June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Coherent is a stock that will test investors as the company has near-perfect positioning, yet the timing is taking longer than what growth investors typically look for. If I had to describe this earnings report, I would use the word “visibility” as the headline numbers will fail to impress, yet I believe the stock price will march upward as the equation of what Coherent offers + where the demand is = will eventually materialize (in 2026).  

The data center and communications segment revenue grew by 33% YoY and 11% QoQ in FQ2, accelerating from 26% YoY growth and 7% QoQ growth in FQ1 driven by strong AI demand. The Communications segment grew 44% YoY and 9% QoQ, although this was down from 11% QoQ growth and 55% YoY reported last quarter. However, the data center segment accelerated meaningfully to 14% QoQ and 36% YoY, up from 4% QoQ growth and 23% YoY last quarter. As of this quarter, data center and communications segment represents 70% of revenue. 

The company offered strong visibility metrics, such as stating book-to-bill ratio is 4X, meaning they are booking orders 4X faster than they can ship. Much of Coherent’s timing hinges on indium phosphide capacity as the company has been working to increase this capacity by moving from 3-inch wafers to 6-inch wafers, which will produce 4X the amount of chips at half the cost. The words “second half" came up frequently with management emphasizing an incoming inflection: “We expect 1.6T to ramp significantly over the coming quarters, with the early phase of the ramp driven by our EML and silicon photonics-based transceivers, followed by our 200G VCSEL-based 1.6T transceivers ramping in the second half of this calendar year.” 

In addition to the transition toward 1.6T being a catalyst, optical circuit switches (OCS) and co-packaged optics (CPO) represent additional catalysts as we move look into 2027. Although in the future, an area where Coherent could stand out is CW lasers for the incoming CPO wave in AI networking. According to management, they secured a large order from a hyperscaler. Management also emphasized their non-mechanical liquid crystal technology for OCS provides an edge, with an update on the call they currently have 10 customers in their pipeline. 

Book-to-Bill at 4X offers Important Visibility 

Coherent’s management team went to great strides to offer visibility, which helped the price stabilize after hours. In particular, the comment their data center bookings have a bill-to-book ratio of 4X was helpful: “In Q2, we experienced another step function increase in our data center bookings, with a book-to-bill ratio that exceeded 4x, as customer demand continues to increase and customers place orders further out in time, which provides us with strong visibility for the coming quarters.” 

This was asked about in the Q&A with management emphasizing again the line of sight they currently have: “I was really pleased with the acceleration of our sequential growth rate, 14% sequential growth. And then we also saw, as I mentioned in the prepared remarks, over 4x book-to-bill ratio. So just seeing incredibly strong demand, and we’re seeing bookings go further out in time than we would have in the past, which is great for us for visibility.” 

Coherent also noted that some large customers are booking 2-3 years out with long-term agreements, which guarantee customers a defined level of supply while offering a stronger growth outlook than optical networking companies have seen in the past.  

Per management: “Then the third thing I would mention with respect to visibility is, number of long-term supply agreements that we’ve either signed with customers or in the process of signing, where, you know, the LTA will provide, a guarantee to our customers for a certain amount of, supply, and in exchange, they give us a guarantee on a certain amount of demand. There’s often, some sort of financial commitment from our customers, like investment for CapEx, et cetera. I would say all those things combined, the visibility of the business is, the best it’s ever been, which gives us just kind of great confidence in terms of the go-forward growth that we’re seeing.” 

Pros/Cons of Internal Sourcing versus External Sourcing 

Coherent’s slower growth compared to peers is due to sourcing the substrates and wafers internally rather than rely heavily on external suppliers. Although this results in higher margins over time, it results in a slower near-term ramp. This manufacturing strategy could ultimately pay off given Coherent can yield more at fixed costs.  

Inevitably this is discussed at length on earnings calls given it’s a competitive differentiation versus other optical networking peers. In the opening remarks, Coherent explained they are on track to increase internal capacity by the end of the year: “For example, we significantly increased our indium phosphide production capacity in Q2, and we are executing on track to our plan to double our internal indium phosphide production capacity by the fourth quarter of this calendar year.” 

During the Q&A, management described the advantages of sourcing internally in the following way: “Another way to look at it is, any time the kind of market price of Indium Phosphide goes up, it makes our internally sourced Indium Phosphide that much more valuable, right, in terms of a differential. And then, you know, I would say in terms of our own pricing, you know, we continue to see, you know, the ability to continue to optimize pricing. I think Sherry mentioned in her prepared remarks that, some of our gross margin improvement last quarter was based on pricing optimization. We continue to see opportunity to optimize pricing, especially in a environment where, where we’re, where demand is very strong.” 

Financials 

By Royston Roche 

Organic Revenue Growth of 22% 

Coherent’s FQ2 ending December 2025 revenue grew by 17.5% YoY and 6.6% QoQ to $1.69 billion, beating estimates by 2.7%. On a pro forma basis, excluding revenue from the divested Aerospace and Defense business, which the company sold in FQ1, revenue grew by 9% QoQ and 22% YoY primarily driven by AI Datacenter & Communications demand. 

Management guided FQ3 revenue of $1.70 billion to $1.84 billion, implying a YoY growth of 18.2% and 5% QoQ at the midpoint, beating estimates by 3.5%. As per our internal proforma estimate, it implies a YoY growth of 23.8% and 6.3% QoQ in FQ3 after excluding Aerospace and Defense business revenue from the prior year quarter and also the recently sold product division based in Munich. The product business in Munich had averaged $25 million quarterly revenue and had a gross margin well below the company’s corporate gross margin. 

Management expects continued strong growth in the second half of fiscal year 2026 and throughout fiscal year 2027 based on strong datacenter and communications demand and the continued production capacity expansion along with improving demand in the Industrial segment. 

The company’s CEO and President, James Anderson said in the earnings call, “In particular, we expect continued strong sequential revenue growth in both our March and June quarters, and we expect our fiscal '27 revenue growth rate to exceed our fiscal '26 growth rate. The key growth drivers that we see over the coming quarters are growth in both 800 gig and 1.6T transceivers, growth from the ramps of new products such as OCS and CPO solutions and ongoing exceptionally strong demand in our products for DCI and scale across.” 

Segments 

Data Center and Communications Segment Revenue Growth of 33% 

The company’s data center and communications segment revenue grew by 33% YoY and 11% QoQ to $1.21 billion. Revenue growth accelerated from 26% YoY and 7% QoQ growth in FQ1 driven by strong AI demand. 

FQ2 data Center segment revenue grew by 36% YoY and 14% QoQ, accelerating from 23% YoY and 4% QoQ growth reported in FQ1. The FQ2 data center revenue growth was driven by growth in both 800 gig and 1.6T transceivers. The company is witnessing very strong AI demand and is also rapidly expanding capacity, and management expects double-digit sequential growth in data center segment in both FQ3 and FQ4.  

Management expects revenue growth in the current quarter to be driven by a combination of growth in both 1.6T and 800 gig transceivers as well as growth in the OCS systems. Coherent is witnessing strong demand for the 1.6T transceivers across multiple customers and continue to expect both 800 gig and 1.6T to grow significantly in calendar 2026. 

Coherent expects OCS revenue to grow sequentially in the coming quarters as they ramp production capacity as fast as possible to meet the rapidly growing demand. Management estimates over $2 billion of addressable OCS market in the coming years. 

Communications segment FQ2 revenue grew by 9% QoQ and 44% YoY driven by growth in data center interconnects products and in traditional telecom applications. Management expects the communications business to grow sequentially in FQ3 and FQ4. 

Industrial segment revenue was down (10%) YoY and down (3%) QoQ. On a pro forma basis, excluding the divested aerospace and defense business revenue grew by grew 4% QoQ and was flat YoY. Sequential growth in FQ2 was driven by industrial lasers and engineered materials product lines. Management expects the Industrial segment to be roughly flat sequentially in FQ3 on a pro forma basis. Looking ahead, they expect improving demand as they witnessed significant increase in orders in FQ2 from the semi-cap customers, which they expect to translate into sequential growth for the industrial business in the June quarter and the remainder of this calendar year.

Margins 

The company’s margins are improving driven by reductions in product costs, manufacturing efficiency gains, and operating leverage.  

  • FQ2 gross profits grew by 22.3% YoY to $622.8 million. Adjusted gross profits grew by 20% YoY to $657.4 million with an adjusted gross margin of 39%, up 80 basis points YoY and 30 basis points sequentially and was in-line with the guide. The improvement in gross margin was driven by reductions in product input costs, efficiency gains from improved cycle times in the manufacturing process, as well as yield improvements. Pricing optimization also continued to contribute meaningfully to the gross margin expansion. The management FQ3 guide is 39.5%. 
  • FQ2 operating income grew by 34.3% YoY to $184 million. Adjusted operating income grew by 26.8% YoY to $336 million with an adjusted operating margin of 19.9%, up 140 basis points YoY and up 40 basis points QoQ and was in-line with the guide. The operating margin improvement was due to operating leverage and operational efficiencies. The management FQ3 guide is 20.9%. 
  • Net income grew by 41.9% YoY to $146.7 million with a net profit margin of 8.7% compared to 7.2% in the same period last year. Adjusted net income grew by 34.2% YoY to $248.2 million with an adjusted net profit margin of 14.7% compared to 12.9% in the same period last year. 

Adjusted EPS grew by 36% YoY 

FQ2 GAAP EPS grew by 72.7% YoY to $0.76, beating estimates by 10.1%. Adjusted EPS grew by 35.8% YoY to $1.29, beating estimates by 7%. 

Management has guided adjusted EPS of $1.28 to $1.48 for FQ3, implying a YoY growth of 51.6% at the midpoint and beating estimates by 4.5%. Analysts expect FQ4 adjusted EPS to grow 43.2% YoY to $1.43 and 31.3% YoY to $1.52 in FQ1. 

Cash Flow and Balance Sheet 

Coherent’s balance sheet is beginning to improve, with the company using proceeds from the divestment to pay down debt, though debt to cash remains upside down. Operating cash flow margins were also thin and free cash outflows increased due to high capex to support the strong AI demand. 

  • FQ2 operating cash flow was $57.9 million or 3.4% of revenue, down from $187.4 million in the same period last year and up from $46 million in the previous quarter. 
  • FQ2 free cash outflow was ($95.7 million) or (5.7% of revenue), down from $81.7 million or 5.7% of revenue in the same period last year. FQ2 capex grew by 45.3% YoY to $154 million to support the strong AI demand. Management expects capex to increase in the coming quarters to support strong expected demand in the data center and communications segments.  
  • The company had debt of $3.35 billion and cash of $863.7 million at the end of the December quarter. While the debt is high, the company has taken steps to streamline its portfolio, with the $400 million sale of its Aerospace and Defense unit in early September, which it used to pay down its debt. Thereby, reducing the debt leverage ratio from 2.4x in the September 2024 quarter to the current 1.7x. The company further plans to pay down its debt by using the proceeds from the recently sold Munich product division, which should also reduce interest expenses and lower the debt leverage ratio.  

Conclusion: 

Data center revenue is accelerating with a 4X book-to-bill ratio and the 6-inch wafer supply is already at 80% of target capacity. In addition, optical circuit switches are moving now and co-packaged optics are on the way – two solutions that Coherent maintains they have significant IP compared to its competitors. 

Coherent hurries for nobody, and that discipline is evident even as the emerging 1.6T cycle is arriving earlier than expected and will be margin accretive. The company clearly has a plan given its pivot to 6-inch wafers; that plan happens to be more gradual than the market prefers to see. However, when strong visibility intersects with an in-line earnings report; strong visibility tends to win out.

Please note: The I/O Fund conducts research and draws conclusions for the Fund’s positions. We then share that information with our readers. This is not a guarantee of a stock’s performance. Please consult your personal financial advisor before buying any stock in the companies mentioned in this analysis.

Recommended Reading:

  • AMD Q4 Earnings: 60%+ Data Center Growth for 3-5 Years
  • Meta Q4 Earnings: A New Era Driven by AI Agents
  • Palantir Q4: Highest Growth as Public Company; US Commercial to Accelerate
  • Lumentum Q2: Capacity Constrained (and Loving It)
Posted in AI Stocks, SemiconductorsLeave a Comment on Coherent Fiscal Q2: Strong Visibility for Back-Half of 2026 and Beyond

Posts navigation

Older posts
Newer posts

Recent Posts

  • The IPO Glut of 2020: Why Valuations Have Gone Too Far
  • Zoom Discusses Two Important Catalysts In Q1 Earnings
  • Three Risk Management Tools the I/O Fund Offers
  • Micron Is Up 900%. Here’s Why the AI Memory Trade May Still Have Room to Run
  • Credo: Reliability Leader Aggressively Moves into Optics

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018

Categories

  • 5G
  • About
  • Accounting Tips
  • AdTech
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • AI Stocks
  • AI Stocks
  • Analysts
  • Application Monitoring
  • Application Monitoring
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • AR
  • Audit Reports
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Avod
  • Avod
  • Battery Charging
  • Bear Market
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Broad Market Today
  • Bull Market
  • Bull Market
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • China Stocks
  • Cloud
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Platforms
  • Cloud Platforms
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Technology
  • Company
  • Company
  • Console Gaming
  • Console Gaming
  • Console Gaming
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer Tech
  • Corrections
  • Crypto Investment
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center and Processing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Dating
  • Defi
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • E-Commerce
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • ECommerce
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Energy Stocks
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Ethereum
  • Events1
  • Events1
  • Exchange
  • Faq
  • Finance
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Markets
  • FinTech
  • Fundamental Analysis
  • Gambling
  • Gaming
  • Genomics
  • Glossary
  • Green Energy
  • Growth Stocks
  • Growth Stocks
  • Growth Stocks
  • Headsets
  • Headsets
  • Health Tech
  • Hydrogen
  • Identity
  • Identity
  • Identity
  • Inflation
  • Inflation
  • Inflation
  • Internet of Things
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Investing
  • Investing
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Macro Trends
  • Macro Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Media
  • Membership
  • Mining
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Multimedia
  • Music Streaming
  • NVDA | NVIDIA Corporation
  • Performance Updates
  • Pin Content
  • Podcasts
  • Podcasts
  • Podcasts
  • Portfolio
  • Premium Research
  • Press Releases
  • Press Releases
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Reports and Whitepapers
  • Research Services Preview
  • Resources
  • Resources
  • Semiconductor Stocks
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Solar
  • Solar
  • Stock Analysis PDFs
  • Stock Updates
  • Stock Updates (Blogs)
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Tech Podcast
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Technical Analysis
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Testing Equipment
  • Testing Equipment
  • Top Tech Stock News
  • Travel
  • Trends Report
  • Tutorials
  • Uncategorized
  • Updates
  • Updates
  • Updates
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video Footage
  • VR
  • Webinar Alerts
  • Webinar Alerts
  • Webinars
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: iofund by iofund.co.uk.