Skip to content
Logo-main-white.860316a8

I/O Fund

  • Home
  • Free Stock Analysis
  • AI Stocks
  • BEST OF 2025
  • Analysts
  • Nvidia Hub
  • About
    • Case Studies
    • About Us
    • Premium Services
    • Pricing
    • Notable Wins
    • I/O Fund Reviews
    • Media
  • Contact Us

Month: October 2021

Updated Terms and Conditions Notice

Posted on October 20, 2021June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Dear Premium Members,

We’d like to let you know that our terms and conditionsterms and conditions have changed.

The major change is that we had a legal team work up a new registration flow new registration flow to ensure our subscribers are properly registered.

The deadline to properly register is October 27, 2021.The deadline to properly register is October 27, 2021.

  • Publication Licenses for Analysts, Bloggers, and Journalists
    If you represent yourself to the public as an analyst, a blogger, or a journalist, then you are not allowed to register as an individual.

    This means, if you publish research on stocks on any domain, including Twitter, then you must register properly. We do intend to enforce this as it’s a copyright violation to write, summarize or interpret another person’s work as your own. This also helps us keep costs low for our individual investors as repurposing our content negates the reason why our Premium Members are paying for subscriptions. We take this violation very seriously.
     

  • Institutional Licenses 
    If you work for a Fund, a bank, or an institution of over $10 million in size, we would be honored to have you. We have a tier for subscriptions that allows you to share our research with your pool of clients and your coworkers without having to pay for each individual license. We have priced this to be competitive with the returns we believe our research and trade notifications will help procure, while also including an extra access point to I/O Fund’s analysts once per month.
     

If you're wondering how to update your Registration type, please follow these instructions:

  1. Review new Registration Type Definitions Review new Registration Type Definitions 
  2. View  New Terms and Conditions View  New Terms and Conditions 
  3. Go to your account settings by selecting, "My AccountMy Account"
  4. Hit the Open Settings Button in the Change plan or billing info section
  5. Click on the Update Plan button to update your membership
  6. Browse through the PLANS AVAILABLE section. Select from the 30 days, 12 months to Yearly Plan Options!
  7. After Selecting a New Plan, hit Continue to Confirm your new plan.
  8. Your Premium Registration will be updated once you hit Confirm!

Follow Video Tutorial:

Thank You for Your Membership

We want to thank each and every Member for sticking with us as we have grown over the past two years. In order to keep the pricing of our site competitive, we must strictly enforce copyright and ask that our research not be shared publicly and/or repurposed under another person’s name. The monthly amount of $65 does not represent the number of hours our team works, and this edge can be quickly eroded if other’s claim our ideas.

We appreciate the community working together to let us know of any violations to the first item, which is bloggers, journalists, and other public stock commentaries. To thank you for this effort, we promise to keep our pricing low even as we add more features.

We appreciate you as a member and thank you for your business.
– The I/O Fund Team

Posted in Membership, ResourcesLeave a Comment on Updated Terms and Conditions Notice

Ad Tech Stock Earnings – What to Expect for Q3 2021 Earnings

Posted on October 15, 2021June 30, 2026 by io-fund
Ad Tech Stock Earnings – What to Expect for Q3 2021 Earnings

In this earnings preview, we review key companies in ad-tech to gauge what to look for in the upcoming Q3 earnings reports. Last quarter, ad-tech saw a rebound in ad spend from Covid yet it’s likely we saw the high-water mark for many companies as the ad industry faced extraordinarily low comps coming out of the historic lows of Q2 2020 when Covid led to reduced spend.

Snapchat will be the first among the ad-tech companies to kick-off the Q3 earnings when it reports on October 21st. In the analysis that follows, we give a brief overview of the ad-tech sector and discuss key trends that investors should be aware of heading into Q3 earnings.

Below is a table of ad-tech stocks ranked by their EV/Fwd sales multiples, along with their most recent YoY growth rate, gross and free-cashflow (FCF) margins. Many Ad-tech names are growing strongly, but M&A activity has inflated some growth rates such as APPS and MGNI. Adjusting for acquisitions, APPS and MGNI reported pro-forma sales growth rates of 104% and 79%, respectively. PINS had the strongest organic topline growth at 125%, as international sales at the company surged 227% YoY during Q2.

Top 10 EV / Fwd Revenue Multiples

However, we can see the high-water mark starts to kick in with the upcoming quarter. Looking forward, Digital Turbine is forecast to grow the strongest in Q3, but this is skewed due to the company’s recent acquisitions. FUBO has high expectations heading into Q3 as subscriber growth from the NFL season which started in Q3 should help fuel sales growth at the company.

Top 10 Three-month Forward YoY Growth Rates

The below table ranks the ad-tech stocks that saw the largest one week change in their share price. With Ad-tech earnings on the horizon, the market may be pricing in which stocks it anticipates to perform strongest. Notably, Digital Turbine and HubSpot have been strong all year and have been some of the strongest Ad-tech stocks recovering from the recent sell off in tech stocks. 

Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% – Click here
Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% – Click here
Click here

We can also see the market continues to question Fubo per the YTD price action below. We’ve written in detail as to why we think the company is stronger than the market realizes due to tailwinds from OTT live sports specifically and the monetization potential from sports betting. We’ve also recently commented on Twitter that Roku is likely to do even better globally than domestically as ad-supported streaming will be preferred over subscriptions in countries with lower GDPs. Considering that the Roku team created the leading operating system in 2008 and has led in the United States for 13 years over Amazon and Google, we think the team is capable of entering new geographies.

Top 10 Weekly Share Price Movement

In the table below, ad-tech stocks are ranked by percentage of change in their forward sales growth estimates over the last 90 days. A rise in growth estimates can lead to a higher multiple, however the market remains in a “wait and see” stage for names such as FUBO and PUBM, as their stocks have declined despite an increase in forward expectations. FUBO has high expectations as sports streaming from the NFL should boost revenues, while PUBM is a relative newcomer to the Ad-tech market and the Street may be waiting for the company to prove it can compete. In general, PubMatic is in a tough place to compete in the tech stack due to the number of competitors on the supply side.

Top 10 Changes in sales growth estimates – last 90 days

Although ad-tech has seen some double-digit declines over the past three months, we do not think this will last for long. Ad-tech is a robust industry that is cash efficient and tends to outperform other sectors in tech. For instance, two of the FAANGs are ad-tech related and there could be more tailwinds for those who hold first-party data as Facebook and Apple duel over third-party ad tracking and measurement. We covered this here.

At the I/O Fund, we have plenty of exposure to ad-tech and are not concerned with any temporary pullbacks.

Update on multiples

Below, I give an overview of topline multiples for the Ad-tech sector. The multiples shown below are calculated by scaling Enterprise Value (market cap + debt – cash) to forward sales. A higher multiple means the company has a premium valuation.

Overall Ad-tech stats:

  • Overall Ad-tech forward median 7x
  • Top 5 Ad-tech forward median 24x
  • Overall Ad-tech forward average 10x

EV/FWD SALES:

Ad-tech valuations peaked during the beginning of the year and have trended down since. The multiple compression has driven the median Ad-tech EV/Fwd sales multiple to 7x, which is below the median 10x multiple that Ad-tech received heading into Q3 earnings last year (2020). If Ad-tech performs strongly in Q3 2021, then the Street may award Ad-tech a higher multiple.  

Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% – Click here
Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% – Click here
Click here

The I/O Fund has stated that we see the current market as a buying opportunity with an in-depth macro analysis from Portfolio Manager, Knox Ridley. The valuations illustrate that we are nearing the 6 Median EV to Forward Revenue and the 10 Average EV to Fwd Revenue, which barring a black swan event like March of 2020, is low for ad-tech valuations. We to tend not hunt for bottoms, rather we prefer to trim near tops and add to key positions near bottoms. Therefore, for the style of the I/O Fund, the current valuations are a buying opportunity and we sent a recent Roku buy notification to our I/O Fund Members at $309.30.

By bifurcating the data for the top 5 in the chart below, we see the valuations in some names have largely recovered their multiple compressions since the beginning of the year. Snap, The Trade Desk, Hubspot, Roku and Pinterest have the highest valuations. The recovery in these premium valued names suggests that the market believes that these five stocks will likely outperform the rest of the group going forward.

TOP 5 EV/FWD SALES:

Below, we break the valuations into the following buckets:

  • Ad-tech High Growth Median EV to Fwd Revenue 10x
  • Ad-tech Mid Growth Median EV to Fwd Revenue 4x
  • Ad-tech Low Growth Median EV to Fwd Revenue 4x

We can further dissect the change in ad-tech valuations by breaking up the group into high growth (>30%), mid growth (>15% and <30%) and low growth (<15%). The above chart shows that the high-growth Ad-tech stocks were valued higher earlier in the year, as the market may be anticipating a slowdown in ad spend in the near term.

EV/FWD SALES IN GROWTH BUCKETS:

 

The chart below highlights the large gap in valuations for ad-tech leaders such as TTD and SNAP and the rest of the sector. SNAP and TTD are valued ~400% higher than the median multiple of 7x, while relatively new entrants PUBM and TRMR are valued below the Ad-tech median, at 6x and 4x, respectively.

EV TO FWD SALES Ad-tech UNIVERSE:

We also include a chart based on EV to Fwd sales but this takes into account forward growth expectations. By scaling valuation relative to forward growth, we can more clearly see which companies are cheapest relative to forward growth. Stocks on the right side of the chart below have the cheapest growth, meaning that they are trading at a bargain. Some standouts are SNAP, which fell from being valued 4x the median to just 2x the median once growth was accounted for. Moreover, FUBO is one of the cheapest Ad-tech stocks when considering their forward growth rates. TTD remains the most expensive and APPS and MGNI are skewed by recent acquisitions, meaning that they appear cheaper because of acquired sales.

Growth adjusted EV/Fwd Revenue (EV/Fwd Rev/Fwd Growth)

Finally, the last table we will be discussing are ad-tech operating metrics. The above table shows that the group as a whole is performing well, as the average median growth in the most recent quarter was a strong 81%, however this should be discounted due to the low base period in the prior year due to Covid (discussed above). Looking forward, the market expects ad-tech to continue to grow strongly as the median growth estimate is 38%.

The ad-tech market appears well positioned to continue to do well going forward. Find out which stocks the I/O Fund will be watching heading into Q3 earnings in our Q3 Stock Earnings Preview – What to Expect for 7 Ad Tech Stocks.

Bradley Cipriano and Royston Roche contributed to this article.

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Please consult with your financial advisor in regards to any stocks you buy.

Posted in Broad Market Today, Digital Ads, Financial Analysis, Tech StocksLeave a Comment on Ad Tech Stock Earnings – What to Expect for Q3 2021 Earnings

Q3 Stock Earnings Preview – What to Expect for 7 Ad Tech Stocks

Posted on October 15, 2021June 30, 2026 by io-fund
Q3 Stock Earnings Preview – What to Expect for 7 Ad Tech Stocks

This quarter, we chose to go over Roku, Snap, PubMatic, The Trade Desk, Magnite, Pinterest, and Digital Turbine for an earnings preview on what to expect from these ad-tech companies. This list was chosen by those with the most forward growth, those with the highest valuations or those that have recently completed an acquisition so we can look deeper into what the Street is expecting from management.

Roku Inc– Earnings on November 05th

Below is a chart of Roku’s financials from last year, last quarter and what is expected in the upcoming quarter.

The consensus estimates suggests that the revenue growth will be slowing down in the next quarter. Below are the analysts’ views on Roku.

  • Wells Fargo analyst Steven Cahall has recently downgraded the stock to Equal Weight and reduced the price target from $488 to $350. He states that "The primary reason we go from Overweight to Equal Weight is, while there may still be a long ARPU runway, it's far better understood," Cahall writes in a note. "Consensus CY22E/CY23E ARPU is +50%/+47% over the past year to now $50/$60. In our January deep dive, we called CY22E ARPU of $55 a bull case scenario; but current consensus shows our alpha has decayed. The Q2 ARPU beat slowed a lot from Q1."
  • On the other hand, Guggenheim analyst Michael Morris says that the recent sell-off is a good opportunity to buy the shares as he upgrades the stock from a neutral rating to a buy with a price target of $395. “We expect the connected television ad marketplace will continue to grow at a rapid pace and that Roku will be a primary beneficiary — this view is unchanged,”
  • KeyBank analyst Justin Patterson has said that the New Amazon fire TV’s as an incremental positive to the company and its competitive position. He notes that Amazon’s devices appear to be similar to Roku’s offering.

Please note, the I/O Fund does not necessarily agree with the financial analysts mentioned above rather our goal is to objectively review companies. Our premium members have been updated frequently on Roku and we have been able to buy this stock very early before the market understood the true potential of this cord-cutting and AVOD play.

You may view our previous analysis on Roku below:

Video: Is the Bottom in for Roku?
The Crucial Difference Between Roku and Netflix
Will Roku Go Boom or Bust This Year
Roku’s Stock Price: Will There Be Another Pullback?
Roku Q3 Earnings: Choppy But Unshakeable Long-Term
Update on $ROKU – Will Roku Miss Earnings?
3 Reasons Why Roku Will Be The Next Tech Darling
Here’s Why Roku Stock Will Surpass $100 In Next Two Years
Long on Roku – Even if they Miss Q1 Earnings

PubMatic Inc – Earnings on November 15th

PubMatic revenue growth rate is expected to show a notable deceleration in comparison with the recent quarter although margins remain high. We will be keeping an eye on the net dollar-based retention ratio in the next quarter. The management has raised the 2021 revenue growth forecast to 38% to 40% and 25% next year.

Macquarie analyst Tim Nollen has an outperform rating on the stock with a price target of $37. He believes that the company benefits from “a strong advertising backdrop in which traditional advertising is shifting to digital, open Internet players are gaining share from walled gardens, and ad spend is consolidating around fewer SSPs,".

Macquarie further states “PubMatic is banking on real CTV growth coming from open exchange, where the OpenWrap bidding engine will be able to grow alongside that migration – though that still needs time to play out”.

“And on an enterprise value/sales basis, it's trading at roughly a 3.5x discount to its closest peer, Magnite and a 5x discount to the broader ad-tech universe.”

You can find the ad-tech companies which had their growth estimates updated in the last few months here.

The Trade Desk Inc – Earnings on November 05th

The consensus revenue estimates for the next quarter suggests a sharp drop in the revenue growth, as well. One of the primary reasons for the strong revenue growth in the second quarter was due to lower comps as Q2 2020 revenue fell 13% YoY.

Needham analyst Laura Martin has a buy rating with a price target of $100 and her 3Q21 revenue estimate is $284M.

She is of the view that “Digital markets have proven themselves to have winner-take most economics, and we believe TTD is the winner among DSP’s (demand side platforms). 30% of TTD’s revenues come from CTV which should accelerate TTD’s growth trajectory since CTV revenues are growing 3-5x faster than other digital media categories. About 15% of TTD’s 1H21 revenues came from outside the US, and offshore is growing faster than the US, suggesting a longer growth runaway”.

Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% – Click here
Click here

Citi analyst Nicholas Jones has a price target of $85 and a neutral rating. He believes: “Trade Desk is a dominant and best-in-class adtech player, but continues to see risk associated with technology disruption and privacy regulation”.

You can view our previous analysis below:

The Trade Desk: Effects Of Lower Ad Demand In 2020

8 Predictions For Tech Stocks In 2020

Snap Inc – Earnings on October 21st

The revenue growth is expected to be lower than the second quarter but higher than the previous year. The adjusted EBITDA in the second quarter showed a strong growth when compared to the previous year. The management also expects to show an improvement in the third quarter.

Goldman Sachs’ analyst believes that the company has a high chance to achieve its target of 50% plus revenue growth in the next three years. Goldman Sachs also believes that the strong growth will be accompanied by margin expansion with the EBITDA margins improving from -13% in 2021 to 40% in 2026. It has a price target of $90.

Source: Investor Presentation

RBC is also positive on the company. They have initiated coverage on the company with an outperform rating and a price target of $88. According to the analysts “Snap has everything pointed in the right direction to become a top social media business, stable footing in an attractive secularly growing ad market, an evolving direct response/ad-load/downfunnel commerce narrative leading to potential ARPU [average revenue per user] and profitability upside and finally, new products that could invite broader usage and incremental monetization.”

Channel checks were more mixed, but the analysts think the possibility of adverse near- or medium-term effects “seems low” compared to the stage of the company’s developing monetization.

You can view our previous analysis below:

Pinterest and Snap Show V-Shaped Recovery; Cloudflare Guns for Zero-Trust

Social Media Projected to Lead Global Ad Spend in 2021

Magnite Inc – Earnings on November 09th

The company is benefitting from the strong growth in digital advertising. However, as discussed earlier the super growth was partly due to the M&A with SpotX.

Analysts are positive on this stock as Berenberg analyst Alexandra Ross has initiated coverage with a buy rating and a price target of $37. Other analysts who are positive about the company include Susquehanna analyst Shyam Patil. He likes the company as a CTV play and is also optimistic about the recent acquisitions of SpotX and SpringServe.

Earlier this year, Truist analyst Thornton said, “Magnite is well positioned in the connected-TV advertising space, with secular growth in connected TV estimated to represent more than half the company's overall revenue by 2024”.

Pinterest Inc – Earnings on October 28th

The stock fell after releasing the 2Q 21 results as the company failed to meet the consensus global monthly active users (MAUs) in spite of beating the revenue and EPS consensus estimates. The management in the earnings call mentioned that due to the lack of visibility they will not be giving guidance for MAUs for this quarter.

Source: Earnings Presentation

RBC Capital analyst Brad Erickson initiated coverage of Pinterest with a Sector Perform rating and $58 price target. “We believe user growth is likely closer to plateauing than not and our channel feedback indicated that outside of targeted categories, conversion needs improvement, particularly vs FB where we think user crossover is virtually 100%. Expectations have come down after last quarter’s miss. However, we need to see an improving content or commerce experience before getting more constructive”.

Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% – Click here
Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% – Click here
Click here

Piper Sandler analyst Thomas Champion has a neutral rating and a $68 price target. He believes “that the post Q2 earnings selloff may be overdone. Recent monthly active user declines seem driven by non-mobile app users, which contribute less to the financial model”.  He sees a more favorable setup for the stock into year-end.

Earlier this year, Argus analyst downgraded the stock to neutral in response to lower user growth in the second quarter. “The disappointing guidance reflects the decline in online sales as traditional stores reopen and users spend more time away from home. But it has strong brand recognition in the U.S. and prospects for growth in international markets over time."

You can view our previous analysis here:

Social Media Projected to Lead Global Ad Spend in 2021

Snapchat Reported Accelerating Growth. Here’s What to Expect From Pinterest

Digital Turbine – Earnings on October 29th

As discussed, Digital Turbine’s revenue growth was partly due to the company’s acquisitions which were completed in the quarter.

Below are the details of the proforma revenue which will helps to give a better picture as the growth is around 104% for fiscal Q1 2022.

Source: 1Q FY2022 earnings release

Canaccord analyst Austin Moldow has upgraded the stock from a hold to a buy. He also raised the price target to $95. “The company has now gotten stronger with its transition into "a full phone lifecycle monetization engine" thanks to the addition of in-app advertising, which grew the total addressable market. He further notes that the Digital Turbine's valuation has "become more reasonable" and the fundamentals have improved up to justify the valuation”.

On the other hand, Macquarie analyst Tim Nollen has initiated coverage on the company with a neutral rating and $60 price target. He's unable to determine the relative position of Digital Turbine's on-device software versus ironSource's (IS). Digital Turbine's in-app advertising business has only just now come on board, and while these acquisitions are growing fast, they are notably smaller than peers”.

Oppenheimer analyst Timothy Horan reiterated an Outperform rating and $100 price target. "Single-Tap could be a revolutionary product, akin to the transition from banner ads to video. Despite the already significant dollars, Single-Tap is very early in its growth phase, with APPS being very selective on the brands being allowed to participate. The moat on Singe-Tap is sizable: IP, hundreds of millions of devices scale, as well as huge investment in last-mile measurement and attribution."

Bradley Cipriano and Royston Roche contributed to this article.

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Please consult with your financial advisor in regards to any stocks you buy.

Posted in Broad Market Today, Digital Ads, Financial Analysis, Tech StocksLeave a Comment on Q3 Stock Earnings Preview – What to Expect for 7 Ad Tech Stocks

Is Bumble Stock a Better Buy Than Tinder?

Posted on October 13, 2021June 30, 2026 by io-fund
Is Bumble Stock a Better Buy Than Tinder?

In the video discussion below, I check in on Bumble following the company’s IPO earlier in the year. Bumble’s stock is down 30% since its IPO, as total growth at the company has somewhat stagnated. However, Bumble users are split 50/50 between Bumble and a Russian dating app called Badoo. Badoo isn’t growing, but Bumble is. In fact, Bumble sales grew strongly in the latest quarter.

I suspect that the Street may be overlooking Bumble because of the underwhelming results of the consolidated company. However, by stripping out Badoo from the company, Bumble results appear much stronger. Bumble App sales grew 55% YoY, which was much faster than Tinder’s 26% YoY growth rate in the latest quarter. Yet, despite its stronger growth rate, Bumble trades at half the valuation of Tinder (MTCH).

Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% – Click here
Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% – Click here
Click here

Looking forward, I believe that as Bumble App users continue to grow strongly, user mix will favor Bumble over Badoo. This trend will force the Street to take an interest in the fast-growing company.  As a result, the large valuation delta between BMBL and MTCH (Tinder) will likely close as Bumble’s growth is better appreciated by the market. If we value BMBL based purely on Bumble App sales (excluding Badoo) but use Tinder’s multiple, there is plenty of upside in Bumble’s share price.

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Please consult with your financial advisor in regards to any stocks you buy.

Posted in Dating, Social MediaLeave a Comment on Is Bumble Stock a Better Buy Than Tinder?

Sentiment Puts a Floor Under this Dip

Posted on October 8, 2021June 30, 2026 by io-fund
Sentiment Puts a Floor Under this Dip

For passive investors, this has been an easy year to be a bull. The market is up over 17% YTD in what is one of the lowest volatility years since 2017.

In 2017, we were in the first year of the Presidential Cycle, the market finished the year up over 19.4% without showing a single 5% dip. For comparison, the S&P 500, on average will experience a 10% or more correction almost every year, and has shown an average annual return over the last 30 years of 10.9%.

Similar to 2017, the S&P 500 is currently up just over 17% and has yet to provide a drawdown greater than 5%. However, unlike 2017, this year is not a broad market uptrend. In fact, the divergence we are seeing with a high number of stocks not participating in this year’s uptrend is important to note.

Big Tech Holds up a Weak Market (Again)

Please reference Knox’s previous analysis here: Upcoming Correction but Still a Bull MarketUpcoming Correction but Still a Bull Market

The above chart shows the price returns of the S&P 500 next to the percentage of stocks in the index that are above their Simple 200-Day Moving Average.

In a healthy market, the two graphs should be trending upward together, which would indicate more stocks across a wider variety of sectors are participating in the bull market. In an unhealthy market, we tend to see the majority of stocks in a downtrend, while the broad market keeps moving higher with narrower leadership. Note the pattern in 2020 – as the indexes makes a new high, the % of stocks above their 200-Day MA makes a lower high. This was a warning that the markets were weakening under the hood. Starting in March of this year the same divergence began, and is still playing out right now.

Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% – Click hereSign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% – Click hereClick here

Because the weighting of the Index is market cap weighted, which is just price times float, it allows for narrow leadership to hold the market up while the underlying stocks move into a correction. As of now, nine of the top 10 names in the S&P500 are Big Tech. Collectively, they account for 25.18% of the entire index weighting. Some may view this concentration as a negative; however, this concentration in Big Tech is what has allowed for the underlying index to complete a covert and deep correction in 2021, without bringing the market down with it.

The above graph compares some of the most important companies in the US Economy since December of 2020 to now. The red area indicates when these names topped and began their corrections. Many names topped in Dec/Jan of last year while a number of names topped in May/June of this year.

The top row, Microsoft and Apple, collectively account for 11.8% of the S&P 500. The combined weighting of Exxon, Caterpillar, JP Morgan, Walmart, Home Depot and Johnson & Johnson is only 4.97%. This shows how major stocks, as well as multiple sectors, can be in a correction while just a handful of key names remain strong.

2021 Has Tested Even Seasoned Investors

The eye-opening consumer price index (CPI) numbers in February/March announced that inflation was potentially here. This led to the indiscriminate selling of risk-on assets, focused specifically in your high beta names that are priced with future cash flows in mind. 

We saw this as a buying opportunity within a much larger uptrend, which we expressed both publicly and within our premium service. For one, the renewed uptrend within the bond market as well as a collapse in many commodity names was suggesting that inflation fears may be over blown. Also, the technical analysis work that we do on broad markets was further suggesting that we still had higher to go.

Over seven months after the growth sell-off, we still hold true to our original thesis.

We spoke in length about the M2 money supply and why it is key to measuring actual inflation in the economy here. In short, it is the layer of the money supply that filters into liquid assets like money market funds, savings accounts, CDs etc. This is the layer that the FED does not directly control, and it measures actual credit/money entering the economy.

Even with a 34% increase in the M2 money supply, we believe that the two one-time events of excessive global stimulus as well as the re-opening of global economies will likely outweigh the increase in M2 on a meaningful level.  These are two extraordinary events that are not being factored into current CPI numbers. Inflation is likely here, as suggested by the increase in M2, however we do not believe that it will have a meaningful and immediate impact on the current bull market that is underway.

Last year was arguably one of the more extreme anomalies in market history, while this year is forcing investors to address the consequences of global policy decisions. Rising rates and commodity prices, coupled with an unexpected dovish FED, has affected growth in different ways.

Many popular high fliers from last year, are negative for the year, as we see a rotation out of Covid names and primarily into tech stocks that surprise to the upside with strong fundamentals.

At I/O Fund, we raised cash going into the end of August due to the technical analysis that we perform on various broad market indexes. Our Elliott Wave work was suggesting that we were approaching a big top or minor top as the NASDAQ100 approached the 16000 level.

The above scenarios are what we based our broad risk management on in August. The red path had us topping in what would likely be a relatively deep correction, while the blue count had us only in a minor dip, which would be relatively brief. Keep in mind, both scenarios still had us in a much larger uptrend, which we see moving into 2022.

Through our cycle work, we had identified that Aug. 30 – Sept. 7 would likely mark an inflection point. This information coupled with fading momentum and a complete 5-wave pattern (in red), had us raise cash going into the inflection point.

In our August 19th report I stated that It’s my belief that the market is marching towards a large degree correction within a much larger uptrend. Whether that large degree correction has started or not will depend on what supports hold. Below is a visual of what I generally believe is playing out.” In other words, I was leaning towards the red count playing out, and so we prepared accordingly.

However, as we progressed in the initial dip, what had shift in real-time towards the more bullish blue count was a few data points. The primary one being sentiment, followed by seasonality trends and relative strength in key economically sensitive sectors. All of these data points were suggesting that a low was in, or at most, one more minor low was possible.

Sentiment

Implied Volatility vs. Realized Volatility

Prior to big unwinds in the market, we will typically see decelerating implied volatility while realized volatility starts ticking up. In short, sentiment is characterized by a belief that the bull market has much more room to go, which causes an increase in leveraged bullish bets.

On September 9th, with the S&P 500 down just 1.1% from its high, we were seeing an unusually large separation from actual volatility over a 30-day period, and what investors were expecting within the next 30 days.

The S&P 500 had a low realized volatility of just 7.5% while the implied volatility was well over double at 18.12%. What this means is that investors were willing to pay high fees for downside protection before at the very beginning of this drawdown.

On Sept 20th, with the S&P 500 down just over 4% from its high, this trend intensified to an extreme we usually see at major bottoms.

The S&P 500 had over 200% gap between its 30-day realized volatility and the implied volatility going forward. In other words, the premium between what investors were expecting and what was going on had investors willing to pay anything for downside protection.

Put/Call Ratio vs Realized Volatility

Another way to view the unusual level of fear in the market surrounding the recent drawdown is in the Put/Call Ratio vs. Realized Volatility.

The above chart takes the 30-day moving average of the Put/Call Ratio (green) and compares it to the 30 realized volatility of the S&P 500 (Blue). Note the pattern going into the February bear market. As realized volatility was actually increasing, investors couldn’t buy enough calls compared to puts. This is the type of sentiment that usually results in overleveraged long bets, and the unwinding of this leverage is usually what fuels large drawdowns.

Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% – Click hereSign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 1100% – Click hereClick here

Compare that pattern to today. We are seeing the opposite unfold – as realized volatility continues to trend down, investors are buying more puts. This is signaling that sentiment is rather bearish to cautious as the market continues to climb higher in a low volatility environment.

The Importance of October

From our estimation, October should be strong. September is known as a seasonally weak period in the markets, while October is historically a strong month. This becomes evident when you look at the average monthly returns for the S&P 500 going back in time.

According to the same data, October has historically been a seasonally strong month. However, there is a caveat to how October tends to play out, and it is determined by how the market is trending into this month.

October has historically been a pivotal month in market history. We have seen an outsized number of major lows, and some major tops in the month of October.

The above chart shows the history on major turning points within the month of October. We’ve had 8 bear market/deep corrections bottom in October with only two major tops occurring in the month of October. In other words, how a market is trending into October is a key factor to the year-end trend.

This pattern also seems to play out on smaller scales. In 2019 and in 2020, September proved to also be weak months. We then saw the market find a bottom in October, which led to a year-end rally.

Conclusion:

When you note seasonal trends and historic patterns, coupled with an unusual amount of negative sentiment and the recent relative strength in economically sensitive sectors, we believe a similar trend will unfold into year-end. For this reason, we have been accumulating high conviction names that are showing excellent relative strength. Many of these names are embedded in strong tech microtrends that we anticipate to continue into the foreseeable future.

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Please consult with your financial advisor in regards to any stocks you buy.

Posted in Broad Market Today, Market UpdatesLeave a Comment on Sentiment Puts a Floor Under this Dip

Aehr Test Systems Deep Dive 2021

Posted on October 5, 2021June 30, 2026 by io-fund

Aehr Test Systems is a small cap semiconductor company that is nearing an inflection point. The company has developed a unique technology that provides tangible benefits for testing emerging semiconductor components, such as silicon carbide and silicon photonics. Silicon carbide is increasingly being used in EVs while silicon photonics is being integrated into edge computing data centers. I explain the tailwinds driving adoption of these materials in greater detail below. 

Aehr’s key markets: Silicon Carbide and Silicon Photonics

Aehr’s wafer level burn-in testing systems are specifically built for testing silicon carbide and silicon photonics. Silicon carbide has recently been adopted by the automotive industry, which is driving demand for Aehr’s testing systems.  Aehr disclosed in its 10K that “silicon carbide (SiC) semiconductors have emerged as the preferred technology for battery electric vehicle power conversion in on-board and off-board electric vehicle battery chargers, and the electric power conversion and control of the electric engines.

These devices reduce power loss by as much as greater than 75% over power silicon alternatives like IGBT (Insulated-Gate Bipolar Transistor) devices, which has essentially changed the entire market dynamic. With this development, the Company sees most, if not every automotive company that is working on electric vehicles, moving to silicon carbide-based powertrain and charging systems in the near future.”

Tesla was the first to start using SiC in its vehicles with its Model 3, and more EV manufacturers are quickly following suit, due to SiC’s ability to withstand hostile conditions, improve efficiencies and lower failure rates. CEO Gayne Erickson explained on the Q1 call that while the SiC market had been around for years, “it really started to take off when Tesla introduced their Model 3 with a silicon carbide traction inverter in it, and then quickly shifted all of their products to it.” The adoption by Tesla was a ‘jolt’ that has spurred further adoption by others. For example, German chipmaker Infineon Technologies launched an SiC inverter for electric vehicles in May 2021. According to Yole Research, “the silicon carbide power semiconductor device market is expected to increase over 500% between 2020 and 2026, growing at a compound average growth rate (“CAGR”) of 36% to $4.5 billion”.

All of these silicon carbide chips need to be tested, and Aehr’s wafer level burn-in testing systems are the most cost-effective way to test these chips at scale. 

Source: Asia Nikkei

On top of the robust growth expected in the automotive SiC market, the company also has favorable tailwinds from the rise of silicon photonics, which is also starting to ramp. In its 10K, Aehr disclosed that its lead silicon photonics customer had moved to full volume production during 2021. It added that “we also saw three different silicon photonics customers move from engineering testing to high volume production test and burn-in of their devices using our FOX-P systems. We expect all three of these customers to ramp production during fiscal 2021”. Aehr’s customers must first perform lengthy qualification tests before ramping up orders. Aehr’s silicon photonic customers are nearly done qualifying and are finally expected to start putting in large orders this year.

During the Q1 call, CEO Erickson explained how we are still in the early days of silicon photonics. He stated that “companies like Intel and Nvidia are talking about integrating fiber optic transceivers into their core and graphics processor units or CPUs and GPUs. This is very exciting and we believe an enormous opportunity for Aehr Test with our unique position of having a cost effective and proven multi wafer solution for testing and burning-in or stabilizing silicon photonics devices at a massive scale while still in the wafer form”.

Silicon photonics are being used to increase communication speeds, which is critical for edge computing as it links 30-megawatt data centers within a 120 km distance to function like a 120-megawatt data center. This enables 100G Ethernet services for cloud operators and enterprises. Microsoft and telecom operators are both customers of Inphi’s silicon photonics. Beth had previously discussed this micro trend in her in-depth analysis of Inphi. She explained that the 100G switches were launched in 2020 but were more of a 2021 story as this is when they will be deployed in volume. Importantly, these 100G switches use silicon photonics.

We see this trend starting to ramp, as Inphi accounted for 10% of Aehr’s sales in 2021, the first time it was mentioned as a significant customer. As Inphi’s thesis plays out, Aehr will also benefit from the increased demand for its silicon photonic testing systems.

As shown below, Yole Research anticipates silicon photonics to rapidly grow at a CAGR of 49% through 2026. The market is relatively small right now, as customers complete lengthy qualification tests, but once the test systems are qualified, bookings of Aehr test systems will likely significantly ramp as silicon photonics gains market share. I discuss how Aehr’s order have started to ramp in 2021 in greater detail next.

Source: Yole Research

Orders begin to ramp in 2021

Aehr’s testing technology, branded as FOX-XP test systems, was first introduced in 2016, and the company had initially sold only small orders of its testing systems (~$2 million to $5 million a quarter) as customers qualified the equipment before placing large orders.

During the fiscal Q4 Earnings Call in July 2021, CEO Erickson announced that the company’s lead silicon carbide customer had finally qualified Aehr’s FOX-XP test systems for “high-volume production” for wafer level burn-in testing for electric vehicles. This was a significant development, as it meant that orders for its test systems may soon start to accelerate.

Just five days after the Q4 earnings call, Aehr announced that it had received an $11 million order for its silicon carbide test systems with a “leading Fortune 500 supplier of semiconductor devices with a significant customer base in the automotive semiconductor market.” To put this order into perspective, it represented more than half of the company’s total orders in all of FY2020 ($16 million). In fact, since the close of Q4, the company has announced a total of $40 million orders to date (June through September), which is more than the aggregate bookings amount over the prior nine quarters.

The company’s strong orders led to an 80% increase in the company’s fiscal 2022 sales guidance, which Aehr now expects to be at least $50 million, or 3x the amount in fiscal 2021. Furthermore, attached to Aehr’s test system sales are high margin WaferPak and DiePak consumables, which are purchased multiple times over the life of a FOX testing system. Over time, management expects that sales of its consumables to be 4x the level of sales of its test systems.

This strategy of selling test systems and recurring consumables is similar to an ink and printer sales model, where the sale of the product leads to recurring sales of higher margin consumables. Aehr explained in its 10K that “as we continue to build our installed base of FOX systems, our WaferPak and DiePak [consumables] business continues to grow and is becoming a much more significant part of our business … our high margin proprietary WaferPak contactors and DiePak carrier consumables … can be up to four times the annual sales of systems. The systems typically are used for longer periods, with annual needs for new contactors and consumables. This is why we are confident that our consumable business is likely to exceed our overall systems business over time, even though both will grow in absolute dollars.”

To highlight the upside to the recent growth in orders, management explained on the Q1 Earnings Call that the $19 million order it recently received in September will likely be accompanied by a separate ~$10 million order for consumables, pushing the true order size up closer to $30 million. Importantly, these consumable purchases will also be recurring over the lifetime of the test systems, so the “lifetime bookings” value of this $19 million system sale may be closer to $60 million once consumables are considered

Continuing with this logic, Aehr’s $40 million in bookings YTD may be understated. Using Aehr’s disclosure from its 10K that recurring consumable purchases can be ~4x system purchases, then the $40m in YTD systems orders can result in a high-margin recurring sales stream of ~$160 million in consumable orders. Stated differently, the firm’s $40 million in test system bookings should also yield an additional $160 million in consumable purchases over the life of the systems, resulting in “lifetime bookings” of ~$200 million.

Importantly, orders are expected to continue to ramp going forward. CEO Erickson stated during the Q1 Earnings Call that “we believe we will add several new silicon carbide customers over the next 18 months that will ramp into production on our solutions.” He explained further that its leading silicon carbide customer is the “fourth largest in the space and not even half as large as the next largest”, meaning that new customer orders could be much larger. If Aehr’s test systems provide a competitive advantage (discussed below) then new customers will likely soon place large orders, further bolstering Aehr’s growth rate. I discuss what is driving the adoption of Aehr’s test systems in more detail next.

What is driving the adoption of Aehr’s test systems?

Aehr has a unique technology that is just now starting to ramp called FOX-XP test systems, which are used for wafer level burn-in testing of silicon carbide and silicon photonics. The main advantage of wafer level burn-in testing is that it reduces “infant mortalities”, or early failures in semiconductor equipment. Burn-in testing attempts to lower the failure rates from stage 1 of the “bathtub curve” (shown below), which increases the reliability of semiconductors.

Wafer level burn-in testing reduces chip failure, which is critical in certain industries such as EVs, 5G and datacenters. For example, if a chip fails in an EV’s drive train, then the passenger is walking home. The high costs of chip failures in EVs is driving the industry to push to zero failures and wafer level burn-in testing helps to achieve this.

“Bath Tub Curve” Representation of Chip Failures

CEO Erickson explained further on the Q1 call that he anticipates “that wafer level test and burn-in will become the industry standard for quality and reliability screening of silicon carbide devices”. He added that Aehr’s patented technology allows “customers to screen devices that would otherwise fail after they are packaged into multi die modules, where the yield impact is 10 times or even a 100 times as costly. With the most cost effective solution in the market to address this opportunity, we believe that Aehr has the chance to achieve a significant, perhaps dominant market share for silicon carbide wafer level burn-in.”

Assuming a yield impact of 10x to 100x, then early adopters of Aehr’s technology will gain a significant advantage over their peers. CEO Erickson added that customers with wafer level burn-in technology are “differentiating themselves against their competitors because they … [are] shipping a higher quality module … So other customers have figured this out, but they're still doing package per burn-in. So the discussions we're having with them in many cases is to move from package to wafer.” The 10x to 100x yield benefit awarded to early adopters can lead to a rapid acceleration in orders of Aehr’s test systems, since competitors will need to also adopt the new technology or risk falling behind. This dynamic rapidly moves Aehr up the “S-Curve” as customers rush to adopt the new technology and orders rapidly increase.

The qualification of the lead customer in July 2021 may have been the beginning of Aehr’s growth story (pictured below). While bookings are relatively low right now at ‘just’ $40 million, the company may be entering a period of growth, which is why the I/O Fund has taken a position. I discuss Aehr’s most recent financial performance and forward growth projections in greater detail next.

Aehr’s Potential S-curve Growth Rate

Source

Aehr’s financials and valuation

As mentioned above, Aehr reported a surge in bookings, as fiscal year YTD bookings (June through September) have grown to $40 million, or more than the prior nine quarters combined. These bookings are expected to convert into sales this year, which led management to raise its FY2022 sales guide to at least $50 million.

In the most recent Q1 quarter, sales increased 181% YOY to $6 million, while gross margin came in at 40%. Operating expenses are largely fixed, and operating income was a slight loss of $1 million during the quarter, while EPS was a loss of -$0.02, which beat by a penny.

Aehr has a history of losses, which makes sense as customers have been placing small orders for the company’s test systems as they qualify the equipment for high-volume use. With customers starting to ramp orders, the company has forecasted that it will be profitable going forward.

Specifically, CEO Erickson stated that the company breaks-even at around $28 million in annual sales, and for every dollar in sales above $28 million, it expects ~50% of that to flow down to earnings. Simply put, the $50 million guide for FY2022 sales should lead to ~$11 million in earnings. Moreover, since Aehr has a history of operating losses, the company has significant net operating loss (NOLs) carry forwards, which lowers the amount of taxes that the company must pay.

Taking this math a step further, the $11 million in earnings will equal about ~$0.43 in after-tax earnings per share (EPS). At ~$13/share, Aehr is valued at 29x forward earnings and 6x forward sales, which seems reasonable for a company expected to grow 200%+ this year. As discussed above, the company has numerous tailwinds as the SiC and silicon photonics markets rapidly grow at a 36% and 49% CAGR through 2026, respectively.

Above is a table of comparable semi-conductor equipment providers that are expected to grow at similar rates to Aehr. Relative to the above comparable companies, Aehr trades at a premium valuation based on forward sales and earnings. However, Aehr has exposure to markets that are expected to rapidly grow going forward (silicon carbide and silicon photonics) which supports a premium valuation. Aehr is also expected to grow faster than the peer median.

Below is a table of peers that Aehr competes against. Aehr is competing against some very large companies, however, Aehr is well positioned to benefit from the above-mentioned tailwinds. If Aehr can capture a dominate position in these rapidly growing markets, its market cap may close in on some of its peers. For reference, just six years ago in 2015, Teradyne’s market cap was much smaller at ~$4 billion, highlighting how semi-conductor testing equipment providers can grow into large companies in a relatively short period of time. It is also noteworthy that Aehr’s CTO used to work at Teradyne.

What sets Aehr apart from the competition is that its wafer level burn-in testing equipment can scale better than competing products. CEO Erickson explained that Aehr’s systems are “architecturally different and unique” as the systems test 18 wafers at a time, while competing products test one to eight wafers at a time. This is significant as each test system has the footprint of a Toyota Prius, so customers who are scaling and need to test 500+ wafers a day will need 500 Prius’ of footprint in a wafer fab, which is expensive and difficult to accomplish.  

CEO Erickson explained further that “we've made an enormous investment in this platform over the last decade, and particularly with the last handful of years. We have IP and patents protecting that capability, both in the tester and the proprietary contactor that enables it and we intend to defend it.” To give you a better sense of how long Aehr has been developing its unique, proprietary technology, the company received funding from DARPA back in 2001 to develop wafer level burn-in testing, and its first product wasn’t introduced until 2016.

While Aehr trades at a premium to some of its peers, the company’s technology has the potential to be a homerun if it can quickly scale with customers and provide the promised cost savings. If early adopters realize strong cost savings and higher quality products, then this will likely lead to more customers rapidly adopting Aehr’s technology. Furthermore, if Aehr can continue to capture market share in the rapidly expanding silicon carbide and silicon photonic markets, then its market cap will likely grow and mimic some of its other semi-conductor testing peers.

Risks and conclusion

A key risk going forward is supply chain risk, which isn’t unique to Aehr, but nonetheless may impact Aehr’s ability to convert the recent ramp in bookings into sales. The company has $10 million in inventory on its books, which helps get the ball rolling but is well below the $40 million in orders it has received in the past few months. The firm also has just $6.5 million of cash on its balance sheet, which helps explain why Aehr recently announced a $25 million share offering to raise more cash.

CEO Erickson explained on the Q1 Call that customers were happy to see the cash raise as it added conviction that Aehr will be able to have the necessary working capital to support its rapid growth in bookings. However, the capital raise will weigh on Aehr’s stock price in the near term.

In regards to the supply chain concerns, CEO Erickson stated that “Aehr has the manufacturing infrastructure and supply chain in place to ramp to significantly higher revenue levels. We have been ordering long lead components for systems and WaferPak, particularly for the enormous opportunity we see for silicon carbide that is gaining momentum, and we have been able to maintain reasonably lead times to meet customer requests.” The company likely has enough capacity to honor the orders that have come in thus far, and it also has the vendor relationships in place to support a further increase in customer orders going forward.

Looking forward, the company has two strong tailwinds propelling it: silicon carbide and silicon photonics. The recent qualification of Aehr’s lead silicon carbide customer may have been the tipping point that drives rapid adoption of its technology, as early adopters can gain a significant cost saving advantage.

Silicon carbide is quickly becoming the material of choice for EVs, which itself are expected to rapidly grow going forward. Furthermore, silicon photonics is also in the early stages of ramping and has exposure to strong microtrends such as datacenters, 5G and edge computing. Taken together, these two markets should help support sales of Aehr’s test systems, which in turn will lead to recurring sales of Aehr’s high-margin consumables. The company’s stock has increased following strong results, but its valuation is not overstretched. In fact, given the firm’s strong growth rate and forecasted profitability, it appears cheap relative to peers. It is also noteworthy that forward growth estimates do not fully encapsulate sales of consumables, meaning that the company’s true sales multiple is cheaper than reported.

Disclosure: Bradley Cipriano and the I/O Fund own shares in Aehr Test Systems and do not have plans to change their respective positions within the next 72 hours. You can access the I/O Fund’s positions herehere. The above article expresses the opinions of the author, and the author did not receive compensation from any of the discussed companies 

Posted in Semiconductor Stocks, Testing EquipmentLeave a Comment on Aehr Test Systems Deep Dive 2021

Apple VS Facebook on Ads and Consumer Privacy: Let’s Get Ready to Rumble

Posted on October 1, 2021June 30, 2026 by io-fund
Apple VS Facebook on Ads and Consumer Privacy: Let’s Get Ready to Rumble

Two years ago, the I/O Fund wrote about Apple’s mobile privacy changes and kept our newsletter readers aware of these changes as they rolled out. Going into earnings, we are seeing headlines that Facebook may be affected. We think when Big Tech goes up against Big Tech, that investors should watch the outcomes closely. Our stance for the past two years is that Apple owns the real estate on iOS, and everyone else is renting. The hierarchy is straight forward yet many critics question Apple’s decisions, often feigning concern for the impact to small businesses. We do not think Facebook cares about small businesses at all, per se, but rather about ad dollars.

This upcoming quarter will be the first full quarter to reflect the change. Some models suggest about 7% decline if 20% of iOS users opt-in. The opt-in rates quoted here match what is being reported (about 1 in 5 users opt-in for Facebook to track them). Flurry also stated about 20% were opting in. Meanwhile, according to Bloomberg, some agencies are reporting that companies went from spending “nearly all” of their budget on Facebook to more around two-thirds or half of their budget due to the iOS tracking changes.

The reality is that Apple built the ecosystem and it’s theirs to monetize as they see fit. In this equation, consumers matter too, and data should not have been collected without permission in the first place. Although we’ve been covering privacy concerns since 2014, we specifically called out Facebook in 2018 during Cambridge Analytica to discuss the various ways Facebook was collecting data without permissions.

We’ve also maintained that Apple is running out of near-term growth markets so it makes sense they’re looking for ways to expand their revenue. Below is a snapshot of Apple’s growth pre-Covid in 2019. Due to an increase in time spent indoors, even sleepy segments like personal computers exploded overnight. However, these segments could return to pre-Covid levels (or even lower if consumer hardware saw a pull forward). This helps us to understand Apple’s motivation taking back its real estate. My only question is … why didn’t Apple do this sooner? 

Pictured below: 2019 revenue for Apple and it’s iPhone segment

Below are excerpts and links to our previous analysis, which was written for our free newsletter subscribers over the past few years.

Governments Won’t Be Able to Stop Facebook and Google — But Apple Could

Published October 3rd, 2019 in MarketWatch

In April 2018, Congress tried to piece together how Facebook’s platform works. It ended up being a disaster. Anyone who works in the mobile-ad industry knows that the mobile device, notorious for its massive data leakage, could be used to collect thousands of data points daily to reveal personal thoughts, behaviors and political preferences.

When Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg answered a question on how Facebook makes money — “We sell ads, senator” — he wasn’t fooling the ad industry. It’s well aware that Facebook sells audiences and identities, as the company’s ads would be worthless without extracting data points from the mobile device and aggregating them for targeting.

This isn’t your typical targeting of pizza (or beer) ads during football games. This targeting knows you better than you know yourself, as it monitors your actions with data science and look-alike modeling.

The only force that can stand up to the complex tracking methods used by Google and Facebook will be an opposite, yet equal, force. It will not come from governments, which think that paying for search results is the problem. Rather, the problem is the pervasive code and software that continually tracks people, which no competitor can compete with.

Turns out, there is an opposite and equal force in magnitude that has chipped away at the anti-competitive tracking that occurs in the browser with Intelligent Tracking Prevention (ITP). Yet it has not done so on the leakiest device of all: mobile. And that would be Apple.

Facebook and Google aren’t the only companies that track users on mobile and browsers. They simply have software and code in more places. For instance, Facebook’s software is in 32% of the top 500 app market — and up to 800,000 applications. They track billions of non-Facebook users with software that can track you whether you have navigated one of their digital properties or not.

There is no way to opt out of Facebook or Google from tracking you, as their tracking is simply everywhere. In fact, security experts, including Bruce Schneier of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard, call such tracking outright surveillance.

The incredible depth of information those giant companies have on mobile and internet users is the “moat” that generates unprecedented cash flow in advertising.

Read more here: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/governments-wont-be-able-to-stop-facebook-and-google-from-abusive-tracking-on-smartphones-but-apple-could-2019-10-03

Advertising Stocks Face New, Major Challenge with Apple’s iOS 14

Excerpts:

Tim Cook has publicly criticized [Facebook with its software development kit “Audience Network” installed in 300,000 applications on iOS and Android combined and has seen nearly 200 billion downloads. Google’s AdMob is even worse with installation in 1.5 million applications and 375 billion downloads. (Now consider that users did not authorize or download this software on purpose!)

[Despite Apple’s privacy advertisements] what happens on the iPhone most certainly does not stay on the iPhone. Mobile has become a free-for-all in data collection over the past ten years. The device leaks volumes of information through software development kits (SDKs) installed inside every application. Most applications have 18 SDKs, which extends beyond Facebook and Google to include a mix and match of ad software companies although the most pervasive being Google and Facebook who are inside the far majority due to the depth of their data for cross-targeting.

The concept of Apple pioneering privacy at the client level is not new. Apple began to restrict tracking on the Safari browser through iterations of Intelligent Tracking Prevention (ITP) from 2017 to 2019. As I covered previously in depth, Apple implemented strict requirements, such as having a relationship with the customer within the last 24 hours to place a cookie, and companies have continued to find loop holes.

Unlike cookies on the web, where there is a tag on the browser, mobile identifiers have much stronger tracking capabilities. Apple’s IDFA enables the following: user tracking, marketing measurement, attribution, ad targeting, ad monetization, programmatic advertising including DSPs, SSPs and exchanges, device graphs, retargeting of individuals and audiences.

What investors may not realize is these advertising cash machines are largely dependent on tracking software for the high CPMS (cost per thousand views) and CPIs (cost per install) they charge because they can track actions on a granular level even days after a mobile user has seen an advertisement. The mobile users are not aware they are being tracked by many companies they do not have a first-party relationship with (but the developer or publisher does). These developers and publishers must now obtain permission. Without permission, the inventory on mobile becomes less valuable.

Mobile applications, such as Spotify, Uber, Lyft, and mobile gaming, for example, are also dependent on the ability to track and identify cohorts for user acquisition. This is one reason we see the top line grow rapidly in ridesharing at the expense of the bottom line; these companies are crunching customer acquisition costs and lifetime value (LTV) across specific demographics and then using lookalike modeling to target the demographics with the best LTV.

Read more here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bethkindig/2020/07/27/advertising-stocks-face-new-major-challenge-with-apples-ios-14/?sh=6d513d4e624e

Facebook’s Surveillance-Like Software is Called Audience Network

The betrayal was two-fold. On one hand, a first-party data company boldly entered the third-party data marketplace to broker data, risking the trust of its social media users. Secondly, Facebook did everything in its power to make sure social media users would not find out. Audience Network, which fuels a substantial portion of Facebook’s revenue from the social network, has not been disclosed to the public to this day. It is eerily absent from PR releases and discussions around privacy. Unless a Facebook user was a detective, they would have no reasonable way to know that Facebook operates Audience Network and is selling private data across hundreds of thousands of applications at an estimated 40% of the app market.

Built in 2012, Audience Network went live in 2014, and caused Facebook to stage a remarkable turnaround on the stock market. Facebook has posted consistent returns ever since. This is in marked contrast to the years prior to Audience Network, between 2012 and 2014, when Facebook faltered quarterly, often losing 50% of its stock value due to frequent, disappointing earnings.

Read more here: https://medium.com/hackernoon/facebooks-surveillance-like-software-is-called-audience-network-56c3e76cdb89

Disclaimer: Beth Kindig and I/O Fund does not own stocks mentioned in this article. This is not financial advice. Please consult with your financial advisor in regards to any stocks you buy.

 

Posted in Cybersecurity, Digital Ads, Stock Updates (Blogs), Tech StocksLeave a Comment on Apple VS Facebook on Ads and Consumer Privacy: Let’s Get Ready to Rumble

Posts navigation

Newer posts

Recent Posts

  • The IPO Glut of 2020: Why Valuations Have Gone Too Far
  • Zoom Discusses Two Important Catalysts In Q1 Earnings
  • Three Risk Management Tools the I/O Fund Offers
  • Micron Is Up 900%. Here’s Why the AI Memory Trade May Still Have Room to Run
  • Credo: Reliability Leader Aggressively Moves into Optics

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018

Categories

  • 5G
  • About
  • Accounting Tips
  • AdTech
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • Ai Platforms
  • AI Stocks
  • AI Stocks
  • Analysts
  • Application Monitoring
  • Application Monitoring
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • Applications
  • AR
  • Audit Reports
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Avod
  • Avod
  • Battery Charging
  • Bear Market
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Blockchain
  • Broad Market Today
  • Bull Market
  • Bull Market
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • Chainlink
  • China Stocks
  • Cloud
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Infrastructure
  • Cloud Platforms
  • Cloud Platforms
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Software
  • Cloud Technology
  • Company
  • Company
  • Console Gaming
  • Console Gaming
  • Console Gaming
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer
  • Consumer Tech
  • Corrections
  • Crypto Investment
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Ctv
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center
  • Data Center and Processing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Data Warehousing
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Databases
  • Dating
  • Defi
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Ads
  • E-Commerce
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earning Updates
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • Earnings Report
  • ECommerce
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Energy Stocks
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Enterprise
  • Ethereum
  • Events1
  • Events1
  • Exchange
  • Faq
  • Finance
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial Markets
  • FinTech
  • Fundamental Analysis
  • Gambling
  • Gaming
  • Genomics
  • Glossary
  • Green Energy
  • Growth Stocks
  • Growth Stocks
  • Growth Stocks
  • Headsets
  • Headsets
  • Health Tech
  • Hydrogen
  • Identity
  • Identity
  • Identity
  • Inflation
  • Inflation
  • Inflation
  • Internet of Things
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Interviews
  • Investing
  • Investing
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Ltbh
  • Macro Trends
  • Macro Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Trends
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Market Updates
  • Media
  • Membership
  • Mining
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Mobile Gaming
  • Multimedia
  • Music Streaming
  • NVDA | NVIDIA Corporation
  • Performance Updates
  • Pin Content
  • Podcasts
  • Podcasts
  • Podcasts
  • Portfolio
  • Premium Research
  • Press Releases
  • Press Releases
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Productivity
  • Reports and Whitepapers
  • Research Services Preview
  • Resources
  • Resources
  • Semiconductor Stocks
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Semiconductors
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Social Media
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Software
  • Solar
  • Solar
  • Stock Analysis PDFs
  • Stock Updates
  • Stock Updates (Blogs)
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Supplychain
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Svod
  • Tech Podcast
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stock News
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Tech Stocks
  • Technical Analysis
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Telehealth
  • Testing Equipment
  • Testing Equipment
  • Top Tech Stock News
  • Travel
  • Trends Report
  • Tutorials
  • Uncategorized
  • Updates
  • Updates
  • Updates
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video
  • Video Footage
  • VR
  • Webinar Alerts
  • Webinar Alerts
  • Webinars
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: iofund by iofund.co.uk.